I've been following a tutorial for opening files from userspace from a Linux kernel module at http://www.howtoforge.com/reading-files-from-the-linux-kernel-space-module-driver-fedora-14
The code is the following:
#include <linux/module.h> // Needed by all modules
#include <linux/kernel.h> // Needed for KERN_INFO
#include <linux/fs.h> // Needed by filp
#include <asm/uaccess.h> // Needed by segment descriptors
int init_module(void)
{
// Create variables
struct file *f;
char buf[128];
mm_segment_t fs;
int i;
// Init the buffer with 0
for(i=0;i<128;i++)
buf[i] = 0;
// To see in /var/log/messages that the module is operating
printk(KERN_INFO "My module is loaded\n");
// I am using Fedora and for the test I have chosen following file
// Obviously it is much smaller than the 128 bytes, but hell with it =)
f = filp_open("/etc/fedora-release", O_RDONLY, 0);
if(f == NULL)
printk(KERN_ALERT "filp_open error!!.\n");
else{
// Get current segment descriptor
fs = get_fs();
// Set segment descriptor associated to kernel space
set_fs(get_ds());
// Read the file
f->f_op->read(f, buf, 128, &f->f_pos);
// Restore segment descriptor
set_fs(fs);
// See what we read from file
printk(KERN_INFO "buf:%s\n",buf);
}
filp_close(f,NULL);
return 0;
}
void cleanup_module(void)
{
printk(KERN_INFO "My module is unloaded\n");
}
The code is copy-pasted from the link above. On my machine, running Fedora 19 with 3.11.10-200 kernel, it seems that filp_open isn't run, providing the buf variable with null values.
What could be wrong? I am still learning the ropes of Linux kernel module development.
First thing you should do is to check if any errors are returned from filp_open (in fact, checking for NULL is probably an outright mistake when modern kernels are concerned). The proper sequence should be:
f = filp_open("/etc/fedora-release", O_RDONLY, 0);
if (IS_ERR(f)) {
// inspect the value of PTR_ERR(f), get the necessary clues
// negative values represent various errors
// as defined in asm-generic/errno-base.h
}
Only then you can move on to diagnosing the read.
977 struct file *filp_open(const char *filename, int flags, umode_t mode)
978 {
979 struct filename *name = getname_kernel(filename);
980 struct file *file = ERR_CAST(name);
981
982 if (!IS_ERR(name)) {
983 file = file_open_name(name, flags, mode);
984 putname(name);
985 }
986 return file;
987 }
Probably the error is in how you put the parameters, the flags parameter is in mode parameter position and vice versa, mode in falgs position.
source: http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/fs/open.c#L977
Related
I am following a tutorial from here.
I have the following code:
#include <linux/init.h> // Macros used to mark up functions e.g. __init __exit
#include <linux/module.h> // Core header for loading LKMs into the kernel
#include <linux/device.h> // Header to support the kernel Driver Model
#include <linux/kernel.h> // Contains types, macros, functions for the kernel
#include <linux/fs.h> // Header for the Linux file system support
#include <linux/uaccess.h> // Required for the copy to user function
#define DEVICE_NAME "ebbchar" ///< The device will appear at /dev/ebbchar using this value
#define CLASS_NAME "ebb" ///< The device class -- this is a character device driver
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); ///< The license type -- this affects available functionality
MODULE_AUTHOR("Derek Molloy"); ///< The author -- visible when you use modinfo
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("A simple Linux char driver for the BBB"); ///< The description -- see modinfo
MODULE_VERSION("0.1"); ///< A version number to inform users
static int majorNumber; ///< Stores the device number -- determined automatically
static char message[256] = {0}; ///< Memory for the string that is passed from userspace
static short size_of_message; ///< Used to remember the size of the string stored
static int numberOpens = 0; ///< Counts the number of times the device is opened
static struct class* ebbcharClass = NULL; ///< The device-driver class struct pointer
static struct device* ebbcharDevice = NULL; ///< The device-driver device struct pointer
static int dev_open(struct inode *, struct file *);
static int dev_release(struct inode *, struct file *);
static ssize_t dev_read(struct file *, char *, size_t, loff_t *);
static ssize_t dev_write(struct file *, const char *, size_t, loff_t *);
static struct file_operations fops =
{
.open = dev_open,
