Query to fetch data between two characters in informix - database

I have a value in informix which is like this :
value AMOUNT: <15000000.00> USD
I need to fetch 15000000.00 afrom the above.
I am using this query to fetch the data between <> as workaround
select substring (value[15,40]
from 1 for length (value[15,40]) -5 )
from tablename p where value like 'AMOUNT%';
But, this is not generic as the lenght may vary.
Please help me with a generic query for this, fetch the data between <>.
The database I am using is Informix version 9.4.

It's a diabolical problem, created by whoever chose to break one of the fundamental rules of database design: that the content of a column should be a single, indivisible value.
The best solution would be to modify the table to contain a value_descr = "AMOUNT", a value = 15000000.00, and a value_type = "USD", and ensure that the incoming data is stored in that fashion. Easier said than done, I know.
Failing that, you'll have to write a UDR that parses the string and returns the numeric portion of it. This would be feasible in SPL, but probably very slow. Something along the lines of:
CREATE PROCEDURE extract_value (inp VARCHAR(255)) RETURNING DECIMAL;
DEFINE s SMALLINT;
DEFINE l SMALLINT;
DEFINE i SMALLINT;
FOR i = 1 TO LENGTH(inp)
IF SUBSTR(inp, i, 1) = "<" THEN
LET s = i + 1;
ELIF SUBSTR(inp, i, 1) = ">" THEN
LET l = i - s - 1;
RETURN SUBSTR(inp, s, l)::DECIMAL;
END IF;
END FOR;
RETURN NULL::DECIMAL; -- could not parse out number
END PROCEDURE;
... which you would execute thus:
SELECT extract_value(p.value)
FROM tablename AS p
WHERE p.value LIKE 'AMOUNT%'
NB: that procedure compiles and produces output in my limited testing on version 11.5. There is no validation done to ensure the string between the <> parses as a number. I don't have an instance of 9.4 handy, but I haven't used any features not available in 9.4 TTBOMK.

Related

SQL Server query using case statement IN Clause doesn't work [duplicate]

What are the best workarounds for using a SQL IN clause with instances of java.sql.PreparedStatement, which is not supported for multiple values due to SQL injection attack security issues: One ? placeholder represents one value, rather than a list of values.
Consider the following SQL statement:
SELECT my_column FROM my_table where search_column IN (?)
Using preparedStatement.setString( 1, "'A', 'B', 'C'" ); is essentially a non-working attempt at a workaround of the reasons for using ? in the first place.
What workarounds are available?
An analysis of the various options available, and the pros and cons of each is available in Jeanne Boyarsky's Batching Select Statements in JDBC entry on JavaRanch Journal.
The suggested options are:
Prepare SELECT my_column FROM my_table WHERE search_column = ?, execute it for each value and UNION the results client-side. Requires only one prepared statement. Slow and painful.
Prepare SELECT my_column FROM my_table WHERE search_column IN (?,?,?) and execute it. Requires one prepared statement per size-of-IN-list. Fast and obvious.
Prepare SELECT my_column FROM my_table WHERE search_column = ? ; SELECT my_column FROM my_table WHERE search_column = ? ; ... and execute it. [Or use UNION ALL in place of those semicolons. --ed] Requires one prepared statement per size-of-IN-list. Stupidly slow, strictly worse than WHERE search_column IN (?,?,?), so I don't know why the blogger even suggested it.
Use a stored procedure to construct the result set.
Prepare N different size-of-IN-list queries; say, with 2, 10, and 50 values. To search for an IN-list with 6 different values, populate the size-10 query so that it looks like SELECT my_column FROM my_table WHERE search_column IN (1,2,3,4,5,6,6,6,6,6). Any decent server will optimize out the duplicate values before running the query.
None of these options are ideal.
The best option if you are using JDBC4 and a server that supports x = ANY(y), is to use PreparedStatement.setArray as described in Boris's anwser.
There doesn't seem to be any way to make setArray work with IN-lists, though.
Sometimes SQL statements are loaded at runtime (e.g., from a properties file) but require a variable number of parameters. In such cases, first define the query:
query=SELECT * FROM table t WHERE t.column IN (?)
Next, load the query. Then determine the number of parameters prior to running it. Once the parameter count is known, run:
sql = any( sql, count );
For example:
/**
* Converts a SQL statement containing exactly one IN clause to an IN clause
* using multiple comma-delimited parameters.
*
* #param sql The SQL statement string with one IN clause.
* #param params The number of parameters the SQL statement requires.
* #return The SQL statement with (?) replaced with multiple parameter
* placeholders.
*/
public static String any(String sql, final int params) {
// Create a comma-delimited list based on the number of parameters.
final StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(
String.join(", ", Collections.nCopies(possibleValue.size(), "?")));
// For more than 1 parameter, replace the single parameter with
// multiple parameter placeholders.
if (sb.length() > 1) {
sql = sql.replace("(?)", "(" + sb + ")");
}
// Return the modified comma-delimited list of parameters.
return sql;
}
For certain databases where passing an array via the JDBC 4 specification is unsupported, this method can facilitate transforming the slow = ? into the faster IN (?) clause condition, which can then be expanded by calling the any method.
