The out of the box Caliburn.Micro WindowManager implementations in Silverlight do not seem to support multiple windows, so I'm trying to create a custom WindowManager to handle multiple windows in Silverlight 5.
I'm using the WPF implementation in Caliburn.Micro (which does handle multiple windows) as a starting point so I have the code below. Is this a good starting point?
It works in that it opens the required view in a new window. Unfortunately the line that I've prefixed with a comment and "/// >>>>" seems to cause an exception when I click any buttons in the resulting windows - it appears clicking any buttons seems to try and close the window and then throws an unhandled exception:
System.Exception: No target found for method MyMethod
If I change the ViewModelBinder.Bind method as follows, buttons in the resulting window\view call the correct methods on their viewmodel, but TryClose no longer works.
ViewModelBinder.Bind(rootModel, locatedView, context);
Can anybody suggest what is causing this? Or an alternate approach to implementing a multiple window manager for Silverlight 5 in Caliburn.Micro?
Code:
/// <summary>
/// Shows a window for the specified ViewModel.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="rootModel">The root ViewModel.</param>
/// <param name="context">The context.</param>
/// <param name="settings">The optional window settings.</param>
public virtual void ShowWindow(object rootModel, object context = null, IDictionary<string, object> settings = null)
{
// Some custom code - I've confirmed it's not causing any issues
CreateWindow(rootModel, false, context, settings).Show();
}
/// <summary>
/// Creates a window.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="rootModel">The view model.</param>
/// <param name="isDialog">Whethor or not the window is being shown as a dialog.</param>
/// <param name="context">The view context.</param>
/// <param name="settings">The optional settings.</param>
/// <returns>The window.</returns>
protected virtual Window CreateWindow(object rootModel, bool isDialog, object context, IDictionary<string, object> settings)
{
var locatedView = ViewLocator.LocateForModel(rootModel, null, context);
var view = EnsureWindow(rootModel, locatedView, isDialog);
/// >>>> The following binding seems to cause an exception. Binding to locatedView instead of view corrects this, but then TryClose doesn't work
ViewModelBinder.Bind(rootModel, view, context);
ApplySettings(view, settings);
new WindowConductor(rootModel, view);
return view;
}
/// <summary>
/// Makes sure the view is a window or is wrapped by one.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="model">The view model.</param>
/// <param name="view">The view.</param>
/// <param name="isDialog">Whethor or not the window is being shown as a dialog.</param>
/// <returns>The window.</returns>
protected virtual Window EnsureWindow(object model, object view, bool isDialog)
{
var window = view as Window;
if (window == null)
{
window = new Window
{
Content = (FrameworkElement) view
};
window.SetValue(View.IsGeneratedProperty, true);
}
return window;
}
static void ApplySettings(object target, IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<string, object>> settings)
{
if (settings == null)
return;
var type = target.GetType();
foreach (var pair in settings)
{
var propertyInfo = type.GetProperty(pair.Key);
if (propertyInfo != null)
propertyInfo.SetValue(target, pair.Value, null);
}
}
And this is the WindowConductor:
class WindowConductor
{
bool _actuallyClosing;
readonly Window _view;
readonly object _model;
public WindowConductor(object model, Window view)
{
_model = model;
_view = view;
var activatable = model as IActivate;
if (activatable != null)
{
activatable.Activate();
}
var deactivatable = model as IDeactivate;
if (deactivatable != null)
{
deactivatable.Deactivated += Deactivated;
}
var guard = model as IGuardClose;
if (guard != null)
{
view.Closing += Closing;
}
}
void Deactivated(object sender, DeactivationEventArgs e)
{
if (!e.WasClosed)
{
return;
}
((IDeactivate)_model).Deactivated -= Deactivated;
_actuallyClosing = true;
_view.Close();
_actuallyClosing = false;
}
void Closing(object sender, CancelEventArgs e)
{
if (e.Cancel)
{
return;
}
var guard = (IGuardClose)_model;
if (_actuallyClosing)
{
_actuallyClosing = false;
return;
}
bool runningAsync = false, shouldEnd = false;
guard.CanClose(canClose =>
{
Execute.OnUIThread(() =>
{
if (runningAsync && canClose)
{
_actuallyClosing = true;
_view.Close();
}
else
{
e.Cancel = !canClose;
}
shouldEnd = true;
});
});
if (shouldEnd)
{
return;
}
runningAsync = e.Cancel = true;
}
}
Additional details:
It looks like in the WPF version of Caliburn.Micro it successfully binds the viewmodel to a Window object, but in trying the same thing in Silverlight causes issues.