.read = dev_read,
.write = dev_write,
.release = dev_release,
};
static int __init ebbchar_init(void){
printk(KERN_INFO "EBBChar: Initializing the EBBChar LKM\n");
// Try to dynamically allocate a major number for the device -- more difficult but worth it
majorNumber = register_chrdev(0, DEVICE_NAME, &fops);
if (majorNumber<0){
printk(KERN_ALERT "EBBChar failed to register a major number\n");
return majorNumber;
}
printk(KERN_INFO "EBBChar: registered correctly with major number %d\n", majorNumber);
// Register the device class
ebbcharClass = class_create(THIS_MODULE, CLASS_NAME);
if (IS_ERR(ebbcharClass)){ // Check for error and clean up if there is
unregister_chrdev(majorNumber, DEVICE_NAME);
printk(KERN_ALERT "Failed to register device class\n");
return PTR_ERR(ebbcharClass); // Correct way to return an error on a pointer
}
printk(KERN_INFO "EBBChar: device class registered correctly\n");
// Register the device driver
ebbcharDevice = device_create(ebbcharClass, NULL, MKDEV(majorNumber, 0), NULL, DEVICE_NAME);
if (IS_ERR(ebbcharDevice)){ // Clean up if there is an error
class_destroy(ebbcharClass); // Repeated code but the alternative is goto statements
unregister_chrdev(majorNumber, DEVICE_NAME);
printk(KERN_ALERT "Failed to create the device\n");
return PTR_ERR(ebbcharDevice);
}
printk(KERN_INFO "EBBChar: device class created correctly\n"); // Made it! device was initialized
return 0;
}
static void __exit ebbchar_exit(void){
device_destroy(ebbcharClass, MKDEV(majorNumber, 0)); // remove the device
class_unregister(ebbcharClass); // unregister the device class
class_destroy(ebbcharClass); // remove the device class
unregister_chrdev(majorNumber, DEVICE_NAME); // unregister the major number
printk(KERN_INFO "EBBChar: Goodbye from the LKM!\n");
}
static int dev_open(struct inode *inodep, struct file *filep){
numberOpens++;
printk(KERN_INFO "EBBChar: Device has been opened %d time(s)\n", numberOpens);
return 0;
}
static ssize_t dev_read(struct file *filep, char *buffer, size_t len, loff_t *offset){
int error_count = 0;
// copy_to_user has the format ( * to, *from, size) and returns 0 on success
error_count = copy_to_user(buffer, message, size_of_message);
if (error_count==0){ // if true then have success
printk(KERN_INFO "EBBChar: Sent %d characters to the user\n", size_of_message);
return (size_of_message=0); // clear the position to the start and return 0
}
else {
printk(KERN_INFO "EBBChar: Failed to send %d characters to the user\n", error_count);
return -EFAULT; // Failed -- return a bad address message (i.e. -14)
}
}
static ssize_t dev_write(struct file *filep, const char *buffer, size_t len, loff_t *offset){
sprintf(message, "%s(%zu letters)", buffer, len); // appending received string with its length
size_of_message = strlen(message); // store the length of the stored message
printk(KERN_INFO "EBBChar: Received %zu characters from the user\n", len);
return len;
}
static int dev_release(struct inode *inodep, struct file *filep){
printk(KERN_INFO "EBBChar: Device successfully closed\n");
return 0;
}
module_init(ebbchar_init);
module_exit(ebbchar_exit);
I have a small testing file as well from the tutorial. The problem is that when the testing code runs, the process ends up being killed. The logs files say it is due to Supervisor Mode access and that a page fault exception was thrown.
After some research and looking in log files It came down to compatibility problems with Supervisor Mode Access Prevention, where kernel code can't access user code due to the new SMAP feature of some CPUs.
After disabling SMAP at boot time with the nosmap option the testing code works just fine.
I am looking for a way to disable/circumvent SMAP properly in module code. Since this application could run on multiple CPUs, I don't think that changing the CR4 register is the proper way.
I think the copy_to_user() function is a good lead. The problem arises when write is called. Could anyone point to me what is the proper way to code the write() function for this module?
If you are having a problem, disabling SMAP won't solve it, it will only hide it. The fact that SMAP kills your process is good and it should stay that way, it's a security measure of the Linux kernel and it should not be disabled only to make a buggy module work.
Your error is here:
sprintf(message, "%s(%zu letters)", buffer, len);
you are reading user space memory from kernel space, which is wrong, and SMAP prevents this generating a fault.