Solution for PostgreSQL:
final PreparedStatement statement = connection.prepareStatement(
"SELECT my_column FROM my_table where search_column = ANY (?)"
);
final String[] values = getValues();
statement.setArray(1, connection.createArrayOf("text", values));
try (ResultSet rs = statement.executeQuery()) {
while(rs.next()) {
// do some...
}
}
or
final PreparedStatement statement = connection.prepareStatement(
"SELECT my_column FROM my_table " +
"where search_column IN (SELECT * FROM unnest(?))"
);
final String[] values = getValues();
statement.setArray(1, connection.createArrayOf("text", values));
try (ResultSet rs = statement.executeQuery()) {
while(rs.next()) {
// do some...
}
}
No simple way AFAIK.
If the target is to keep statement cache ratio high (i.e to not create a statement per every parameter count), you may do the following:
create a statement with a few (e.g. 10) parameters:
... WHERE A IN (?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?) ...
Bind all actuall parameters
setString(1,"foo");
setString(2,"bar");
Bind the rest as NULL
setNull(3,Types.VARCHAR)
...
setNull(10,Types.VARCHAR)
NULL never matches anything, so it gets optimized out by the SQL plan builder.
The logic is easy to automate when you pass a List into a DAO function:
while( i < param.size() ) {
ps.setString(i+1,param.get(i));
i++;
}
while( i < MAX_PARAMS ) {
ps.setNull(i+1,Types.VARCHAR);
i++;
}
You can use Collections.nCopies to generate a collection of placeholders and join them using String.join:
List<String> params = getParams();
String placeHolders = String.join(",", Collections.nCopies(params.size(), "?"));
String sql = "select * from your_table where some_column in (" + placeHolders + ")";
try ( Connection connection = getConnection();
PreparedStatement ps = connection.prepareStatement(sql)) {
int i = 1;
for (String param : params) {
ps.setString(i++, param);
}
/*
* Execute query/do stuff
*/
}
An unpleasant work-around, but certainly feasible is to use a nested query. Create a temporary table MYVALUES with a column in it. Insert your list of values into the MYVALUES table. Then execute
select my_column from my_table where search_column in ( SELECT value FROM MYVALUES )
Ugly, but a viable alternative if your list of values is very large.
This technique has the added advantage of potentially better query plans from the optimizer (check a page for multiple values, tablescan only once instead once per value, etc) may save on overhead if your database doesn't cache prepared statements. Your "INSERTS" would need to be done in batch and the MYVALUES table may need to be tweaked to have minimal locking or other high-overhead protections.
Limitations of the in() operator is the root of all evil.
It works for trivial cases, and you can extend it with "automatic generation of the prepared statement" however it is always having its limits.
if you're creating a statement with variable number of parameters, that will make an sql parse overhead at each call
on many platforms, the number of parameters of in() operator are limited
on all platforms, total SQL text size is limited, making impossible for sending down 2000 placeholders for the in params
sending down bind variables of 1000-10k is not possible, as the JDBC driver is having its limitations
The in() approach can be good enough for some cases, but not rocket proof :)
The rocket-proof solution is to pass the arbitrary number of parameters in a separate call (by passing a clob of params, for example), and then have a view (or any other way) to represent them in SQL and use in your where criteria.
A brute-force variant is here http://tkyte.blogspot.hu/2006/06/varying-in-lists.html
However if you can use PL/SQL, this mess can become pretty neat.
function getCustomers(in_customerIdList clob) return sys_refcursor is
begin
aux_in_list.parse(in_customerIdList);
open res for
select *
from customer c,
in_list v
where c.customer_id=v.token;
return res;
end;
Then you can pass arbitrary number of comma separated customer ids in the parameter, and:
will get no parse delay, as the SQL for select is stable
no pipelined functions complexity - it is just one query
the SQL is using a simple join, instead of an IN operator, which is quite fast
after all, it is a good rule of thumb of not hitting the database with any plain select or DML, since it is Oracle, which offers lightyears of more than MySQL or similar simple database engines. PL/SQL allows you to hide the storage model from your application domain model in an effective way.
The trick here is:
we need a call which accepts the long string, and store somewhere where the db session can access to it (e.g. simple package variable, or dbms_session.set_context)
then we need a view which can parse this to rows
and then you have a view which contains the ids you're querying, so all you need is a simple join to the table queried.
The view looks like:
create or replace view in_list
as
select
trim( substr (txt,
instr (txt, ',', 1, level ) + 1,
instr (txt, ',', 1, level+1)
- instr (txt, ',', 1, level) -1 ) ) as token
from (select ','||aux_in_list.getpayload||',' txt from dual)
connect by level <= length(aux_in_list.getpayload)-length(replace(aux_in_list.getpayload,',',''))+1
where aux_in_list.getpayload refers to the original input string.