When I dig into the Caliburn.Micro code it looks like the following call in the default ActionMessage.SetMethodBinding:
currentElement = VisualTreeHelper.GetParent(currentElement);
Is not getting a Window as the parent of my View in Silverlight, but it does in WPF, and since the ViewModel is bound to the Window it never finds the viewmodel so doesn't call the actions.
I actually found later that changing CreateWindow to bind to locatedView (which is UserControl) instead of view (which is a Window wrapping a UserControl) actually works correctly in my main project, but not in the small sample sample project I was testing this in. I still don't understand why that is either, but haven't had a lot of time to dig into that.
Related
I want to send a string to textbox using a button click on wpf... Does anyone knows how to use inputmanager because the code below wont work? I use the code to test to send a delete or a letter a to a textbox...
public static class SendKeys
{
/// <summary>
/// Sends the specified key.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="key">The key.</param>
public static void Send(Key key)
{
if (Keyboard.PrimaryDevice != null)
{
if (Keyboard.PrimaryDevice.ActiveSource != null)
{
var e1 = new KeyEventArgs(Keyboard.PrimaryDevice, Keyboard.PrimaryDevice.ActiveSource, 0, Key.Down) {RoutedEvent = Keyboard.KeyDownEvent};
InputManager.Current.ProcessInput(e1);
}
}
}
}
The initial problem is enough known - "Cannot animate '(0).(1)' on an immutable object instance".
There are many questions here in SO about it but all the solutions are more fixes or crutches. And most of questions are linked to concrete part of code.
Also there are few topics about this problem with possible causes:
https://wpftutorial.net/DebuggingAnimations.html
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/mikehillberg/2006/09/25/tip-cannot-animate-on-an-immutable-object-instance/
I have huge corporate app where a have hundreds styles and storyboards. I can't disable them step by step and it's painstaking work to looking for problem part of code.
I look at these bug not from side of looking for in many xamls but from side of loging. I tried to research info in InvalidOperationException that is raised but there is no useful info like control place in xaml or smth else.
Also one idea is to create class inherited from Storyboard and to override methods.
But there is no methods to override.
Can someone propose how to log the internality of storyboard or other class that is responsible of animation?
At last I found sulution.
You should add classes: listener to animation, AttachedProperty and custom StoryBoard.
