I have found some issues working with Twitter Bootstrap in Cakephp and having set cake.generic.css
Most tutorials are telling to use both, cake.generic.css and bootstrap.css in the same time, although there are some conflicts between styles.
On the other hand, I have found some comments on the net saying it is not needed, after setting bootstrap, to use cake.generic.css. (http://cakephp.1045679.n5.nabble.com/What-s-the-best-way-to-get-Twitter-Bootstrap-into-Cake-td5712643.html, http://thehappydeveloper.wordpress.com/2012/02/24/setting-up-twitter-bootstrap-with-cakephp/)
What is the best practice to setup Twitter Bootstrap with Cakephp?
Working with Twitter Bootstrap is not any different than working with any other frontend framework. That being said, you don't need to keep default css if you are not going to use it. Just modify your layout to include the css/js files as usual and style your elements in the way Bootstrap is expecting you to do it.
However, since nobody likes to reinvent the wheel I would suggest to use a CakePHP plugin that handles all that for you, here is one
When dealing with forms, you can make use of the Bootstrap 3 FormHelper we created, that pretends to be highly configurable and let us do none or minimal additional coding. You are able to create inline or horizontal forms easily, or even create new form styles and apply them globally in your app. You can download it and see instructions/examples at http://bs3form.qtsdev.com.
Bs3Form tries to be a better alternative to the the BoostCakeForm (it's just a helper, not an entire plugin). Some of the main features are: Creation of default / horizontal / inline forms with almost no additional configuration, creation of static controls, adding feedback or input groups easily, global options and styles definitions that remove the need to define inputDefaults in every form, external wrapping for smaller input in horizontal forms that prevent help/error messages unnecesarily breaking, etc.
Related
I'm going to start a react project. I want a little clarification about the choice of Material UI over Reactstrap. Material UI is better than Bootstrap as mentioned in another comparison of Bootstrap vs Material UI for React?. But I'm a little confused about Reactstrap after going through Pros & Cons of Material UI and Reactstrap as shown in the below images. Or should I use both of them as per requirement in the same project?
I would like to use ready made UI components like Collapse-able Side Menu, Tables with pagination, Auto complete Select etc.
react-bootstrap is more popular than reactstrap. I will speak about react-bootstrap and Material UI.
I have more experience with Material UI. I don't even know how Material UI became that popular while it was very bad when it was released. It used inline styling and it was a nightmare to customize anything. Its performance was very poor. Still, it became very popular and it improved a lot. I used it in my latest project and the performance was great and I used its new CSS in JS solution combined with styled-components. I think it will be a bit harder to use than react-bootstrap but it has more components out of the box.
For most people, react-bootstrap would be an easier choice.
I can't tell you which one to use but I can give you some things to think about and decide yourself:
Which design do you prefer?
If you have more experience with bootstrap, go with react-bootstrap.
If you prefer sass go with react-bootstrap. If you prefer CSS in JS go with Material UI.
If react-bootstrap is missing some components you would need that exists in Material UI go with Material UI but remember that you can add other external components to your project anyway so I think this may not be a limitation.
It depends on your choices, yes, it's a little bit of complicated to customized material, but the looks and feels is outstanding, for tables and all, better to use Material-UI it has inbuilt pagination if you are not comfortable in that you can try this one it also comes inbuilt pagination and much more https://github.com/react-bootstrap-table/react-bootstrap-table2
I agree with comments about the cons referred in your question seems to be more opinions than facts; probably the only fact we can say after compare the two packages is that Material UI has some more built in components.
Once said that it's hard to take a decision without knowing the specification of your project.
Probably the best suggestion we can give you is simply use the one you are more comfortable with.
Hope this helps.
Refer to my experience, if it is an commerial/external project that needs minimal branding, and you are looking for basic reuse-able component to create Admin Portal or CMS, I prefer reactstrap/CoreUI. My main concern is Theme Overriding.
Not enough documentation about overriding material ui style, had quite a hard time to edit and test the theme setting again and again, while reactstrap/CoreUI allow you to import your own .css file, or overriding its class css. So you can simply change the textfield padding at once in css while your designer request to.
Neither material ui and reactstrap/CoreUI can fulfil your need. You may install other useful npm like react-select, multiple datetime picker, autosize textarea, or color picker. Then you try to make its style to be consistent as other Textfield. Styling a component like material ui is quite hard because of its behavior, e.g. label zoom out while focus. But Styling like reactstrap/CoreUI is much easier, you can even reuse the bootstrap classname.
