New to IPC, can't get my pipe to work - c

Sorry for the length of this post... I've encountered about a zillion problems in this. Up front I'll say I'm a student and my professor is a worthless resource. So, all I want to to do is have producer fork, then the parent producer will count some stuff in a file and send two ints to consumer, which was launched by the child process. I've tested everything, the fork and the file stuff works and I have printf statements all over the place so I know what is being done and where the code is at.
When I added the
if (pipe(pipefd) == -1) {
perror("pipe");
}
it caused my parent to just terminate. It reaches "parent pipe open" but then it dies. I checked with $ ps to see if it was just hung, but it's not there; it just dies. If I take that snippet out, it runs to the end but I presume if that code isn't there, then it's not actually aware that pipefd is a pipe... right?
I did search on this site and found another example of this and followed what he did as well as the answer and mine just refuses to work. I'm pretty sure it's a trivially easy thing to fix but I've run out of ideas of what to try :(
I don't really want to post all my code because it'll be a huge wall of text but I don't want to accidentally cut something out that turns out to be important either.
producer.c
#include <stdio.h> /* printf, stderr, fprintf */
#include <sys/types.h> /* pid_t */
#include <unistd.h> /* _exit, fork, execl */
#include <stdlib.h> /* exit */
#include <errno.h> /* errno */
#include <string.h> /* strlen */
#include <sys/wait.h> /* wait */
#define SLEEP_TIME 8
int main (int argc, char *argv[]){
//PID
pid_t local_pid;
local_pid = fork();
//Logic to determine if the process running is the parent or the child
if (local_pid == -1) {
/* Error:
* When fork() returns -1, an error happened
* (for example, number of processes reached the limit).
*/
fprintf(stderr, "can't fork, error %d\n", errno);
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
} else if (local_pid == 0) {
//Child specific code
int child;
char *temp[] = {NULL};
printf("Child PID found\n");
child = execv("./consumer", temp);
_exit(0);
} else {
//Parent specific code
printf("Parent running\n");
//open file
FILE * randStrings;
randStrings = fopen("randStrings.txt", "r");
int file_length;
int num_of_e = 0;
int c; //using this as a char
//until eof
while (feof(randStrings) == 0) {
c = fgetc(randStrings);
//calculate length of file
file_length++;
//count e chars
if (c == 'e') {
num_of_e++;
}
}
//close file
fclose(randStrings);
//send bundle to child
int a[2];
a[0] = num_of_e;
a[1] = file_length;
printf("num of e = %i\n", a[0]);
printf("len = %i\n", a[1]);
//set up parent pipe
int pipefd[2];
if (pipe(pipefd) == -1) {
perror("pipe");
printf("x\n");
}
printf("parent pipe open\n");
close(pipefd[0]); //close the read end
write(pipefd[1], &a[0], sizeof(int));
write(pipefd[1], &a[1], sizeof(int));
close(pipefd[1]);
printf("parent pipe closed\n");
//wait for child to finish running
wait(NULL);
printf("parent out\n");
//terminate
}
}
and consumer.c
#include <stdio.h> /* printf, stderr, fprintf */
#include <sys/types.h> /* pid_t */
#include <unistd.h> /* _exit, fork, execl */
#include <stdlib.h> /* exit */
#include <errno.h> /* errno */
#define SLEEP_TIME 5
int main (int argc, char *argv[]){
sleep(SLEEP_TIME);
printf("Child program launched\n");
//receive bundle
int pipefd[2];
int buf[2];
if (pipe(pipefd) == -1) {
perror("pipe");
printf("child x\n");
}
close(pipefd[1]); //child closes write end
buf[0] = 0;
buf[1] = 0;
/*int i = 0; // i dont like this
while (read(pipefd[0], &buf[i], sizeof(int)) > 0) {
i++;
}*/
printf("child reading pipe\n");
read(pipefd[0], &buf[0], sizeof(int));
read(pipefd[0], &buf[1], sizeof(int));
close(pipefd[0]);
//buf should have the stuff in it
int num_of_e = buf[0];
int file_length = buf[1];
printf("child num of e = %i\n", num_of_e);
printf("child len = %i\n", file_length);
//open file
FILE * resultStrings;
resultStrings = fopen("resultStrings.txt", "w");
for (int i = 0; i < num_of_e; i++) {
//write num_of_e e chars
fputc('e', resultStrings);
}
//or if no e chars, write - chars
if (num_of_e == 0) {
for (int i = 0; i < file_length; i++) {
//write file_length '-' chars
fputc('-', resultStrings);
}
}
//close file
fclose(resultStrings);
printf("child out\n");
}
if you're still here after all that, you deserve a thank you just due to the length of this.