public static class TriggerTracing
{
static TriggerTracing()
{
// Initialise WPF Animation tracing and add a TriggerTraceListener
PresentationTraceSources.Refresh();
PresentationTraceSources.AnimationSource.Listeners.Clear();
PresentationTraceSources.AnimationSource.Listeners.Add(new TriggerTraceListener());
PresentationTraceSources.AnimationSource.Switch.Level = SourceLevels.All;
}
#region TriggerName attached property
/// <summary>
/// Gets the trigger name for the specified trigger. This will be used
/// to identify the trigger in the debug output.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="trigger">The trigger.</param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static string GetTriggerName(TriggerBase trigger)
{
return (string)trigger.GetValue(TriggerNameProperty);
}
/// <summary>
/// Sets the trigger name for the specified trigger. This will be used
/// to identify the trigger in the debug output.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="trigger">The trigger.</param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static void SetTriggerName(TriggerBase trigger, string value)
{
trigger.SetValue(TriggerNameProperty, value);
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty TriggerNameProperty =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached(
"TriggerName",
typeof(string),
typeof(TriggerTracing),
new UIPropertyMetadata(string.Empty));
#endregion
#region TraceEnabled attached property
/// <summary>
/// Gets a value indication whether trace is enabled for the specified trigger.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="trigger">The trigger.</param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static bool GetTraceEnabled(TriggerBase trigger)
{
return (bool)trigger.GetValue(TraceEnabledProperty);
}
/// <summary>
/// Sets a value specifying whether trace is enabled for the specified trigger
/// </summary>
/// <param name="trigger"></param>
/// <param name="value"></param>
public static void SetTraceEnabled(TriggerBase trigger, bool value)
{
trigger.SetValue(TraceEnabledProperty, value);
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty TraceEnabledProperty =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached(
"TraceEnabled",
typeof(bool),
typeof(TriggerTracing),
new UIPropertyMetadata(false, OnTraceEnabledChanged));
private static void OnTraceEnabledChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
var triggerBase = d as EventTrigger;
if (triggerBase == null)
return;
if (!(e.NewValue is bool))
return;
if ((bool)e.NewValue)
{
// insert dummy story-boards which can later be traced using WPF animation tracing
var storyboard = new TriggerTraceStoryboard(triggerBase, TriggerTraceStoryboardType.Enter);
triggerBase.Actions.Insert(0, new BeginStoryboard() { Storyboard = storyboard });
//storyboard = new TriggerTraceStoryboard(triggerBase, TriggerTraceStoryboardType.Exit);
//triggerBase.ExitActions.Insert(0, new BeginStoryboard() { Storyboard = storyboard });
}
else
{
// remove the dummy storyboards
//foreach (TriggerActionCollection actionCollection in new[] { triggerBase.EnterActions, triggerBase.ExitActions })
foreach (TriggerActionCollection actionCollection in new[] { triggerBase.Actions })
{
foreach (TriggerAction triggerAction in actionCollection)
{
BeginStoryboard bsb = triggerAction as BeginStoryboard;
if (bsb != null && bsb.Storyboard != null && bsb.Storyboard is TriggerTraceStoryboard)
{
actionCollection.Remove(bsb);
break;
}
}
}
}
}
#endregion
private enum TriggerTraceStoryboardType
{
Enter, Exit
}
/// <summary>
/// A dummy storyboard for tracing purposes
/// </summary>
private class TriggerTraceStoryboard : Storyboard
{
public TriggerTraceStoryboardType StoryboardType { get; private set; }
public TriggerBase TriggerBase { get; private set; }
public TriggerTraceStoryboard(TriggerBase triggerBase, TriggerTraceStoryboardType storyboardType)
{
TriggerBase = triggerBase;
StoryboardType = storyboardType;
}
}
/// <summary>
/// A custom tracelistener.
/// </summary>
private class TriggerTraceListener : TraceListener
{
public override void TraceEvent(TraceEventCache eventCache, string source, TraceEventType eventType, int id, string format, params object[] args)
{
base.TraceEvent(eventCache, source, eventType, id, format, args);
if (format.StartsWith("Storyboard has begun;"))
{
TriggerTraceStoryboard storyboard = args[1] as TriggerTraceStoryboard;
if (storyboard != null)
{
// add a breakpoint here to see when your trigger has been
// entered or exited
// the element being acted upon
object targetElement = args[5];
// the namescope of the element being acted upon
INameScope namescope = (INameScope)args[7];
TriggerBase triggerBase = storyboard.TriggerBase;
string triggerName = GetTriggerName(storyboard.TriggerBase);
var str = "";
var element = targetElement as DependencyObject;
while (element != null)
{
str += element.ToString() + Environment.NewLine;
element = VisualTreeHelper.GetParent(element);
}
LoggingInfrastructure.DefaultLogger.Log(...);
}
}
}
public override void Write(string message)
{
}
public override void WriteLine(string message)
{
}
}
Then you could add property to xaml where you need:
<EventTrigger Ui:TriggerTracing.TriggerName="CopyTextBlockStyle PreviewMouseLeftButtonDown"
Ui:TriggerTracing.TraceEnabled="True" RoutedEvent="PreviewMouseLeftButtonDown">
I have a Timer and three buttons to control it: Start, Stop, and Pause.
