I have a Camel based application which receives a request and gives the reply from cache but in between this process it updates the database which i want it to run in a different thread , can anyone tell me how can i achieve this, i tried with WireTap and SEDA but it does not work that way...any help appreciated.
<camel:wireTap uri="seda:tap" processorRef="updateHitCountProcessor"/>
In updateHitCountProcessor I have written code to update table
it is updating the database in same thread (i.e main route thread)
You need to do
<camel:wireTap uri="ref:updateHitCountProcessor"/>
The processorRef attribute is creating and sending a new message, and not for tapping the existing message. So you should not use that.
The uri is used for sending the message which happens in a separate thread. So when you send it to the ref endpoint it will do that in another thread, and call your processor.
You can find details on the wire tap page at: http://camel.apache.org/wire-tap
From the documentation of the camel-seda component (here):
By default, the SEDA endpoint uses a single consumer thread, but you
can configure it to use concurrent consumer threads.
You can add a thread pool to a SEDA endpoint like this:
<from uri="seda:stageName?concurrentConsumers=5" />
Related
I created a RoutePolicy that suspends a consumer when a configurable number of errors occurred in the route.
Before I suspend the consumer I want to make sure it will be resumed after a configurable amount of time (for example 30 minutes after suspension).
What is the best way to achieve this?
I tried to use the onExchangeBegin method of the RoutePolicy. But in a test I found that it is no more executed when the route is suspended (as I assumed).
I tried to create a SimpleScheduledRoutePolicy before suspending the route but I didn't found a way to register this new Bean in the Camel context (backed by Spring).
Therefore I currently create a TimerTask that sends a message to Camel Control Bus to resume the route. That works, but feels a bit of alien since Camel does not know about such resume tasks.
Is there another, more "Camel native" way to reach my goal?
Before you suspend the consumer, you can create a dummy file.
Have another route polling for the dummy file with a filter to check if it was created 30 minutes prior. Something like:
from("file:dummyLocation?include=.dummy&delete=true&filter=#filterFileOlderThanThirtyMins)
.to("controlbus:route?routeId=suspendedRoute&action=start")
This is just off the top of my head, though!
Trying to understand how throttling work is two consumers lead to a direct consumer that does some work and then sends a transformed message onward.
I can specify throttle on each consumer, but if the intent is not to overwhelm the destination, can I apply throttle to the direct route?
More importantly, would it act just as if it is throttling the 2 consumers, or would it consume and potentially create a "build up" of messages between the initial routes and the direct route?
Maybe, instead of direct it has to be seda?
Follow-up question: Can the throttled messages be flushed out if a graceful-shutdown begins?
There is a nice example here corresponding to your problem - in this case, a JMS consumer + a file consumer, both sending to a same seda endpoint.
You will notice that a single throttling policy is defined, and that each consumer is referring to this policy, so that the final destination is not overwhelmed.
Hope this helps.
I currently have a camel route that exposes a cxf endpoint. When a messages comes through the endpoint I would first enrich that message with some information from another webservice and then do more processing afterwards. However, I want make the first half of this route synchronous so I can send back a response to whomever called my exposed cxf endpoint.
The route looks something like this:
from(cxf:CxfEndpoint)
.process(someProcessing)
.to(cxf:ExternalCxfEndpoint)
.to(activemq:queue:somequeue)
//return a response back to caller here
from(activemq:queue:somequeue)
... //additional processing here
...
The reason for this is because when a message comes via my exposed cxf endpoint I don't know if it's a valid message. I need to first validate it with the message enrichment. Once the message is enriched, I want let whomever sent the message know that their message is accepted but don't want them to wait for the message to make it through the whole route as that could take hours.
Does anyone know how this would work?
Thanks in advance!
I believe all you need to do is set exchangePattern to InOnly a.k.a. make it an Event Message. This should have your route not wait for a reply from ActiveMQ. Camel exchange will default to InOut when it's originating from a web service, as in your case.
A related question with an answer from a Camel dev here.
Also see this one for some details on the behavior when your broker is down.
Yes definitely , 100% possible. A simple example would be this :
From cxf endpoint
Store your request in a camel property or header
To xslt - generate xslt for cxf endpoint - Synchronous flow
Reset your original payload using set body.
Wiretap Endpoint - to any endpoint downstream or even a route , this becomes asynchronous . This won't take part in the above sync response .
Note- step 2 & 4 may not be required, it depends on your use case .
There are whole lots of things you can do, I just gave a very simple example . It doesn't need to be wiretap as well, but wiretap helps us not to write any additional custom exceptional handling.
Some AMQP enabled brokers like Microsoft Service Bus or ActiveMQ allow only one active producer or consumer per session. The Apache JMS Camel component seems not be able to handle this correctly, which result that JMS throws exceptions when processing InOut messages sent from e.g. Service Bus.
A small JMS test application with separate sessions for producer and consumer works nice. With using the same session, it run into the same problem.
Issue is rooted in the Spring JMS template, which is used as base for the Camel JMS implementation.
Does anybody know how to overcome that behavior?
You can define a 2nd JMS component and use that for the "other".
Or you can turn off any kind of connection pooling maybe.
If you use XML then you can define a 2nd jms component
<bean id="jms2" class="org.apache.camel.component.jms.JmsComponent"/>
I am using Apache camel to implement dispatcher EIP. There are thousands of messages in a queue which needs to be delivered at different URLs. Each message has its own delivery URL and delivery protocol (ftp,email,http etc).
The way it is been implemented:
Boot a single camel context, the context is disabled for JMX and the
loadStatisticsEnabled is set to false on the ManagementStrategy. As
mentioned in a jira issue, addressed in 2.11.0 version, for disabling
the background management thread creation.
For each message a route is being constructed , the message is being
pushed to the route for delivery.
After the message is processed route is shutdown and removed from
context.
Did a small perf test by having 200 threads of dispatcher component, each sharing the same context.
Observed that the time to start a route increases upto a maximum of 60 seconds while the time to process is in milliseconds.
Issue CAMEL-5675 mentions that this has been fixed but still observing significant time being taken in starting up routes.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5675
The route that is being creating for http is
from("direct:"+dispatchItem.getID())
.toF("%s?httpClient.soTimeout=%s&disableStreamCache=true", dispatchItem.getEndPointURL(),timeOutInMillis);
Each dispatchItem has a unique ID.
This is being active discussed elsewhere, where the user posted this question first: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Slow-startup-of-routes-tp5732356.html