You're doing it wrong. The whole mechanism works because a child process inherits the parent's open file descriptors.
It should go like this:
Open the pipe with pipe(pipefd)
fork()
Parent (producer):
closes the read side (pipefd[0])
writes to the write side (pipefd[1])
Child (consumer):
closes the write side (pipefd[1])
reads from the read side (pipefd[0]) or calls exec
You are opening distinct pipes in both the parent and child process (after you've forked.) It needs to happen before you fork.
Now since you're execing, the new process needs to be aware of read-only pipe. There are a couple ways you could do this:
Pass it the file descriptor number (pipefd[0]) on the command line
dup2(1, fd) it to be the stdin of the newly exec'd process

Related

Why does program hang on child to parent communication?

I am trying to understand why my program hangs. The Parent sends input froma
file it reads to the child program, and the child program will send the result of its computation back to it's parent. However, I have trouble sending the message back through a second pipe. The parent seems to hang when reading from the pipe.
From the other posts, I have read it seems to indicate that the parent should wait for the child to finish by using wait or waitpid (which in my case both of them does not resolve my issue).
I have notice by adding print statement that neither the PARENT or the CHILD finishes.. Could someone please explain to me why this is happening?
Why does this not work?
int main(int argc,char** argv) {
char buffer[1];
int i;
int fd1[2]; int fd2[2];
pipe(fd1); pipe(fd2);
pid_t pid;
// FIRST PROCESS.
// -------------------
pid = fork();
if(pid == 0) {
int cnt;
dup2(fd1[0], STDIN_FILENO);
dup2(fd2[1], STDOUT_FILENO);
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
close(fd1[i]);
close(fd2[i]);
}
while(read(STDIN_FILENO, buffer, sizeof(buffer)) > 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "( %s )", buffer);
cnt = cnt + *buffer - 48;
}
write(STDOUT_FILENO, &cnt, sizeof(cnt));
exit(0);
}
// PARENT.
// ------------------------
int file = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY);
// READ THE FILE.
while(read(file, buffer, 1) > 0) {
if (48 <= *buffer && *buffer <= 57) {
// PIPE TO CHILD.
write(fd1[1], buffer, 1);
}
}
// WAIT FOR CHILD TO FINISH SENDING BACK.
// int status = 0;
// waitpid(pid, &status, 0);
// THIS BLOCK DOESN'T RESOLVE ANYTHING. IT HANGS AT WAIT OR WAITPID.
// **** THIS IS THE PART WHERE IT DOESN'T WORK.
while(read(fd2[0], buffer, 1) > 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "RESULT : %s", buffer);
}
// CLOSING PIPES
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
close(fd1[i]);
close(fd2[i]);
}
close(file);
exit(0);
}
You aren't closing enough file descriptors in the parent soon enough.
Rule of thumb: If you
dup2()
one end of a pipe to standard input or standard output, close both of the
original file descriptors returned by
pipe()
as soon as possible.
In particular, you should close them before using any of the
exec*()
family of functions.
The rule also applies if you duplicate the descriptors with either
dup()
or
fcntl()
with F_DUPFD
Now, your child process is following the RoT perfectly. But the corollary for parent processes is that they need to close the unused ends of the pipe, and they must close the write end of a pipe that they use to signal EOF to the reading end of that pipe. This is where your code fails.
Arguably, before reading the file, the parent process should close the read end of the pipe it uses to write to the child, and it should close the write end of the pipe it uses to read from the child.
Then, after reading the whole of the file, it should close the write end of the pipe to the child, before going into the 'read from child' loop. That loop never terminates because the parent still has the write end of the pipe open, so there's a process that could (but won't) write to the pipe.
Also, since the child writes the bytes of an integer onto a pipe, the parent should read the bytes of an integer. Using char buffer[1]; with a %s format is pointless; you need a null terminator for the string, and a single char buffer can't hold both a null byte and any data.
Along with various other improvements ('0' instead of 48, for example), you might end up with:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
if (argc != 2) {
fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s filename\n", argv[0]);
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
int fd1[2];
int fd2[2];
char buffer[1];
pipe(fd1);
pipe(fd2);
pid_t pid = fork();
if (pid == 0) {
int cnt = 0;
dup2(fd1[0], STDIN_FILENO);
dup2(fd2[1], STDOUT_FILENO);
for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
close(fd1[i]);
close(fd2[i]);
}
while (read(STDIN_FILENO, buffer, sizeof(buffer)) > 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "(%c)", buffer[0]); // Changed
cnt = cnt + buffer[0] - '0';
}
putc('\n', stderr); // Aesthetics
write(STDOUT_FILENO, &cnt, sizeof(cnt));
exit(0);
}
int file = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY);
if (file < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "failed to open file '%s' for reading\n", argv[1]);
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
close(fd1[0]); // Added
close(fd2[1]); // Added
while (read(file, buffer, sizeof(buffer)) > 0) {
if ('0' <= buffer[0] && buffer[0] <= '9') {
write(fd1[1], buffer, sizeof(buffer));
}
}
close(file); // Moved
close(fd1[1]); // Added
// Rewritten
int result;
while (read(fd2[0], &result, sizeof(result)) == sizeof(result)) {
fprintf(stderr, "RESULT : %d\n", result);
}
close(fd2[0]); // Added
// Close loop removed
return 0;
}
If that is stored in file pipe71.c and compiled, I get the following outputs when it is run:
$ ./pipe71 pipe71.c
(2)(0)(1)(2)(2)(2)(1)(1)(2)(0)(0)(2)(1)(0)(2)(2)(1)(0)(2)(1)(2)(0)(0)(0)(0)(0)(1)(0)(1)(1)(0)(2)(1)(0)(0)(0)(0)(9)(1)(1)(1)(1)(2)(0)(2)(0)(0)
RESULT : 49
$ ./pipe71 pipe71
(0)(0)(8)(0)(0)(2)(2)(0)(8)(1)(1)(5)(1)(1)(1)(1)(5)(1)(1)(1)(8)(5)(1)(9)(8)(5)(1)(1)(0)(4)(4)(4)(6)(0)(2)(8)(0)(0)(0)(2)(7)(1)(3)(8)(3)(0)(4)(3)(0)(4)(9)(0)(0)(0)(0)(7)(1)(9)(8)(1)(3)(0)
RESULT : 178
$

