I am writing a little PDF library in C. When generating PDF source code that is responsible for rendering text, I need to know how much space the rendered text occupies in order to render the next paragraph correctly.
How do I find out?
Thank you!
The mechanisms and math of PDF text rendering are exhaustively explained in the PDF specification ISO 32000-1. Most important are chapters 8 Graphics and 9 Text.
Essentially you need to know the current graphic state (which should be easy because you after all are the one who creates the PDF) and the metrics of the font you use and then calculate.
Most of these details are governed by the operators and calculations described in chapter 9 but one should not forget the current transformation matrix described in chapter 8.
Related
I created a font binary file from a TTF file and I can place it on the TFT screen on the TTGO T5 T-Display just fine. Looks great! I have been looking for 2 days for how to center this information on screen. I cannot find the format of the .vlw file or the format of what I included in the sketch to print from (converted by online site from .vlw format). And I can't find a routine to do it for me.
I am using the TFT_eSPI and it does not contain a getTextBounds routine. There is one in the Adafruit_GFX library and I included that but it not available any way I have tried. And I can't read it enough to fix it for what I need. Too deep for me at this time, especially since I don't know the data file format. I have been programming for decades but can't make this stuff up!
So, simple question with a complex answer, it seems. How to center a proportional font (invoked by name (not one of the numbered default fonts) on TTGO TFT screen using ESP32.
This makes my brain hurt. Help, please...
I have a question that's very specific, yet very general at the same time. (Also, I don't know if this is quite the right site for this.)
The Scenario
Let's say I have an uncompressed video vid.avi. It is then run through [Some compression algorithm], which is lossy. I want to compare vid.avi and the new, compressed file to determine just how much data was lost in the compression. How can I compare the files and how can I measure the difference between the two, using the original as the reference point? Is it possible at all? I would prefer a generic answer that will work with any language, but I would also gladly accept an answer that's specific to a language.
EDIT: Let me be more specific. I want something that compares two video files in a similar way that the Notepad++ Compare plugin compares text files. I just want to find out how close each individual pixel's colour is to the original file's colour for that pixel.
Thanks in advance, and thank you for taking the time to read this question.
It is generally the change in video quality that people want to measure when comparing compression methods, rather than a loss of data.
If you did want to measure somehow the data loss, you would have to define what you mean by 'data' and how you wanted to measure it. Video compression is quite complex and the approach may even differ frame by frame within a video. Data could mean the colour depth for each pixel, the number of frames per second, whether a frame is encoded based on a delay to other frames etc.
Video quality is subjective so the reduction in quality after compression will not be an absolute value. The usual way to measure the quality is similar to the technique used for audio - Mean Opinion Score: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_opinion_score. Its essentially uses a well defined process to try to apply some objectivity to a test audiences subjective experience.
Lets say I have an image called Test.jpg.
I just figured out how to bring an image into the project by the following line:
FILE *infile = fopen("Stonehenge.jpg", "rb");
Now that I have the file, do I need to convert this file into a bmp image in order to apply a filter to it?
I have never worked with images before, let alone OpenCl so there is a lot that is going over my head.
I need further clarification on this part for my own understanding
Does this bmp image also need to be stored in an array in order to have a filter applied to it? I have seen a sliding window technique be used a couple of times in other examples. Is the bmp image pretty much split up into RGB values (0-255)? If someone can provide a link on this item that should help me understand this a lot better.
I know this may seem like a basic question to most but I do not have a mentor on this subject in my workplace.
Now that I have the file, do I need to convert this file into a bmp image in order to apply a filter to it?
Not exactly. bmp is a very specific image serialization format and actually a quite complicated one (implementing a BMP file parser that deals with all the corner cases correctly is actually rather difficult).
However what you have there so far is not even file content data. What you have there is a C stdio FILE handle and that's it. So far you did not even check if the file could be opened. That's not really useful.
JPEG is a lossy compressed image format. What you need to be able to "work" with it is a pixel value array. Either an array of component tuples, or a number of arrays, one for each component (depending on your application either format may perform better).