Each button is bound to a RelayCommand.
I have a TimerState property of type enum TimerState. (This is useful for setting various GUI elements.)
Is there a way to somehow bind the RelayCommands' CanExecute functionality to the TimerState property?
Currently, I have 3 methods that look like this:
private bool CanStartTimer()
{
return (TimerState == TimerState.Stopped || TimerState == TimerState.Paused);
}
In the TimerState setter, I call
StartTimerCmd.RaiseCanExecuteChanged();
Is there a better way bind the CanExecute state of the RelayCommands to a property like TimerState?
Thanks for any insight.
I've implemented a class to handle commands, actually it's based on DelegateCommand because i'm using PRISM but it could easily be changed to be used with RelayCommand or any other class implementing ICommand
It could have bugs, i've not yet fully tested it, however it works fine in my scenarios, here it is:
public class MyDelegateCommand<TViewModel> : DelegateCommand where TViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged {
private List<string> _PropertiesToWatch;
public MyDelegateCommand(TViewModel viewModelInstance, Action executedMethod)
: base(executedMethod) {
}
public MyDelegateCommand(TViewModel viewModelInstance, Action executedMethod, Func<bool> canExecuteMethod)
: base(executedMethod, canExecuteMethod) {
}
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
/// <param name="viewModelInstance"></param>
/// <param name="executedMethod"></param>
/// <param name="selector"></param>
public MyDelegateCommand(TViewModel viewModelInstance, Action executedMethod, Func<bool> canExecuteMethod, Expression<Func<TViewModel, object>> propertiesToWatch)
: base(executedMethod, canExecuteMethod) {
_PropertiesToWatch = RegisterPropertiesWatcher(propertiesToWatch);
viewModelInstance.PropertyChanged += PropertyChangedHandler;
}
/// <summary>
/// handler that, everytime a monitored property changes, calls the RaiseCanExecuteChanged of the command
/// </summary>
/// <param name="sender"></param>
/// <param name="e"></param>
private void PropertyChangedHandler(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs e) {
if (_PropertiesToWatch.Contains(e.PropertyName)) {
this.OnCanExecuteChanged();
}
}
/// <summary>
/// giving an expression that identify a propriety or a list of properties, return the property names obtained from the expression
/// Examples on selector usage
/// proprietà singola:
/// entity => entity.PropertyName
/// proprietà multiple
/// entity => new { entity.PropertyName1, entity.PropertyName2 }
/// </summary>
/// <param name="selector"></param>
/// <returns></returns>
protected List<string> RegisterPropertiesWatcher(Expression<Func<TViewModel, object>> selector) {
List<string> properties = new List<string>();
System.Linq.Expressions.LambdaExpression lambda = (System.Linq.Expressions.LambdaExpression)selector;
if (lambda.Body is System.Linq.Expressions.MemberExpression) {
System.Linq.Expressions.MemberExpression memberExpression = (System.Linq.Expressions.MemberExpression)(lambda.Body);
properties.Add(memberExpression.Member.Name);
}
else if (lambda.Body is System.Linq.Expressions.UnaryExpression) {
System.Linq.Expressions.UnaryExpression unaryExpression = (System.Linq.Expressions.UnaryExpression)(lambda.Body);
properties.Add(((System.Linq.Expressions.MemberExpression)(unaryExpression.Operand)).Member.Name);
}
else if (lambda.Body.NodeType == ExpressionType.New) {
NewExpression newExp = (NewExpression)lambda.Body;
foreach (var argument in newExp.Arguments) {
if (argument is System.Linq.Expressions.MemberExpression) {
System.Linq.Expressions.MemberExpression mExp = (System.Linq.Expressions.MemberExpression)argument;
properties.Add(mExp.Member.Name);
}
else {
throw new SyntaxErrorException("Syntax Error, selector has to be an expression that returns a new object containing a list of properties, e.g.: s => new { s.Property1, s.Property2 }");
}
}
}
else {
throw new SyntaxErrorException("Syntax Error, selector has to be an expression that returns a new object containing a list of properties, e.g.: s => new { s.Property1, s.Property2 }");
}
return properties;
}
}
note that my solution implies that this command has to be wired with the viewmodel that handle it and the viewmodel has to implement the INotifyPropertyChanged interface.
