There are 2 pages, that some part of the code is repeated, to this part of code, I apply this CSS:
#media (max-width: 767px) {
.sliderContent {
width: 100%;
}
}
When I check one page on an iPhone, it loads this CSS, but the other does not use this style.
I have added an alert with the screen size in both pages, and both have the same width.
Do you know where the max-width is taken? that could be making the difference between the two pages?
Can the HTML somehow affect the size of the min-width?
Max width is the width of the viewport in css pixels. What that declaration is saying is that when the viewport is less than 767px width, apply the .sliderContent style.
The reason it applys to the iPhone is that the reported width is less than 767px. If you were to open the page in question in a newer browser (IE9+, Chrome, Firefox, etc), and resize the window below 767px you'll see the same result.
https://hacks.mozilla.org/2013/09/css-length-explained/
Related
I'm a bit confused about something that is hopefully quite simple, I'm extremely new to tailwind CSS, and even after looking into documentation I was not able to find the solution myself.
I have an image that I want visible for larger screen sizes, but hidden for smaller screen sizes.
I tried adding "sm:hidden relative" classNames to an img tag, I expected it to set the img to hidden on devices smaller than 768px.
The Opposite of what I want happens, the img shows on all devices up to 768px, but none bigger
Here is the section of my tailwind.config.cjs with media query overrides;
screens: {
xs: "480px",
ss: "620px",
sm: "768px",
md: "1060px",
lg: "1200px",
xl: "1700px",
},
My Img tag is as follows;
<img src={astronaught} alt="hero-astronaught" className=" z-[5] w-[100%] h-[100%] sm:hidden relative" />
If I only have relative, without the sm:hidden, as expected, the img shows on all devices, if I add the above code, it shows on smaller devices, but not devices larger than 768px, I am extremely confused.
I thought that the way it works logically with sm:hidden relative was "on sm devices, it is hidden, otherwise, it is relative"
Inspecting via console shows that the media query is being applied as follows in full-screen mode;
#media (min-width: 768px)
<style>
.sm\:hidden {
display: none;
}
Inspecting via console during responsive mode for a mobile device, shows no media query at all being applied.
An important thing to note is that I have used these media queries throughout the website and they work fine for padding and margins etc.
Any help would be appreciated, Thanks
Edit: If switching around the order, e.g. hidden sm:visible - then the image does not show on any device. If I inspect the class, it shows that the visible tag is applying, but so is the .hidden class, setting display to none
The way that tailwind media queries work, is that e.g. doing sm:hidden says "for all screens equal or greater than sm: use hidden". So if you do lg:hidden, it counts for both lg and xl and larger, while sm counts for all sizes from sm and up.
If you want to achieve what you're describing, I'd simply do the opposite:
hidden sm:block.
This will make it show from 768px and up.
I managed to find the solution, if I switched the classes to invisible sm:visible, then it worked correctly, but I want hidden, not invisible, as they work a bit differently, and so I realised that the issue was with having relative as my "opposite" to hidden. the new classes go as follows sm:block hidden - Thanks to Sebastion for helping me to properly understand media queries in tailwind!
I'm porting chrome extension to Firefox and I'm testing on Nightly 51a.. version.
When I click the popup options icons it opens and scrollbars appear and after half a second those disappear.
How to correct this?
At the moment I've given a hyperlink in the top in the optins popup with this code which when clicked opens full view html in a new tab and this works just fine:
<a style="font-size:1.5em;" href="options.html" target="_blank">Open Full Window</a>
The popup that is being shown for a browser_action is, currently, being set to a maximum of 800x600 pixels (at least in my testing). However, your content is being rendered at a much larger size while having the scroll bars not shown to the user (either not rendered at all, or positioned outside of the view into the document provided by the panel).
There are multiple ways to solve this. However, I was not able to find one that did not result in specifying an explicit height and width for the <body>, or a sub element (e.g. a <div> enclosing all content). Several ways showed the scroll bars, but left them disabled.
The simplest way to get the scroll bars to show up, is to change your HTML from:
<body>
to:
<body style="height:580px;width:800px;">
Obviously, you could also change this in your CSS (banks/options.css). From:
body{
min-width:500px;
min-height: 500px;
}
To:
body{
height: 580px;
width: 800px;
min-width: 500px;
min-height: 500px;
}
However, neither of those allow for the possibility that the panel will be shown with different dimensions (e.g. on other sized screens, or if Firefox changes what it is doing).