A possible approach would be to pass pl/sql arrays (supported by Oracle only), however you can't use those in pure SQL, therefore a conversion step is always needed. The conversion can not be done in SQL, so after all, passing a clob with all parameters in string and converting it witin a view is the most efficient solution.
Here's how I solved it in my own application. Ideally, you should use a StringBuilder instead of using + for Strings.
String inParenthesis = "(?";
for(int i = 1;i < myList.size();i++) {
inParenthesis += ", ?";
}
inParenthesis += ")";
try(PreparedStatement statement = SQLite.connection.prepareStatement(
String.format("UPDATE table SET value='WINNER' WHERE startTime=? AND name=? AND traderIdx=? AND someValue IN %s", inParenthesis))) {
int x = 1;
statement.setLong(x++, race.startTime);
statement.setString(x++, race.name);
statement.setInt(x++, traderIdx);
for(String str : race.betFair.winners) {
statement.setString(x++, str);
}
int effected = statement.executeUpdate();
}
Using a variable like x above instead of concrete numbers helps a lot if you decide to change the query at a later time.
I've never tried it, but would .setArray() do what you're looking for?
Update: Evidently not. setArray only seems to work with a java.sql.Array that comes from an ARRAY column that you've retrieved from a previous query, or a subquery with an ARRAY column.
My workaround is:
create or replace type split_tbl as table of varchar(32767);
/
create or replace function split
(
p_list varchar2,
p_del varchar2 := ','
) return split_tbl pipelined
is
l_idx pls_integer;
l_list varchar2(32767) := p_list;
l_value varchar2(32767);
begin
loop
l_idx := instr(l_list,p_del);
if l_idx > 0 then
pipe row(substr(l_list,1,l_idx-1));
l_list := substr(l_list,l_idx+length(p_del));
else
pipe row(l_list);
exit;
end if;
end loop;
return;
end split;
/
Now you can use one variable to obtain some values in a table:
select * from table(split('one,two,three'))
one
two
three
select * from TABLE1 where COL1 in (select * from table(split('value1,value2')))
value1 AAA
value2 BBB
So, the prepared statement could be:
"select * from TABLE where COL in (select * from table(split(?)))"
Regards,
Javier Ibanez
I suppose you could (using basic string manipulation) generate the query string in the PreparedStatement to have a number of ?'s matching the number of items in your list.
Of course if you're doing that you're just a step away from generating a giant chained OR in your query, but without having the right number of ? in the query string, I don't see how else you can work around this.
You could use setArray method as mentioned in this javadoc:
PreparedStatement statement = connection.prepareStatement("Select * from emp where field in (?)");
Array array = statement.getConnection().createArrayOf("VARCHAR", new Object[]{"E1", "E2","E3"});
statement.setArray(1, array);
ResultSet rs = statement.executeQuery();
Here's a complete solution in Java to create the prepared statement for you:
/*usage:
Util u = new Util(500); //500 items per bracket.
String sqlBefore = "select * from myTable where (";
List<Integer> values = new ArrayList<Integer>(Arrays.asList(1,2,4,5));
string sqlAfter = ") and foo = 'bar'";
PreparedStatement ps = u.prepareStatements(sqlBefore, values, sqlAfter, connection, "someId");
*/
import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.PreparedStatement;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
public class Util {
private int numValuesInClause;
public Util(int numValuesInClause) {
super();
this.numValuesInClause = numValuesInClause;
}
public int getNumValuesInClause() {
return numValuesInClause;
}
public void setNumValuesInClause(int numValuesInClause) {
this.numValuesInClause = numValuesInClause;
}
/** Split a given list into a list of lists for the given size of numValuesInClause*/
public List<List<Integer>> splitList(
List<Integer> values) {
List<List<Integer>> newList = new ArrayList<List<Integer>>();
while (values.size() > numValuesInClause) {
List<Integer> sublist = values.subList(0,numValuesInClause);
List<Integer> values2 = values.subList(numValuesInClause, values.size());
values = values2;
newList.add( sublist);
}
newList.add(values);
return newList;
}
/**
* Generates a series of split out in clause statements.
* #param sqlBefore ""select * from dual where ("
* #param values [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]
* #param "sqlAfter ) and id = 5"
* #return "select * from dual where (id in (1,2,3) or id in (4,5,6) or id in (7,8,9) or id in (10)"
*/
public String genInClauseSql(String sqlBefore, List<Integer> values,
String sqlAfter, String identifier)
{
List<List<Integer>> newLists = splitList(values);
String stmt = sqlBefore;
/* now generate the in clause for each list */
int j = 0; /* keep track of list:newLists index */
for (List<Integer> list : newLists) {
stmt = stmt + identifier +" in (";
StringBuilder innerBuilder = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 0; i < list.size(); i++) {
innerBuilder.append("?,");
}
String inClause = innerBuilder.deleteCharAt(
innerBuilder.length() - 1).toString();
stmt = stmt + inClause;
stmt = stmt + ")";
if (++j < newLists.size()) {
stmt = stmt + " OR ";
}
}
stmt = stmt + sqlAfter;
return stmt;
}
/**
* Method to convert your SQL and a list of ID into a safe prepared
* statements
*
* #throws SQLException
*/
public PreparedStatement prepareStatements(String sqlBefore,
ArrayList<Integer> values, String sqlAfter, Connection c, String identifier)
throws SQLException {
/* First split our potentially big list into lots of lists */
String stmt = genInClauseSql(sqlBefore, values, sqlAfter, identifier);
PreparedStatement ps = c.prepareStatement(stmt);
int i = 1;
for (int val : values)
{
ps.setInt(i++, val);
}
return ps;
}
}
Spring allows passing java.util.Lists to NamedParameterJdbcTemplate , which automates the generation of (?, ?, ?, ..., ?), as appropriate for the number of arguments.
