a quick question for what is strange behavior in my opinion.
I'm developing an app which, for the moment, is meant to run fully locally, with no network access at all.
Well, since when I've introduced some 3d graphics I'm having this in the debugger log window (in light sky blue)
Please note that such (apparent?) CDN access was fully absent before the addition of a 3d scene.
Could someone tell me what Apple is asking to a CDN and, most important, how can I prevent such accesses that have not been explicitly authorized/configured by the end user?
Thank you
In this case "CDN" does not refer to a Content Delivery Network, but rather to Apple's CoreDisplay framework. The following command will show that these logs come from the framework:
strings /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreDisplay.framework/CoreDisplay | grep "client setup_"
I know that some of the Microsoft employees are members of StackOverflow like the famous Raymond Chen to Larry Osterman (enginner of the Vista's audio stack and per-application sound controlling mechanism) and we know Jeff Atwood is here too. So maybe we can learn some lessons about managed code in core Windows componenets straight from the horse's mouth.
I have downloaded all leaked Windows Longhorn builds (from the "obvious" sources) and poked around to find managed code with tools like "dotPeek" and ".net OR not". I found that managed code was declining in every build after the august 2004 "longhorn reset". But i even find "windows movie maker" written in managed code.
So, here is the question: What are the diffuculties of writing core os components in managed code?
I'm sure there's other considerations, but this is a reasonably obvious one that springs to mind:
Managed code components require a specific version of the managed runtime, and, IIRC, a process can have only one instance of the managed runtime in it. Right off the bat, this rules out using managed code for shared components - since an app and one or more of its components could require different versions of the runtime, and limits its use to application-style components.
Also keep in mind that more parts of Windows are actually 'shared components' than might be immediately obvious. While you might think of Explorer as a form of application, as soon as an app opens a File/Open common dialog, it's now got a bunch of Explorer components within it, listing the available files and directories.
I am using KIF to test my application. I want to start my tests from command line, I looked into the tool WaxSim, looks like it's for running the tests on a simulator. But is there a way to use KIF tests in continous Integration with the real device. It would be helpful if I can invoke the tests from command line which run in a real device.
I know it is possible to do this with apple UI automation on ios5 beta version, but let me know if there is a way to do this in ios4.
Your help will be much appreciated.
-Teja
From the KIF google group
Right now, no, there isn't. Are there any particular device-only needs you have, or is it just on general principle? We're looking in to a way of doing device tests in CI, but it's a tough nut to crack. All of the frameworks for controlling devices are private.
I have registered my Phone 7 app as a Share Picker Extension. It works—my app is in the list of Share options and it gets launched and I can load the chosen image. Okay, great.
But then things go wrong in my code. I would like to be able to debug the issues, but I can't seem to keep the debugger attached.
I cannot debug this in the simulator, since the Pictures app (and thus the Share Picker functionality) is not present in the simulator.
I cannot debug this on the phone because as soon as I pick my app from the Share list, the debugger detaches... right as my app is "launching" again.
Is it possible to attach the debugger to a running WP7 app? Is it possible to keep the debugger attached? Am I doing it wrong? Any suggestions, advice or guesses are welcome because I'm tearing my hair out.
When doing M+V hub integration (sorry, haven't done any pictures hub integration yet) I initially used a crude debug technique (Messagebox.Show, etc. - like Justin mentioned) to verify what was being passed to the NavigationEventArgs of OnNavigatedTo and wrapped the whole method in a try..catch block to learn what was going on. I then refactored the code when I knew what could be expected. (Remember OnNavigatedTo will be called when your app is launched normally too and so e won't be populated in the same way.)
When the app is launched from a/the hub it creates a new instance of the app and there is currently no way to connect to this for debugging while the main page is being navigated to.
Great question. I'm unsure if that's possible. As far as I know, there's no way to attach the debugger to when the WP7 O/S starts an app (which wasn't triggered by the debugger).
Photo Share picker extensibility, music+Video hub extensibility and other O/S extensibility points seem to not play nicely with the VS debugger. Normally I resort to MessageBox.Show to debug any problems with WP7 O/S integration.
1) Connect the Device
2) Turn off Zune
3) Start C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows Phone\v7.1\Tools\WPConnect\x86\WPConnect.exe
To properly debug your application that uses the Media Library, you'll need to use the Windows Phone Connect Tool (WPConnect.exe) as described on MSDN. Jaime has some additional tips on his blog.
Once you are connected, you should be able to debug your application. Fingers crossed anyway. If that doesn't help, I'll dig a bit further.
It's not so much about the WPConnect tool. The nature of your application means that you have to have it closed and the user should pick a photo. Only after that the data is returned to the application.
You should read about the application execution model on Windows Phone 7. Also a good explanation is available here.
Initially, I would say that you should look at tombstoning (a good explanation here) but then again, the image returned will re-start the app and won't allow you to directly attach the debugger.
Yeah, looks like this is impossible...
All the answers above seem to be missing the point: I presume you're able to debug your app in the "standalone" mode (when it's launched normally), but not when it's launched via the Share Picker Extension. Am I write? This is the wall I'm hitting... :-(
I thought the proper way would be to attach to the process once it's launched.
I tried to use Debug > Attach to Process, then select Smart Device as the Transport and Windows Phone Device as the Qualifier... But in return I get the ugly "Unable to connect to 'Windows Phone Device'. Not implemented" message.
Bummer :-(
What's the best way to determine if the version of the JRE installed on a machine is high enough for the application which the user wants to run? Is there a way of doing it using java-only stuff? I'd like the solution to work on Windows/Linux/MacOSX - if the JRE version is too low a message should be displayed. Currently I'm getting an exception if i try to run it on Java 1.5 (the app is built for Java 1.6). If there's no universal solution, what's the best way to do it on Windows?