Thus, my prefered solution is to use JavaScript. In options.js add something like:
function setBodyHeightWidth(){
let width=window.innerWidth;
let height=window.innerHeight;
height -= 20; //Adjust for Save button and horizontal scroll bar
//document.body.style.width=width; //Does not work
//document.body.style.height=height; //Does not work
document.body.setAttribute('style','height:' + height + 'px;width:' + width + 'px;');
}
function onDOMLoaded(){
setBodyHeightWidth();
//Anything else you need to do here.
}
document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', onDOMLoaded);
Using a significantly trimmed down version of the code for your extension (i.e. I removed all your JavaScript, and most of the non-visible HTML), the above code makes it look like:
I have fitVids working on my site. However, I'm wondering if it is possible to prevent fitVids from enlarging a video beyond its defined height/width. For example, if a video is 600px wide, but the container is 800px, fitVids enlarges the video to 800px wide and it is blurry. I'd only like fitVids to shrink the video when the container shrinks for smaller devices. Is that possible?
jQuery(document).ready(function(){
// Target your .container, .wrapper, .post, etc.
$("#thing-with-videos").fitVids();
});
helgatheviking's solution constrains the width of the video, but not the height. If your container is wider than the video, you end up with a really tall, letter-boxed video. The height is easy to fix, using the same technique to constrain the width. But, there's a third variable.
fitVids wraps the iframe in a div, with the class "fluid-width-video-wrapper", and sets padding-top equal to the aspect ratio of the video. Even if height and width are constrained, the fluid-width-video-wrapper will still be as tall as the video could be, if it didn't have a max-height. So, you end up with a bunch of white-space below the video.
Rather than set all three values (width, height, and padding), you can simplify everything by wrapping the iframe in a div with a max-width, before initializing fitvids.
var vidFrame = $('#fitvids_container').find('iframe');
var vidWidth = vidFrame.attr('width');
if (typeof vidWidth !== undefined) {
// Wrap the iframe in a Div with max-width defined
vidFrame.wrap('<div style="max-width:' + vidWidth + 'px;"></div>');
}
// Initialize fitVids
$('#fitvids_container').fitVids();
Like helgatheviking's solution, if you have more than one video per page, you'll have to calculate the max-width for each video.
One option is to make a small modification to the fitvids code which checks for a data-maxwidth attribute and if found wraps a div with a max-width style to limit the resized iframe.
This allows each videos max width behaviour to be specified independently.
For example. Add the data-maxwidth attribute to the iframe.
<iframe width="560" height="315" data-maxwidth="560" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/L-UIiRlydow" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe>
Then add the following code snippet to the fitvids.js file, at the end of the $allVideos.each function, just after $this.removeAttr('height').removeAttr('width');
if ($this.data("maxwidth"))
$this.parent('.fluid-width-video-wrapper').wrap('<div></div>').parent().css('max-width', $this.data("maxwidth"));
It simple!
Assuming "thing-with-videos" is the ID of the wrapper on which you are calling .fitvids()
So just set the max width css property for this container.
Example:
#thing-with-videos {
max-width: 600px;
margin: 0px auto;
}
This wont let your video width go beyond 600px. Margin property will center your video container.
Live Edit Demo -
http://bitconfig.com/fit-vids/bitconfig_fitvids.html
Set your custom width in the "Video container width" textbox and watch the preview!
-Patrick
Patrick's answer eventually made me realize that I could put a max-width on the iframe itself.
#fitvids_container {
max-width: 600px;
}
#fitvids_container iframe {
max-width: 500px;
}
However, if you were using a lot of videos (of different sizes), you might want to do this dynamically. With jQuery we can get the width from the iframe attribute and make it a max-width style rule. This only works if you've included the width attribute in your embed code though. This is a single example, but could be adapted to an .each() loop or at least renaming the container div to a class.
var width = $('#fitvids_container').find('iframe').attr('width');
if (typeof width !== undefined) {
$('#fitvids_container').find('iframe').css('maxWidth', width + 'px');
}
See my example: http://jsfiddle.net/Qd4FW/2/
I'm having a slight issue with my width=100% css rule. On desktop browsers it's fine, however on mobile, it only uses 100% of the device width. So On a phone I'll end up have a div that spans 480px rather than across the entire horizontal screen.
Thanks for your help!