For Oracle, this blog posting discusses the use of oracle.sql.ARRAY (Connection.createArrayOf doesn't work with Oracle). For this you have to modify your SQL statement:
SELECT my_column FROM my_table where search_column IN (select COLUMN_VALUE from table(?))
The oracle table function transforms the passed array into a table like value usable in the IN statement.
try using the instr function?
select my_column from my_table where instr(?, ','||search_column||',') > 0
then
ps.setString(1, ",A,B,C,");
Admittedly this is a bit of a dirty hack, but it does reduce the opportunities for sql injection. Works in oracle anyway.
Sormula supports SQL IN operator by allowing you to supply a java.util.Collection object as a parameter. It creates a prepared statement with a ? for each of the elements the collection. See Example 4 (SQL in example is a comment to clarify what is created but is not used by Sormula).
Generate the query string in the PreparedStatement to have a number of ?'s matching the number of items in your list. Here's an example:
public void myQuery(List<String> items, int other) {
...
String q4in = generateQsForIn(items.size());
String sql = "select * from stuff where foo in ( " + q4in + " ) and bar = ?";
PreparedStatement ps = connection.prepareStatement(sql);
int i = 1;
for (String item : items) {
ps.setString(i++, item);
}
ps.setInt(i++, other);
ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery();
...
}
private String generateQsForIn(int numQs) {
String items = "";
for (int i = 0; i < numQs; i++) {
if (i != 0) items += ", ";
items += "?";
}
return items;
}
instead of using
SELECT my_column FROM my_table where search_column IN (?)
use the Sql Statement as
select id, name from users where id in (?, ?, ?)
and
preparedStatement.setString( 1, 'A');
preparedStatement.setString( 2,'B');
preparedStatement.setString( 3, 'C');
or use a stored procedure this would be the best solution, since the sql statements will be compiled and stored in DataBase server
I came across a number of limitations related to prepared statement:
The prepared statements are cached only inside the same session (Postgres), so it will really work only with connection pooling
A lot of different prepared statements as proposed by #BalusC may cause the cache to overfill and previously cached statements will be dropped
The query has to be optimized and use indices. Sounds obvious, however e.g. the ANY(ARRAY...) statement proposed by #Boris in one of the top answers cannot use indices and query will be slow despite caching
The prepared statement caches the query plan as well and the actual values of any parameters specified in the statement are unavailable.
Among the proposed solutions I would choose the one that doesn't decrease the query performance and makes the less number of queries. This will be the #4 (batching few queries) from the #Don link or specifying NULL values for unneeded '?' marks as proposed by #Vladimir Dyuzhev
SetArray is the best solution but its not available for many older drivers. The following workaround can be used in java8
String baseQuery ="SELECT my_column FROM my_table where search_column IN (%s)"
String markersString = inputArray.stream().map(e -> "?").collect(joining(","));
String sqlQuery = String.format(baseSQL, markersString);
//Now create Prepared Statement and use loop to Set entries
int index=1;
for (String input : inputArray) {
preparedStatement.setString(index++, input);
}
This solution is better than other ugly while loop solutions where the query string is built by manual iterations
I just worked out a PostgreSQL-specific option for this. It's a bit of a hack, and comes with its own pros and cons and limitations, but it seems to work and isn't limited to a specific development language, platform, or PG driver.
The trick of course is to find a way to pass an arbitrary length collection of values as a single parameter, and have the db recognize it as multiple values. The solution I have working is to construct a delimited string from the values in the collection, pass that string as a single parameter, and use string_to_array() with the requisite casting for PostgreSQL to properly make use of it.
So if you want to search for "foo", "blah", and "abc", you might concatenate them together into a single string as: 'foo,blah,abc'. Here's the straight SQL:
select column from table
where search_column = any (string_to_array('foo,blah,abc', ',')::text[]);
You would obviously change the explicit cast to whatever you wanted your resulting value array to be -- int, text, uuid, etc. And because the function is taking a single string value (or two I suppose, if you want to customize the delimiter as well), you can pass it as a parameter in a prepared statement:
select column from table
where search_column = any (string_to_array($1, ',')::text[]);
This is even flexible enough to support things like LIKE comparisons:
select column from table
where search_column like any (string_to_array('foo%,blah%,abc%', ',')::text[]);
Again, no question it's a hack, but it works and allows you to still use pre-compiled prepared statements that take *ahem* discrete parameters, with the accompanying security and (maybe) performance benefits. Is it advisable and actually performant? Naturally, it depends, as you've got string parsing and possibly casting going on before your query even runs. If you're expecting to send three, five, a few dozen values, sure, it's probably fine. A few thousand? Yeah, maybe not so much. YMMV, limitations and exclusions apply, no warranty express or implied.