How to distinguish one child process from other child processes

I have an assignment for class and I am confused on this part of the requirements. So we need to make a multi process word counter with n number of processes and n will be an input argument for the program. Each process needs to do their own mini word count of a select portion of the inputted file. So essentially the inputted file will be divided into 1/n parts and split between n processes.
I understand how to fork the processes through a for loop and how to use pipes to send the mini word count from the children processes to the parent process, but I unsure of how to tell a certain process to do a select part of the input file.
Would you use their PID values to check which process they are then assign them their task?
This is my code so far.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#define MSGLEN 64
#define MESSES 3
int main(){
int fd[2];
pid_t pid;
int result;
//Creating a pipe
result = pipe (fd);
if (result < 0) {
//failure in creating a pipe
perror("pipe error\n");
exit (1);
}
//Creating a child process
for(int i = 0; i < MESSES; i++){
if ((pid = fork()) < 0) {
//failure in creating a child
perror ("fork error\n");
exit(2);
}
if(pid == 0)
break;
}
if (pid == 0) {
// ACTUALLY CHILD PROCESS
char message[MSGLEN];
//Clearing the message
memset (message, 0, sizeof(message));
printf ("Enter a message: ");
//scanf ("%s",message);
fgets (message, 1024, stdin);
close(fd[0]);
//Writing message to the pipe
write(fd[1], message, strlen(message));
close(fd[1]);
close(fd[0]);
exit (0);
}
else {
//Parent Process
char message[MSGLEN];
char *ptr;
long wc;
close(fd[1]);
while (1) {
//Clearing the message buffer
memset (message, 0, sizeof(message));
//Reading message from the pipe
if(read(fd[0], message, sizeof(message)) == 0)
exit(0);
printf("Message entered %s\n",message);
/*
Message entered needs to be in the format of number first space then string for it to work
*/
wc = 0;
wc = strtol(message, &ptr, 10);
printf("The number(unsigned long integer) is %ld\n", wc);
printf("String part is %s", ptr);
}
close(fd[0]);
wait(NULL);
// exit(0);
}
return 0;
}
The key thing to remember when using fork is that the parent and child share the same memory and a copy of everything the parent has is passed to the child. At which point the child has now forked the parents data.
In the code below we're counting how many processes we've created. You could if you wanted use this as an argument in the child ie the nth child gets value n.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define PROCESS_COUNT 50
int main(void) {
pid_t pid;
size_t pid_count = 0;
//pid_t pid_array[PROCESS_COUNT];
for(int i = 0; i < PROCESS_COUNT; i++) {
if ((pid = fork()) < 0) {
perror ("fork error\n");
exit(2);
}
if (pid == 0) {//child
size_t n = 0;
size_t p = getpid();
while(n++ < 2) {
//Next line is illustration purposes only ie I'm taking liberties by
//printing a pid_t value
printf("child %zu has pid_count == %zu\n", p, pid_count);
sleep(1);
}
exit (0);
}
else {
//Count how many process we've created.
pid_count++;
int status;
waitpid( -1, &status, WNOHANG);
}
}
wait(NULL);
return 0;
}
If you want to get really fancy you can use IPC using pipes or shared memory. There are lots of ways to get data from one process to another, sometimes something as simple as temporary files is more than sufficient. For your problem I'd use mmap but it does not need to be that complicated

FIFO between multiple processes - Only printing from a single process

