model saving but success and error callbacks not executing - backbone.js

I save a backbone model, the save is successful. However the success or the error function dont seem to be getting called. Here is what I have tried :
that.model.save(null,{
success:function(model, response){
console.log("save successful");
},
error: function(model, response){
console.log("save error");
}
});

Related

Angular $http not handling error

My angular app doesn't handle the errors in $http calls.
I have a $httpProvider where I return $q.reject(response) in errorResponse as required by documentation. In the console the angular just puts angular.min.js:99 GET http://localhost:8080/my/api 500 (Internal Server Error).
Code
console.log('before');
$http.get('/my/api', function(response){
console.log('ok');
console.log(response);
}, function(response){
console.log('not ok');
console.log(response)
});
console.log('after');
I just get 'before', 'after' and the message above.
Also in the network tab I get the expected response from server with status 500 and a json content in the body.
Except for the $httpProvider's errorResponse without a return $q.reject(), what could be the problem?
You have syntactical mistake, you should use .then function and then put success & error callback to them.
Code
$http.get('/my/api').then(function(response){
console.log('ok');
console.log(response);
}, function(response){
console.log('not ok');
console.log(response)
});
What I understood by your code/question is, you are expecting to get error callback function to execute, but it is not doing that. If I missed something then do ask same in comments.

chaining ngResource $promise success and errors

I'd like to know if it's possible to handle the $promise returned by ngResource on multiple levels so that the code is DRY
here is a simple example
aService = function(aResource) {
var error, success;
success = function(response) {
console.log('Service Success');
};
error = function(response) {
console.log('Service Error');
};
this.servicePostReq = function() {
return aResource.save().$promise.then(success, error);
};
return this;
angular.module('app.service').factory('aService', ['aResource', aService]);
this works fine so far... it Service Success when response is OK and it Service Error when response is not OK
but when I add a controller that use this aService like following
aController = function(aService) {
var error, success;
success = function(response) {
console.log('Controller Success');
};
error = function(response) {
console.log('Controller Error');
};
this.controllerPostReq = function() {
aService.servicePostReq().then(success, error);
};
return this;
};
angular.module('app.controller').controller('aController', ['aService', aController]);
the controller always success...
so if the request return success the output is
Service Success
Controller Success
and if the request fails the output is
Service Error
Controller Success
how do I chain the promise so that I don't have to add the code handled in the service for every controller that use the service ?
The problem is your service. Change this:
this.servicePostReq = function() {
return aResource.save().$promise.then(success, error);
};
To this:
this.servicePostReq = function() {
return aResource.save().$promise.then(success);
};
Explanation:
Since your service returns aResource.save().$promise.then(success, error), it's returning a new promise with an error handler included. Later, in your controller, you add onto the chain like this.
aService.servicePostReq().then(success, error);
The complete promise chain at this point looks if you expand it out:
return aResource.save().$promise
.then(successFnFromService, errorFnFromService)
.then(successFnFromController, errorFnFromController);
Since you catch the error from aResource.save() with errorFnFromService, the promise chain is basically "clean" at this point and it will just continue with the next then.
By removing the first error handler, you allow the error to be caught later on.
A better way (in general) to handle errors in promise chains would be to use a single .catch() at the end of the chain.
Consider this bad code (try running on your browser console):
new Promise(
function(resolve, reject){
reject('first');
}).then(
function(result) {
console.log('1st success!', result);
return result;
},
function(err) {
console.log('1st error!', err);
return err;
}
).then(
function(result){
console.log('2nd success!', result);
},
function(err){
console.log("2nd error!", err);
}
);
Output:
1st error! first
2nd success! first
Better way:
new Promise(
function(resolve, reject){
reject('first');
}).then(function(result) {
console.log('1st success!', result);
return result;
}).then(function(result){
console.log('2nd success!', result);
// catch error once at the end
}).catch(function(err){
console.log("error!", err);
});
Output:
error! first
Try both of those in browser console, and change reject to resolve to see how it affects the output.
add a dependency on the $q and use $q.reject to control the execution...
in your example you need a $q.reject in the aService.error method
as mentioned here in the $q docs
reject(reason);
Creates a promise that is resolved as rejected with the specified reason. This api should be used to forward rejection in a chain of promises. If you are dealing with the last promise in a promise chain, you don't need to worry about it.
When comparing deferreds/promises to the familiar behavior of try/catch/throw, think of reject as the throw keyword in JavaScript. This also means that if you "catch" an error via a promise error callback and you want to forward the error to the promise derived from the current promise, you have to "rethrow" the error by returning a rejection constructed via reject.
To properly chain promises, both success and error handlers should return some value. The return values are automatically wrapped in a new promise for you. This means that in the case of errors, you must return a rejected promise using $q.reject.
So your service should look like this:
aService = function($q, aResource) {
var error, success;
success = function(response) {
// important! return a value, handlers down the chain will
// execute their success handlers and receive this value
return 'Service Success';
};
error = function(response) {
// important! return a REJECTION, handlers down the chain will
// execute their error handlers and receive this value
return $q.reject('Service Error');
};
this.servicePostReq = function() {
return aResource.save().$promise.then(success, error);
};
return this;
angular.module('app.service').factory('aService', ['$q', 'aResource', aService]);

