I am trying to debug code that works with byte arrays of extremely large sizes (7 million or so bytes), but the built in functionality of VS is insufficient, Array Visualizer cannot handle such sizes, and you cannot write your own custom debugging visualizers to work with arrays. Is there an easy way to visualize or inspect regions of the array from within visual studio so I do not have to write the array to file and inspect it with a hex editor?
Thanks!
If you are debugging native languages you can use the following:
You can use the syntax (array + offset), to watch a particular range of elements starting at the offset position (of course, array here is your actual object). If you want to watch the entire array, you can simply say array, count.
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/469416/More-Visual-Studio-Debugging-Tips-for-Native-De
Related
I want to work with a dynamic array using visual basic and I want that each element of the array will be an individual dynamic array too. How I should proceed? Thanks.
Read this - https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa716275(v=vs.60).aspx
And also this, in case you decide that reDim-ing things is annoying: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.collections.arraylist(v=vs.110).aspx
Essentially though, you want to make an array and fill it with arrays. Then just treat those arrays independently for re-sizing purposes.
In many languages you can specify that an array is of a certain type. For instance, in Java you could write:
String[] arrayOfStrings;
However in ActionScript 3 it seems that you can only specify that an object is of type Array, for instance:
var myArray:Array;
Is there a way to specify what type of object an AS3 array will contain?
You can use Vector.<String> to store several objects of the given type in an array. Vector is type-safe and is faster than Array so in almost all cases (when it's up to you) you should use Vector instead of Array.
I also recommend reading this article about the various ways to construct a vector. The article is from 2010 (so many Flash Player improvements have been done since then) but much of it still applies and you can download Jackson's test source to run the performance test on the current player.
is there a way to create a fixed size array in LabView?
I know that I can do some check on the array size, then discard values when an array size become greater than a specific value. But, I think that is a common problem, so there is some built in function in LabView to have a fixed size array?
As far as I know this is impossible, unless they changed something in one of their latest releases but I doubt it: it would probably require a serious rewrite of the core array code.
The closest you can get is writing your own (possibly polymorphic) array class in which you encapsulate an actual array, that you initialize once with a certain size. For the rest your class only exposes methods to get/set by index. No resize etc.
Or, if you are talking about arrays of controls etc on the front panel, you can probably do this at the UI level by hide the indexing control from it and making sure it cannot be resized graphically. Or probably it's also doable to create a custom control and strip lots of array functionality from it.
If the array size is fixed at design time, then you might consider using a cluster instead. There is even a primitive to convert an array to a cluster of fixed size, provided the length is less then 257. (Array To Cluster function.)
There is also a primitive to go the other way if you need to index the array.
One implementation that you could do is a queue with a fixed size. You can use preview queue and flush queue to implement the functionality you want. However a specific custom class is probably a better idea.
In regular desktop LabVIEW, fixed-sized arrays would be something you'd have to code as per the answers you've already gotten here. However, in LabVIEW FPGA with, say, cRIO, all arrays must be fixed-size.
When calling the Call Library Function Node to a WINAPI DLL, there are times where a structure element may be officially be defined as BYTE[130]. So how do you absolutely, positively make sure your cluster has exactly the space for 130 bytes?
You can't do it with arrays no matter what, because LabVIEW arrays are pointers to a structure (the first element being the length), meaning any array you insert will only allocate enough space for a pointer, 4 bytes.
The work-around I came up with is to insert a cluster that includes sixteen U64 and one U16, pass that through an unflatten to string and you'll find it's exactly 130 bytes long.
When the cluster returns from the call, merely type cast the flattened into string results into a U8 array
I am currently trying to write a UI for a Data Acquistion System in Visual Studio C++ 2010, and I am having a lot of trouble dealing with the interfacing of the third party libraries I am using and Windows Forms. The two libraries I am using are DAQX, a C library for a Data Acqustion System, and VITCam, a C++ library for a 1394 High Speed Camera. It's extremely frustrating trying to work with these libraries and any UI library that VS has to offer, as none of the function arguments ever get along.
DAQX uses windows types like WORD and DWORD, in normal C fashion, and when I'm writing a normal program, no UI involved, it works fine, but Windows Forms seems to hate anytime I want to make a simple DWORD Array inside the class.
VITCam is even worse. I can open the camera fine, but I am completely lost when it comes to trying to put the image on the screen somehow. I haven't uncovered an equivalanet, easy to follow way for putting it to the screen as to how the documentation puts it:
CDC* pDC=GetDC(); // obtain the device context for your window...
// move the image data
::SetDIBitsToDevice(pDC->m_hDC,0,0,
(int) (MyCam.GetDispBuf()->bmiHeader.biWidth),
(int) (MyCam.GetDispBuf()->bmiHeader.biHeight),
0,0,0,(WORD) (WORD) MyCam.GetDispBuf()->bmiHeader.biHeight,
MyCam.GetDispPixels(),MyCam.GetDispBuf(),
DIB_RGB_COLORS);
I can barely follow it as is. So, without doing to much blathering, How do most people work with static unmanaged libraries that were not developed with Windows Forms in mind? I've tried MFC as the VITCam documentations mentioned it, but it makes very little sense and isn't as intuitive as Windows Forms feels.