Now implementing image format decoders becomes tedious. It's not exactly difficult but also not something you can write down on a single evening. Of course the devil is in the details and writing an implementation that is high quality, covers all corner cases and is fast is a major effort. That's why for every image (and video and audio) format out there you usually can find only a small number of encoder and decoder implementations. The de-facto standard codec library for JPEG are libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo. If your aim is to read just JPEG files, then these libraries would be the go-to implementation. However you also may want to support PNG files, and then maybe EXR and so on and then things become tedious again. So there are meta-libraries which wrap all those format specific libraries and offer them through a universal API.
In the OpenGL wiki there's a dedicated page on the current state of image loader libraries: https://www.opengl.org/wiki/Image_Libraries
Does this bmp image also need to be stored in an array in order to have a filter applied to it?
That actually depends on the kind of filter you want to apply. A simple threshold filter for example does not take a pixel's surroundings into account. If you were to perform scanline signal processing (e.g. when processing old analogue television signals) you may require only a single row of pixels at a time.
The universal solution of course to keep the whole image in memory, but then some pictures are so HUGE that no average computer's RAM can hold them. There are image processing libraries like VIPS that implement processing graphs that can operate on small subregions of an image at a time and can be executed independently.
Is the bmp image pretty much split up into RGB values (0-255)? If someone can provide a link on this item that should help me understand this a lot better.
In case you mean "pixel array" instead of BMP (remember, BMP is a specific data structure), then no. Pixel component values may be of any scalar type and value range. And there are in fact colour spaces in which there are value regions which are mathematically necessary but do not denote actually sensible colours.
When it comes down to pixel data, an image is just a n-dimensional array of scalar component tuples where each component's value lies in a given range of values. It doesn't get more specific for that. Only when you introduce colour spaces (RGB, CMYK, YUV, CIE-Lab, CIE-XYZ, etc.) you give those values specific colour-meaning. And the choice of data type is more or less arbitrary. You can either use 8 bits per component RGB (0..255), 10 bits (0..1024) or floating point (0.0 .. 1.0); the choice is yours.
Given an image (i.e. newspaper, scanned newspaper, magazine etc), how do I detect the region containing text? I only need to know the region and remove it, don't need to do text recognition.
The purpose is I want to remove these text areas so that it will speed up my feature extraction procedure as these text areas are meaningless for my application. Anyone know how to do this?
BTW, it will be good if this can be done in Matlab!
Best!
You can use Stroke Width Transform (SWT) to highlight text regions.
Using my mex implementation posted here, you can
img = imread('http://i.stack.imgur.com/Eyepc.jpg');
[swt swtcc] = SWT( img, 0, 10 );
Playing with internal parameters of the edge-map extraction and image filtering in SWT.m can help you tweak the resulting mask to your needs.
To get this result:
I used these parameters for the edge map computation in SWT.m:
edgeMap = single( edge( img, 'canny', [0.05 0.25] ) );
Text detection in natural images is an active area of research in computer vision community. U can refer to ICDAR papers. But in your case I think it should be simple enough. As you have text from newspaper or magazines, it should be of fixed size and horizontally oriented.
So, you can apply scanning window of a fixed size, say 32x32. Train it on ICDAR 2003 training dataset for positive windows having text in it. U can use a small feature set of color and gradients and train an SVM which would give a positive or negative result for a window having text or not.
For reference go to http://crypto.stanford.edu/~dwu4/ICDAR2011.pdf . For code, you can try their homepages
This example in the Computer Vision System Toolbox in Matlab shows how to detect text using MSER regions.
If your image is well binarized and you know the usual size of the text you could use the HorizontalRunLengthSmoothing and VerticalRunLengthSmoothing algorithms. They are implemented in the open source library Aforge.Net but it should be easy to reimplement them in Matlab.
The intersection of the result image from these algorithm will give you a good indication that the region contains text, it is not perfect but it is fast.
Hi i want to transform a image like this (right to left image ):
I have searching about functions like cvCartToPolar but i dont know how to use it..
Can someone help me? :)
nowadays, there is cv::warpPolar and if you can't achieve what you want (because for example your input image is only part of a disk, you might be interessed in cv::remap (the former uses the later internally).
In the later case, you have to build the mapping table yourself with some math.