But it works.
No one else seems to have suggested using an off-the-shelf query builder yet, like jOOQ or QueryDSL or even Criteria Query that manage dynamic IN lists out of the box, possibly including the management of all edge cases that may arise, such as:
Running into Oracle's maximum of 1000 elements per IN list (irrespective of the number of bind values)
Running into any driver's maximum number of bind values, which I've documented in this answer
Running into cursor cache contention problems because too many distinct SQL strings are "hard parsed" and execution plans cannot be cached anymore (jOOQ and since recently also Hibernate work around this by offering IN list padding)
(Disclaimer: I work for the company behind jOOQ)
Just for completeness: So long as the set of values is not too large, you could also simply string-construct a statement like
... WHERE tab.col = ? OR tab.col = ? OR tab.col = ?
which you could then pass to prepare(), and then use setXXX() in a loop to set all the values. This looks yucky, but many "big" commercial systems routinely do this kind of thing until they hit DB-specific limits, such as 32 KB (I think it is) for statements in Oracle.
Of course you need to ensure that the set will never be unreasonably large, or do error trapping in the event that it is.
Following Adam's idea. Make your prepared statement sort of select my_column from my_table where search_column in (#)
Create a String x and fill it with a number of "?,?,?" depending on your list of values
Then just change the # in the query for your new String x an populate
There are different alternative approaches that we can use for IN clause in PreparedStatement.
Using Single Queries - slowest performance and resource intensive
Using StoredProcedure - Fastest but database specific
Creating dynamic query for PreparedStatement - Good Performance but doesn't get benefit of caching and PreparedStatement is recompiled every time.
Use NULL in PreparedStatement queries - Optimal performance, works great when you know the limit of IN clause arguments. If there is no limit, then you can execute queries in batch.
Sample code snippet is;
int i = 1;
for(; i <=ids.length; i++){
ps.setInt(i, ids[i-1]);
}
//set null for remaining ones
for(; i<=PARAM_SIZE;i++){
ps.setNull(i, java.sql.Types.INTEGER);
}
You can check more details about these alternative approaches here.
For some situations regexp might help.
Here is an example I've checked on Oracle, and it works.
select * from my_table where REGEXP_LIKE (search_column, 'value1|value2')
But there is a number of drawbacks with it:
Any column it applied should be converted to varchar/char, at least implicitly.
Need to be careful with special characters.
It can slow down performance - in my case IN version uses index and range scan, and REGEXP version do full scan.
After examining various solutions in different forums and not finding a good solution, I feel the below hack I came up with, is the easiest to follow and code:
Example: Suppose you have multiple parameters to pass in the 'IN' clause. Just put a dummy String inside the 'IN' clause, say, "PARAM" do denote the list of parameters that will be coming in the place of this dummy String.
select * from TABLE_A where ATTR IN (PARAM);
You can collect all the parameters into a single String variable in your Java code. This can be done as follows:
String param1 = "X";
String param2 = "Y";
String param1 = param1.append(",").append(param2);
You can append all your parameters separated by commas into a single String variable, 'param1', in our case.
After collecting all the parameters into a single String you can just replace the dummy text in your query, i.e., "PARAM" in this case, with the parameter String, i.e., param1. Here is what you need to do:
String query = query.replaceFirst("PARAM",param1); where we have the value of query as
query = "select * from TABLE_A where ATTR IN (PARAM)";
You can now execute your query using the executeQuery() method. Just make sure that you don't have the word "PARAM" in your query anywhere. You can use a combination of special characters and alphabets instead of the word "PARAM" in order to make sure that there is no possibility of such a word coming in the query. Hope you got the solution.
Note: Though this is not a prepared query, it does the work that I wanted my code to do.
Just for completeness and because I did not see anyone else suggest it:
Before implementing any of the complicated suggestions above consider if SQL injection is indeed a problem in your scenario.
In many cases the value provided to IN (...) is a list of ids that have been generated in a way that you can be sure that no injection is possible... (e.g. the results of a previous select some_id from some_table where some_condition.)
If that is the case you might just concatenate this value and not use the services or the prepared statement for it or use them for other parameters of this query.
query="select f1,f2 from t1 where f3=? and f2 in (" + sListOfIds + ");";
PreparedStatement doesn't provide any good way to deal with SQL IN clause. Per http://www.javaranch.com/journal/200510/Journal200510.jsp#a2 "You can't substitute things that are meant to become part of the SQL statement. This is necessary because if the SQL itself can change, the driver can't precompile the statement. It also has the nice side effect of preventing SQL injection attacks." I ended up using following approach:
String query = "SELECT my_column FROM my_table where search_column IN ($searchColumns)";
query = query.replace("$searchColumns", "'A', 'B', 'C'");
Statement stmt = connection.createStatement();
boolean hasResults = stmt.execute(query);
do {
if (hasResults)
return stmt.getResultSet();
hasResults = stmt.getMoreResults();
} while (hasResults || stmt.getUpdateCount() != -1);
OK, so I couldn't remember exactly how (or where) I did this before so I came to stack overflow to quickly find the answer. I was surprised I couldn't.
