procs, fork(), and mutexes - c

I want to create n processes running in parallel and have them lock a mutex, increment a counter, and then unlock and exit.
Here is my code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <pthread.h>
pthread_mutex_t mutex;
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
if (argc != 2)
return 0;
int n = atoi(argv[1]);
int i = 0;
int status = 0;
pthread_mutex_init(&mutex, NULL);
pid_t pid = 1;
static int *x;
x = mmap(NULL, sizeof *x, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
*x = 0;
printf("Creating %d children\n", n);
for(i = 0; i < n; i++) {
if (pid != 0)
pid = fork();
}
if (pid == 0) {
pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
*x = *x + 1;
printf("[CHLD] PID: %d PPID: %d X: %d\n", getpid(), getppid(), *x);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
exit(0);
}
wait(&status);
printf("[PRNT] PID: %d X: %d\n", getpid(), *x);
munmap(x, sizeof *x);
return 0;
}
./procs 10000 however does not return with x=10000
I think this is because the mutex isn't shared between the processes, but what's the correct way to share the mutex?

Here's a port of my example in the comment using pthread_mutex. First time I've done this, but seems to work:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <pthread.h>
typedef struct
{
bool done;
pthread_mutex_t mutex;
} shared_data;
static shared_data* data = NULL;
void initialise_shared()
{
// place our shared data in shared memory
int prot = PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE;
int flags = MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS;
data = mmap(NULL, sizeof(shared_data), prot, flags, -1, 0);
assert(data);
data->done = false;
// initialise mutex so it works properly in shared memory
pthread_mutexattr_t attr;
pthread_mutexattr_init(&attr);
pthread_mutexattr_setpshared(&attr, PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED);
pthread_mutex_init(&data->mutex, &attr);
}
void run_child()
{
while (true)
{
puts("child waiting. .. ");
usleep(500000);
pthread_mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
if (data->done) {
pthread_mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
puts("got done!");
break;
}
pthread_mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
}
puts("child exiting ..");
}
void run_parent(pid_t pid)
{
puts("parent sleeping ..");
sleep(2);
puts("setting done ..");
pthread_mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
data->done = true;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
waitpid(pid, NULL, NULL);
puts("parent exiting ..");
}
int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
initialise_shared();
pid_t pid = fork();
if (!pid) {
run_child();
}
else {
run_parent(pid);
}
munmap(data, sizeof(data));
return 0;
}

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
typedef struct {
pthread_mutex_t mutex;
int data;
}MUTEX_N_DATA;
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
if (argc != 2)
return 0;
int n = atoi(argv[1]);
int i = 0;
bool wait = true;
pthread_mutexattr_t attr;
pthread_mutexattr_init(&attr);
pthread_mutexattr_setpshared(&attr, PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED);
pid_t pid = 1;
MUTEX_N_DATA *x;
x = mmap(NULL, sizeof(MUTEX_N_DATA), PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
x->data = 0;
pthread_mutex_init(&x->mutex, &attr);
printf("Creating %d children\n", n);
for(i = 0; i < n; i++) {
if (pid != 0) {
pid = fork();
printf("Created Child %d \n",pid);
}
}
if (pid == 0) {
pthread_mutex_lock(&x->mutex);
x->data = x->data + 1;
printf("[CHLD] PID: %d PPID: %d X: %d\n", getpid(), getppid(), x->data);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&x->mutex);
exit(0);
}
while(wait){
pthread_mutex_lock(&x->mutex);
if(x->data == n){
wait = false;
}
pthread_mutex_unlock(&x->mutex);
usleep(100000);
}
printf("[PRNT] PID: %d X: %d\n", getpid(), x->data);
munmap(x, sizeof *x);
return 0;
}
The wait() waits only until one of the child exits. with following changes it works.
mutex attribute set to shared & moved to mmap memory.
parent waiting for the count to reach the number of childrens.
https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/fork.2.html
https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/wait.2.html

Related

Cant Share the dynamically allocated memory block created in parent to child process [duplicate]

