I'm creating an application for Phonegap using Backbone framework and Parse.com as backend service. I create an object with Parse.com (corresponding to Backbone models).
This object has a saveDraftToP() method that calls the Parse.com function save().
After this method is called from a view, I'd like to retrieve the updated object.
To do so I'm binding the 'change' event to the model but the Parse assigned ID is undefined.
Here is the code of the model:
var Match = Parse.Object.extend("Match", {
states: {'DRAFT': 0, 'RUNNING': 1, 'ENDED': 2},
saveDraftToP: function () {
var self = this;
this.save({
user: Parse.User.current(),
ACL: new Parse.ACL(Parse.User.current()),
state: self.states.DRAFT
}, {
success: function (result) {
self = result;
},
error: function (e) {
}
});
}
});`
And here is the code for the view:
var vmNuovaPartita = Parse.View.extend({
template: Handlebars.compile(template),
model: new Match(),
collection: new HintCollection(),
initialize: function () {
this.bind("change:model", console.log(this.model.id) , this);
},
render: function (eventName) {
var match = this.model.toJSON();
$(this.el).html(this.template(match));
return this;
}
});
I'm not quite sure why you have a save function wrapped in another save-like function. :-)
Say you have something like myMatch which is an object.
Through your UI, a button click saves the object data. You can just use myMatch.save({attr:val, ...}) straight out of the box. Backbone (and Parse) by default are optimistic. That means, you it will set the values of the model with the expectation that persisting to the server will succeed.
Thus, you don't need to retrieve anything extra. You already have the model in it's most current state.
To have a model view that responds to these changes, I'd design the view a little differently.
var vmNuovaPartita = Parse.View.extend({
template: Handlebars.compile(template),
initialize: function () {
this.model.on('change', this.render);
},
render: function (eventName) {
var match = this.model.toJSON();
$(this.el).html(this.template(match));
return this;
}
});
var myView = new vmNuovaPartita({
model: myModel
});
I'd initialize the model outside of the view, then pass it in as an option when you generate a new view. When you pass a model in as an option, it's special and will be attached directly to the view ... view.model which you can refer inside your view code as this.model
In the init we place a listener on the model for change events, then fire off a rerender of the view. Or a nicer way to go about this sort of thing is to throw in the newer Backbone Events with the .listenTo() method.
Related
Im having trouble figuring out how to populate a model's attributes from the server and then add the populated model to a collection and have that collection rendered by a view. Here's the code I have:
var movieDetails = new cinephile.Models.MovieDetailsModel({ id: movie.get('id') });
this.collection.add(movieDetails);
Inside of the MovieDetailsModel:
cinephile.Models.MovieDetailsModel = Backbone.Model.extend({
url: function()
{
return '/cinephile/api/index.php?action=getMovieDetails&movieId=' + this.id;
},
initialize: function()
{
this.fetch();
}
});
And this.collection is just a collection with the model set to be a cinephile.Models.MovieDetailsModel
I am listening for items to be added to the collection and when they are, the following is executed:
displayMovie: function(movie)
{
var view = new cinephile.Views.MovieView({
model: movie,
className: 'movie clearfix',
template: JST['app/scripts/templates/MovieView.ejs'],
});
this.$("#my-movies").append(view.el);
},
MovieView looks like this:
cinephile.Views.MovieView = Backbone.View.extend({
initialize: function(options)
{
this.template = options.template;
this.render();
},
render : function()
{
this.$el.html(this.template(this.model.attributes));
return this;
},
});
The problem I have is that the template I'm using is trying to access an attribute of the model that is undefined. Im pretty sure it's undefined because the MoveDetailsModel hasn't finished fetching before the model is added to the collection and subsequently rendered to the view.
How can I solve this issue? I'd like to be able to create a MovieDetailsModel that takes in an id, use that id to get the movie details from the server and then add the populated model to a collection and then render that collection to the screen.
Any help is appreciated.
Backbone fetch returns a jqXHR object, which is a Deferred objects Promise.
When fetch is called, the attributes are not populated yet. Promise objects have a don
ejqXHR function, where a callback can be passed to be executed once the request is done.
I would recommend moving the fetch into another method not the constructor, because there You can return the jqXHR object and access its done function.
Here is an example:
var movieDetails = new cinephile.Models.MovieDetailsModel({ id: movie.get('id') });
var promise = movieDetails.fetch();
promise.done(function() {
var view = new cinephile.Views.MovieView({model: movieDetails});
view.render();
});
Background:
I am making changes to an application that uses backbone.js with Handlebars as the templating engine. After a change event fires I need to create html that is appended to the current DOM structure which is basically just a spit-out of information that is contained in the model. This change needed to fit in the already established application structure.
Issue:
I have created a new view that uses a Handlebars template and the model to create the html. I then instantiate that view and call the render function and append the output using JQuery. What I am noticing is that when the html is rendered the model that is passed in because attributes on the $el instead of filling in the template (like I think it should).