So, how I got around the IN problem a long time ago was with a statement like this:
where myColumn in ( select regexp_substr(:myList,'[^,]+', 1, level) from dual connect by regexp_substr(:myList, '[^,]+', 1, level) is not null)
set the myList parameter as a comma delimited string: A,B,C,D...
Note: You have to set the parameter twice!
This is not the ideal practice, yet it's simple and works well for me most of the time.
where ? like concat( "%|", TABLE_ID , "|%" )
Then you pass through ? the IDs in this way: |1|,|2|,|3|,...|

Entity Framework updates with wrong values after insert

This issue is discovered because I have an object with a field calculated off the ID, which contains the ID as part of it with a prefix and a checksum digit. It is a requirement that these calculated values are unique, but they also cannot be random, so this seemed the best way to do it.
The code in question looks like this:
entity = new Entity() { /* values */ };
context.SaveChanges(); //generate the ID field
entity.CALCULATED_FIELD = CalculateField(prefix, entity.ID);
This works just fine in 99% of cases, but occasionally we get a value in the database which looks like:
ID: 1234
CALCULATED_FIELD : prefix000{1233}8
EXPECTED: prefix000{1234}3
With the parts in the braces being calculated from the ID column.
The fact that the calculated field is incorrect is bad enough, but the implication is that upon doing a savechanges, there is no guarantee that the row returned to Entity Framework is the one which was originally worked on! I am looking into using a stored procedure on insert in order to fix the generated field problem, but in the long run we're going to have lots of bad data if we keep working on the wrong rows.
When I told entity framework to map the table to stored procedures it generated the following boilerplate code:
INSERT [dbo].[tableName](fields...)
VALUES(values...)
DECLARE #ID int
SELECT #ID = [ID]
FROM [dbo].[tableName]
WHERE ##ROWCOUNT > 0 AND [ID] = scope_identity()
SELECT t0.[ID]
FROM [dbo].[tableName] as t0
WHERE ##ROWCOUNT > 0 AND t0.[ID] = #ID
The best idea I can come up with is that an extra insert could occur before scope_identity() is called. We are migrating this system from using stored procedures where we used ##IDENTITY in place instead, could there be a difference there?
EDIT: CalculateField:
public static string CalculateField(string prefix, int ID)
{
var calculated = prefix.PadRight(17 - ID.ToString().Length)
.Replace(" ", "0") + ID.ToString();
var multiplier = 3;
var sum = 0;
foreach (char c in calculated.ToCharArray().Reverse())
{
sum += multiplier * int.Parse(c.ToString());
multiplier = 4 - multiplier;
}
if (sum % 10 == 0) { return calculated + "0"; }
return calculated + (10 - (sum % 10)).ToString();
}
UPDATE: Changing the called method from static to an instance method and only running it later after additional changed were made instead of straight after creation appears to have solved the problem, for reasons I can't comprehend. I'm leaving the question open for now since I don't yet have a large enough sample to be completely sure the problem is resolved, and also because I have no explanation for what really changed.

Need to eliminate the last 4 characters in a string(varchar)

i am using a stored procedure, where it is taking policy number as parameter which is varchar. I need to eliminate the last 4 characters of the policy number when we retrive from the tables. But the data for policy numbers is not consistent, so I am confused how to use the logic for this. The sample policy numbers are:
KSDRE0021-000
APDRE-10-21-000
KSDRE0021
APDRE-10-21
These are four formats where policies are there in our tables.For some policies there is no tailing end '-000', so that is the challenging part. Now, I need to eliminate the tailing part '-000' from the policies when I retrieve the data from tables.
This is the sample code, which is pulling the policy data from tables.
Create Proc usp.dbo.policydataSP #policy_num varchar(18)
AS
Begin
Select * from policy_table pt
where pt.policy_num = #policy_num
End
STEP 1: Create a User Defined Function to normalize a policy number.
create function dbo.normalize_policy_num
(#policy_num varchar(100))
returns varchar(100)
as
begin
-- replace trailing digits
if (#policy_num like '%-[0-9][0-9][0-9]')
set #policy_num = left(#policy_num, len(#policy_num) - 4)
-- replace remaining hyphens
set #policy_num = replace(#policy_num, '-', '')
return #policy_num
end
What this essentially doing is stripping off the trailing '-000' from policy numbers that contain the pattern, then removing remaining hyphens. This function seems to work on your supplied policy numbers:
-- returns: KSDRE0021
select dbo.normalize_policy_num('KSDRE0021-000')
-- returns: APDRE1021
select dbo.normalize_policy_num('APDRE-10-21-000')
-- returns: KSDRE0021
select dbo.normalize_policy_num('KSDRE0021')
-- returns: APDRE1021
select dbo.normalize_policy_num('APDRE-10-21')
STEP 2: Modify your SP as follows:
create proc usp.dbo.policydataSP
#policy_num varchar(18)
as
begin
select
dbo.normalize_policy_num(pt.policy_num) as normalized_policy_num,
pt.*
from policy_table pt
where dbo.normalize_policy_num(#policy_num) = dbo.normalize_policy_num(pt.policy_num)
Note: If you are able to modify the table schema, you could add a persisted computed column using the UDF specified above. If you add an index to it, queries will run much faster. However, there will be some penalty for inserts, so there is a trade-off.