You should use copy_from_user(), since you are dealing with a user space buffer:
static ssize_t dev_write(struct file *filep, const char __user *buffer, size_t len, loff_t *offset){
unsigned long remaining;
// NEVER copy more than your message buffer size.
if (len > 256)
len = 256;
// Ensure that the additional string fits (XXX because len is at most 3 chars).
if (len + strlen(" (XXX letters)") >= 256) {
pr_info("User buffer is too big (%zu).\n", len);
return -EINVAL;
}
remaining = copy_from_user(message, buffer, len);
if (remaining > 0) {
pr_info("Failed to copy %lu characters from the user.\n", remaining);
return -EFAULT;
}
sprintf(message + len, " (%zu letters)", len);
size_of_message = len + strlen(message + len);
pr_info("Received %zu characters from the user.\n", len);
return len;
}
A few other tips:
error_count should be an unsigned long instead of an int since copy_to_user() returns that type.
Your dev_read() and dev_write() functions take pointers from user space. Any time a kernel function takes a pointer that comes from user space, that pointer should be declared using the __user annotation, like I did in the function above.
You can use the macro pr_info() instead of printk(KERN_INFO ...), also like I did above.
You can avoid writing the module name (EBBChar:) every single time at the beginning of each line simply by re-defining the pr_fmt macro like this:
// This will make any pr_* function (except pr_cont) prepend the module name to each message.
// KBUILD_MODNAME is automatically generated when building and is your module name.
// Put this at the top of your module.
#ifdef pr_fmt
#undef pr_fmt
#endif
#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
My goal is to write a kernel-module. I am following the memory tutorial of the freesoftware magazine.
The tutorial works fine. I am able to compile the code. When loaded with insmod, the kernel prints <1>Inserting memory module as expected. When I remove the module using rmmod the kernel prints <1>Removing memory module.
For debugging purposes, I am trying to add printk() to the other methods. But they are never printed.
The priority of all the messages is <1>.
I write into the device by: echo -n test1234 > /dev/memory
And use cat /dev/memory to get back the data.
cat /var/log/messages and dmesg donĀ“t print anymore information
[ 5550.651221] <1>Inserting memory module
[ 5550.655396] <1>Inserting memory module !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[12230.130847] <1>Removing memory module
cat /proc/sys/kernel/printk
7 4 1 7
uname- a
Linux generic-armv7a-hf 3.14.0-163850-g775a3df-dirty #2 SMP Mon Jan 12 13:53:50 CET 2015 armv7l GNU/Linux
Why does printk() only work in the init and exit method?
Is there any (better) way to print variable values than printk()?
Here the code:
/* Necessary includes for device drivers */
#include <linux/init.h>
//#include <linux/config.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h> /* printk() */
#include <linux/slab.h> /* kmalloc() */
#include <linux/fs.h> /* everything... */
#include <linux/errno.h> /* error codes */
#include <linux/types.h> /* size_t */
#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
#include <linux/fcntl.h> /* O_ACCMODE */
#include <asm/system.h> /* cli(), *_flags */
#include <asm/uaccess.h> /* copy_from/to_user */
MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
/* Declaration of memory.c functions */
int memory_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp);
int memory_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp);
ssize_t memory_read(struct file *filp, char *buf, size_t count, loff_t *f_pos);
ssize_t memory_write(struct file *filp, char *buf, size_t count, loff_t *f_pos);
void memory_exit(void);
int memory_init(void);
/* Structure that declares the usual file */
/* access functions */
struct file_operations memory_fops = {
read: memory_read,
write: memory_write,
open: memory_open,
release: memory_release
};
/* Declaration of the init and exit functions */
module_init(memory_init);
module_exit(memory_exit);
/* Global variables of the driver */
/* Major number */
int memory_major = 60;
/* Buffer to store data */
char *memory_buffer;
int memory_init(void) {
int result;
/* Registering device */
result = register_chrdev(memory_major, "memory", &memory_fops);
if (result < 0) {
printk(
"<1>memory: cannot obtain major number %d\n", memory_major);
return result;
}
/* Allocating memory for the buffer */
memory_buffer = kmalloc(1, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!memory_buffer) {
result = -ENOMEM;
goto fail;
}
memset(memory_buffer, 0, 1);
printk("<1>Inserting memory module\n"); ///this works fine
printk("<1>Inserting memory module !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!\n"); ///this works fine too
return 0;
fail:
memory_exit();
return result;
}
void memory_exit(void) {
/* Freeing the major number */
unregister_chrdev(memory_major, "memory");
/* Freeing buffer memory */
if (memory_buffer) {
kfree(memory_buffer);
}
printk("<1>Removing memory module\n"); //never printed
}
int memory_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) {
printk("<1>memory open\n"); //never printed
/* Success */
return 0;
}
int memory_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) {
printk("<1>memory_release\n"); //never printed
/* Success */
return 0;
}
ssize_t memory_read(struct file *filp, char *buf,
size_t count, loff_t *f_pos) {
printk("<1>mem read\n"); //never printed
/* Transfering data to user space */
copy_to_user(buf,memory_buffer,1);
/* Changing reading position as best suits */
if (*f_pos == 0) {
*f_pos+=1;
return 1;
} else {
return 0;
}
}
ssize_t memory_write( struct file *filp, char *buf,
size_t count, loff_t *f_pos) {
printk("<1>mem write\n"); //never printed
char *tmp;
tmp=buf+count-1;
copy_from_user(memory_buffer,tmp,1);
return 1;
}
Your driver seems fine, but you aren't actually talking to it with your test commands, so the functions with printks aren't being called. Once the module is loaded, it registers a major and minor number, 60 and 0 in your case. (Down the road you should update the module to request an available major number instead of using a hard-coded one.)
