C Stack pointing to Address? - c

I am new to C. I have implemented a simple stack with some structs and what not. I have posted the entire code below. The problem section is commented.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
typedef struct Node{
int data;
struct Node *next;
} Node;
typedef struct Stack{
Node *top;
int size;
} Stack;
/* Function Prototypes */
void push(Stack *sPtr, int data);
int pop(Stack *sPtr);
void create(Stack *sPtr);
int main(void)
{
static Stack first;
create(&first);
push(&first,4);
push(&first,3);
push(&first,2);
printf("%d\n",pop(&first));
printf("%d\n",pop(&first));
printf("%d\n",pop(&first));
exit(1);
}
void push(Stack *sPtr, int data)
{
struct Node newNode;
newNode.data = data;
newNode.next = sPtr->top;
sPtr->top = &newNode;
sPtr->size++;
printf("%d\n",sPtr->top->data);
}
int pop(Stack *sPtr)
{
struct Node *returnNode = sPtr->top;
struct Node *topNode = sPtr->top;
if(sPtr->size != 0){
sPtr->top = topNode->next; /* =============PROBLEM?=============== */
return returnNode->data;
}
else{
printf("Error: Stack is Empty!\n");
return -1;
}
}
void create(Stack *sPtr)
{
sPtr->size = 0;
sPtr->top = NULL;
}
The output of this code is
4
3
2
2
8103136
680997
So obviously, it is pulling off the top node, and then printing the addresses of the next two nodes, instead of their data.
But why is it doing this? As far as I know (which is little) preforming this operation
sPtr->top = topNode->next;
should tell the program to make top now point to to topNode.next. But instead, it seems to be returning the address. What's going on here?

In your push() function, you're creating a new struct Node and adding it to your stack. However, the node is a local variable within the scope of push()--allocated on the stack (not your stack, the call stack), and will be gone when push() returns.
What you want to do is create the node on the heap, which means it will still be there after push() returns.
Since you're coding in C, you'll want to do something like:
struct Node *newNode = (struct Node*)malloc(sizeof(struct Node));
Since you're now dealing with heap-allocated memory, you'll need to make sure that at some point it gets freed (somewhere) using free().
You're also not decrementing size as Jonathan has pointed out.

One trouble is that pop() never decrements size, so size is really 'number of elements ever pushed onto stack', not 'the number of elements in the current stack'.
int pop(Stack *sPtr)
{
struct Node *returnNode = sPtr->top;
struct Node *topNode = sPtr->top;
if (sPtr->size != 0)
{
sPtr->top = topNode->next;
sPtr->size--;
return returnNode->data;
}
else
{
fprintf(stderr, "Error: Stack is Empty!\n");
return -1;
}
}
Another trouble, as pointed out by unluddite in his answer is that you are not pushing data correctly. You need both fixes to be safe. There might still be other problems (such as not freeing memory correctly — or at all), but these two will get you a long way.