this is probably your best bet. Match the policy number up to the length of the requested parameter:
Create Proc usp.dbo.policydataSP
#policy_num varchar(18)
AS
Begin
Select * from policy_table pt where LEFT(len(#policy_num),pt.policy_num) = #policy_num
End
If you only want to strip -000 when returning results:
select case right(policy_num, 4)
when '-000' then left(policy_num, len(policy_num) - 4)
else policy_num end as policy_num
from policy_table pt
where pt.policy_num = #policy_num
If you want to strip any 3-digit value following a dash:
select case when policy_num like '%-[0-9][0-9][0-9]' then left(policy_num, len(policy_num) - 4)
else policy_num end as policy_num
from policy_table pt
where pt.policy_num = #policy_num

Problems with writing to a MS Access Database (Delphi)

I'm trying to write bits of code to a Microsoft access database from Delphi. I'm getting data from a TStringGrid. The first column has the ItemID, and the 2nd column has the Quantity. I'd like it to loop through the TStringGrid and save each row as a reperate row in my database and also save the Order ID with it on every column (The order ID stays the same for each order so that doesn't need to change) .
I'm getting an error when running which says
"Project Heatmat.exe raised an exception class EVarientInvalidArgError with message 'Invalid Argument'. Process Stopped."
I can't figure out why it's giving me this error, and as you can probably see i'm not very good at coding yet. Any help would be appreciated!
Thank you.
procedure TCreateNewOrder.btnSaveClick(Sender: TObject);
var
intNumber, count : integer;
begin
Count:= 0;
if messagedlg ('Are you sure?', mtWarning, [mbyes, mbno], 0) = mryes then
begin
with HeatmatConnection.HeatmatDatabase do
begin
intNumber:= TBLOrder.RecordCount;
TBLOrder.Append;
TBLOrder['CustomerID']:= CompanyName.ItemIndex+1;
TBLOrder['OrderID']:= intNumber +1;
for count:= 1 to StringGrid1.RowCount-1 do
begin
TBLOrderedItem.Append;
TBLOrderedItem['OrderID']:= intNumber+1;
TBLOrderedItem['ItemID']:= StringGrid1.Cells[1, count];
TBLOrderedItem['Quantity']:= StringGrid1.Cells[2, count];
TBLOrderedItem.Post;
end;
end;
end;
end;
TStringGrid cells are strings. trying to assign a string directly to a numeric field will raise an Exception.
So a good practice is to assign values to database fields via AsString, AsInteger, AsBoolean etc... this will make the correct conversion.
In your code use:
TBLOrderedItem.FieldByName('ItemID').AsString := StringGrid1.Cells[1, count];
The same is true for Quantity.
To assign an Integer value use:
TBLOrderedItem.FieldByName('OrderID').AsInteger := intNumber + 1;
BTW, you are forgetting TBLOrder.Post i.e:
....
TBLOrder.Append;
TBLOrder.FieldByName('CustomerID').AsInteger := CompanyName.ItemIndex + 1;
TBLOrder.FieldByName('OrderID').AsInteger := intNumber + 1;
TBLOrder.Post;
...
Finally, I would also suggest to rename TBLOrder to tblOrder so that it's name wont imply that it is a Type.

How to do hit-highlighting of results from a SQL Server full-text query

We have a web application that uses SQL Server 2008 as the database. Our users are able to do full-text searches on particular columns in the database. SQL Server's full-text functionality does not seem to provide support for hit highlighting. Do we need to build this ourselves or is there perhaps some library or knowledge around on how to do this?
BTW the application is written in C# so a .Net solution would be ideal but not necessary as we could translate.
Expanding on Ishmael's idea, it's not the final solution, but I think it's a good way to start.
Firstly we need to get the list of words that have been retrieved with the full-text engine:
declare #SearchPattern nvarchar(1000) = 'FORMSOF (INFLECTIONAL, " ' + #SearchString + ' ")'
declare #SearchWords table (Word varchar(100), Expansion_type int)
insert into #SearchWords
select distinct display_term, expansion_type
from sys.dm_fts_parser(#SearchPattern, 1033, 0, 0)
where special_term = 'Exact Match'
There is already quite a lot one can expand on, for example the search pattern is quite basic; also there are probably better ways to filter out the words you don't need, but it least it gives you a list of stem words etc. that would be matched by full-text search.