You need to create a file system node with mknod in order to actually use the driver. This will create the /dev/memory node and connect it to the module you have loaded. Then when it is opened, closed, read from, or written to, the file_operations in your module will be called, and the printks will work.
For your module, you should be able to use
mknod /dev/memory c 60 0
You can also chmod 666 /dev/memory to allow any user to use the device, rather than running as root all the time.
Here's a script based on the one I use with modules I develop:
#!/bin/sh
device="memory"
mode="666"
major=$(awk "\$2==\"$device\" {print \$1}" /proc/devices}
mknod /dev/${device} c $major 0
chmod $mode /dev/${device}
It will look up the major number associated with your module and create a file system node for it automatically.
Once you have loaded the module and run mknod or the script, you should be able to use the driver. You will know that it is working becase cat will only return the last character written to the device - your driver only has a one character buffer, and it is automatically overwritten each time a new character comes in. Then dmesg should show the printk's associated with the functions in your module.
The reason your driver seemed to work is because you were creating a regular file with your echo command, which cat happily printed right back to you. It's the same thing that would have happened if you ran those commands on a file in your home directory, you just happened to be in /dev instead.
For example I opened up 2 devices in an array of devices..
NODES are /dev/ttyUSB0, /dev/ttyUSB1 etc..
#define MAXDEV 4
devlist[MAXDEV];
const char *devices[] = {"/dev/ttyUSB0","/dev/ttyUSB1");
for(loop =0; loop<sizeof(devices); loop++){
fd= open(devices[loop]);
}
Now I add them to the list of fds;
for(i=0; i<MAXDEV; i++){
if(devlist[i] != 0){
devlist[i] = fd;
fd = -1;
}
}
Now I read on the devices for data.
for(iter=0; iter<MAXDEV; iter++){
if(FD_ISSET(devlist[iter],&fds)){
if ((nbytes = read(devlist[iter], buf, sizeof(buf)-1)) > 0 && nbytes != 0)
{
buf[nbytes] = '\0';
printf("Data Received on Node ???");
}
if(nbytes < 0){
printf("connection reset\n");
FD_CLR(devlist[iter], &fds);
close(devlist[iter]);
devlist[iter] = 0;
}
if(nbytes ==0){
printf("Device Removed on Node ???\n");
FD_CLR(devlist[iter], &fds);
close(devlist[iter]);
devlist[iter] = 0;
}
}
}
Now how do I get the device node using its fd?.. Thanks.
The proper way to do this is to do your own book-keeping. That would allow you to log the device node name exactly as supplied by the user, rather than provide an equivalent, yet confusingly different one.
For example you could use a hash table, to associate file descriptor numbers to char arrays with the device name used for the corresponding open() call.
A simpler, but far more fragile and definitely not recommended, solution might involve using a simple array of pointers to char with an inordinately large size, in the hopes that any file descriptor value that you may encounter can be used as an index to the appropriate string without going beyond the array bounds. This is slightly easier to code than a hash table, but it will cause your program to die horribly if a file descriptor value exceeds the maximum allowed index in your string array.
