I am applying printf and/or other functions to a certain string of characters, read from a file. I want to skip the first 5 characters under certain conditions. Now I thought to be clever by, if the conditions apply, increasing the string pointer by 5:
if (strlen(nav_code) == 10 ) {nav_code = 5+nav_code;}
but the compiler refuses this:
error: assignment to expression with array type
What have I misunderstood? How to make my idea work - or is it a bad idea anyway?
It's probably becuase nav_code is not a pointer but a character array like char nav_code[50]. Try the following:
char nav_code[50];
char *nav_code_ptr = nav_code;
if (strlen(nav_code_ptr) == 10 ) {nav_code_ptr += 5;}
// forth on, use nav_code_ptr instead of nav_code
I am applying printf and/or other functions to a certain string of characters, read from a file. I want to skip the first 5 characters under certain conditions.
If printf is all what you need, then sure you can skip the first 5 characters.
Given nav_code is string (either char array or char pointer), then:
printf( "%s", nav_code + 5 ); // skip the first 5 characters
Of course you need to make sure your string has more than 5 characters, otherwise it's flat out illegal as out-of-bound access.
In your code, nav_code is an array and arrays cannot be assigned.
Instead, use a pointer, initialize that with the address of the first element of the array, make pointer arithmetic on that pointer and store the updated result back to the pointer.
I'm confused as to what is causing this behavior in my program. I'm just trying to copy the contents of one char* array to another and instead of copying the element, but it's concatenating the strings in a strange way. I'm doing something like this:
char* a[50];
char* b[50];
for(int n=0; n<x; n++){
a[n] = malloc(sizeof(char) * (1 + strlen(b[n])));
strcpy(a[n], b[n]);
}
Has anyone experienced this before? I can post my output if that helps.
Thanks.
A few issues:
You loop while n < x. What is x? If x >= 50, you'll run off the end of your arrays. Your loop condition needs to protect against this possibility.
Also, remember that the memory returned by malloc is uninitialized. It is good that you are allocating an extra byte for the NULL terminator. What you are missing is the code that actually sets the value of the NULL terminator. The consequence of this is that your a[] strings are most likely not NULL-terminated (the last character is whatever random garbage that was previously stored in that byte). When you try to print them out or use a string function like strlen on it, you'll read past the end of the string and into whatever happens to be sitting in the memory range that follows.
Trying using strncpy, note that you have add the null termination character at the end of a[n], This way you are sure to know what you are copying rather relying on the assumption that b[n] has null terminating character.
I have a little problem here with memcpy()
When I write this
char ipA[15], ipB[15];
size_t b = 15;
memcpy(ipA,line+15,b);
It copies b bytes from array line starting at 15th element (fine, this is what i want)
memcpy(ipB,line+31,b);
This copies b bytes from line starting at 31st element, but it also attaches to it the result for previous command i.e ipA.
Why? ipB size is 15, so it shouldnt have enough space to copy anything else. whats happening here?
result for ipA is 192.168.123.123
result for ipB becomes 205.123.123.122 192.168.123.123
Where am I wrong? I dont actually know alot about memory allocation in C.
It looks like you're not null-terminating the string in ipA. The compiler has put the two variables next to one another in memory, so string operations assume that the first null terminator is sometime after the second array (whenever the next 0 occurs in memory).
Try:
char ipA[16], ipB[16];
size_t b = 15;
memcpy(ipA,line+15,b);
ipA[15] = '\0';
memcpy(ipB,line+31,b);
ipB[15] = '\0';
printf("ipA: %s\nipB: %s\n", ipA, ipB)
This should confirm whether this is the problem. Obviously you could make the code a bit more elegant than my test code above. As an alternative to manually terminating, you could use printf("%.*s\n", b, ipA); or similar to force printf to print the correct number of characters.
Are you checking the content of the arrays by doing printf("%s", ipA) ? If so, you'll end up with the described effect since your array is interpreted as a C string which is not null terminated. Do this instead: printf("%.*s", sizeof(ipA), ipA)
Character strings in C require a terminating mark. It is the char value 0.
As your two character strings are contiguous in memory, if you don't terminate the first character string, then when reading it, you will continue until memory contains the end-of-string character.
I am new to C and I am very much confused with the C strings. Following are my questions.
Finding last character from a string
How can I find out the last character from a string? I came with something like,
char *str = "hello";
printf("%c", str[strlen(str) - 1]);
return 0;
Is this the way to go? I somehow think that, this is not the correct way because strlen has to iterate over the characters to get the length. So this operation will have a O(n) complexity.
Converting char to char*
I have a string and need to append a char to it. How can i do that? strcat accepts only char*. I tried the following,
char delimiter = ',';
char text[6];
strcpy(text, "hello");
strcat(text, delimiter);
Using strcat with variables that has local scope
Please consider the following code,
void foo(char *output)
{
char *delimiter = ',';
strcpy(output, "hello");
strcat(output, delimiter);
}
In the above code,delimiter is a local variable which gets destroyed after foo returned. Is it OK to append it to variable output?
How strcat handles null terminating character?
If I am concatenating two null terminated strings, will strcat append two null terminating characters to the resultant string?