AngularJS Resource error callback being called with a promise

I've been writing a service in AngularJS to save some data and, if it fails, alert the user. However, after I create my resource and call $save:
myResource.$save(function(success) {
console.log(success);
}, function(error) {
console.log(error);
});
I expect the error callback's argument to be an object with data, status, headers, etc., but all I get is an object with a "then" function. I tried to mock it up in JSFiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/RichardBender/KeS7r/1/
However, this example works as I originally expected. I yanked this JSFiddle example and put it in my project and it has the same problem I originally described, despite that as far as I can tell everything else is equal. Does anyone have any idea why this might be? My project was created with Yeoman/Bower/Grunt but I can't see why those things would make a difference here.
Thanks,
Richard
I solved the problem. The error was in my HTTP interceptor, where upon an error code, I was accidentally returning $q.reject(promise) rather than $q.reject(response).
The bugged version:
.factory('httpInterceptor', function($q) {
return function(promise) {
return promise.then(
// On success, just forward the response along.
function(response) {
return response;
},
function(response) {
// ... where I process the error
return $q.reject(promise);
}
);
};
The fixed version:
.factory('httpInterceptor', function($q) {
return function(promise) {
return promise.then(
// On success, just forward the response along.
function(response) {
return response;
},
function(response) {
// ... where I process the error
return $q.reject(response);
}
);
};
-Richard

How to get a good response from saving a model

With backbone.js I'm saving a model. A PUT is send to the server and the response is returned. The first time I do it, it returns success, the following times an error is return, because after the first time the response is added to the model.
Save function in Backbone.js:
saveCountry: function() {
this.model.save({},{
success: function(model, response) {
console.log('success! ' + response);
},
error: function(model, response) {
console.log('error! ' + response);
}
});
this.render();
return false;
},
PHP returns a JSON-string:
{"response": "Model saved!"}
Following PUT's get an error as response, because 'response' is added to the model:
Unknown column 'response' in 'field list'
Why is the response added to the model and how do I prevent it?
From Backbone's documentation on model save:
Set a hash of model attributes, and sync the model to the server. If
the server returns an attributes hash that differs, the model's state
will be set again.
http://documentcloud.github.com/backbone/docs/backbone.html#section-41
What to do to make it work: don't return {"response": "Model saved!"} from the server. Just return a success (status 200) with no content.
If the save did not work, return a JSON with the errors, and Backbone will trigger an error event on your model, with the JSON you provided (see http://documentcloud.github.com/backbone/docs/backbone.html#section-41 and http://documentcloud.github.com/backbone/docs/backbone.html#section-145).
Just to resurrect an ancient thread...
It isn't always possible/desirable to change the response you get back from the server.
Another solution is to override parse in the model to take care of this. For your situation, where the response is inappropriate for ALL of your models, you could do it in a superclass.
MyModel = Backbone.Model.extend({
parse: function(data) {
delete data["success"];
return data;
}
});
Address = MyModel.extend({
saveCountry: function() {
this.model.save({},{
success: function(model, response) {
console.log('success! ' + response);
},
error: function(model, response) {
console.log('error! ' + response);
}
});
this.render();
return false;
},
...
});

How do I trigger the success callback on a model.save()?

this.model.save({
success: function(model, response){
console.log('success');
},
error: function(){
console.log('error');
}
})
The model is correctly posted to the server which handles the save, but the success callback is not fired. Do I need to send something back from the server ?
The first argument of save is the attributes to save on the model:
this.model.save( {att1 : "value"}, {success :handler1, error: handler2});
For some unknown reason, none of the above method worked for me. The api only was not hit in my case.
But later while searching on this, I bumped into this link, where some one had tried null instead of {} as the first parameter.
this.model.save(null, {
success: function (model, response) {
console.log("success");
},
error: function (model, response) {
console.log("error");
}
});
so, this worked for me. Hope this helps you too.
Your server must return a JSON object. If the response is not a JSON object, the callbacks will not fire.
If for success your server doesn't return a JSON object, perform a save with dataType:"text" option, like this:
this.model.save([],{
dataType:"text",
success:function() {},
error:function() {}
});
With this option it will not be waiting for a JSON in response, but a text, and thus the callback will be launched.
You may use underscore lib as follows as backbone already depends upon this. Remember first argument of save must either have attributes or you may just pass {} in case you want to save model itself.
this.model.save({}, _.bind(function(model, response){
//Do whatever you want e.g.
this.collection.add(model)
}, this))
so im a little confused - do i still need to pass in all attributes in order for me to call a save event? what if my model is large.. i dont wish to set every property manually
im calling model.save and attempting to do the following:
this.model.save(
{
success: function (model, response) {
console.log('model saved');
}
});
ok just to answer my own question incase anyone finds this post, i did the following which works:
this.model.save({ id: this.model.get('id') },
{
success: function (model, response) {
console.log("success");
},
error: function (model, response) {
console.log("error");
}
});
EDIT: I couldn't reply to you for some reason, but I can edit
but you don't have to set id: this.model.get('id') you can just pass a blank object because a blank attribute just won't extend attributes, does nothing:
this.model.save({}, {
success: function (model, response) {
console.log("success");
},
error: function (model, response) {
console.log("error");
}
});
The following is the code that i am using for backbone model save.
this.model.save(model,{
success:function(model){
console.log("Saved Successfully");
},
error:function(model){
console.log("Error");
}
});
Cheers
Roy M J
For those that want to save a model, without updating the attributes, you can do the following:
model.once("sync", function(model, response, options){
//
});
model.once("error", function(model, response, options){
//
});
model.save();
In you initialize function, bind the sync method to a method you define (onSaveSuccess)
initialize: function (options) {
this.model.on('sync', _.bind(this.onSaveSuccess, this));
},
onSaveSuccess: function() {
console.log('saved');
this.render();
},
This way, any time you run this.model.save(), it will run the onSaveSuccess function as a callback if your sync is successful

Resources