You could do this using reflection and two compilers. Compile a main class with the oldest java version you want to be able to run at all with. It checks the version using System.getProperty("java.version"), or whatever, and then uses reflection to load your real main class if that check passes, possibly even loading the jar directly. The JRE shouldn't load any classes that weren't referenced by your outer main class at compile time.
You might consider Java Webstart. Even if the name implies something like applets, it's about standalone-applications. Webstart is a launcher, that checks a JNLP-file (a simple XML-file, where you configure the download-location of your app, the needed Java-version and some other metadata) and starts your app with the correct JRE. It even updates the application, if a newer version is available. The downside is, you have to write a JNLP-file. Here is an example:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!--
###############################################################################
#
# #(#)draw.jnlp 1.6 02/09/11
#
# JNLP File for Draw Demo Application
#
###############################################################################
-->
<jnlp spec="0.2 1.0"
codebase="http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/desktop/javawebstart/apps"
href="draw.jnlp">
<information>
<title>Draw 4 App</title>
<vendor>Sun Microsystems, Inc.</vendor>
<homepage href="http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/desktop/javawebstart/demos.html"/>
<description>A minimalist drawing application along the lines of Illustrator</description>
<description kind="short">Draw Demo Short Description</description>
<icon href="images/draw.jpg"/>
<offline-allowed/>
</information>
<resources>
<j2se version="1.3+" href="http://java.sun.com/products/autodl/j2se"/>
<j2se version="1.3+"/>
<jar href="draw.jar" main="true" download="eager"/>
</resources>
<application-desc main-class="Draw"/>
</jnlp>
A second possibility is to use a launcher-program. An example is the Apache Commons Launcher. You can also write some launcher app yourself, but that's usually not worth the effort.
You might also consider using Commons-Launcher, which allows you to setup various environment settings, or perform pre-checks before calling your application.
http://commons.apache.org/launcher
Generally, we've approached this with a C or (when unix-only) shell wrapper. Not sure this will really work for you.
We also approach this by embedding the JRE in our product. Takes care of 99.9% of the cases (the other 0.1% of the time is a user explicitly changing our configuration to use a different JVM). Again, not sure that this is a reasonable solution for you.
In our case, there is significant amounts of native code (JNI and otherwise), so tailoring an installable image for each platform we support is required anyway. But if you're dealing with a pure-Java solution, you may simply have to document your minimum and tell people to get with the program (no pun intended) if they're to run your stuff. It's sorta like people complaining that my Mac won't run MSVC, or that my Linux box is having problems running World of Warcraft. That's just not the (virtual) machine the software is targeted for - you need to switch. At least in the Java world, we really can call this an upgrade, though, without hurting anyone's OS-religious feelings. (Try telling the Mac user to "upgrade" to Windows XP to run MSVC - there's a beat-down waiting to happen.)
You can require a Java version when running the Java command, e.g. java -version:1.6* com.me.MyClass. Not sure if this works on all releases of Java, but it works OK on 1.6 anyway.
An application built for a higher-version JRE will not run on a lower-version JRE. So you wouldn't be able to just add code to your application to check the JRE version - if the JRE version was incompatible, your JRE-version-checking code would not run in the first place.
What you'd have to do is have some sort of launcher application that is built for a lower-version JRE (1.3?) that checks the version and then launches your app if necessary. This sounds kind of kludgy to me.
What about checking the version during installation? Are you installing the app in a way that allows you to check environment variables, or do any sort of scripting?
For the launcher - Check the version in there.
Inside the APP; as above use System.getProperties();
Properties sProp = java.lang.System.getProperties();
String sVersion = sProp.getProperty("java.version");
sVersion = sVersion.substring(0, 3);
Float f = Float.valueOf(sVersion);
if (f.floatValue() < (float) 1.4) {
System.out.println("Java version too low ....");
System.exit(1);
}
...
Have a launching class compiled for Java 1.2 which invokes the real main() in your 1.6 classes. If an unsupported class exception is thrown them catch it and display a nice error message.
Here is the code to get the JRE version installed in a system.
var list = deployJava.getJREs();
var result = "";
result = list[0];
for (var i=1; i<list.length; i++)
{
result += ", " + list[i];
}
document.write("jre version : "+result);
System.getProperties() gives you a listing of JVM properties including the different version ids of the JRE, JVM and specification. This implemented for all versions of Java so should work regardless of version compiled in and version run in, or the implementation.
If you write a basic class to test the version, you can call this first in your main() launching class. It must really be basic functionality though or you might risk breaking it.
Hmm .. call me a boring guy, but what's wrong with using Launch4J or any other native launcher, for instance.
Use a native launcher to check the JVM version before actually running your code. Java only solutions (in my book) only make sense when you deal with developers; once you hit end-users, you'll realize that they dont care about Java or its technical details at all. If you would have written your application in GW-Basic they would not care less as long as your application works.
If Java 1.6 is not installed, lauchner4j will point the user to the download page for JDK 1.6. Thats probably more suitable for your problem than doing magic in Java.
I find that WinRun4J works quite well for me (but then again I may be biased since I wrote it:-)). This lets you specify a minimum and/or maximum version of java allowed. It will pop up a message box to the user if a suitable JRE version is not found (and the message is customisable).
All those above is too damn complicated.
Just go:
Properties props = System.getProperties()
props.list(System.out)
And you will see everything about your JVM, JRE, JDK and staff.
Or get a specific value by using:
//full list of possible props you can see if u run code above
String props = System.getProperty(prop)