Edit:
This is the error message I get when trying to use a normal (at least to me) array.
Error 1 error C4368: cannot define 'buffer' as a member of managed 'WirelessHeadImpact::Form1': mixed types are not supported
And it points to this line:
private:
WORD buffer[BUFFSIZE*CHANCOUNT];
What I had before was this:
static array<WORD>^ _buffer;
And within a function I create the former array, pass it to the function, then return the latter after looping through and updating the array.
WORD buffer[BUFFSIZE*CHANCOUNT];
DWORD scansCollected = 0;
while (total_scans < SCANS) {
daqAdcTransferBufData(_handle, buffer, BUFFSIZE, DabtmWait, &scansCollected);
if (scansCollected > 0) {
for (WORD i=0;i<scansCollected;i++) {
_buffer[i] = buffer[i];
}
mixed type support is removed in Visual C++ 2005. If you want to associate a DWORD array to a managed class, use new (not gcnew) to allocate the array itself on the native heap and save the pointer of the array in the class.
by the way, you cannot pass addresses of objects on the managed heap to a native function without pinning the object, otherwise the GC is free to move the object at any time. If you want to pass a managed value to a native function, make sure your pass by value or the object is pinned.
It helps the readers if you post the actual error message you are getting, instead of having to guess out from your question.
First post here. Using C in Visual Studio 2008. Can work with VS 2005 if necessary.
How do I display numerical data in arrays as in a spreadsheet?
How do I plot numerical data in arrays?
These seem to be simple questions. But I cannot find solutions. So far, I would print the data to a file, import into Excel and view/plot. However, with this code there are too many arrays--so the print/import/plot is tiring.
Some constraints.
I do not want to write 20+ lines of code to do the above. MATFOR or Array Visualizer let you do the plotting with a one line function call.
They cannot display the data in a convenient format. I would like to display the data and the plot in one or two windows so that they are visible simultaneously.
This is a win32 console application---all the code is portable.
Will be using these during debugging.
Free or paid.
While I am looking for something specific, the requirements are substantially the same for any one doing numerical work with arrays and matrices--displaying data and plot simultaneously.
I am hoping that a such a tool has been written and is available.
I am also open to a solution that outputs the array data to an Excel sheet (can keep Excel open) and if it can also plot that can be great but I can live without plotting.
PS: I need this only when debugging the code.
I use ArrayDebugView which is a plug-in you install in Visual studio and draws graphs out of arrays while you are debugging your application. It works as a visual way of variable watch in debug mode. You don't need to write a line of code.
I can't think of any library that would enable what you want in a console app in less than 20 lines of code. My suggestion would be instead to script the plotting-step using MATLAB og GNU Octave to do the actual plotting.
In order to display numerical data in array, you should add the pointer to the first data element you want to observe, into the watch --- if you want to observe the array from the beginning, it would just be the array name, which is the pointer to the first element. In order to view more then one element, you add a "," after the pointer, followed by the number of element you want to observe.
For example, in order to observe the elements of float farray[100];, you should add to the watch farray,100.
In order to plot, you can copy-paste from the watch to your plotting software (i.e. excel), but it is not very convenient as you cannot copy the data column alone, but the columns to the left and right as well, so it involves extra manual editing.
I use GNUPlot (http://www.gnuplot.info/) to display my performance/speedup measurements.
I print my numbers to stdout and wrote a bash script that combines these numbers and calls gnuplot for rendering.
I made a simple plotting program for that purpose. There is only a textbox where I paste the data and a chart where it's drawn.
The data needs to be in either form:
with an automatic X (increment by 1 for each value): seriesName value
for both X and Y specified: seriesName xvalue yvalue
Most of the time I used to plot data from tracepoints.
I copy/paste the whole output window of VS, the plotting program ignores anything that doesn't follow these 2 forms (so I don't have to cleanup the string and put it in excel and all).
It does line, point, colum, area charts and save image, copy to clipboard.
MiniPlot
There are several ways to do this but this will require writing some code. Visualizing data is generally easy and straight forward but visualizing data exactly the way you want them to look will require some additional code and work.
There are several options to visualize data:
A combination of BASH and GNUPLOT
Use MATLAB or OCTAVE for all your calculations and visualization
Use PYTHON and SciPy and matlibplot libraries.
Gnuplot is a great tool to plot data but it is cumbersome to use. It looks fabulous if you invest time to get the plots right and combines excellent with LaTeX and has a good fit implementation for arbitrary functions. Visit http://gnuplot-tricks.blogspot.ch/ great site to learn all about gnuplot.
Numerical programs such as MATLAB and it's open source equivalent OCTAVE are great because they are fast implementation languages for numerical programs and have extensive additional libraries especially MATLAB. For high load numerical computing it is really slow and the plot library is only good for basic plotting needs.
Using PYTHON and its scientific programing libraries (SciPy and matlibplot) are a great combination. This allows excellent plot which are not as cryptic as gnuplot to plrogram and it is more flexible than MATLAB in plotting. Additionally it gives you a environment for numerical programing like MATLAB.