Is there a good beginner level article which explains how strings work in C and how can I perform the usual string manipulations?
Any help would be great!
Last character: your approach is correct. If you will need to do this a lot on large strings, your data structure containing strings should store lengths with them. If not, it doesn't matter that it's O(n).
Appending a character: you have several bugs. For one thing, your buffer is too small to hold another character. As for how to call strcat, you can either put the character in a string (an array with 2 entries, the second being 0), or you can just manually use the length to write the character to the end.
Your worry about 2 nul terminators is unfounded. While it occupies memory contiguous with the string and is necessary, the nul byte at the end is NOT "part of the string" in the sense of length, etc. It's purely a marker of the end. strcat will overwrite the old nul and put a new one at the very end, after the concatenated string. Again, you need to make sure your buffer is large enough before you call strcat!
O(n) is the best you can do, because of the way C strings work.
char delimiter[] = ",";. This makes delimiter a character array holding a comma and a NUL Also, text needs to have length 7. hello is 5, then you have the comma, and a NUL.
If you define delimiter correctly, that's fine (as is, you're assigning a character to a pointer, which is wrong). The contents of output won't depend on delimiter later on.
It will overwrite the first NUL.
You're on the right track. I highly recommend you read K&R C 2nd Edition. It will help you with strings, pointers, and more. And don't forget man pages and documentation. They will answer questions like the one on strcat quite clearly. Two good sites are The Open Group and cplusplus.com.
A "C string" is in reality a simple array of chars, with str[0] containing the first character, str[1] the second and so on. After the last character, the array contains one more element, which holds a zero. This zero by convention signifies the end of the string. For example, those two lines are equivalent:
char str[] = "foo"; //str is 4 bytes
char str[] = {'f', 'o', 'o', 0};
And now for your questions:
Finding last character from a string
Your way is the right one. There is no faster way to know where the string ends than scanning through it to find the final zero.
Converting char to char*
As said before, a "string" is simply an array of chars, with a zero terminator added to the end. So if you want a string of one character, you declare an array of two chars - your character and the final zero, like this:
char str[2];
str[0] = ',';
str[1] = 0;
Or simply:
char str[2] = {',', 0};
Using strcat with variables that has local scope
strcat() simply copies the contents of the source array to the destination array, at the offset of the null character in the destination array. So it is irrelevant what happens to the source after the operation. But you DO need to worry if the destination array is big enough to hold the data - otherwise strcat() will overwrite whatever data sits in memory right after the array! The needed size is strlen(str1) + strlen(str2) + 1.
How strcat handles null terminating character?
The final zero is expected to terminate both input strings, and is appended to the output string.
Finding last character from a string
I propose a thought experiment: if it were generally possible to find the last character
of a string in better than O(n) time, then could you not also implement strlen
in better than O(n) time?
Converting char to char*
You temporarily can store the char in an array-of-char, and that will decay into
a pointer-to-char:
char delimiterBuf[2] = "";
delimiterBuf[0] = delimiter;
...
strcat(text, delimiterBuf);
If you're just using character literals, though, you can simply use string literals instead.
Using strcat with variables that has local scope
The variable itself isn't referenced outside the scope. When the function returns,
that local variable has already been evaluated and its contents have already been
copied.
How strcat handles null terminating character?
"Strings" in a C are NUL-terminated sequences of characters. Both inputs to
strcat must be NUL-terminated, and the result will be NUL-terminated. It
wouldn't be useful for strcat to write an extra NUL-byte to the result if it
doesn't need to.
(And if you're wondering what if the input strings have multiple trailing
NUL bytes already, I propose another thought experiment: how would strcat know
how many trailing NUL-bytes there are in a string?)
BTW, since you tagged this with "best-practices", I'll also recommend that you take care not to write past the end of your destination buffers. Typically this means avoiding strcat and strcpy (unless you've already checked that the input strings won't overflow the destination) and using safer versions (e.g. strncat. Note that strncpy has its own pitfalls, so that's a poor substitute. There also are safer versions that are non-standard, such as strlcpy/strlcat and strcpy_s/strcat_s.)
Similarly, functions like your foo function always should take an additional argument specifying what the size of the destination buffer is (and documentation should make it explicitly clear whether that size accounts for a NUL terminator or not).
How can I find out the last character
from a string?
Your technique with str[strlen(str) - 1] is fine. As pointed out, you should avoid repeated, unnecessary calls to strlen and store the results.
I somehow think that, this is not the
correct way because strlen has to
iterate over the characters to get the
length. So this operation will have a
O(n) complexity.
Repeated calls to strlen can be a bane of C programs. However, you should avoid premature optimization. If a profiler actually demonstrates a hotspot where strlen is expensive, then you can do something like this for your literal string case:
const char test[] = "foo";
sizeof test // 4
Of course if you create 'test' on the stack, it incurs a little overhead (incrementing/decrementing stack pointer), but no linear time operation involved.
Literal strings are generally not going to be so gigantic. For other cases like reading a large string from a file, you can store the length of the string in advance as but one example to avoid recomputing the length of the string. This can also be helpful as it'll tell you in advance how much memory to allocate for your character buffer.