If you are trying to deliver something fast & small without designer, material ui is a good choice, cover most of your use cases. If it is a long-term project and designer is watching you, I am afraid material ui is not a good choice.
Anyway, case by case.
I would say it is your Choice. But if you are good at bootstrap-4, best to go with Reactstrap which is component based library for react.
In my Company we are using Reactstrap and things go quite well. But this doesn't mean we are not using our own media queries and flexbox,styled-jsx which we obviously do.
Even though you will be using ready made Components available in Reactstrap, as you progress in the project you will have to use other libraries 'React-Final-Forms' to handle forms and form data efficiently having high performance when compared with normal forms available in ReactStrap.
Similarly you will need a library known as 'React-select' to handle drop downs, which will give me more options than normal ReactStrap select form Component.
As for now, I am doing project on Next.js and Material-UI. I was also looking for such comparison between Bootstrap(reactstrap)/Material/Ant. And I am agreed with Daniel Ricci with choosing Material-UI.
Why's that?
First of all, I have spoken with my better experienced friend (he has contributed to his own (DEVExpress) React Component Library, so he was know what he has talking about)
Project Management Side pros:
Material itself has a very useful style guidelines from Google. So it is also not about library components, but about styles / colors / design. So you could always customize yourself and create your own theme. But as for you, it will be easier to understand why you are using Roboto:400 at H3 title, and «what color I should pick as secondary?», if you decide to choose primary color.
As a result, it's much easier to find a UI/UX designer for your project. And you always know how your project should looks like.
Default react Material-UI component library is quite rich and very good described with examples. (As you may already noticed). And also there are a lot of plugin libraries components, which is ready-to-use out of the box. In my own case I was needed for a editable material react tables, and have found them in via google in 5 seconds or so. In my project tables are everything and they present the product (price comparison) so that's why I choose material myself.
You could compare component libraries via google trends or github stars, but in your own case with: Collapse-able Side Menu, Tables with pagination, Auto complete Select I would choose MaterialUI.
As for cons, visually Material Style is very populated by devs (cause it's Android's app default theme) and some people thinks that it looks a bit ugly, but I thought it couldn't be a problem because you could always customize your own theme.
And as mentioned Kleo is his original answer:
If you have the time, dedication and resources, there is really nothing wrong with mixing them together. But you just need to think about the time/cost/benifit of it. DIY to make the end user happy, even if you mix them. Totally yourself is remaking the wheel, but you can always pull in boostrap styles etc.
I'm considering using Blueprintjs in an application.
Is it possible to use custom SVG icons in the button, menu and navbar components? All the examples I've seen use the built-in icon set.
The app I'm developing would rely heavily on custom icons so being restricted to the built-in set wouldn't work.
Seems like it would be an obvious thing to be able to do, so I presume I'm just not finding the samples. If anyone could point me to some, I'd appreciate it.
Custom icons are currently unsupported in the core components. You should follow this issue for future updates that might enable support for this kind of use case: https://github.com/palantir/blueprint/issues/365
I'm very new to Angular's material design and I'm finding it hard to locate and proper tutorial for beginners. I am wanting to know if it is possible to use a predefined color palette(css) with the $mdThemingProvider? Is there any proper documentation that can explain to me what $mdThemingProvider actually does code wise. Any help would be much appreciated!
While it is possible to style your AngularJS Material Design objects with CSS (like any other HTML elements), it is not the recommended way. Instead, the AngularJS Material Design package provides us with themes that will allow for simple full-ui color changes in the future (and for our users to pick).
Firstly, read this page. From a code standpoint, it truly is what you need to know. You'll want to reference it often.
Secondly, and unfortunately, they don't really offer an easy way to create a new palette of colors for within your theme. In order to do that, you need to specify a hex code for all of the main color options in a palette OR extend a default palette and modify just a couple colors. I've created a theme generator to help you through this process and make things a little easier, which you can use here.
Thirdly, the big one when coming from more traditional setups is the need for "Warning" or "Success" themes that allow for operation-oriented themeing instead of site-wide themeing. There are many discussions about this across the net, but I'd recommend creating a theme for each of these typical "states" for use throughout your application. This allows you to use secondary palettes within any particular state- like being able to invert a warning theme without needing to rewrite the CSS. Here is a discussion about this.
In the end- it takes a change in perspective to theme with this package, much like it did when using AngularJS the first time after jQuery/Prototype.
Cheers!