In fork child, if we modify a global variable, it will not get changed in the main program.
Is there a way to change a global variable in child fork?
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int glob_var;
main (int ac, char **av)
{
int pid;
glob_var = 1;
if ((pid = fork()) == 0) {
/* child */
glob_var = 5;
}
else {
/* Error */
perror ("fork");
exit (1);
}
int status;
while (wait(&status) != pid) {
}
printf("%d\n",glob_var); // this will display 1 and not 5.
}
You can use shared memory (shm_open(), shm_unlink(), mmap(), etc.).
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <unistd.h>
static int *glob_var;
int main(void)
{
glob_var = mmap(NULL, sizeof *glob_var, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
*glob_var = 1;
if (fork() == 0) {
*glob_var = 5;
exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
} else {
wait(NULL);
printf("%d\n", *glob_var);
munmap(glob_var, sizeof *glob_var);
}
return 0;
}
Changing a global variable is not possible because the new created process (child)is having it's own address space.
So it's better to use shmget(),shmat() from POSIX api
Or You can use pthread , since pthreadsare sharing the globaldata and the changes in global variable is reflected in parent.
Then read some Pthreads tutorial.
Here is an alternative solution.
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/ipc.h>
#include <sys/shm.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
typedef struct
{
int id;
size_t size;
} shm_t;
shm_t *shm_new(size_t size)
{
shm_t *shm = calloc(1, sizeof *shm);
shm->size = size;
if ((shm->id = shmget(IPC_PRIVATE, size, IPC_CREAT | IPC_EXCL | S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR)) < 0)
{
perror("shmget");
free(shm);
return NULL;
}
return shm;
}
void shm_write(shm_t *shm, void *data)
{
void *shm_data;
if ((shm_data = shmat(shm->id, NULL, 0)) == (void *) -1)
{
perror("write");
return;
}
memcpy(shm_data, data, shm->size);
shmdt(shm_data);
}
void shm_read(void *data, shm_t *shm)
{
void *shm_data;
if ((shm_data = shmat(shm->id, NULL, 0)) == (void *) -1)
{
perror("read");
return;
}
memcpy(data, shm_data, shm->size);
shmdt(shm_data);
}
void shm_del(shm_t *shm)
{
shmctl(shm->id, IPC_RMID, 0);
free(shm);
}
int main()
{
int var = 1;
shm_t *shm = shm_new(sizeof var);
int pid;
if ((pid = fork()) == 0)
{ /* child */
var = 5;
shm_write(shm, &var);
printf("child: %d\n", var);
return 0;
}
/* Wait for child to return */
int status;
while (wait(&status) != pid);
/* */
shm_read(&var, shm);
/* Parent is updated by child */
printf("parent: %d\n", var);
shm_del(shm);
return 0;
}
Build with:
$ gcc shm.c -o shm && ./shm

Convert fork implementation to pthread implementation

I'm trying to transform this code that uses fork() to thread. Because i need the variable value to change.
Code using fork():
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
int value = 5;
int main(){
pid_t pid;
pid = fork();
if(pid == 0){ //child process
printf("Entrei no filho! \n");
value += 15;
return 0;
}
else if(pid > 0){ //parent process
wait(NULL);
printf("PARENT: value = %d\n", value);
return 0;
}}
The final value is 5
My attempt:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <pthread.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[]){
pthread_t thread1, thread2;
char *msg1 = "First thread";
char *msg2 = "Second thread";
int value = 5;
pthread_create(thread1, NULL, if1, (void *) msg1);
pthread_create(thread2, NULL, if2, (void *) msg2);
pthread_join(thread1, NULL);
pthread_join(thread2, NULL);
return 0;
}
void *if1(){
value += 15;
return NULL;
}
void *if2(){
printf("Final value: %d",value);
return NULL;
}
The final value has to be 20 using threads