I have a string and need to append a
char to it. How can i do that? strcat
accepts only char*.
If you have a char and cannot make a string out of it (char* c = "a"), then I believe you can use strncat (need verification on this):
char ch = 'a';
strncat(str, &ch, 1);
In the above code,delimiter is a local
variable which gets destroyed after
foo returned. Is it OK to append it to
variable output?
Yes: functions like strcat and strcpy make deep copies of the source string. They don't leave shallow pointers behind, so it's fine for the local data to be destroyed after these operations are performed.
If I am concatenating two null
terminated strings, will strcat
append two null terminating characters
to the resultant string?
No, strcat will basically overwrite the null terminator on the dest string and write past it, then append a new null terminator when it's finished.
How can I find out the last character from a string?
Your approach is almost correct. The only way to find the end of a C string is to iterate throught the characters, looking for the nul.
There is a bug in your answer though (in the general case). If strlen(str) is zero, you access the character before the start of the string.
I have a string and need to append a char to it. How can i do that?
Your approach is wrong. A C string is just an array of C characters with the last one being '\0'. So in theory, you can append a character like this:
char delimiter = ',';
char text[7];
strcpy(text, "hello");
int textSize = strlen(text);
text[textSize] = delimiter;
text[textSize + 1] = '\0';
However, if I leave it like that I'll get zillions of down votes because there are three places where I have a potential buffer overflow (if I didn't know that my initial string was "hello"). Before doing the copy, you need to put in a check that text is big enough to contain all the characters from the string plus one for the delimiter plus one for the terminating nul.
... delimiter is a local variable which gets destroyed after foo returned. Is it OK to append it to variable output?
Yes that's fine. strcat copies characters. But your code sample does no checks that output is big enough for all the stuff you are putting into it.
If I am concatenating two null terminated strings, will strcat append two null terminating characters to the resultant string?
No.
I somehow think that, this is not the correct way because strlen has to iterate over the characters to get the length. So this operation will have a O(n) complexity.
You are right read Joel Spolsky on why C-strings suck. There are few ways around it. The ways include either not using C strings (for example use Pascal strings and create your own library to handle them), or not use C (use say C++ which has a string class - which is slow for different reasons, but you could also write your own to handle Pascal strings more easily than in C for example)
Regarding adding a char to a C string; a C string is simply a char array with a nul terminator, so long as you preserve the terminator it is a string, there's no magic.
char* straddch( char* str, char ch )
{
char* end = &str[strlen(str)] ;
*end = ch ;
end++ ;
*end = 0 ;
return str ;
}
Just like strcat(), you have to know that the array that str is created in is long enough to accommodate the longer string, the compiler will not help you. It is both inelegant and unsafe.
If I am concatenating two null
terminated strings, will strcat append
two null terminating characters to the
resultant string?
No, just one, but what ever follows that may just happen to be nul, or whatever happened to be in memory. Consider the following equivalent:
char* my_strcat( char* s1, const char* s2 )
{
strcpy( &str[strlen(str)], s2 ) ;
}
the first character of s2 overwrites the terminator in s1.
In the above code,delimiter is a local
variable which gets destroyed after
foo returned. Is it OK to append it to
variable output?
In your example delimiter is not a string, and initialising a pointer with a char makes no sense. However if it were a string, the code would be fine, strcat() copies the data from the second string, so the lifetime of the second argument is irrelevant. Of course you could in your example use a char (not a char*) and the straddch() function suggested above.
If I have a pointer that is pointing somewhere in a string, let's say it is pointing at the third letter (we do not know the letter position, basically we don't know it is the third letter), and we want it to point back to the first letter so we can make the string to be NULL how do we do that?
For example:
if we have ascii as a pointer
ascii is pointing now somewhere in the string, and i want it to point at the first char of the string how do i do that?
(Note:
I tried saying
int len = strlen(ascii);
ascii -= len;
ascii = '0';
but it is not working, it changes wherever the pointer is to 0 but not the first char to 0)
You cannot. C and C++ go by the "no hidden costs" rule, which means, among other things, noone else is going to secretly store pointers to beginnings of your strings for you. Another common thing is array sizes; you have to store them yourself as well.
First of all, in your code, if ascii is a pointer to char, that should be
*ascii = '\0';
not what you wrote. Your code sets the pointer itself to the character '0'. Which means it's pointing to a bad place!
Second of all, strlen returns the length of the string you are pointing to. Imagine the string is 10 characters long, and you are pointing at the third character. strlen will return 8 (since the first two characters have been removed from the calculation). Subtracting this from where you are pointing will point you to 6 characters before the start of the string. Draw a picture to help see this.
IMHO, without having some other information, it is not possible to achieve what you are wanting to do.
From what I said above, you should be able to work out what you need to do as long as you keep the original length of the string for example.
No. You, however, can make it point at the last character of the string, which is right before '\0' in every string (it's called zero-terminated string).
What you could do is instead of a char* you could use a pointer to a struct which contains the information you need and the string.
It's not guaranteed to work, but you might get away with backing up until you find a null character, and then moving forward one.
while(*ascii) ascii--;
ascii++;