View I'm altering:
$.hart.TestView = Backbone.View.extend({
tagName: "li",
template: Handlebars.compile($('#templateOne').html()),
initialize: function () {
this.model.on('change', function () {
this.createMoreInfoHtml();
}, this);
},
selectSomething: function () {
this.$el.removeClass('policies');
this.createMoreInfoHtml(); //function created for new view stuff
},
createMoreInfoHtml: function () {
var id = this.$el.attr('data-id', this.model.get("ID"));
$('.info').each(function () {
if ($(this).parent().attr('data-id') == id
$(this).remove();
});
var view = new $.hart.NewView(this.model, Handlebars.compile($("#NewTemplate").html()));
$('h1', this.$el).after(view.render().el);
},
render: function () {
... //render logic
}
});
View I Created:
$.hart.NewView = Backbone.View.extend({
initialize: function (model, template) {
this.model = model;
this.template = template;
},
render: function () {
this.$el.html(this.template({ info: this.model }));
this.$el.addClass('.info');
return this;
}
});
Json the is the model:
{
"PetName":"Asdfasdf",
"DateOfBirth":"3/11/2011 12:00:00 AM",
"IsSpayNeutered":false,
"Sex":"F",
"SpeciesID":2,
"ID":"ac8a42d2-7fa7-e211-8ef8-000c2964b571"
}
The template
<script id="NewTemplate" type="text/html">
<span>Pet Name: </span>
<span>{{this.PetName}}</span>
</script>
So now to the question: What am I doing wrong? Why are the properties of the model being created as attributes on the $el instead of filling in the template? Can someone please direct me as to how to get the results I am looking for?
Let's skip the problem Jack noticed.
The way you're creating your view is just wrong. It may work as you get the expected arguments in the initialize function, but it has unexpected behaviors you don't see. See the View's constructor:
var View = Backbone.View = function(options) {
this.cid = _.uniqueId('view');
this._configure(options || {});
Now let's have a look at this _configure method:
_configure: function(options) {
if (this.options) options = _.extend({}, _.result(this, 'options'), options);
_.extend(this, _.pick(options, viewOptions));
And of course...
var viewOptions = ['model', 'collection', 'el', 'id', 'attributes', 'className', 'tagName', 'events'];
Ok here we are... Basically when passing the model as the options argument, you're passing an object with an attributes key (the attributes of your model). But this attributes key is also used in the View to bind attributes to its element! Therefore the behavior your noticed.
Now, other wrong thing. You're compiling your template each time you create a new function, but not using it as a singleton either. Put your template in the view:
$.hart.NewView = Backbone.View.extend({
template: Handlebars.compile($("#NewTemplate").html(),
And change your view's creation to make the whole thing work:
new $.hart.NewView({model: this.model});
Oh, and get rid of this useless initialize method. You're just doing things Backbone already does.
I have the following problem…
MyView which is connected to two views: TaskModel and UserModel
TaskModel = {id: 1, taskName: "myTask", creatorName: "myName", creator_id: 2 },
UserModel = {id: 2, avatar: "someAvatar"}
The view should display
{{taskName}}, {{creatorName}}, {{someAvatar}}
As you can see the fetch of TaskModel and UserModel should be synchronized, because the userModel.fetch needs of taskModel.get("creator_id")
Which approach do you recommend me to display/handle the view and the two models?
You could make the view smart enough to not render until it has everything it needs.
Suppose you have a user and a task and you pass them both to the view's constructor:
initialize: function(user, task) {
_.bindAll(this, 'render');
this.user = user;
this.task = task;
this.user.on('change', this.render);
this.task.on('change', this.render);
}
Now you have a view that has references to both the user and the task and is listening for "change" events on both. Then, the render method can ask the models if they have everything they're supposed to have, for example:
render: function() {
if(this.user.has('name')
&& this.task.has('name')) {
this.$el.append(this.template({
task: this.task.toJSON(),
user: this.user.toJSON()
}));
}
return this;
}
So render will wait until both the this.user and this.task are fully loaded before it fills in the proper HTML; if it is called before its models have been loaded, then it renders nothing and returns an empty placeholder. This approach keeps all of the view's logic nicely hidden away inside the view where it belongs and it easily generalizes.
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/ambiguous/rreu5jd8/
You could also use Underscore's isEmpty (which is mixed into Backbone models) instead of checking a specific property:
render: function() {
if(!this.user.isEmpty()
&& !this.task.isEmpty()) {
this.$el.append(this.template({
task: this.task.toJSON(),
user: this.user.toJSON()
}));
}
return this;
}
That assumes that you don't have any defaults of course.