Producer consumer semaphore value is not correct

I'm trying to implement producer-consumer problem in C using processes and System V IPC and I'm stuck on one thing. This is early version of my code (without implementing queue operations or even producer and consumer executing in loop) that I was using to learn and test how semaphores work:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/ipc.h>
#include <sys/sem.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <time.h>
#include "sem.h"
#include "shm.h"
#define BUFFER_SIZE 9
int full;
int empty;
int mutex;
struct buff {
int queue[BUFFER_SIZE];
} *buffer;
void producer();
void consumer();
int main() {
int parent_pid, pid, i;
parent_pid = getpid();
int shmid = allocate_shared_memory(sizeof(*buffer));
buffer = (struct buff *) attach_shared_memory(shmid);
for (i = 0; i < BUFFER_SIZE; i++) {
buffer->queue[i] = 0;
}
full = sem_allocate();
empty = sem_allocate();
mutex = sem_allocate();
printf("Full %d\n", full);
printf("Empty %d\n", empty);
printf("Mutex %d\n", mutex);
sem_init(full, 0);
sem_init(empty, BUFFER_SIZE);
sem_init(mutex, 1);
printf("Full value %d\n", sem_get_val(full));
printf("Empty value %d\n", sem_get_val(empty));
printf("Mutex value %d\n", sem_get_val(mutex));
srand(time(0));
pid = fork();
if (!pid) {
printf("Producer here: %d\n", getpid());
producer();
printf("Full value after prod() %d\n", sem_get_val(full));
return 0;
} else printf("Created new producent: %d\n", pid);
sleep(1);
pid = fork();
if (!pid) {
printf("Consumer here: %d\n", getpid());
printf("Full value before cons() %d\n", sem_get_val(full)); //here I always get 0
consumer();
return 0;
} else printf("Created new consumer: %d\n", pid);
while (1)
{
int status;
pid_t done = wait(&status);
if (done == -1)
{
if (errno == ECHILD) break; // no more child processes
}
else
{
if (!WIFEXITED(status) || WEXITSTATUS(status) != 0) {
exit(1);
}
}
}
if (getpid() == parent_pid) {
sem_deallocate(full);
sem_deallocate(empty);
sem_deallocate(mutex);
}
}
void producer() {
sem_wait(empty);
sem_wait(mutex);
printf("Producer is producing!\n");
buffer->queue[0]=0;
sem_post(mutex);
sem_post(full);
}
void consumer() {
sem_wait(full);
sem_wait(mutex);
printf("Consumer is consuming!\n");
sem_post(mutex);
sem_post(empty);
}
int sem_allocate() {
return semget(IPC_PRIVATE, 1, IPC_CREAT | 0666);
}
void sem_deallocate(int semid) {
if (semctl(semid, 0, IPC_RMID, NULL) == -1)
{
perror("Error releasing semaphore!\n");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}
int sem_init(int semid, int value) {
union semun arg;
arg.val = value;
if (semctl(semid, 0, SETVAL, arg) == -1) {
perror("semctl");
return -1;
}else return 1;
}
int sem_wait(int semid) {
printf("Someone is waiting %d\n", semid);
struct sembuf sem = { 0, -1, SEM_UNDO };
return semop(semid, &sem, 1);
}
int sem_post(int semid) {
printf("Someone is posting %d\n", semid);
struct sembuf sem = { 0, 1, SEM_UNDO };
return semop(semid, &sem, 1);
}
int sem_get_val(int semid) {
return semctl(semid, 0, GETVAL, 0);
}
int allocate_shared_memory(int size) {
return shmget(IPC_PRIVATE, size, IPC_CREAT | SHM_W | SHM_R);
}
void deallocate_shared_memory(const void* addr, int shmid) {
shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, 0);
}
void* attach_shared_memory(int shmid) {
return shmat(shmid, NULL, 0);
}
sem.h:
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <errno.h>
union semun {
int val;
struct semid_ds *buf;
ushort* array;
};
int sem_post(int);
int sem_wait(int);
int sem_allocate();
void sem_deallocate(int);
int sem_init(int, int);
int sem_get_val(int);
shm.h:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/shm.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
int allocate_shared_memory(int size);
void deallocate_shared_memory(const void* addr, int shmid);
void* attach_shared_memory(int shmid);
Why before executing consumer function value of full semaphore is 0? Even if right after producer finishes his job the value is 1...
I'm new to this kind of topics so maybe there is an obvious explenation of the situation, but I have no idea what can I do and hope you can help me.
You initialize the "full" semaphore to zero. Your "child" producer, prior to exiting calls your sem_post() function, which calls semop() with a SEM_UNDO argument.
int sem_post(int semid) {
printf("Someone is posting %d\n", semid);
struct sembuf sem = { 0, 1, SEM_UNDO };
return semop(semid, &sem, 1);
}
The Ubuntu Linux man page for semop says the following about SEM_UNDO:
... If an operation specifies SEM_UNDO, it will be automatically
undone when the process terminates.
This means, "producer" increments "full" prior to exiting, then after it exits the system "undoes" the increment (i.e. it decrements "full") setting it back to zero.
So,for the purposes of the "full" semaphore, you should NOT specify SEM_UNDO.