I'm trying to make a FIFO between two programs (one being a child process of the other) so that the child can write data back to the parent. Here's what I have so far:
(Parent)
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#define MAX_BUF 1024
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
//number of seperate processes to create
int num_processes = 4;
int i = 0;
//FIFO accross processes
int fd;
char * myfifo = "/tmp/myfifo";
char buf[MAX_BUF];
/* create the FIFO (named pipe) */
mkfifo(myfifo, 0666);
for (i; i < num_processes; i++) {
pid_t pid = fork();
if (pid < 0) {
perror("fork failed");
exit(1);
}
else if (pid == 0) {
//child now exec's
char* args[] = {"./child", "args", NULL};
execv("./child", args);
}
}
printf("Parent doing stuff\n");
//Parent wait for child
printf("Parent waiting on child\n");
/* open, read, and display the message from the FIFO */
fd = open(myfifo, O_RDONLY);
if (fcntl(fd, F_GETFD) == -1) {
perror("fd failed");
exit(1);
}
read(fd, buf, MAX_BUF);
printf("Received: %s\n", buf);
//Wait for child processes to finish
int j = 0;
for (j; j < num_processes; j++) {
wait(NULL);
}
//Close FIFO
close(fd);
return 0;
}
(Child, created 4 times)
void main() {
printf("Completed\n");
//Create FIFO
int fd;
char * myfifo = "/tmp/myfifo";
/* write "Hi" to the FIFO */
fd = open(myfifo, O_WRONLY);
if (fcntl(fd, F_GETFD) == -1) {
perror("open failed");
exit(1);
}
write(fd, "Hi", sizeof("Hi"));
//close(fd);
/* remove the FIFO */
//unlink(myfifo);
}
Right now, "Completed" is being printed 4 times, showing that there are 4 seperate processes running as there should be. However, only one "Received: Hi" is printed in the terminal. How come I am not getting a FIFO response from the other processes?
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
You need to check fd and make sure the open succeeded. And note that it can only succeed once, because the first child will unlink(myfifo).
The parent should also wait for all of the children to finish before reading from the fifo. And the parent should read the fifo in a loop until the fifo is empty.
The problem in your code is that there are multiple child writing to the same FIFO.
As pointed out also by user3386109 you have to wait each child and read the FIFO.
here is a sample code:
//Wait for child processes to finish
int child_status = 0;
while (wait(&child_status) != -1) {
if (WIFEXITED (child_status)) {
fprintf (stdout, "the child process exited normally, with exit code %d\n", WEXITSTATUS (child_status));
// Read The buffer
read(fd, buf, MAX_BUF);
printf("Received: %s\n", buf);
}
else fprintf (stderr, "the child process exited abnormally\n");
}
I also suggest to pass to the child an id (this is just a sample add checks if needed):
else if (pid == 0) {
//child now exec's
char mypid[10];
snprintf(mypid, 10, "%d", i);
char* args[] = {"./child", mypid, NULL};
execv("./child", args);
sleep(1);
That each child read in argv[1]
int mypid = atoi(argv[1]);
Please, see also this post: C Named pipe (fifo). Parent process gets stuck
Solved by putting my read statements into the loop waiting for the child processes to finish:
/* open, read, and display the message from the FIFO */
fd = open(myfifo, O_RDONLY);
if (fcntl(fd, F_GETFD) == -1) {
perror("fd failed");
exit(1);
}
//Wait for child processes to finish
int j = 0;
for (j; j < num_processes; j++) {
read(fd, buf, MAX_BUF);
printf("Received: %s\n", buf);
wait(NULL);
}
//Close
close(fd);
return 0;

