Do I need to purchase an iTextSharp license for an intranet application? [closed] - licensing

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
This question may have been answered already, but I haven't been able to find an answer matching my scenario. I'm trying to understand when it's required to purchase a license for iTextSharp.
I want to use iTextSharp in an intranet application within a for-profit company. Can I use the free version? Or am I required to purchase a license? I will not be selling the application or the source code. The application will be used internally by members of the organization.

The issue is not about the internal/external use. It's not even about selling the application or not. It's just a matter of license:
If you release you application under a AGPL-compatible license, you don't need to purchase an iText commercial license.
In not, you'll have to contact their sales department, and purchase one.

Related

Can I use advertisements with community license for dot42? [closed]

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I want to start making apps for Android and I want to know if I can start safely with free license and see if I can make some money with advertisements inside my apps. So my question is can I do that?
The Community License is free. It does not permit any form of
commercial use. Furthermore, the Community License allows you to
publish free apps on a public market place such as (but not limited
to) Google Play or SlideME.
It seems like kind of commercial use, but then again, the application would be free...
If the answer is no, would you recommend some other way of making apps that would be free? HTML5? Java with Eclipse?
Thanks in advance!
Ads inside your app is considered commercial so you would need the Pro license. You may start without ads with the community license. See how your audience grows and then move to the Pro license when you feel it pays off.

MonoTouch Enterprise Licensing [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
How many developers can work together with MonoTouch Enterprise Licensing?
It's one seat per license, but they do have volume licensing aswell.
http://support.xamarin.com/customer/portal/topics/80275-store-faq/articles
Only one developer can use the enterprise license at one time.
This license is assigned to your company though, instead of a specific developer, so if you hire somebody else, or the current developer leaves the team, another one can work on the project without having to purchase a new license.

Wurfl license in a commercial product [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I noticed that WURFL changed his license model on 30 august 2010. Can please anyone explain me, can I use it with new license in commercial product?
See licensing info for commercial use at ScientaMobile
A cloud offering should be making it's debut in roughly a month, and may save you some $ depending on your usage. A free version with limited capabilities will likely be included as well.

JIRA opensource licence [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I saw this on the licensing information section on the Jira website
JIRA is free for use by official non-profit organisations and charities (proof of non-profit status is required). There are certain organisations whose purpose is to make the world a better place, and we believe in helping them achieve that.
Community licenses are designed for organisations which are:
* non-profit,
* non-government,
* non-academic,
* non-commercial,
* non-political and
* secular
What does the last bullet point actually mean? Does it mean that if you believe in God you cant have a free license for a bug tracking software product?
I would imagine that you as an individual may believe in God(s), but the organisation itself should not be a religious organisation.
I actually asked Atlassian support the very same question a year ot two ago and they said that they don't do community licenses for churches etc. Seemed a bit restrictive to me.

ObjectListView in closed-source program to sell [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Is it possible to use ObjectListView, which uses the GPL v3 license, legally in a closed-source program that will be sold?
If so, what has to be done to make sure to not violate the license?
ObjectListView has a GPL license so that it is usable by all free software.
Commercial licenses are available, with payment being related to the size of the organisation that wants the licenses.
If you cannot afford any license, we can still work something out. I've never denied a commercial license to anyone who wanted one.

Resources