Related

Segmentation fault when reading from stack

This is my first time creating stacks. I'm quite clear at what I must do, but am quite discouraged by the code not working.
It runs fine till I try to retrieve any data from the root, which immediately results in a segfault.
Here's my program:
#include<stdio.h>
#include<string.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
struct stackNode
{
char letter;
struct stackNode * next;
};
int size=0;
int capacity=10;
struct stackNode * root=NULL;
void push(char data, struct stackNode * root)
{
if(size==capacity)
{
printf("Error: Stack Overflow\n");
return;
}
struct stackNode * new=(struct stackNode *)malloc(sizeof(struct stackNode *));
new->letter=data;
new->next=root;
printf("%c,%u", new->letter, new->next);
root=new;
printf("%c,%u", new->letter, new->next);
size++;
}
char pop(struct stackNode ** root)
{
if(size==0)
{
printf("Error: Stack is Empty\n");
return '\0';
}
printf("\npop*\n");
char temp;
printf("\n*\n");
struct stackNode * tempad;
printf("\n*\n");
temp=(*root)->letter;
printf("\n*\n");
tempad=*root;
printf("\n*\n");
*root=(*root)->next;
printf("\n*\n");
free(tempad);
printf("\n*\n");
size--;
return temp;
}
int main()
{
push('c', root);
push('v', root);
push('n', root);
printf("%c %c %c", pop(&root), pop(&root), pop(&root));
}
Here's the output:
pop*
*
*
Segmentation fault
Could someone point out the mistake?
The main issue is usage of unnecessary global variables which seem to be causing confusion. In push, the parameter is of type struct stackNode * yet it's being manipulated as if it referred to the global root. But root = new is purely local and has no impact on the global root. However, size++ does impact the global scope. This corrupts the stack's logical state, and your error handler at the beginning of pop thinks that size == 3 and doesn't complain. The function then dutifully dereferences root, crashing the program.
A correct stack class should not use global data. It should encapsulate all necessary state in structs. This makes it reusable, enabling creation of multiple stacks (a property I'd want in most classes I'm using).
A few other suggestions:
Avoid side effects where possible. Prints are OK for temporary debugging purposes but should be completely separated from program logic otherwise.
If you are planning on writing error handlers, print to stderr and avoid magic values like return '\0'; that might be mistaken for actual node data.
Don't cast the result of malloc. This can suppress errors and is visually noisy.
Hardcoding capacity feels pretty arbitrary. I'm not sure there's any point to having this (but if there is, add it to the struct). If there's too much metadata about the stack inside each node (ideally, there should be none), create a Stack struct to contain this metadata and point it to the actual stackNode chain.
Another stack design point: malloc/free are slow. For character data, a simple array with a top pointer will be faster and simpler to implement. You can amortize allocation calls with periodic doubling the array when top >= capacity and contracting when top < capacity / 2.
Here's a quick re-write (without the suggestion for the Stack wrapper struct or the array):
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
struct stackNode {
char letter;
struct stackNode *next;
int size;
};
void push(char data, struct stackNode **root) {
struct stackNode *new = malloc(sizeof(*new));
new->size = *root ? (*root)->size + 1 : 1;
new->letter = data;
new->next = *root;
*root = new;
}
char pop(struct stackNode **root) {
if (!*root || !(*root)->size) {
fprintf(stderr, "pop from empty stack\n");
exit(1);
}
char popped = (*root)->letter;
struct stackNode *cull = *root;
*root = (*root)->next;
free(cull);
return popped;
}
int main() {
struct stackNode *root = NULL;
push('c', &root);
push('v', &root);
push('n', &root);
while (root) {
printf("%c ", pop(&root));
}
puts("");
return 0;
}
This is really confusingly written code (i.e globals with the same name as variables in the local scope). I'm just going to rewrite it, untested and on mobile but should be fine. You can diff to see the issue(s). For one thing though you're setting local variable root to the newest allocation rather than global root.
#include<stdio.h>
#include<string.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
struct stackNode
{
char letter;
struct stackNode* prev;
};
stackNode* kTailStack = NULL;
void push(char data)
{
stackNode* p=(stackNode *)malloc(sizeof(stackNode));
p->letter=data;
p->prev=kTailStack;
kTailStack = p;
}
char pop()
{
stackNode* prev_tail = kTailStack;
char n = 0;
if (prev_tail != NULL)
{
n = prev_tail->letter;
kTailStack = prev_tail->prev;
free(prev_tail);
}
return n;
}
int main()
{
push('c', kTailStack);
push('v', kTailStack);
push('n', kTailStack);
printf("%c %c %c", pop(kTailStack), pop(kTailStack), pop(kTailStack));
}

Why am I getting Segmentation fault (core dumped) or bus error (core dumped) when trying to populate a struct?

