I am trying to model a student database but I am unsure of how to represent the student, assessment taken, and student results. Below is the description of the scenario:
Several students are offering one or more subjects, these subjects have one or more assessments. How would the you represent students, the subject offered, the assessment taken and the results of the assessment taken by the students? I have attached a copy of the design I made so far.
my intension is to design a database where querying of the student,subject,assessment,
and assessment result can be possible and easy.
Full-size image
IMHO you should have a ternary relationship between student, subject and assessment owning the assessment result. This is necessary in the case where a student can have many subject for the same assessment.
Otherwise if an assessment have many subject but only one for a given student you have different choice :
You can keep the ternary.
You can otherwise store the subject id and result in a student - assessment relationship table
or the student id and result in a subject - assessment table.
This should depend on the way you will usually query those tables (all subject for assessment A, all students with subject X for assessment A, all results for subject X for assessment A, etc...
This have several ways to resolve, but why you don't use the Students*---*Subject relationship to associate the assessment to. Because assessment is directly related with this association. So it can't make sense without the relation between a student and a Subject.
You can call the derived table from the has_and_belongs to many relationship between Students and Subject, Assessment with the following fields(There is no place that obey you to call this association student_subjects):
ASSESSMENT
id:PK
student_id:FK
subject_id:FK
assessment_result
created_at, TIMESTAMP
Imagine that the student can make several assessments during their school year, you can save phase 1, phase 2, or Exam1, Exam2, etc... in other field in this table.
The timestamp will provide you a way to know the last result that a student had for a subject.
This is just my point of view, correct me if there is something that i'm not seeing.
Related
I am new to using UML and I am not sure if my diagram is correct. I would like some advice from someone more experienced than me.
The statement of my problema says:
Students study courses and each student can take several courses "studies" each. Any course can have more than one student studying it.
Students, who are identified by a numerical code, have a name, date of birth and one or more nationalities.
A student who studies can receive scholarships.
A Student can recieve more than one scholarship per course. And an
individual scholarship can be given to more than one student. The
scholarships have a numeric code, which identifies them, a name, a
base amount and different conditions to be fulfilled at the time of
the assignment.
My proposal is the following:
What I want is to represent students, grants and the courses the student takes, and I am not sure if I should use an associative relation or a ternary relation.
Can anybody confirm if my proposal UML diagram is the right one?
The only statement directly relating students, courses & grants is the unclear "[a s]tudent can receive more than one grant per course".
It only actually says that each student-course pair can have more than one associated grant. (Maybe the author of the assignment thought that that "per" sentence is saying more than that, but it's not.) It doesn't say of a student whether their grants depend on their courses, and if so how. Your design is best when given a triplet you can't tell anything about any other triplet. The design with Takes(student,course) & Receives(student, course, grant) with th FK (foreign key) {student, course} from Receives to Takes is best when if you know a student & course pair then you know its grants. If grants are given to a student independently of courses then a design with Takes(student,course) & Receives(student,grant) is enough.
Clarify with your instructor.
Almost. The lozenge (or diamond) shaped element is itself an association class which associates all connected classes. What you want it a simple association class between Student and Studies like this:
The Scholarship represents the exams passed by the students in specific studies. The association class relation is indicated by the dashed line linked to the association (which has a m-n multiplicity).
Before you get to any attributes, I don't see a correlation between the nouns in the problem statement and your classes. I would expect to see the following classes:
Student
Course
Nationality
Scholarship
I would also expect to see an association class, called CourseEnrollment, that would have the following italicized properties at the ends of the association:
Student studiedCourse [1..*] Course
Course studyingStudent [1..*] Student
That association class would have yet another association with Scholarship, called ScholarshipAward, that would have the following italicized properties at the ends of the association:
CourseEnrollment awardedScholarship [0..*] Scholarship
Scholarship receivingCourseEnrollment [0..*] CourseEnrollment
With this arrangement, a Scholarship can be awarded to a combination of Student and Course.
So I've volunteer to create a Registering system for my local church's education ministry. It should be able to register new students and keep track of their progress. Here are the requirements I've managed to gather:
The educational institution offers several courses.
Courses have a name and description.
Courses are organized in levels. There are several courses per level.
Courses also have requirements (i.e. other courses that need to be taken first).
A student graduates from a level when it has passed all courses of that level.
If a student cannot pass a course, he may repeat it as many times as he wants/needs.
Students can only take one course per semester.
An inactive student is one that isn't enrolled in the current semester.
Teachers will teach only one course per semester. Teachers may teach a different course each semester.
There could be semesters a teacher doesn't teach.
Now, this is my relational model.
![https://dl.dropbox.com/u/10900918/rmodels.jpg][1]
My questions are:
Are there any tables missing?