Working with semaphores and shared memory in C

The program should create 200000 integers and write 2000 to a shared memory. A forked process should read 2000 from shared memory and the parent should write the next 2000 to shared memory.
if i use the code below without sleep, the parent first creates all 200000 integers and then the child reads the same integers from shared memory.
With sleep everything looks good, but we have to use semaphore.
shm.c (parent):
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/ipc.h>
#include <sys/shm.h>
#include <sys/sem.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/resource.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#define N_DATA 200000
#define N_SHARED 2000
#define LOCK -1
#define UNLOCK 1
static struct sembuf semaphore;
char shmidArg[32];
char semidArg[32];
int *shmData;
int i, j;
int status;
char *strsignal(int sig);
pid_t pid;
static int shmid;
static int semid;
char *strsignal(int sig);
/** Semaphore Operation */
static int semaphore_operation (int op) {
semaphore.sem_num = 1;
semaphore.sem_op = op;
semaphore.sem_flg = IPC_NOWAIT;
if( semop (semid, &semaphore, 1) == -1) {
perror(" semop ");
exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
}
return 1;
}
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
/* Ein Shared-Memory-Segment einrichten */
shmid = shmget(IPC_PRIVATE, N_SHARED*sizeof(int), IPC_CREAT | SHM_R | SHM_W);
if (shmid == -1) {
perror("shmid");
exit(1);
}
printf("Shared-Memory-ID: %d\n",shmid);
/* Pointer zu Shared-Memory-Segment erhalten */
shmData = (int *)shmat(shmid,0, 0);
if (shmData == (int *)(-1)) {
perror("shmat");
exit(1);
}
/* Semaphore anlegen */
semid = semget(IPC_PRIVATE, 1, IPC_CREAT | SHM_R | SHM_W);
if (semid < 0) {
perror("semid");
exit(1);
}
printf ("Semaphor-ID : %d\n", semid);
/* Semaphor mit 1 initialisieren */
if (semctl (semid, 0, SETVAL, (int) 1) == -1) {
perror("semctl");
}
snprintf(shmidArg,32, "%d", shmid);
snprintf(semidArg,32, "%d", semid);
/** erstellen des Kindprozesses */
pid = fork();
// Kindprozess
if (pid == 0) {
execlp("./shm_child",shmidArg,semidArg,NULL);
} else if (pid < 0) {
perror("Kindprozess konnte nicht erzeugt werden!");
return 1;
}
// Elternprozess
else {
/** ininitalisieren des Zufallsgenerator durch aktuellen Zeitstempel */
srand48(time(NULL));
for(i=0;i<N_DATA;i=i+N_SHARED) {
semaphore_operation(LOCK);
for (j=0; j<N_SHARED; j++) {
shmData[j] = lrand48();
//MSZ
//printf("SHM-->%d-->%d\n",i+1,shmData[i]);
}
// if(i == 0 || i == 2000) {
printf("Parent-->%d-->0-->%d\n",i,shmData[0]);
printf("Parent-->%d-->1999->%d\n",i,shmData[1999]);
// }
semaphore_operation(UNLOCK);
//sleep(1);
}
}
//MSZ
//sleep(2);
printf("PID: %d\n", pid);
if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) == -1) {
perror("wait konnte nicht erzeugt werden!");
return 1;
}
if (WIFEXITED(status)) {
printf("Exitcode: %d\n", WEXITSTATUS(status));
semctl (semid, 0, IPC_RMID, 0);
shmctl (shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
//If process terminaded by a signal
} else if (WIFSIGNALED(status)) {
printf("Signal: %d %s\n", WTERMSIG(status), strsignal(WTERMSIG(status)));
semctl (semid, 0, IPC_RMID, 0);
shmctl (shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
}
}
shm_child.c (Child):
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/ipc.h>
#include <sys/shm.h>
#include <sys/sem.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#define N_DATA 6000
#define N_SHARED 2000
#define LOCK -1
#define UNLOCK 1
int i,j;
int *shmData;
static int shmid;
static int semid;
static struct sembuf semaphore;
/** Semaphore Operation */
static int semaphore_operation (int op) {
semaphore.sem_num = 0;
semaphore.sem_op = op;
semaphore.sem_flg = SEM_UNDO;
if( semop (semid, &semaphore, 1) == -1) {
perror(" semop ");
exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
}
return 1;
}
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
shmid = atoi(argv[0]);
semid = atoi(argv[1]);
printf("\nshm_child shared memoryid:%d\n",shmid);
printf("shm_child Semaphoren-ID:%d\n",semid);
/* Pointer auf Shared-Memory erstellen */
shmData = (int *)shmat(shmid,0,0);
if (shmData == (int *)(-1)) {
perror("shmat");
exit(1);
}
for(i=0;i<N_DATA;i=i+N_SHARED) {
semaphore_operation(LOCK);
for(j=0;j<N_SHARED;j++) {
//printf("%d-->%d --> %d\n",i,j+1,shmData[j]);
}
// if(i == 0 || i == 2000) {
printf("child-->%d-->0-->%d\n",i,shmData[0]);
printf("child-->%d-->1999->%d\n",i,shmData[1999]);
// }
semaphore_operation(UNLOCK);
sleep(1);
}
return 0;
}
Please help us
Thank you guys
Edit: Thank you very much for your answers. I can't mark the right answer because i dont know what its right. But i dont want try anything more. 15 hours are enough
The writer process shall give reader a permission to read, and wait for the reading completion. After that the reader shall give writer a permission to proceed, and wait for writing completion.
This goal cannot be achieved with a single semaphore. You need two, along the lines of:
// parent aka writer
writer_barrier = semaphore(UNLOCKED);
reader_barrier = semaphore(LOCKED);
start_reader();
while(...) {
lock(writer_barrier);
write_data();
unlock(reader_barrier);
}
// child aka reader
while(....)
lock(reader_barrier);
read_data();
unlock(writer_barrier);
}