So I am trying to use a pointer to a struct of MonsterAttacks as the data that belongs to an element of a linked list. In order to do this I try to populate a struct of MonsterAttacks and then pass that along with a null ptr to a next node to a function called create. However somewhere in the populate method a segmentation fault error occurs. I am working with three files list_demo.c, linked_list.h and linked_list.c. I will build all the the functions that make up a fully functioning linked list, well hoping I can as soon as I get pass this error. Been dealing with this error for about two days and I showed my professor and he could not figure out why its happening, it seems to come from the populate function. I have tried to return a pointer to a strut in which case I get a bus error, and I have tried almost every variation of getting input and storing it on the strut. I even deleted the function and tried to populate it in main, but nothing works. I am new to C and my professor helped me out for about an hour debug this problem and he finally gave up, so any help would be appreciated.
list_demo.c
#include <stdio.h>
#include "linked_list.h"
#include <stdlib.h>
void populate(struct MonsterAttacks *m){
printf("Enter the name for the Monster \n");
scanf("%40s",m->monsterName);
puts("What is his/her attack location?");
scanf("%40s",m->attackLocation);
puts("What are the number of victims this monster has demolished?");
scanf("%ud", &m->numOfVictims);
m->attackID = 0;
}
int main(void)
{
node* tmp = NULL;
struct MonsterAttacks *tmpMonst = (struct MonsterAttacks *)
malloc(sizeof(struct MonsterAttacks));
if(tmpMonst == NULL){
printf("Error allocating memory");
}
else
populate(tmpMonst);
node *head = create(tmpMonst,tmp);
free(tmpMonst);
return 0;
}
linked_list.h
#ifndef LINKED_LIST
#define LINKED_LIST
typedef struct node{
struct MonsterAttacks *monsterAttack;
struct node* next;
} node;
struct MonsterAttacks{
unsigned int attackID;
char monsterName[41];
char attackLocation[41];
unsigned int numOfVictims;
};
/*
create a new node
initialize the data and next field
return the newly created node
*/
node* create(struct MonsterAttacks *m,node* next);
#endif
linked_list.c
// from zentut.com, heavily adapted
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include "linked_list.h"
/*
create a new node
initialize the data and next field
return the newly created node
*/
node* create(struct MonsterAttacks *m,node* next)
{
node* new_node = (node*)malloc(sizeof(node));
if(new_node == NULL)
{
printf("Error creating a new node.\n");
exit(0);
}
new_node->monsterAttack->attackID = 0;
new_node->next = next;
strncpy(new_node->monsterAttack->monsterName,m->monsterName,41);
strncpy(new_node->monsterAttack->attackLocation, m->attackLocation, 41);
new_node->monsterAttack->numOfVictims = m->numOfVictims;
return new_node;
}
Btw running on Red Hat using gcc compiler
new_node->monsterAttack->attackID = 0;
Allocating memory for new_node does not allocate memory for the MonsterAttacks struct inside it. That is why dereferencing monsterAttack to get its attackID is causing a seg fault.
A minimal working code
#include <string.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
// Moved the two structs out to make a minimal reproducible code
/* #include "linked_list.h" */
struct MonsterAttacks{
unsigned int attackID;
char monsterName[41];
char attackLocation[41];
unsigned int numOfVictims;
};
typedef struct node{
struct MonsterAttacks *monsterAttack;
struct node* next;
} node;
void populate(struct MonsterAttacks *m){
printf("Enter the name for the Monster \n");
scanf("%40s",m->monsterName);
puts("What is his/her attack location?");
scanf("%40s",m->attackLocation);
puts("What are the number of victims this monster has demolished?");
scanf("%ud", &m->numOfVictims);
m->attackID = 0;
}
node* create(struct MonsterAttacks *m,node* next)
{
node* new_node = (node*)malloc(sizeof(node));
if(new_node == NULL)
{
printf("Error creating a new node.\n");
exit(0);
}
// Just add this line
new_node->monsterAttack = malloc(sizeof (struct MonsterAttacks));
new_node->monsterAttack->attackID = 0;
new_node->next = next;
strncpy(new_node->monsterAttack->monsterName,m->monsterName,41);
strncpy(new_node->monsterAttack->attackLocation, m->attackLocation, 41);
new_node->monsterAttack->numOfVictims = m->numOfVictims;
return new_node;
}
int main(void)
{
node* tmp = NULL;
struct MonsterAttacks *tmpMonst = (struct MonsterAttacks *)
malloc(sizeof(struct MonsterAttacks));
if(tmpMonst == NULL){
printf("Error allocating memory");
}
else {
populate(tmpMonst);
}
node *head = create(tmpMonst,tmp);
printf("Name: %s\n", tmpMonst->monsterName);
printf("num victim: %d\n", tmpMonst->numOfVictims);
free(tmpMonst);
return 0;
}
When you allocate memory for new_node in create(...), you allocate memory on the heap for a structure of type node to hold all the variables it contains. In this case, monsterAttack in node is initially a pointer to a struct that is pointing to nowhere. You need to explicitly allocate memory for the monsterAttack pointer to point to.
Edit: #bruceg pointed out the lack of semicolon, this malloc isn't the issue. #lightalchemist have highlighted that the second one is the fault.
struct MonsterAttacks *tmpMonst = (struct MonsterAttacks *);
malloc(sizeof(struct MonsterAttacks));
Your malloc call is wrong, malloc allocates and returns a pointer to the memory. You ignore/discard the pointer value.
Later code seems to assume that tmpMonst points to this allocated memory but there is no link between the two.
Try struct MonsterAttacks *tmpMonst = malloc(sizeof(struct MonsterAttacks));

How to link stacks to other stacks using Linked List in C programming?