How to pipe stdin to a child and execl cat in C

In the code below, I am simply trying to send a file via stdin to a child process which will exec the cat OS command. The code compiles fine. Here is how I call it from the command line:
$ ./uniquify < words.txt
However, when I run it I get a seg fault error. I am really having a hard time understanding how the flow if information is supposed to work through pipes to children. I am trying to make the code as simple as possible, so I can understand it, but it is not yet making sense. Any help would be appreciated.
#include <unistd.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#define NUM_CHILDREN 2
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
pid_t catPid;
int writeFds[NUM_CHILDREN];
int catFds[2];
int c = 0;
FILE *writeToChildren[NUM_CHILDREN];
//create a pipe
(void) pipe(catFds);
if ((catPid = fork()) < 0) {
perror("cat fork failed");
exit(1);
}
//this is the child case
if (catPid == 0) {
//close the write end of the pipe
close(catFds[1]);
//close stdin?
close(0);
//duplicate the read side of the pipe
dup(catFds[0]);
//exec cat
execl("/bin/cat", "cat", (char *) 0);
perror("***** exec of cat failed");
exit(20);
}
else { //this is the parent case
//close the read end of the pipe
close(catFds[0]);
int p[2];
//create a pipe
pipe(p);
writeToChildren[c] = fdopen(p[1], "w");
} //only the the parent continues from here
//close file descriptor so the cat child can exit
close(catFds[1]);
char words[NUM_CHILDREN][50];
//read through the input file two words at a time
while (fscanf(stdin, "%s %s", words[0], words[1]) != EOF) {
//loop twice passing one of the words to each rev child
for (c = 0; c < NUM_CHILDREN; c++) {
fprintf(writeToChildren[c], "%s\n", words[c]);
}
}
//close all FILEs and fds by sending and EOF
for (c = 0; c < NUM_CHILDREN; c++) {
fclose(writeToChildren[c]);
close(writeFds[c]);
}
int status = 0;
//wait on all children
for (c = 0; c < (NUM_CHILDREN + 1); c++) {
wait(&status);
}
return 0;
}
Since your question seems to be about understanding how pipes and forks work, I hope below programs can help you. Please notice that this is for illustration only. It wouldn't qualify for commercial implementation, but I wanted to keep it short!
You can compile the two programs as follows:
cc pipechild.c -o pipechild
cc pipeparent.c -o pipeparent
Then execute with ./pipeparent
pipeparent.c source
/* pipeparent.c */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <string.h>
#define MESSAGE "HELLO!\n"
#define INBUFSIZE 80
#define RD 0 // Read end of pipe
#define WR 1 // Write end of pipe
int main(void)
{
int ptocpipe[2]; // Parent-to-child pipe
int ctoppipe[2]; // Chile-to-parent pipe
pid_t childpid; // Process ID of child
char inbuf[80]; // Input from child
int rd; // read() return
int rdup; // dup():ed stdin for child
int wdup; // dup():ed stdout for child
char *eol; // End of line
// Create pipe for writing to child
if (pipe(ptocpipe) < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "pipe(ptocpipe) failed!\n");
return 2;
}
// Create pipe for writing back to parent
if (pipe(ctoppipe) < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "pipe(ctoppipe) failed!\n");
return 2;
}
// Verify that one of the pipes are working by filling it first
