i am working on a Cakephp 2.3 ..In my modals i am doing encryption an decryption in these two functions beforeSave and afterFind .. as again and again i have to write this
Security::rijndael($text, Configure::read('constants.crypt_key'), 'encrypt');
so i decided to make a function so i have done this
static public function encrypt($text) {
return Security::rijndael($text, Configure::read('constants.crypt_key'), 'encrypt');
}
static public function decrypt($text) {
return Security::rijndael($text), Configure::read('constants.crypt_key'), 'decrypt');
}
but i want to know where should i write these function.. should it be in app/lib/utility or app/vendors directory and also after suggesting, do tell me how can i access the function in the Model ..how can i import the class in Model..thanks in advance
To use a common function on controller side you have to declare it in 'AppController.php'
While to use function in view files you can mention it in 'AppHelper.php' And for model you can put it in 'Appmodel.php'
It depends where you want to be calling them from. If you're only calling them from your model (which I think makes sense in your case), then you should place them in AppModel.php, which all your models inherit from.
however, having seen your previous question, if you're having to write the encrypt/decrypt function "again and again", then you're probably not designing your app very well.
Really, you should only need to call encrypt once, in your beforeSave, and decrypt once, in your afterFind. If you have to call them in one or two other places... OK. But if you're having to call them all over the place, you're going about things the wrong way.
And also, there should be no need to make it a static function.
Related
I'm writing a variety of Model Tests in CakePHP (PHPUnit)
In TravisCI, I get something like: "Base table or view not found: 1146 Table 'test.events'
In Cake's test runner I get an assertion failure.
The problem I am having is there are methods in my ModelClasses that I am trying to test which call other models with App::uses. For example:
Method on User model:
public function getOtherData() {
App::uses('Event', 'Model');
$this->Event = new Event;
return $this->Event->find('all');
}
And the test:
public function testGetOtherData() {
$result = $this->User->getOtherData();
$this->assertTrue(!empty($result));
}
Note the above example is just that. An example, simplified to show the problem. I understand that the above example has better 'cake' ways of doing it.
Also, I am using defining required fixtures and they work just fine. (I know this by another method in the model which uses a join in the find, instead of App::Uses())
EDIT:
The code when run works, BUT the UnitTest is looking for the other models data (When using App::uses) in the default database, and not the test database. Why doesn't it use the test database? Am I missing something?
LAST NOTE
Using App::uses() and then instantiating the class will work at runtime. But during testing it will fail, as it attempts to use the default database connection, instead of the test database connection.
Per the selected answer, rather than using App::uses, Cakes built in class registry, ClassRegistry::init('Model', true);, you can include a Model from inside another model method.
It's not generally a good idea to instantiate an object in the middle of your functions using the new statement. This is why -- there's no way to block or redirect that call. Also, it's not necessarily easy to get the right parameters to the object's constructor when it's in the middle of another function, so it's best to keep that code separate.
The right way to do this is to use a different method call to get your object. If you use Cake's ClassRegistry::init() to create model objects, they should use the test database.
If you need to create other non-Cake objects, it's best to create them using some other function, e.g. $this->fetchMeOneOThemEventThingies(). Then, during testing, you can mock out that function and have it return something else. Or, you could use some other DI container like pimple, which will take the same role as Cake's ClassRegistry.
If you need a mock model object for testing, be sure to pass the appropriate arguments to the model's constructor as the third parameter to getMock(), or it may use the production database.
I have two types of data that are similar but different. They have some pieces of presentational code that they share but some that they implement differently.
I was thinking that I would have a factory function in a helper (Tracker is a TrackerHelper) like so;
$this->Tracker->getInstance("boolean"); // Returns a BooleanTrackerHelper
But I'm not sure how to return another helper from within another helper. I don't think I can just do a return new BooleanTrackerHelper() since CakePHP probably has it's own routines it wants to go through, and besides; that would force me to place all the classes in the same file.
There is a function in the manual that allows you to load a helper from within a view ($this->Helpers->load()) but I want to load a helper from another helper.
More generally; What do you do if you don't want to repeat in a bunch of different views that if data is of type A use helper A and if it's of type B use helper B, and where helpers A and B share some pieces of code.
There might be a brighter way of solving this, if so; please feel free to share!