After you get the results you need, you can use RegEx to parse through the result set (or preferably only a subset to speed it up, although I haven't yet figured out a good way to do so). For this I simply use two while loops and a bunch of temporary table and variables:
declare #FinalResults table
while (select COUNT(*) from #PrelimResults) > 0
begin
select top 1 #CurrID = [UID], #Text = Text from #PrelimResults
declare #TextLength int = LEN(#Text )
declare #IndexOfDot int = CHARINDEX('.', REVERSE(#Text ), #TextLength - dbo.RegExIndexOf(#Text, '\b' + #FirstSearchWord + '\b') + 1)
set #Text = SUBSTRING(#Text, case #IndexOfDot when 0 then 0 else #TextLength - #IndexOfDot + 3 end, 300)
while (select COUNT(*) from #TempSearchWords) > 0
begin
select top 1 #CurrWord = Word from #TempSearchWords
set #Text = dbo.RegExReplace(#Text, '\b' + #CurrWord + '\b', '<b>' + SUBSTRING(#Text, dbo.RegExIndexOf(#Text, '\b' + #CurrWord + '\b'), LEN(#CurrWord) + 1) + '</b>')
delete from #TempSearchWords where Word = #CurrWord
end
insert into #FinalResults
select * from #PrelimResults where [UID] = #CurrID
delete from #PrelimResults where [UID] = #CurrID
end
Several notes:
1. Nested while loops probably aren't the most efficient way of doing it, however nothing else comes to mind. If I were to use cursors, it would essentially be the same thing?
2. #FirstSearchWord here to refers to the first instance in the text of one of the original search words, so essentially the text you are replacing is only going to be in the summary. Again, it's quite a basic method, some sort of text cluster finding algorithm would probably be handy.
3. To get RegEx in the first place, you need CLR user-defined functions.
It looks like you could parse the output of the new SQL Server 2008 stored procedure sys.dm_fts_parser and use regex, but I haven't looked at it too closely.
You might be missing the point of the database in this instance. Its job is to return the data to you that satisfies the conditions you gave it. I think you will want to implement the highlighting probably using regex in your web control.
Here is something a quick search would reveal.
http://www.dotnetjunkies.com/PrintContent.aspx?type=article&id=195E323C-78F3-4884-A5AA-3A1081AC3B35
Some details:
search_kiemeles=replace(lcase(search),"""","")
do while not rs.eof 'The search result loop
hirdetes=rs("hirdetes")
data=RegExpValueA("([A-Za-zöüóőúéáűíÖÜÓŐÚÉÁŰÍ0-9]+)",search_kiemeles) 'Give back all the search words in an array, I need non-english characters also
For i=0 to Ubound(data,1)
hirdetes = RegExpReplace(hirdetes,"("&NoAccentRE(data(i))&")","<em>$1</em>")
Next
response.write hirdetes
rs.movenext
Loop
...
Functions
'All Match to Array
Function RegExpValueA(patrn, strng)
Dim regEx
Set regEx = New RegExp ' Create a regular expression.
regEx.IgnoreCase = True ' Set case insensitivity.
regEx.Global = True
Dim Match, Matches, RetStr
Dim data()
Dim count
count = 0
Redim data(-1) 'VBSCript Ubound array bug workaround
if isnull(strng) or strng="" then
RegExpValueA = data
exit function
end if
regEx.Pattern = patrn ' Set pattern.
Set Matches = regEx.Execute(strng) ' Execute search.
For Each Match in Matches ' Iterate Matches collection.
count = count + 1
Redim Preserve data(count-1)
data(count-1) = Match.Value
Next
set regEx = nothing
RegExpValueA = data
End Function
'Replace non-english chars
Function NoAccentRE(accent_string)
NoAccentRE=accent_string
NoAccentRE=Replace(NoAccentRE,"a","§")
NoAccentRE=Replace(NoAccentRE,"á","§")
NoAccentRE=Replace(NoAccentRE,"§","[aá]")
NoAccentRE=Replace(NoAccentRE,"e","§")
NoAccentRE=Replace(NoAccentRE,"é","§")
NoAccentRE=Replace(NoAccentRE,"§","[eé]")
NoAccentRE=Replace(NoAccentRE,"i","§")
NoAccentRE=Replace(NoAccentRE,"í","§")
NoAccentRE=Replace(NoAccentRE,"§","[ií]")
NoAccentRE=Replace(NoAccentRE,"o","§")
NoAccentRE=Replace(NoAccentRE,"ó","§")
NoAccentRE=Replace(NoAccentRE,"ö","§")
NoAccentRE=Replace(NoAccentRE,"ő","§")
NoAccentRE=Replace(NoAccentRE,"§","[oóöő]")
NoAccentRE=Replace(NoAccentRE,"u","§")
NoAccentRE=Replace(NoAccentRE,"ú","§")
NoAccentRE=Replace(NoAccentRE,"ü","§")
NoAccentRE=Replace(NoAccentRE,"ű","§")
NoAccentRE=Replace(NoAccentRE,"§","[uúüű]")
end function

Resources