Looking at the semester + semester_code_description: is this the best way to do this? Under the assumption that a year has 2 semesters and that each semester have the same start and end months (i.e. semester 1: Aug - Dec, semester 2: Jan - May), is semester_code_description table really necessary?
How could I improve the design?
Sorry I didn't include any arrows. The program I'm using is a mess.
Thanks so much for your valuable time in advance.
1) Nice job on your design. I don't see any missing tables - it looks like you covered all of your requirements.
2) The semester_description table makes sense to me, whether or not you need it depends on whether you plan to do anything with that data.
3) The requirement "students can only take one course per semester" would imply that the Has_Taken relationship's primary key should be (student_id, semester_id). As it stands now, I could insert two different courses for the same student and semester. Similarly for the Has_Teached relationship.
Some other thoughts:
The "last_whatever" columns in some of your tables will force some extra processing on your actual application. You will need some mechanism to monitor/update those. Another option would be to derive them from your tables. I can get a student's last_semester by finding the semester with the max year/code.
One last consideration, how stable are these courses/descriptions/levels? I worked at a university for several years and our courses would change on a semester basis, forcing us to save an entire copy of course records for each change because we want a student's record to reflect what they actually took at that time.
Here's a little example in your app. Let's say I graduated level 1. Then a year later, the church adds a new course (Course A) to level 1. I will effectively be un-graduated b/c now there are level 1 courses I don't have (Course A).
This may not matter to you if your courses are pretty stable. Good luck!
Here is the scenario.
Two completely different Entities are independently related to the third entity in the same way. How do we represent it in the ERD? or (Enhanced ER)
Ex:
Student "BORROWS" BOOK (from the library)
DEPARTMENT "BORROWS" BOOK (from the same library).
If I define 'BORROWS' relationship twice, it would be awkward and clumsy in terms of appearance in the diagram, and increase the complexity of implementation as well.
At the same time, I can not declare a ternary relationship since STUDENT and DEPARTMENT are not inter-related in a relationship-instance.
However, I couldn't find a better way.
How do I solve it?
If Wikipedia is to be believed, Enhanced ER permits inheritance. Why don't you have a BORROWER entity (with the appropriate relationship), and have STUDENT and DEPARTMENT subclass that?
I've been having a similar issue - where a company or a person can order a product.
You've got an order, that can belong to either a person, or a company - so what do you link the relationship to? I'm thinking orders will have a companyId, and a personId foreign key, but how do you make them exclusive? The data returned won't necessarily be the same - a company doesn't have a first name / last name field for example.
I guess it could be done by having a name returned, and in the case of a person build the string out of firstname / lastname, and in the case of a company use the companyname field .
suppose if i need to take different college details and store courses offered by them into databases.Assume number of courses are different for different colleges.how table should be designed to store courses.
here these courses should be able retrieved for further processing
can any one suggest idea for this..
You can start with 2 tables, 1 for Institution (the university/college), and 1 for Course. The Course table should have a foreign key institution_id to the Institution table.
This way you can have as many courses as you want for any college, and looking up courses for a college is as simple as doing a query on institution_id.
Naturally, this is only a start, you will probably have to expand on this. For example, you might want to have another table like College that has a a foreign key to Institution, to model the fact that sometimes universities have many sub-schools within them. You could also have Institution rows reference other Institution rows to model the same thing; what you want to do depends on the details.
I have to create a database and I want to know what would be the best solution.
Let's say I have to store information about students and teachers.
Should I make one single table containing all the personal information (name,email,phone password) to both students and teachers?
For additional information should I keep them in separate tables as ADD_TEACHERS and ADD_STUDENTS?
You may want to create a people table for the common data like name,email etc. You can then use a primary key column in this table, and if there has to be information specific to teacher (like course_instructor, head_teacher of class), then use that unique key from people as reference in your course_information table. Do the same for students too.
It sounds like your best route is to have a separate table for teachers and students. You'll have what is called a one-to-many relationship between teachers and students: one teacher, many students.
But that only covers one semester. When you consider other semesters, you have a many-to-many relationship between students and teachers.
In the end, you're best off with at least three tables: Teachers, Students, and teacher-to-student relationship.
First thing you have to do is Map the entity relationships (ER) and its attributes.then design the database and apply the normalization strategies.
In the proposed scenario students and teachers are different entities . and find out thier relationship
ONE student ONE TEACHER
MANY Students HAVE ONE TEACHER
MANY Students HAVE MANY TEACHERs
Then check out their attributes Example - Student(Name,Class,DOB)
It depends on how you are going to use the data. If you have a lot of use cases where you are interested in "persons", regardless of role, or if you have a lot of persons who are both teachers and students, you may want to learn the gen-spec design pattern, as it applies to relational tables.
See previous discussion.