I have started with this:
Configuring a theme
I am confused with angular material design and material css.
Why do both have different layout and grids?
What is the equivalent for bootstrap container in angular material design?
Shall I use angular material design for my project comparing with bootstrap?
The main reason to go with Angular Material is because it is based on Flexible Box Layout specification, witch is a W3C standard Flexible Box.
The closer tag for bootstrap container could be: <div layout="row" layout-wrap></div>
Angular Material Design does not have an exact equivalent to a Bootstrap container because Material Design (AMD) is more flexible. A container has 8 sections. AMD has the layout and flex attributes. AMD's flex can increment by 5% (20 sections in BS) or by 33 and 66 (2 sections) or by combinations of 5%, 33% and 66%, which can go to more than 100% (most any number of sections) in which case multiple lines are automatically created. The best single page with examples that I've found, so far, is https://material.angularjs.org/#/layout/grid Click on the Source box above each example to get more specifics about AMD's HTML syntax for layout and flex.
You have further flexibility via Child Alignment, which controls spacing between each div in horizontal and vertical. Click the radio buttons on that page to see how divs are centered, or spread, or pushed to one end, or lifted to the top, etc.
The HTML syntax displayed will work on a set sized page. If you want the equivalent of media-queries to change sizes for different devices, you have some further coding to do to make angular controllers. Look at the DEMOS examples for various components to get an idea.
Angular Material grid > Bootstrap grid, especially for Angular applications. Bootstrap grid uses float, which is outdated compared to flexible box model. float replaced the horrendous table layouts, but now flexible box model is starting to push float aside (for grid layouts). Just note that you need to add certain suffixes in your CSS for older browsers. See this CSS Tricks article for an example of how to implement flex for older browsers. Bootstrap grid applications also require you to create an endless amount of divs, which looks terrible and should be avoided in any application using HTML5. Technically, you could write your own Angular directives to replace certain divs, and group them based on what or how they display, but then why not just use Angular Material when they have already done that for you?
Materialize is a modern responsiveCSS framework based on Material Design by Google.
And
Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JavaScript framework for developing responsive, mobile-first web sites.
So if you want new modern design i think you should go with material design. It has very nice animation too.
I was looking for an answer for the same question. I see some great comments here. Few additions as of December 2016: Bootstrap does have Flexbox support now. Check this link also check this link to make bootstrap use Flexbox by default by just changing a flag or download bootstrap-flex.css. As far as, grid support in material goes, use a grid demo here, there is a material flex-layout engine which looks great (I haven't tried it yet). It is very close to bootstrap grid. Check this link.
if you work with Angular, instead of using grid you should rather use flexbox, Angular provides a package for it:
https://github.com/angular/flex-layout
A huge advantage using it is the fact that you can use typescript public variables to the flex-layout directives (you can't do that with bootstrap). It also includes Observables for media query changes.
My requirement is a build a web form designer in a browser - just like how Zoho Creator (or something similar to other browser based designer tools like proto.io, protoshare, gomockingbird, lucidcharts etc).
Have a tool box/palate on one side, a canvas and a properties box that always shows the properties of the selected control.
I definitely don't think that using JQuery and working with DOM elements will give a scalable solution like these (proto.io, lucidchart etc.). After numerous trials, I feel that AngularJS is the way to go, but it does not have native support for drag-drop and hence I want inputs from community members like you may have more experience with AngularJS on whether what I am setting out to do, is Angularjs the right framework to use for this kind of a solution?
See screens shots of tools like Proto.io - something very similar to what I am setting out to build. Just that my palate will contain form controls like textbox, label etc which I will drag and drop on the canvas instead of the shapes that proto.io has.
Angular is fine. But the main idea of these kind of frameworks like Angular, Dojo, backbone is to structure your application with a specific designed pattern.Hence getting benefit from that pattern. And Angular will help you construct your app into MV* pattern. i may think what you need now is a graph library that support things with canvas , drag-drop , palettes, templates, overview, etc. Some may be useful are JointJS, MxGraph,Draw2D, Data-driven Documents, gojs, mindfusion.
Draw2D supports Angular as well. The lib has a boilerplate app whichs shows
how to use the draw2d stuff in combination with angluar.
The examples shows how to structure your app with Controller, Factories and two way
data binding.
I think you can use the draw2d boilderplate with any other DragDrop lib. It's just
a pattern how to integrate a third party lib into angular.
Angular has many hooks and pattern which supports any kind of lib
Greetings
Andreas