first two constructor are there so the command is backward compatible with DelegateCommand but the 3rd is the important one, that accepts a linq expression to specify which property to monitor
the usage is pretty simple and easy to understand, let me write it here with methods but of course you can create your handler methods. Suppose you have have a ViewModel called MyViewModel with two properties (PropertyX and PropertyY) that rise the propertychanged event, and somewhere in it you create an instance of SaveCommand, it would look like this:
this.SaveCommand = new MyDelegateCommand<MyViewModel>(this,
//execute
() => {
Console.Write("EXECUTED");
},
//can execute
() => {
Console.Write("Checking Validity");
return PropertyX!=null && PropertyY!=null && PropertyY.Length < 5;
},
//properties to watch
(p) => new { p.PropertyX, p.PropertyY }
);
maybe i'll create an article somewhere about this, but this snippet should be clear i hope
Fabio's answer works well. Here's a parameterized version for DelegateCommand<T>. (I've tightened up the code a little, too.)
public class DepedencyCommand<TViewModel, TArg> : DelegateCommand<TArg>
where TViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private readonly List<string> _propertiesToWatch;
public DepedencyCommand(Action<TArg> executedMethod)
: base(executedMethod) { }
public DepedencyCommand(Action<TArg> executedMethod, Func<TArg, bool> canExecuteMethod)
: base(executedMethod, canExecuteMethod) { }
public DepedencyCommand(TViewModel viewModelInstance, Action<TArg> executedMethod, Func<TArg, bool> canExecuteMethod, Expression<Func<TViewModel, object>> propertiesToWatch)
: base(executedMethod, canExecuteMethod)
{
_propertiesToWatch = _RegisterPropertiesWatcher(propertiesToWatch);
viewModelInstance.PropertyChanged += PropertyChangedHandler;
}
/// <summary>
/// handler that, everytime a monitored property changes, calls the RaiseCanExecuteChanged of the command
/// </summary>
/// <param name="sender"></param>
/// <param name="e"></param>
private void PropertyChangedHandler(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (_propertiesToWatch.Contains(e.PropertyName))
{
this.OnCanExecuteChanged();
}
}
/// <summary>
/// giving an expression that identify a propriety or a list of properties, return the property names obtained from the expression
/// Examples on selector usage
/// proprietà singola:
/// entity => entity.PropertyName
/// proprietà multiple
/// entity => new { entity.PropertyName1, entity.PropertyName2 }
/// </summary>
/// <param name="selector"></param>
/// <returns></returns>
private static List<string> _RegisterPropertiesWatcher(Expression<Func<TViewModel, object>> selector)
{
var properties = new List<string>();
LambdaExpression lambda = selector;
if (lambda.Body is MemberExpression)
{
var memberExpression = (MemberExpression)lambda.Body;
properties.Add(memberExpression.Member.Name);
}
else if (lambda.Body is UnaryExpression)
{
var unaryExpression = (UnaryExpression)lambda.Body;
properties.Add(((MemberExpression)unaryExpression.Operand).Member.Name);
}
else if (lambda.Body.NodeType == ExpressionType.New)
{
var newExp = (NewExpression)lambda.Body;
foreach (var argument in newExp.Arguments)
{
if (argument is MemberExpression)
{
MemberExpression mExp = (MemberExpression)argument;
properties.Add(mExp.Member.Name);
}
else
throw new SyntaxErrorException("Syntax Error, selector has to be an expression that returns a new object containing a list of properties, e.g.: s => new { s.Property1, s.Property2 }");
}
}
else
throw new SyntaxErrorException("Syntax Error, selector has to be an expression that returns a new object containing a list of properties, e.g.: s => new { s.Property1, s.Property2 }");
return properties;
}
}
There doesn't seem to be a better solution. I know what you mean, it seems inelegant but whatever lipstick you put on it, the onus is on the objects involved in the expression to notify the command.