// in one end and then reading it from the other. The OS will
// buffer the contents for us. Note, this is not at all necessary,
// it's just to illustrate how it works!
write(ptocpipe[WR], MESSAGE, strlen(MESSAGE));
read(ptocpipe[RD], inbuf, INBUFSIZE);
if (strlen(inbuf) != strlen(MESSAGE)) {
fprintf(stderr, "Failed to flush the toilet!\n");
return 6;
} else {
printf("Wrote to myself: %s", inbuf);
}
// Next, we want to launch some interactive program which
// replies with exactly one line to each line we send to it,
// until it gets tired and returns EOF to us.
// First, we must clone ourselves by using fork(). Then the
// child process must be replaced by the interactive program.
// Problem is: How do we cheat the program to read its stdin
// from us, and send its stdout back to us?
switch (childpid = fork()) {
case -1: // Error
fprintf(stderr, "Parent: fork() failed!\n");
return 3;
case 0: // Child process
// Close the ends we don't need. If not, we might
// write back to ourselves!
close(ptocpipe[WR]);
close(ctoppipe[RD]);
// Close stdin
close(0);
// Create a "new stdin", which WILL be 0 (zero)
if ((rdup = dup(ptocpipe[RD])) < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "Failed dup(stdin)\n");
return 4;
}
// Close stdout
close(1);
// Create a "new stdout", which WILL be 1 (one)
if ((wdup = dup(ctoppipe[WR])) < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "Failed dup(stdout)\n");
return 5;
}
// For debugging, verify stdin and stdout
fprintf(stderr, "rdup: %d, wdup %d\n", rdup, wdup);
// Overload current process by the interactive
// child process which we want to execute.
execlp("./pipechild", "pipechild", (char *) NULL);
// Getting here means we failed to launch the child
fprintf(stderr, "Parent: execl() failed!\n");
return 4;
}
// This code is executed by the parent only!
// Close the ends we don't need, to avoid writing back to ourself
close(ptocpipe[RD]);
close(ctoppipe[WR]);
// Write one line to the child and expect a reply, or EOF.
do {
write(ptocpipe[WR], MESSAGE, strlen(MESSAGE));
if ((rd = read(ctoppipe[RD], inbuf, INBUFSIZE)) > 0) {
// Chop off ending EOL
if ((eol = rindex(inbuf, '\n')) != NULL)
*eol = '\0';
printf("Parent: Read \"%s\" from child.\n", inbuf);
}
} while (rd > 0);
fprintf(stderr, "Parent: Child done!\n");
return 0;
}
pipechild.c source
/* pipechild.c
* Note - This is only for illustration purpose!
* To be stable, we should catch/ignore signals,
* and use select() to read.
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <strings.h>
#include <string.h>
#define MAXCOUNT 5 // Maximum input lines toread
#define INBUFSIZE 80 // Buffer size
int main(void)
{
char buff[INBUFSIZE];
int remains = MAXCOUNT;
pid_t mypid;
char *eol;
mypid = getpid(); // Process-ID
fprintf(stderr, "Child %d: Started!\n", mypid);
// For each line read, write one tostdout.
while (fgets(buff, INBUFSIZE, stdin) && remains--) {
// Chop off ending EOL
if ((eol = rindex(buff, '\n')) != NULL)
*eol = '\0';
// Debug to console
fprintf(stderr, "Child %d: I got %s. %d remains.\n",
mypid, buff, 1 + remains);
// Reply to parent
sprintf(buff, "Child %d: %d remains\n", mypid, 1 + remains);
write(1, buff, strlen(buff));
}
fprintf(stderr, "Child %d: I'm done!\n", mypid);
return 0;
}