I made my own stack using linked list. But I think this is wrong.
my push method is linking Stack1 to other stacks.
So, I think it is like...
In my main function,
push(stack1, 10);
push(stack1, 20);
[Stack1] -> [nextStack]
[Stack1] -> [nextStack] (new address from first nextStack)
So, It's like... I am repeating to link stack1 to other stacks again and again...
this is my stack using linked list code below.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
typedef struct{
int data;
struct stack *top;
}stack;
void push(stack *currentStack, int data){
if (currentStack->top == NULL)
fprintf(stderr, "Stack is emtpy");
else{
stack *nextStack = (stack*)malloc(sizeof(stack));
currentStack->data = data;
currentStack->top = nextStack;
printf("currentStack is %d\n", currentStack->data);
}
}
int main(){
stack* stack1;
stack1 = (stack*)malloc(sizeof(stack));
push(stack1, 10);
push(stack1, 20);
return 1;
}
and this is the result of my code.
currentStack is 10
currentStack is 20
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
struct stack
{
int data;
struct stack *top;
} *head = NULL;
void push(int data)
{
if (head == NULL) //that means stack is empty
{
head =(struct node *)malloc(1*sizeof(struct node));
head->top = NULL;
head->data = data;
}
else
{
temp =(struct node *)malloc(1*sizeof(struct node));
temp->top = head;
temp->data = data;
head = temp;
}
}
Your push() function is incomplete.
It should consider two cases one when stack is empty and one when it is not.
Also there is no need to pass a pointer-to-stack in push() function because push() function by default pushes the new element on the topmost node and there is only one stack.
Also you have not initialised your stack pointer with NULL. This might give you undefined behaviour during program run.

C program acting weird

I've started implementing a circular queue in C, and I have the following lines of code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include "cirq.h"
//allocate a circular queue
cirq cq_alloc(void){
cirq cq = NULL;
element *head;
element *tail;
if((head = malloc(sizeof(struct element*))) &&
(tail = malloc(sizeof(struct element *)))){
head->content = 0; // head node keeps track of size.
tail->content = NULL;
head->next = tail;
tail->next = head;
cq = &head;
} else {
printf("ERROR: No space for more cqueues.\n");
}
return cq;
}
int cq_size(cirq q){
return (int)(*q)->content;
}
int main(){
cirq q = cq_alloc();
printf("Size of element ptr %lu\n", sizeof(struct element *));
printf("%d\n", cq_size(q));
return 0;
}
Now when I compile and run this program, having commented out the line in main that prints out sizeof(struct element *)), the program runs fine and I get the right size of the queue, 0. When I leave the line in, the size of the struct is printed out, but after that I get a segmentation fault: 11. Also, to make things clear, the struct element has void *data and struct element *next fields. How can adding in a line that prints stuff change the behavior of the program so much?
EDIT: cirq.h
#ifndef CIRQ_H
#define CIRQ_H
typedef struct element **cirq; // cirq handle
typedef struct element {
void *content;
struct element *next;
} element;
extern cirq cq_alloc(void);// allocate a queue
extern int cq_size(cirq q);// return the size of a queue
extern void cq_enq(cirq q, void *value);// add a value to the queue
extern void *cq_deq(cirq q);// dequeue and return a queue value
extern void *cq_peek(cirq q);// return the value at the queue head
extern void cq_rot(cirq q);// requeue the head element at the tail
extern void cq_free(cirq q);// return all space allocated to queue
#endif
This is a bad smell:
if((head = malloc(sizeof(struct element*))) &&
You're mallocing the size of a pointer. I think you meant to malloc the struct itself...?
It doesn't really matter what cirq is, the fact that you return the address of a local object is the problem.
This here
cq = &head;
is causing the undefined behavior, because that's the address of the pointer head which is stored locally in the function only, when the function returns it's deallocated and thus invalid. Using it elsewhere (outside the function) is Undefined Behavior.
Also, do not typedef a pointer. Never do that, let the code reader know that it is a pointer.