Working with semaphores and shared memory under Linux

I need to write a program that is creating a N amount of sub processes and every single one of them adds one to a shared memory variable. My idea is to use semaphores and shared memory, but the processes are not waiting for each other and the shared memory variable is also not working as I want it.
mydefs.h
#ifndef __MYDEFS__H__
#define __MYDEFS__H__
// Includes
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <semaphore.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <memory.h>
#include <sys/ipc.h>
#include <sys/msg.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/shm.h>
#endif // __MYDEFS__H__
main.c
#include "mydefs.h"
#define PROC_COUNT 3
#define INITAL_MARKER_VALUE 0
#define PID_LEN 32
char mypid[PID_LEN];
int main()
{
int i, shm_id;
sem_t mutex;
if(sem_init(&mutex,1,1) < 0)
{
perror("semaphore initilization");
exit(0);
}
shm_id = shmget(IPC_PRIVATE, 4*sizeof(int), IPC_CREAT | 0666);
if (shm_id < 0) {
printf("shmget error\n");
}
int *shmpointer = shmat(shm_id,0,0);
memset(mypid, 0, sizeof(mypid));
sprintf(mypid, "%06d", getpid());
for(i = 0; i < PROC_COUNT; i++)
{
if (fork() == 0)
{
while(sem_wait(&mutex)!=0);
execl("slaveproc", "slaveproc", mypid, (char *)0);
shmpointer += 1;
sem_post(&mutex);
perror("\n Can't exec slave program. Cause ");
exit(1);
}
}
sleep(1);
printf("%d\n", *shmpointer);
return 0;
}
slaveproc.c
#include "mydefs.h"
int marker; // Marker value
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
master_pid = atoi(argv[1]);
printf("\n --------------------------------------");
printf("\n I'm the slave proc!");
printf("\n My pid: %d", getpid());
printf("\n My master's pid: %d", master_pid);
printf("\n --------------------------------------");
for(;;) pause();
return 0;
}
The problem (or at least "a problem") is that mutex is not in shared memory: it's allocated on the stack. When you fork(), the new process will have a completely separate copy from the old process, so calling sem_wait(&mutex) on one process will not affect the other process's mutex at all.
You should put mutex in the shared memory:
int main()
{
int i, shm_id;
shm_id = shmget(IPC_PRIVATE, sizeof(sem_t) + 4*sizeof(int), IPC_CREAT | 0666);
if (shm_id < 0) {
printf("shmget error\n");
}
int *shmpointer = shmat(shm_id,0,0);
sem_t *mutex = shmpointer;
shmpointer = (void*)shmpointer + sizeof(sem_t);
if(sem_init(mutex,1,1) < 0)
{
perror("semaphore initilization");
exit(0);
}
memset(mypid, 0, sizeof(mypid));
sprintf(mypid, "%06d", getpid());
for(i = 0; i < PROC_COUNT; i++)
{
if (fork() == 0)
{
while(sem_wait(mutex)!=0);
execl("slaveproc", "slaveproc", mypid, (char *)0);
shmpointer += 1;
sem_post(mutex);
perror("\n Can't exec slave program. Cause ");
exit(1);
}
}
sleep(1);
printf("%d\n", *shmpointer);
return 0;
}
You're also never writing to the memory in shmpointer (perhaps you meant (*shmpointer) += 1?), but I'll let you figure that out on your own.

Resources