If your condition is based purely on other notify properties you could add your own handler to PropertyChanged, that provides a bit of abstraction.
In this case, TimerState would be a VM property. Then you can a handler to your ViewModel.PropertyChanged event. You can then inspect the property name and update your CanExecute. This is still ugly, but at least you have all the garbage in one block.
I am facing a few difficulties with EF 4, foreign keys and INotifyPropertyChanged / the partial methods exposed for scalar properties.
I hope you can help me find the right way to do this.
Image I have a Customer entity with *..1 relationship with the Country entity.
Now, I'd obviously like to be able to do:
var customer = new Customer();
customer.Country = [...]
...but I don't necessarily need the CountryKey property.
I create a Association in EF with the correct cardinality in the .edmx designer. I choose not to "add foreign key properties" in the dialog.
This leaves me with a generated class without the partial OnCountryChanging and OnCountryChanged.
Next, I try to add the foreign key properties, and I now have a OnCountryKeyChanging and OnCountryKeyChanged.
However, the generated code looks like this:
/// <summary>
/// No Metadata Documentation available.
/// </summary>
[EdmScalarPropertyAttribute(EntityKeyProperty=false, IsNullable=false)]
[DataMemberAttribute()]
public global::System.Int64 CountryKey
{
get
{
return _CountryKey;
}
set
{
OnCountryKeyChanging(value);
ReportPropertyChanging("CountryKey");
_CountryKey = StructuralObject.SetValidValue(value);
ReportPropertyChanged("CountryKey");
OnCountryKeyChanged();
}
}
private global::System.Int64 _CountryKey;
partial void OnCountryKeyChanging(global::System.Int64 value);
partial void OnCountryKeyChanged();
As you can see from the generated code, the PropertyChanged notification occurs with "CountryKey" instead of "Country". This makes data binding in WPF difficult.
My question is: how do I get around this?
Do I wrap my object in a ViewModel, listen to property changes and strip the "Key" part?
Do I modify the T4 template?
Or is there a third option I just can't see yet?
I'd greatly appreciate any suggestions here, as I am experimenting with WPF / EF without wrapping each Model property in a ViewModel.
The 'best practices' approach is to decorate your model in a viewmodel, exposing the model properties as required. You can create a generic ViewModel with some nifty work with dynamicobject, using perhaps a property mapping etc.