Writing a push and pop in c

Original Q: I'm trying to create this calculator in C for a project. I got the math functions working, but not I am stuck on how to handle the push an pop. Can somebody help me get started? I know what push and pop are supposed to do from java, but I am not sure how to use them without using nodes or an array.
My includes and stack struct:
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include "stack.h"
#include "debug.h"
#define DEFAULT_CAPACITY 16
struct stack {
size_t capacity;
size_t size;
stack_item *data;
};
My attempted push and pop:
UPDATED
void push_stack (stack *this, stack_item item) {
if (full_stack (this)) realloc_stack (this);
this->data[this->size++]=item;
}
stack_item pop_stack (stack *this) {
assert (! empty_stack (this));
if(this->data == NULL){
fprintf(stderr, "fail");}
else{
stack_item tempPop = this->data[this->size--];
return tempPop;}
}
Updated Q: This is now what I am doing for my push/pop method. I am getting no warnings and no errors, but when I run it, it seg faults after it should pop.
My new question is, does it appear that something I am doing in this block of code is causing my seg fault?
Use linked lists.
struct stack_element {
struct stack_element* next; // reserved for stack control
int data0; // whatever
int data1;
int data2;
};
void push_stack(struct stack_element** stack, struct stack_element* element)
{
element->next = *stack;
*stack = element;
}
struct stack_element* pop_stack(struct stack_element** stack)
{
struct stack_element* element = *stack;
if (element)
*stack = element->next;
return element;
}
struct stack_element* stack = NULL; // your stack. its empty
Creating new stack element and adding to stack:
struct stack_element* element = malloc(sizeof(struct stack_element)); // created new element
element->data0 = 123;
element->data1 = 456;
element->data2 = 789;
push_stack(&stack, element); // stored in stack
Fetching an element from stack:
struct stack_element* element = pop_stack(&stack);
if (element == NULL)
printf("Stack was empty, no elements to fetch.");
PS: The same element can never be pushed to the stack more than once.
You can also have the stack control separated from the data, in which case you will be able to store the same element more than once:
struct stack_control {
struct stack_control* next;
void* data;
};
void push_stack(struct stack_control** stack, void* data)
{
struct stack_control* temp = malloc(sizeof(struct stack_control));
temp->data = data;
temp->next = *stack;
*stack = temp;
}
void* pop_stack(struct stack_control** stack)
{
void* data = NULL;
struct stack_control* temp = *stack;
if (temp)
{
data = temp->data;
*stack = temp->next;
free(temp);
}
return data;
}
struct stack_control* stack = NULL; // empty stack
This code the way it is can be used to stack pointers of any type, because void* is generic.
//Validation sample code of behavior
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#if 0
#include "stack.h"
#include "debug.h"
#else
typedef char* stack_item;
#endif
#define DEFAULT_CAPACITY 16
struct stack {
size_t capacity;
size_t size;
stack_item *data;
};
typedef struct stack stack;
stack *Stack(void){
stack *s = malloc(sizeof(stack));
s->capacity = DEFAULT_CAPACITY;
s->size = 0;
s->data = malloc(s->capacity * sizeof(stack_item));
return s;
}
int full_stack(stack *this){
return this->capacity == this->size;
}
int empty_stack(stack *this){
return this->size == 0;
}
void realloc_stack(stack *this){
this->capacity += DEFAULT_CAPACITY;
this->data = realloc(this->data, this->capacity*sizeof(stack_item));
}
void push_stack (stack *this, stack_item item) {
if (full_stack (this))
realloc_stack (this);
this->data[this->size++]=item;
}
stack_item pop_stack (stack *this) {
assert (!empty_stack (this));
if(this->data == NULL){
fprintf(stderr, "fail");
exit(1);//Maybe malloc or realloc
}
return this->data[--(this->size)];
}
int main(void){
stack *s = Stack();
push_stack(s, "sin");
push_stack(s, "+");
push_stack(s, "cos");
while(!empty_stack(s)){
puts(pop_stack(s));
}
//Stack_(s);//call destructor
return 0;
}
I understand what you mean when you say "I know what push and pop are supposed to do from java", but please bear in mind that push and pop are just operations that you can do to a data structure that is known as a stack. A stack is more of an idea and that concept can be implemented in any language.
To start of, I would advice you not to use a array. A stack imposes an order in the way you access elements and its perfectly fine with a nice linked list because you only need to remove from the head and add elements to the same head. You typically use an array when you want to access elements at any position in O(1) complexity. The effect of using a linked list is that you dont really have a bound in the number of elements you can add to the stack (unless you really want to).
If you decide to go for a linked list I would advice you to use two structures:
struct stack_node {
int data;
stack_node* next;
};
struct stack {
int current_size;
int max_size;
struct stack_node head;
};
The you can always do
void push(struct stack* s, int x){
if(s->max_size > s->current_size+1){
add to the stack
} else {
stack is full!!
}
}
int pop(struct stack* s) {
if(s->current_size == 0){
Ops! No data in stack, throw error or something
} else {
return head and remove item from stack
}
}
Note that this is only a template to give you an idea... Also, I dont really understand in your code what does "realloc_stack". I think the main problem in your code is that you might still be in a bit of a java minset and programming C requires you to think a bit more low level and do more thinks yourself...

Resources