when we are suppose to use PreviewMouseRightButtonDown event instead of MouseRightButtonDown while handling mouse right button events ?
Please elaborate the ease of use.
There is no real difference between handling the PreviewMouseRightButtonDown and MouseRightButtonDown events except the timing of when each are called. Tunneling (Preview...) events are always called before the corresponding Bubbling events.
However #nit is correct... there is much written information relating to this online and so it is not worth writing again about that here. Please read the WPF Input Events section of the Routed Events Overview page on MSDN for further information.
Preview Events are Tunneling events i.e they tunnel through parent to the origin child (where event has actually occured). While the other one are Bubbling events i.e they bubble from origin child to parent.
you should understand bubbling and tunneling events in wpf to understand this. There are many article on this like
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/464926/To-bubble-or-tunnel-basic-WPF-events
Related
Basically we have a huge project, and we have an event handler that sometimes is triggered and some others it isn't. I think this is because somewhere in the jungle of code, we're handling that event, so it doesn't bubble up to where we need it. Is there anyway to find out where is it being handled?
Thanks!
Did you try to use Snoop..... there is an event Tab that tells us where the event is bubbled to and where its handled...
I would like to have a clear explanation about how to determine in each situation which control is the sender and which one is the source for a WPF Routed Event event both in the case of tunnelling and bubbling events.
Edit:
Suppose you have an event handler and two controls one child of the other. The handler is in the parent control. How would I know beforehand and without debugging which control is passed as the sender and which one as the e.source? And does this change when you consider bubbling or tunnelling events?The general concept of events is clear to me, but I would like to understand which parameter to use in the eventhandler to indentify both controls without debugging
There probably isn't an exhaustive "clear explanation", because there are so many ways you could end up with events. Especially when a lot of events use EventArgs.Empty, because there are no other details, other than the source.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/17sde2xt(v=VS.100).aspx
or, more specificly:
RoutedEvent: Source vs. OriginalSource
Do you have a specific question you need answered?
Edit: from the above linked article, with an answer similar to your comment
Consider a custom control (called CustomControl1 in this example) that is composed of a TextBlock.
When a MouseDown event is raised on the TextBlock, the OriginalSource property will be the
TextBlock, but in CustomControl1's handler, the Source will be changed to the CustomControl1
object so that other elements along the event's route will know that CustomControl1 received a
MouseDown.
I have implemented a UserControl. Then I would like to handle an event that is originally handled by Window (keyboard press). What is the best way to route the event caught by another component (higher in the components' tree)?
Thanks in advance for the replies and hints!
Cheers
It depends on the event you're trying to access. If it's a Preview event and the Window is setting e.Handled to true you'll need to use the method Alex suggests to circumvent the Window's handling of the tunneling. If it is a bubbling event (i.e. KeyDown) you don't need to do anything special since bubbling events hit the handlers on child elements first and go up the visual tree so the Window handler won't occur until after your UC's.
One thing you need to be careful with using Key events is that the event is only going to get picked up by your UC in the first place if the Focus is on or inside of it. This isn't something you need to worry about with things like Mouse events since they start at a specific location in the tree.
I believe you cannot gurantee that.
Window class is wrapping Win32 message-based event model and this will be the only WPF entity which will have access to those information.
I suggest that you create an attached property (which will be used by the Window) and implement the routing of the events yourself so that controls could subscribe to.
You can attach the routed handler specifying that you want to handle handled messages as well:
this.AddHandler(routedEvent, handler, true);
where this is an UIElement or derived class.
However there may still be events (key presses in this case) which don't make it past the window, not sure.
A colleague and I were chatting about routed events, and we came up with some things that didn't make a lot of sense. Primarily, what is the purpose of a Direct event, and why are both LeftMouseButtonDown and PreviewLeftMouseButtonDown direct events as opposed to bubbling and tunneling respectively?
According to the documentation, the LeftMouseButtonDown (and preview) events appear to behave as bubbling and tunneling events, except that the event is raised and reraised as these events traverse the tree. Since direct events can only be handled by the source of the event, it follows that any UIElement could handle a direct event since each one is raising the event and is also therefore the source. (Unless reraising the event is different than raising?). Why are these then not tunneling and bubbling like so many other similar events?
Neither my colleague nor I could come up with a use case in which we would ever create a custom event using a direct strategy (although we came up with some for tunneling and bubbling), yet LeftMouseButtonDown, one of the most common events (if not THE most common) is using this strategy.
Anyone have any ideas about the rational behind this?
Thanks!
My guess would be performance and there are considerations for having multiple events for the same thing.
There is already an event for MouseDown, to route both that and LeftMouseDown wouldn't make much sense. Finally, which would fire first and would cancelling\handling the first prevent the other? It sounds like it would be too easy to handle the same event twice.
I hope this makes sense.
I have created several WPF User Controls. The lowest level item is 'PostItNote.xaml'. Next, I have a 'NotesGroup.xaml' file that has an ItemsControl bound to a List of PostItNotes. Above that, I have a 'ProgrammerControl.xaml' file. Each ProgrammerControl has a grid with four different NotesGroup user controls on it (and each NotesGroup contains 0-many PostItNotes.
Then, I have my main window. It also has an ItemsControl, bound to a list of Programmers.
So, you end up with a high level visual view of a list of programmers, each programmer has four groups of tickets, each group of tickets has many PostItNotes.
The trouble I'm having, is that I want to respond to a mouse click event in my mainWindow's code behind file.
I can add a MouseClick event into my PostItNote.xaml.vb file and that is getting called when the user clicks a PostItNote, and I can re-raise the event; but I can't seem to get the NotesGroup to listen for that event. I'm not sure if that's even the correct approach.
When the user clicks the PostItNote, I'm going to do a bunch of business-logic type stuff that the PostItNote control doesn't have a reference to/doesn't know about it.
Can anyone point me in the right direction?
You have a couple choices:
Use the PreviewXXX events which are fired during the "tunneling" phase of WPF event routing. The parent controls can always preview the events going down through them to children.
Use the more advanced approach to hooking up events leveraging the AddHandler method to which you can pass a parameter called "handledEventsToo" which basically means you want to know when the event happened "within" you even if some descendent element handled the event itself.
I am going to take a flyer here. You probably don't want to be handling the event that high up; not really anyway. You are catching the event at the lower levels, which is unavoidable. Consider invoking a routed command from the PostItNote click event handler.
The routed commands bubble up and tunnel down through the tree. You can have an architecture where a high-level handler can listen to a logical event (Opening a postit note perhaps?). The handler for this doesn't need to care where the command originates from. It might be from you clicking something, it might be from clicking on a toolbar button. Both are valid scenarios.
It sounds like you are creating some kind of custom UI, am I right? You want the application to respond to the users interactions. That is what the RoutedCommands are for.