If you simply want to use one helper from within another helper, just include it in the $helpers array where you want to use it:
class TrackerHelper extends AppHelper {
public $helpers = array('BooleanTracker');
public function someMethod() {
// Using the other helper
$this->BooleanTracker->someOtherMethod();
}
}
I have a project I'm developing which includes articles that can be commented on (comments stored in separate table of course). I want to perform pre logic on a field from each comment, wherever they are loaded through-out the app. The data logic I want to performed is from a custom written component.
The logical place to me that this could be achieved globally is from the comment model, but I could be wrong.
I'm not even 100% if I can use a component from a model, but I've been trying to do this logic using the afterFind() call-back function:
function afterFind($results) {
foreach ($results as $key => $val) {
if (isset($val['Comment']['created'])) {
$results[$key]['Comment']['created'] = $this->Dateconvert->howLongAgo($val['Comment']['created']);;
}
}
return $results;
}
I have tried echoing from inside this function and it doesn't actually seem to be getting called but searching hasn't revealed any functions that do, but I believe afterFind() is best to illustrate what I'm trying to achieve.
So I am looking for a solution where I can performed the post-load logic on articles comments, whether they are being loaded from other controllers with associations to comments or in the comments controller. Basically a global one hit solution :D
cakephp indicates that components are for controllers and behaviours for models and helpers for view...
knowing that first, you may also know that you can use any part of it wherever you want because cake still php, though is not recomended... if is a library of functions you may want to put it inside the libs folders and access it from there.
how, easy use App::import('component', 'nameComponent'); component can be lib, controller, etc..
Having said that, afterFind is a good place to do after load things, remember that this function is call ONLY when a find is used, if you use, any other like query or save or update it won't be called.
hope this helps you :)
I have an admin controller that I would like to utilize functions in other controllers (these functions do not represent pages that someone would load in their browser), but it cannot utilize those functions because the functions in the other controllers are private. They are private because I don't want the public to access them. Is there a way to make a controller function not accesible to the public without making the function private or protected?
public function __blah(){
// function that can't be accessed from outside, but can be called from other functions
}
Based on what I've read in the comment of the answer Piotr gave you:
You don't use an admin controller. You want to use admin prefixes:
http://book.cakephp.org/view/950/Prefix-Routing
And authentication:
http://book.cakephp.org/view/1250/Authentication
If you call - and thats how your comment sounds like - one controller from another you're doing something totally wrong in an MVC framework. If it should be re-usable code it should go into components if it's about admin action use the prefix routing and admin_* methods, auth component and protected methods for what you call "helper" methods.
Yes.
You have a lot of information in the CakePHP Book about ACL (access control list) and that is exactly what you're looking for.
Or you may use Auth component.
I see three possible solutions (they can also be combined):
The first solution is to move the code you want to reuse to components (as mentioned by burzum).
The second solution depends on your code. It's possible that you do stuff in the controller which should be done in the model. In this case, move the respective code to the model.
The third solution is to put the code you want to reuse into plain old PHP classes and load them as vendor files.
I'm new to PHP and decided to use the cakePHP framework to help me get started.
I can't figure out one thing though, I want to call methods on the RequestHandlerComponent class to update a users last used IP address and other information, I figured the best place to put this would be in the beforeSave() method on the User model.
I can't figure out how to call the getClientIP method though.
The normal code that would otherwise go in the controller doesn't work. Is there another way to call this class if you're in the model and not the controller?
Class Level:
var $components = array('RequestHandler');
And in the function:
$this->data['User']['lastActiveIP'] = $this->RequestHandler->getClientIP();
Gives:
Undefined property: User::$RequestHandler
Call to a member function getClientIP() on a non-object
Components, by design, aren't available to models (without bypassing MVC convention - which you can do, of course). If you chose to force it to be available, look into ClassRegistry::init(). A better solution, I think, would be to employ the RequestHandler component in your controller (where it's meant to be used), set the lastActiveIp value in the controller (exactly as you've shown in your own example code) and pass the entire data array along to the model.
Now your component is being used where it should be and the model gets to remain ignorant about where it gets its data. At the risk of oversimplification, all the model should know is what to do with the data once it arrives; let the controller worry about collecting and packaging the data.
In addition to Rob's answer, maybe it's enough to put a bit of code together yourself that uses the general env('REMOTE_ADDR') or similar variables. Look at the RequestHandler code, it's not doing anything terrifically complicated.
You may even be able to call the component statically, which is slightly better than instantiating it in the model (still in violation of MVC though). Untested, but should work:
App::import('Component', 'RequestHandler');
RequestHandlerComponent::getClientIp();