I'm attempting to set up my computer such that I can authenticate myself using an external device connected to a python script. I started by replacing the login program in inittab with my own program, and I've been able to get into a bash shell. The problem is that it doesn't get a fresh environment like the one that is (I presume) given with login. I know there are ways for me to mess with the environment, but i haven't seen a way to give it a "default" configuration, if even such a thing makes sense.
Some ideas:
First of all it would be better in most cases to use the pluggable login architecture PAM. This will ensure, that all PAM-enabled applications and services can use the authentification method (ssh for example) and that there is no way to bypass it using regular services.
If you really want to replace login i'd suggest to clear the environment by yourselves using unsetenv for each environment variable set (you may use environ to determine the variables already set). After cleaning up the environment you may use a exec-like call to replace your program with a bash, the environment will be unchanged in this context. You may want to add the command line argument -l to start up bash as it would have been invoked by login.
Bash is running some init scripts on startup. You may check /etc/profile, /etc/bashrc and similar files for environment variables you don't want to be set.
If you want to be dependant on env (wich is not so bad, since it should be present on every linux system out there) you can use env -i bashto call bash in a clean environment.
When main(int argc, char *argv[], char *envp[]) is called by the operating system, the third parameter contains the environment. So just save a copy of it until you need to call bash.
Related
I am trying to find an equivalent for setenv to use in a C program. What I am trying to do is to modify the values of all the environment variables of the currently running process. I am trying to use putenv but it doesn't change the variables` values in any way. What could I do?
Those are the correct methods for setting the environment variables. The issue you are hitting is that SetEnvironmentVariable which is what is used by the C Runtime setenv does not change system-wide environment variables; only the environment of the currently running process.
Changing the system-wide or per-user environment variables on Windows is normally done using scripts or UI. To modify the system-wide environment variables from a C program, you need (a) to run it with administrator rights, (b) you need to modify the System Registry, and (c) you need to send a WM_SETTINGSCHANGE Win32 message to get the changes picked up by the Windows shell.
I have a custom board running Yocto (Jethro) and would like to run a single u-boot command, preboot. Obviously, breaking the boot sequence with space and running it manually works. How do I get it to run automatically? More specifically, where is the startup command sequence, by default?
Edit: Also, I am aware I can edit the environment at runtime. However, I am trying to build this change into the image so I can distribute it.
When you are in the uboot environment. Enter printenv, it will list the environment variables that uboot uses.
There is a variable name bootcmd. Currently, mine contain a bunch of if else command. Similarly, add your prefer function there for boot.
And after it is finished and tested. Use saveenv to store the edit
Here is a syntax for uboot.
Edit:
U-Boot allows to store commands or command sequences in a plain text file. Using the mkimage tool you can then convert this file into a script image which can be executed using U-Boot's autoscr command. U-boot Scripting Capabilities
Typically, your U-Boot recipe will build U-Boot for a single machine, in that case, I'd normally just patch the compiled in, default, U-Boot environment to do the right thing. This is achieved by
SRC_URI_machine += "file://mydefenv.patch"
Or (even better) use your own git tree. This would also have the additional benefit that your system might be able to boot up and to something useful, even if the environment would be totally corrupted.
Another possibility is to do it like Charles suggested in a comment to another answer, create an environment offline, and have U-Boot load it, see denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/UBootScripts
A third possibility, that I've also used sometimes, is to construct the environment offline (possibly using the same or a similar mechanism as in the link above), and the flash the environment to flash during the normal flash programming process. Though, most of the time I've done this on AT91's, using a tcl script similar to at91 Sam-Ba TCL script
No matter which method you chose, the bootcmd variable in U-Boot should hold your boot script.
The general answer is that bootcmd is run by default, and if there is persistent environment you can change the command and 'saveenv' so that it's kept.
It is easiest to modify the said bootcmd, which is executed anyway.
As an alternative to patching the kernel, it is possible to override the command in u-boot.
Create a file e.g. platform-top.h at the same place where you would place the patch file (it might already exist) and override the CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND.
The result will look something like this:
/* ... */
/* replace the memory write with any other valid command */
#define CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND "mw 0x1 0x1 && run default_bootcommand"
Don't forget to make the file known in your bbapend SRC_URI = "file://platform-top.h"
I am using xinetd to serve the output of check_mk_agent. I have custom check_mk_agent scripts, some of which are configured with environment variables. These environment variables are set in /etc/profile.d/set_env.sh. When I run check_mk_agent manually, the environment variables are found, and the custom checks succeed. When i do telnet myhost 6556, the environment variables are not found, and the custom checks fail.
My question is, what is a good way to ensure that set_env.sh gets run in the xinetd context? I would rather not use env and passenv variables in xinetd configuration, because it would be annoying to unnecessarily maintain environment variables in multiple places on the same host.
Thanks!