If your program is bound to the Linux platform anyway, you might be able to, uh, cheat by using the /dev/fd directory or the /proc filesystem (more specifically the /proc/self/fd directory to which /dev/fd is usually a symbolic link). Both contain symbolic links that associate file descriptor values to canonical versions of the paths that where used to open the corresponding files. For example consider the following transcript:
$ ls -l /proc/self/fd
total 0
lrwx------ 1 user user 64 Nov 9 23:21 0 -> /dev/pts/10
l-wx------ 1 user user 64 Nov 9 23:21 1 -> /dev/pts/10
lrwx------ 1 user user 64 Nov 9 23:21 2 -> /dev/pts/10
lr-x------ 1 user user 64 Nov 9 23:21 3 -> /proc/16437/fd/
You can use the readlink() system call to retrieve the target of the link that corresponds to a file descriptor of interest.
You need the fstat(2) syscall, perhaps also fstatfs(2). Check that it succeeded.
struct stat st;
memset (&st, 0, sizeof(st));
if (fstat (fd, &st))
perror("fstat");
else {
// use st, notably st.st_rdev
}
Remember that you could have a device outside of /dev. If you are sure that your device is in it, you could stat(2) every entry in it, and compare their st_rdev
Read also Advanced Linux Programming (it is online under a free license, but you may want to buy the book).
Well I can see this question is about 1 year old. But right now I was looking for a way of doing this. And I found it. For getting the device node using the file descritor you can combine stat and libudev here is an example:
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <libudev.h>
#include <iostream>
#include <fcntl.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
struct stat sb;
// Get a file descriptor to the file.
int fd = open(argv[1], O_RDWR);
// Get stats for that file descriptor.
if (fstat(fd, &sb) == -1) {
perror("stat");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
// Create the udev context.
struct udev *udev;
udev = udev_new();
// Create de udev_device from the dev_t obtained from stat.
struct udev_device *dev;
dev = udev_device_new_from_devnum(udev, 'b', sb.st_dev);
// Finally obtain the node.
const char* node = udev_device_get_devnode(dev);
udev_unref(udev);
std::cout << "The file is in: " << node << std::endl;
return 0;
}
I'm trying to implement a program to access memory on an embedded system. I need to access some control register so I think that ioctl is the best way to do it. I have added the ioctl to the fops:
struct file_operations aes_fops = {
read: aes_read,
write: aes_write,
unlocked_ioctl: aes_ioctl,
open: aes_open,
release: aes_release
};
And have set up the function:
int aes_ioctl(struct inode *inode,
struct file *file,
unsigned int ioctl_num,
unsigned long ioctl_param){
printk(KERN_INFO "in ioctl\n");
....
}
But I am not getting inside of this function. Here is my user space code. Please help me understand if I am doing this totally wrong.
int main(int argc, char* argv[]){
int fd = fopen("/dev/aes", "r+");
ioctl(fd, 0, 1);
fclose(fd);
}
Some of the code is apparently for older kernels, because I am compiling for an embedded system where an older version of Linux has been modified.
The problem with your code is the request number you are using - 0. The kernel has some request number reserved for internal use. The kernel regards the request number as a struct, separates it to fields and calls the right subsystem for it.
See Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.txt (from Linux 3.4.6):
Code Seq#(hex) Include File Comments
========================================================
0x00 00-1F linux/fs.h conflict!
0x00 00-1F scsi/scsi_ioctl.h conflict!
0x00 00-1F linux/fb.h conflict!
0x00 00-1F linux/wavefront.h conflict!
0x02 all linux/fd.h
0x03 all linux/hdreg.h
...
Depending on what you are during, you'd have to follow the kernel guidelines for adding new ioctls():
If you are adding new ioctl's to the kernel, you should use the _IO
macros defined in <linux/ioctl.h>:
_IO an ioctl with no parameters
_IOW an ioctl with write parameters (copy_from_user)
_IOR an ioctl with read parameters (copy_to_user)
_IOWR an ioctl with both write and read parameters.
See the kernel's own Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-decoding.txt document for further details on how those numbers are structured.
In practice, if you pick Code 1, which means starting from 0x100 up until 0x1ff, you'd be fine.
Is your setup of the aes_fops structure correct? I've never seen it done that way. All the code I have is:
.unlocked_ioctl = aes_ioctl,
rather than:
unlocked_ioctl: aes_ioctl,
Colons within a structure (as you have in your setup) fields are used for bit fields as far as I'm aware (and during definition), not initialising the individual fields.