#intro {background-color: #1F1F1F; width: 100%; margin: auto; display:block;}
#intro-inner {height:450px; width:1105px; padding-top:50px;display:block;margin:0 auto;position:relative;}
On the HTML page, the intro inner div is inside the intro div. The background color is blue. On a desktop the site appears fine. However on a mobile after the devise width, ex. 480px, the #intro div background and it's color ends.
I have website with fixed width of 1000px. I want to support 2 smaller widths of this page. I have succesfully done this through CSS media-queries like this:
#media only screen and (min-width : 800px) and (max-width : 999px) {
#content { width:800px; }
}
#media only screen and (max-width : 799px) {
#content { width:600px; }
}
Now when I test my webpage on Android browser (2.3.3), it uses viewport width of 1000px so it displays website in full width. But it would be much better, if it would chosen viewport width of 800px, because webpage would display more optimized for device with smaller displays.
I know I can set viewport width using e.g.: <meta name="viewport" content="width=800px" /> or to set width coresponding to device physical width using: <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width" />, but none of these would work. Because either it would force all mobile devices to always use 800px viewport in first case, or it would use physical width of pixels on device in second case, but that wouldn't work out too, because in portrait mode (how most people surf mobile web and use phone) that would be 300px or at most 400px, which is too small and user would have to scroll horizontally a lot.
So actually my question is this - can I support and possibly force mobile browsers to use different viewport widths depending on their actual screen size ? I don't know if I explained it properly enough, so I will get example what I want to achieve:
For mobile devices with physical width of 400px (modern devices with bigger displays) I would like to force viewport of 800px width and possibly with scale 0.5 so on first page visit would be displayed full without need of horizontal scrolling and with user option to zoom in to parts of the page.
For mobile devices with physical width of 300px ( some middle-class and low-end devices ) or smaller - I would like to force viewport of 600px width and possibly with scale 0.5 so on first visit would be displayed full or at least most of it on screen with little horizontal scrolling needed. And of course, user could zoom in to parts of the page.
Is this possible set up using just CSS or CSS3 ? I can imagine JS solution, but I would like to implement this just using CSS.
Thank you for any help in advance.
I do understand some part of your question...I have mainly worked on iPhone / iPad devices and less on Android ones...
I would recommend using
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width" />
to set the viewport based on devoce width..
Now even though you say, it would not work on orientation change, on the iPhone/iPad, the device width is always 768px whatever be the orientation.
So atleast on those devices, setting to device width would be fine..
For the Android devices, i am not really sure if the device width is returned different in each orientations..
My guess is it should be the same.
Could you please try setting the meta tag as above and see if it works fine. if no, i would be able to suggest some other way..
Thank you.
just add a few more media queries and css zoom
//base setting, overwrite with other queries
#content { width:800px; }
#media only screen and (max-width : 799px) {
#content { width:600px; }
}
#media only screen and (min-width : 400px) and (max-width :599px) {
#content { width:800px;}
//don't need to set zoom as it is handled by the next media query
}
#media only screen and (max-width : 599px}
body{zoom:200%}
//don't need to set #content as it has a default value of 600 set in the first media query.
}
You could also set initial-scale by doing user-agent sniffing, or adding it via javascript based on widow size, however via css only, you could use zoom to zoom in (user can always zoom out)
Here is some Css that may help you:
// target small screens (mobile devices or small desktop windows)
#media only screen and (max-width: 480px) {
/* CSS goes here */
}
/* high resolution screens */
#media (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2),
(min--moz-device-pixel-ratio: 2),
(min-resolution: 300dpi) {
header { background-image: url(header-highres.png); }
}
/* low resolution screens */
#media (-webkit-max-device-pixel-ratio: 1.5),
(max--moz-device-pixel-ratio: 1.5),
(max-resolution: 299dpi) {
header { background-image: url(header-lowres.png); }
}
If not have a read through this link
http://davidbcalhoun.com/2010/using-mobile-specific-html-css-javascript
Have you tried simply zooming completely out, then letting the user scale in to see whatever it is you want?
Try:
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,minimum-scale=0.25,height=device-height,user-scalable=yes" />
You could do this in javascript by getting the viewport element (either by id or name) and setting it by inspecting the screen.width or window.outerWidth on the fly.
function setViewport() {
var viewport = document.getElemementById("viewport");
if(window.outerWidth <= 400) {
//screen.width gives display pixel count, use window.outerWidth for physical pixel count.
viewport.setAttribute('content', 'width=800);
}
}