Edit the file check_mk_agent file, and add the flowing line just after #!/bin/bash:
source /etc/profile.d/set_env.sh
Save this, and retry.
I'm writing a 'C' program that makes several calls to system() to execute other programs. When constructing the command string is it better to explicitly give the full path to the program being called, or should I just give the executable name and let the shell resolve its location using the PATH environment variable?
The programs I'm calling are all part of a single package and I have the path to the installation directory from a preprocessor definition. Giving the explicit path would seem to avoid errors that might occur if multiple installed programs share the same name. However it makes building the command strings a little more complicated, and everything will break if the user moves the programs around after installation.
Is there a widely accepted best practice covering this?
[Clarification]
I'm using autoconf/automake to generate the distribuion. The preprocessor definition providing the installation directory is created by the makefile. It reflects the user's choice of the installation directory as specified either on the configure comamnd line or the make command line. I do take the point about using environment variables to specify the location for the binaries though. It seems like an unneeded pain in the butt to make users rebuild just to change the location of the binaries.
Best practice is never to assume that you know your install directory at build time. Let your users decide where to install and work anyway.
This means that you will need to find out where your programs are located using some other mechanism. Consider using environment variables or command line parameters to allow the user to specify the actual path, if your platform does not provide you with the means to find out where the executables are located. You can use your knowledge of where you are normally installed as a fallback option.
For your actual question, in case you can build the absolute path to your program (using another mechanism than preprocessor directives) - use that. Otherwise, fall back to having the system find out for you.
The best practice is to not presume anything about the system you're installing onto. You can have the best of both worlds if you just let the user choose. Make the command you call an application preference or require paths to be defined in the environment:
PATH_TO_TOOL1=foo
PATH_TO_TOOL2=/usr/bin/bar
You can, of course, just fall back to a default of some kind if the variables aren't defined or the preference isn't set. Writing your application to be more flexible is always the best choice!
You should definitely let the user specify the path with an environment variable to the installed binaries. Not all systems are the same and many people will want to put their execs in different places.
the best example I can think of is people doing a local install vs system install. If your program is installed in a home directory that user will have to set and env variable to say where the binaries are copied to.
If you're absolutely sure of the path names, and if they are not "well-known" commands (for example, POSIX shell utilities on Unix are "well-known"), you should specify the pathname, otherwise don't specify the full path, or let the user control it by using an environment variable.
In fact, you may be able to write something like a function such as int my_system(const char *);, which does the prefixing of the path for you. If later you determine that it was a bad idea, it's just a matter of making my_system() identical to system().
I'm not sure if it's a best practice, but what I do in these cases is I write my C code to extend the PATH environment variable to include the installation directory at the end. Then I just use the PATH. That way, if the user's PATH wants to override where I believe the stuff was installed, it can—but if the software was installed in an out-of-the-way place, I can call it without forcing my users to put the directory on $PATH themselves.
Please note that the extended PATH lasts only as long as the C program runs; I'm not proposing changing the persistent PATH.
I am currently using libproxy to get the proxy information (if any) on RedHat and Debian Linux. It doesn't work all that well, but it's the only way I know I can use to get the proxy information from my code.
I need to stop using the lib since in most cases it doesn't recognize the proxy.
Is there any way to acquire the proxy information? What i mean is, is there a file (or group of files) i can read, or an env variable or an API or system call that i can use to get the information?
Gnome based code is OK, KDE might help as well but i am looking for something more generic.
The code is C.
Now, before anyone asks, I don't want to use libproxy anymore. Period. I don't want to start investigating why it doesn't work. I don't really want to know whether there is a new version of that lib. I know it might work, I just don't want to use it. i can't use it (just because). So please don't point me that way.
Code is appreciated.
thanks.
In linux, the "global proxy setting" is typically just environment variables that are usually set in /etc/profile. You can examine those variables to see what proxy is set.
The variables are:
http_proxy - the proxy for HTTP connections
ftp_proxy - the proxy for FTP connections
Using the Network Proxy Preferences tool under Gnome saves information in the GConf database. The path to the keys are /system/http_proxy and /system/proxy. You can read about the detail in those trees at this page.
You can access the GConf database using the library API. Note that GConf is based on GObject. To examine the contents of this tree using the command line, try the following:
gconftool-2 -R /system/http_proxy
This will provide a "name = value" listing of the tree, which may be usable in your application. Note that this requires a system() call, so it's not recommended for a deployed application, but it might help you get started.
GNOME has its own place to store the Proxy settings, and I am sure KDE or any other DE has its own place too. May be you can look for any mention of where Proxy settings should be store in the Linux Standard Base. That could hint you a standard of doing it irrespective of Distro or DE.
DE -> Desktop Environment
char* proxy = getenv("all_proxy");
This statement puts the value of the environment variable called all_proxy, which is used by the system as a global proxy, in your C variable.
To print it in bash, try env | grep 'all_proxy' | cut -d= -f 2.