In other words, try:
struct file_operations aes_fops = {
.read = aes_read,
.write = aes_write,
.unlocked_ioctl = aes_ioctl,
.open = aes_open,
.release = aes_release
};
Note: It appears that gcc once did allow that variant of structure field initialisation but it's been obsolete since gcc 2.5 (see here, straight from the GCC documentation). You really should be using the proper method (ie, the one blessed by the ISO standard) to do this.
Without knowing the error returned, it's hard to say... My first though is your permissions on your file descriptor. I've seen similar issues before. First, you can get some more information about the failure if you take a look at the return of the ioctl:
#include <errno.h>
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
long ret;
int fd = fopen("/dev/aes", "r+");
ret = ioctl(fd, 0, 1);
if (ret < 0)
printf("ioctl failed. Return code: %d, meaning: %s\n", ret, strerror(errno));
fclose(fd);
}
Check the return values and this should help give you something to search on. Why check? See the bottom of the post...
Next in order to check if it is permissions issue, run the command:
ls -l /dev/aes
if you see something like:
crw------- 1 root root 10, 57 Aug 21 10:24 /dev/aes
Then just issue a:
sudo chmod 777 /dev/aes
And give it a try again. I bet it will work for you. (Note I ran that with root permissions since root is the owner of my version of your mod)
If the permissions are already OK, then I have a few more suggestions:
1) To me, the use of fopen/fclose is strange. You really only need to do:
int fd = open("/dev/aes");
close(fd);
My system doesn't even let your code compile as is.
2) Your IOCTL parameter list is old, I don't know what kernel version your compiling on, but recent kernels use this format:
long aes_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int ioctl_num, unsigned long ioctl_param){
Note the removal of the inode and the change of the return type. When I ran your code on my system, I made these changes.
Best of luck!
Note: Why should we check the return when we're "not getting into the ioctl"? Let me give you an example:
//Kernel Code:
//assume include files, other fops, exit, miscdev struct, etc. are present
long hello_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned long ioctl_num, unsigned long ioctl_param) {
long ret = 0;
printk("in ioctl");
return ret;
}
static const struct file_operations hello_fops = {
owner: THIS_MODULE,
read: hello_read,
unlocked_ioctl: hello_ioctl,
};
static int __init hello_init(void) {
int ret;
printk("hello!\n");
ret = misc_register(&hello_dev); //assume it worked...
return ret;
}
User space code:
//assume includes
void main() {
int fd;
long ret;
fd = open("/dev/hello");
if(fd) {
c = ioctl(fd, 0, 1);
if (c < 0)
printf("error: %d, errno: %d, meaning: %s\n", c, errno, strerror(errno));
close(fd);
}
return;
}
So what's the output? Lets assume bad file permissions on /dev/hello (meaning our user space program can't access /dev/hello).
The dmesg | tail shows:
[ 2388.051660] Hello!
So it looks like we didn't "get in to" the ioctl. What's the output from the program?
error: -1, errno: 9, meaning: Bad file descriptor
Lots of useful output. Clearly the ioctl call did something, just not what we wanted. Now changing the permissions and re-running we can see the new dmesg:
[ 2388.051660] Hello!
[ 2625.025339] in ioctl
I am trying to write a /proc file created by a loadable kernel module. I am using fopen() to open the file for write but am getting errno : 13 (permission denied).
FILE *fp;
fp = fopen("/proc/file1","w");
if(fp == NULL){
printf("Errno : %d",errno); // prints 13
}
The LKM contains the following code:
static struct proc_dir_entry *proc_entry;
static ssize_t proc_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buff, unsigned long len, void *data)
{
// code writes from buffer to local variable
return len;
}
static ssize_t proc_read(char *page, char **start, off_t off, int count, int *eof, void *data)
{
// code for reading file
return 0;
}
int proc_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
try_module_get(THIS_MODULE);
return 0;
}
int proc_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
module_put(THIS_MODULE);
return 0;
}
Any suggestions on how to overcome this?
Thanks.
The most probable answer is that the procfs node that is created does not have the correct permissions for the user.
When run as root, it bypasses most of the permission checking for the node, so you do not receive an error (there are exceptions; this is the general case).
in the kernel loadable module, where it creates the procfs node (somewhere in the .c file):
create_proc_entry(...)
You need to make sure that the second parameter, the mode is set to something that permits opening for writing by users other than root in order to support your desired open option; e.g. 0666 makes the file globally openable as R/W by anyone.
Generally, nodes in procfs are created with the flags 0444 (i.e. R/O only for all users). Some are created in mode 0644 (R/W by root, R/O for all other users), some are created with permissions 0400 (R/O for root, all others stay away).