Good day. :D
I'm in some trouble configuring BonitaBPM with Ms Sql database.
Already searched a lot on the internet but many of the examples used in mysql show, it tried to do the same, so that the problem that the files mentioned in the articles do not exist in my folders setup Bonita (Bundle, etc.).
I try to configure the file that links to BD's but gives a runtime error.
My goal is to use Ms Sql as the primary database, thus making the emigration of all tables in Bonita to SQL DB.
I would like to receive an example how to do this configuration.
Thank you already.
Actually Bonita BPM 6 can be configured to use Microsoft SQL Server 2012 (Bonitasoft provide official support for such configuration) but only with the JBoss bundle or other supported applications server such as Oracle WebLogic.
That is because:
Apache Tomcat is not a full Java EE application server
An extra library (Bitronix) is included to provide transaction management support
Bitronix has known issues with SQL Server
So only solution I may suggest is to switch to JBoss bundle, or, if possible, use an alternative DBMS such as PostgreSQL.
Sorry to not be able to come with a better option but here we facing a limitation of Bitronix library.
Related
I have been supporting a product written in VB6 with an Access database for a long time. In many of the installations a mapped drive was used to allow multiple workstations to run simultaneously. Since it seems Microsoft has broken that recently, I need to re-write everything with a new set of tools.
I plan to use VB.net and I would like to use a SQL database this time for the stability. The problem is that the market I sell to cannot / will not support installing full blown SQL Server and all the complexities of managing it.
What I am not able to find any current info about is whether or not SQL Server Compact still exists, whether or not it can be added to a NON web based project and if it will be easy to deploy and be easy to manage like an Access database was.
When I try to follow the directions to add SQL Server Compact to my project, it isn't available in the Data Source drop down list (there are "Simple by ErikEJ" versions listed but they don't seem to work) I have seen SQL Server Compact talked about with regards to web projects but I am building a locally installed .exe. I can't find ANY current info about what flavors of SQL are available right now to add to a local program running over a peer to peer network.
SQL Server Compact is no longer supported and developed by Microsoft, I suggest that you use SQL Server Express, it allows remote connections (if configured to allow it) and has modest resource requirements. Supports a database up to 10 GB of size.
As suggested, SQL Server CE can still be used but is no longer supported. For file-based databases, Microsoft currently recommend SQLite.
For a multi-user system, SQL Server Express is probably your best bet. It's still server-based though, so the server needs to be installed somewhere. For local databases, you can install on the same machine as the application and attach a data file on demand. For multiple clients, you'll need the server installed on a machine accessible to all and a permanently-attached database.
Im unable to get any connectivity to Oracle 7.3 using the current SSMA from Microsoft. There is no legacy download anymore and i think i need an older version, 6.0. I keep getting two-task connection potocol errors when I use the tnsnames method to define a service. This works with the schema manager in the legacy oracle tools but no matter what i try Im unable to get a connection in the new SSMA without seeing that error. I should say im on a windows 7 vm for legacy reasons.
I have tried using a linked server in sql 2008 and 2012 which would allow me to make views. I could then bring it into Entity Framework, which is the ultimate goal, but same result as above.
Anyone had a similar issue and happen to have an older SSMA?
Client/Server Interoperability Support [ID 207303.1]
For Oracle Server 7.3 you need oracle client 7.3 or 8.0.5-8.1.7 or 9.0
Oracle8 i 8.1.7 Documentation
To configure oracle client SQL*Net V1, V2 ,tnsnames.ora read SQL*Net FAQ
I installed Oracle 7.3 very long ago in 1996 :).
Update
You can migrate to the free version of the Oracle 11 XE version or use an RDS instance of Oracle in the Amazon cloud with free 1-year service .
Use the utility exp and imp. These utilities are no longer being developed and are not supported, but are necessary for migration from very old versions.
Migration plan:
Define the necessary schemes and users for migration in the source
database, table spaces.
Install the free version of Oracle 11 or create an RDS instance of Oracle in the Amazon cloud with free 1-year service.
Create the required tablespaces.
Create profiles, users and roles.
Import the dump file.
Make the migration in mssql.
I'm currently working on an application that runs a small SQLite DB, but I want to use .RDLC for reporting.
I generate the reports over my view models, the idea was for them to be decoupled from the DB, but now I run into this snag that I have to install SQL Server in order to use the reporting framework.
I wouldn't want to require my clients to install SQL Server on their machines just to be able to generate reports. They won't be happy about that. And I don't want to redesign my reporting component either(I have something from a previous project which used SQL Server and that works very well. I want to reuse it)
Is there a way to deploy the Reporting framework on the target machine without SQL Server?
Ideally I would like to just just copy the needed libraries in my application's installation folder, under OTS, but I don't really know which libraries to copy and what I can leave out or even if it's going to work this way.
Any insight would be helpful.
No. SSRS will only work on a machine with SQL Server installed on it.
Same with SSAS and SSIS.
So what we ended up doing is installing two nuget packages.
Microsoft.ReportViewer.Windows and Microsoft.SqlServer.Types
This will allow us to use the reporting framework without deploying SQL server on our target machines.
I'm currently evaluating options for synchronizing two identical databases that will be deployed on two different SQL Server (1) instances. I've started with the Microsoft Sync Framework and if it does not fit my requirements I'll check SQL Replication.
Anyway, long story short, I'm trying to get a basic scenario to work using the Sync Framework but unfortunately all of the examples and tutorials I've seen online use the SQL Provisioning Provider which adds certain tables, stored procedures and triggers to the database - I want to avoid this, obviously.
I read somewhere that the Sync Framework can use SQL Server's built-in Change Tracking features, but this only works when the client is SQL CE (example). But all what I have read so far seems to be out-dated. I couldn't find anything that is relatively recent about the topic. So I was wondering whether the above is still valid or the Sync Framework added support for the built-in Change Tracking with SQL Server 2012 (or 2014).
In case this scenario is still not supported until this day, could someone refer me to an example (or at least some hints) of how I could develop a custom provider to use Change Tracking on both the client and the server?
(1) SQL Edition is not a constraint. Even SQL Server Enterprise Edition is an option.
support for SQL Change Tracking only works for the older SqlCeClientSyncProvider/DBSyncProvider/SyncAgent, in short you can only use to sync SQL Ce with a SQL Server configured for SQL CT.
the newer sync providers do not support SQL CT.
there used to be a sample SQLExpressClientSyncProvider from MS that has been pulled out from the download site due as it has some issues.
Writing a custom sync provider is not easy, if you can go for SQL Replication, that will be an easier route.
I recently started a Winforms VB.NET application that uses a mysql database to store information. Problem is this is a standalone system no network access to the database is needed. And installing mysql server, along with the connector has become a great burden. Is there a viable alternative database engine that will be non-transactional, and EF still works with. This database just needs to keep up with client details, payment History, and related items..
SQL Server Compact might work for you, depending on it's limitations. If not, SQL Server Express will work fine