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/ambiguous/4q07budc/
jQuery's Deferreds work well here. As a crude example:
var succesFunction = function () {
console.log('success');
};
var errorFunction = function () {
console.log('error');
};
$.when(taskModel.fetch(), userModel.fetch()).then(successFunction, errorFunction);
You could also pipe the request through using the crude data (remember that fetch, save, create are really just wrappers around jQuery's $.ajax object.
var taskModelDeferred = taskModel.fetch();
var userModelDeferred = taskModelDeferred.pipe(function( data ) {
return userModel.fetch({ data: { user: data.userId }});
});
note: Backbone returns the collection and model in the success / error functions by default on collections and models so if you need this be sure have a reference handy.
I've run into this very same issue with a complex layout that used two models and multiple views. For that, instead of trying to synchronize the fetches, I simply used the "success" function of one model to invoke the fetch of the other. My views would listen only to the change of the second model. For instance:
var model1 = Backbone.Model.extend({
...
});
var model2 = Backbone.Model.extend({
...
});
var view1 = Backbone.View.extend({
...
});
var view2 = Backbone.View.extend({
...
});
model2.on("change",view1.render, view1);
model2.on("change",view2.render, view2);
Then...
model1.fetch({
success : function() {
model2.fetch();
}
});
The point to this is you don't have to do any sophisticated synchronization. You simply cascade the fetches and respond to the last model's fetch.
I'am redesigning my backbone application based on the answer of #20100 to this question The best way to fetch and render a collection for a given object_id.
Please read the comment on the code because I think is more clear, and my question looks better in smaller sizes.
// My View
define([
"js/collections/myCollection",
"js/models/myFeed"
], function (MyCollection, MyModel) {
var MyView = Backbone.View.extend({
tagName: 'ul',
initialize: function () {
this.collection = new MyCollection();
this.collection.on('add', this.onAddOne, this);
this.collection.on('reset', this.onAddAll, this);
// when I make myView = new MyView(_.extend( {el:this.$("#myView")} , this.options));
// myView.render is not called
// in order to trigger the render function I make the following… but probably there is a better way …
var that = this;
this.collection.fetch({
success: function () {
that.render();
}
});
}
});
return MyView;
});
// MyCollection
define([
"js/models/myModel"
], function (MyModel) {
var MyCollection = Backbone.MyCollection.extend({
model: MyModel, // add this
url: function () {
var url = "http://localhost/movies";
return url;
// if I look to the GET request the url is without idAttribute
// how can I attach the idAttribute to this url?
// should bb takes care of this?
}
});
return MyCollection;
});
//MyModel
define([
], function () {
var MyModel = Backbone.MyModel.extend({
idAttribute: 'object_id'
});
return MyModel
});
There's two paths you want to explore
Pre-populate your collection with your model data
In your example you're already doing this, but you're fetching a collection, the collection URL is http://localhost/movies, if you want an individual model take a look at the next point
Fetch each individual model only when you need it
In the assumption that you're trying to get an ID on a collection that is not pre-populated and are loading 1 model at a time, you will have to approach this a bit in a custom way by adding a method to your collection somewhat similarly to this
getOrFetch: function(id, options)
{
var model;
if (this.get(id))
{
model = this.get(id);
}
else
{
model = new this.model({
id: id
});
this.add(model);
model.fetch(options);
}
return model;
}
or add the function as Backbone.Collection.prototype.getOrFetch so you can use it on every Backbone Collection if you need it.
I'm trying to learn backbone.js and I'm having trouble understanding how to bind models and read them after a fetch.
This is my code:
$(function() {
var Bid = Backbone.Model.extend();
var BidsList = Backbone.Collection.extend({
model: Bid,
url: '/buyers/auction/latestBids?auctionId=26&latestBidId=0',
});
var BidsView = Backbone.View.extend({
el: $('#bids'),
initialize: function() {
log('hi');
_.bindAll(this, 'render');
this.collection = new BidsList();
this.collection.fetch();
this.render();
},
render: function() {
log(this.collection);
return this;
},
});
var bidsView = new BidsView();
});
function log(m) { console.log(m); }
This is what the webservice json looks like
{
"AuctionState":3,
"ClosedOn":null,
"Bids":[
{
"BidId":132,
"AuctionId":26
},
{
"BidId":131,
"AuctionId":2
}
]
}
How do I would I bind that response to the model?
You need to override the parse() method on your BidCollection to pull the Bids out and present them, and them only, to the collection's add() routine. You can do other things with the parse() method to manage the AuctionState field.
You also need to listen for 'change' events in your view, so the view automatically updates after the fetch. You shouldn't need to call render() in your view; you should bind the model's 'change' event to to render(), then fetch the data and let that trigger the render.
As always, Backbone's source code is highly readable. I recommend learning and understanding it.
For example:
var BidsList = Backbone.Collection.extend({
model: Bid,
url: '/buyers/auction/latestBids?auctionId=26&latestBidId=0',
parse: function(response){
return response.Bids;
}
});