SIGPIPE in a simple two process program

I have a simple setup for a fork and pipe that I have used before. But this time around I'm getting a SIGPIPE in my write call. Here's the code
int fd[2];
int pid;
if (pipe(fd) == -1) {
perror("pipe init error");
exit(1);
}
// signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN);
if ((pid = fork()) < -1) {
perror("fork error"); exit(1);
}
// parent
else if (pid > 0) {
close(fd[0]);
write(fd[1], "WHAT", MAXWORD); //SIGPIPE here
close(fd[1]);
int status;
wait(&status);
}
// child
else {
close(fd[1]);
// void foo(char *dirname, int in, int out);
// foo takes a path, reads from fd 'in' and outputs to 'fd' out
foo("./some/path", fd[0], 1);
close(fd[0]);
}
Here's function foo:
void foo(char *dirname, int in, int out){
int string_length;
char word[MAXWORD];
// to get rid of \n
char* sep;
sep = malloc(sizeof(char));
// read from piped stdin until it's closed
while ((string_length = read(in, word, MAXWORD)) > 0){
// get rid of \n
sep = strchr(word, '\n');
*sep = '\0';
printf("THe word is: %s\n", word);
}
}
If you get SIGPIPE when you write on a pipe, it means there is no process that can read from the pipe: neither the current process (you've close the read end of the pipe — which is good; you'd be deadlocked instead of dead if you'd not closed it) nor the other (child) process.
Since you've not shown what the function foo() does, we can't tell you any more about what's wrong.
Now that foo() has been added, it is not clear what's up. There are issues, but most are not show stoppers.
Argument dirname is unused.
Argument out is unused.
You leak the memory allocated to sep in the loop.
You do not ensure that the string read from the pipe is null terminated. This could lead to crashes, which in turn would lead to writes failing.
I suspect item 4 is the immediately critical issue; the others are more matters of tidiness.
I note that in the main code, you have:
write(fd[1], "WHAT", MAXWORD); //SIGPIPE here
Unless MAXWORD is either 4 or 5, you are on a losing path; you should only write 4 or 5 characters.
Combined with the read()...the read will attempt to read MAXWORD bytes but might get fewer. However, there's no sign that the data written contains a newline, so the search for a newline in the input is not going to work reliably. However, that problem should manifest itself after the pipe was successfully written too, not before.
I note that the variable int fd_parent_write_word[2]; is unused and the code uses variable int fd[2] without declaring it.
It is a nuisance when what you get to analyze is not an SSCCE (Short, Self-Contained, Correct Example). It is so much easier when the test case has been reduced to a simple program that can be compiled and run with the submitter confident that the problem reproduces with it.
This SSCCE code compiles cleanly and runs OK:
#include <assert.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
enum { MAXWORD = 5 };
static void foo(int in);
static void he_who_pays_the_piper(int signum)
{
assert(signum == SIGPIPE);
const char msg[] = "Received signal SIGPIPE\n";
write(2, msg, sizeof(msg)-1);
exit(1);
}
int main(void)
{
int fd[2];
int pid;
if (pipe(fd) == -1) {
perror("pipe init error");
exit(1);
}
signal(SIGPIPE, he_who_pays_the_piper);
if ((pid = fork()) < -1) {
perror("fork error"); exit(1);
}
else if (pid > 0) {
close(fd[0]);
write(fd[1], "WHAT", MAXWORD); //SIGPIPE here
close(fd[1]);
int status;
pid = wait(&status);
printf("Got status 0x%04X from %d\n", status, pid);
}
else {
close(fd[1]);
foo(fd[0]);
close(fd[0]);
}
return 0;
}
static void foo(int in)
{
int string_length;
char word[MAXWORD];
while ((string_length = read(in, word, MAXWORD)) > 0)
printf("The word is: %.*s\n", string_length, word);
}
Example output:
The word is: WHAT
Got status 0x0000 from 49458
Note that this works because the '\0' at the end of the string WHAT is written to the pipe, and read from the pipe. Most usually, you do not write the strings including the trailing '\0'.

Resources