public class DynamicViewModel : DynamicObject, INotifyPropertyChanged, IDisposable
{
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
private static readonly Dictionary<Type, Tuple<Dictionary<string, PropertyInfo>, Dictionary<string, string>>> typeDictionary = new Dictionary<Type, Tuple<Dictionary<string, PropertyInfo>, Dictionary<string, string>>>();
private readonly Dictionary<string, object> additionalProperties = new Dictionary<string, object>();
private readonly object underlyingObject;
public object UnderlyingObject
{
get
{
return underlyingObject;
}
}
private readonly Type type;
/// <summary>
/// constructor which takes a model for which it will be extensing its perceived properties
/// </summary>
/// <param name="underlyingObject">the underlying object</param>
public DynamicViewModel(IBindableRfqViewModel underlyingObject) : this(underlyingObject, new Dictionary<string, string>())
{
}
/// <summary>
/// constructor which takes a model for which it will be extensing its perceived properties as well as a property map
/// </summary>
/// <param name="underlyingObject">the underlying object</param>
/// <param name="propertyMap">a string/string dictionary, where the key is a property on the underlying object, and the value is the name of the dynamic property to be used as a binding target</param>
public DynamicViewModel(IBindableRfqViewModel underlyingObject, Dictionary<string, string> propertyMap)
{
this.underlyingObject = underlyingObject;
if (underlyingObject is INotifyPropertyChanged)
{
((INotifyPropertyChanged)underlyingObject).PropertyChanged += OnUnderlyingPropertyChanged;
}
type = underlyingObject.GetType();
if (typeDictionary.ContainsKey(type))
{
return;
}
lock (typeDictionary)
{
if (typeDictionary.ContainsKey(type))
{
return;
}
var forwardPropertyMap = propertyMap;
var typeProperties = type.GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance).ToDictionary(p => p.Name, p => p);
typeDictionary.Add(type, Tuple.Create(typeProperties,forwardPropertyMap));
}
}
private void OnUnderlyingPropertyChanged(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
this.OnPropertyChanged(e.PropertyName);
}
private bool TryGetProperty(string name, out object result)
{
try
{
var propertyData = typeDictionary[type];
var modelProperty = name;
if (propertyData.Item2.ContainsKey(name))
{
modelProperty = propertyData.Item2[name];
}
if (propertyData.Item1.ContainsKey(modelProperty))
{
result = propertyData.Item1[modelProperty].GetValue(underlyingObject, null);
return true;
}
if (additionalProperties.ContainsKey(name))
{
result = additionalProperties[name];
return true;
}
result = null;
return true;
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
result = null;
return false;
}
}
/// <summary>
/// <see cref="DynamicObject.TryGetMember" />
/// </summary>
public override bool TryGetMember(GetMemberBinder binder, out object result)
{
return this.TryGetProperty(binder.Name, out result);
}
/// <summary>
/// <see cref="DynamicObject.TryGetIndex" />
/// </summary>
public override bool TryGetIndex(GetIndexBinder binder, object[] indexes, out object result)
{
return this.TryGetProperty(indexes[0].ToString(), out result);
}
private bool TrySetProperty(string name, object value)
{
try
{
var propertyData = typeDictionary[type];
var modelProperty = name;
if (propertyData.Item2.ContainsKey(name))
{
modelProperty = propertyData.Item2[name];
}
if (propertyData.Item1.ContainsKey(modelProperty))
{
propertyData.Item1[modelProperty].SetValue(underlyingObject, value, null);
}
else
{
if (!additionalProperties.ContainsKey(name))
{
additionalProperties.Add(name, new object());
}
additionalProperties[name] = value;
}
this.OnPropertyChanged(name);
return true;
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
return false;
}
}
/// <summary>
/// <see cref="DynamicObject.TrySetMember" />
/// </summary>
public override bool TrySetMember(SetMemberBinder binder, object value)
{
return this.TrySetProperty(binder.Name, value);
}
/// <summary>
/// <see cref="DynamicObject.TrySetIndex" />
/// </summary>
public override bool TrySetIndex(SetIndexBinder binder, object[] indexes, object value)
{
return indexes.Length == 0 || this.TrySetProperty(indexes[0].ToString(), value);
}
private void OnPropertyChanged(string propName)
{
var handler = PropertyChanged;
if (handler != null)
{
handler(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propName));
}
}
/// <summary>
/// IDisposable implementation
/// </summary>
public void Dispose()
{
if (underlyingObject is INotifyPropertyChanged)
{
((INotifyPropertyChanged)underlyingObject).PropertyChanged -= OnUnderlyingPropertyChanged;
}
if (underlyingObject is IDisposable)
{
((IDisposable)underlyingObject).Dispose();
}
}
}
I have multiple viewModels in my application and am binding/used them in ViewModelLocator mvvm light. I have done button on one of my DailyActivities.xaml page. but when i clicked on it,it gives me error in ViewModelLocator like "Object reference not set to an instance of an object". and control comes to this line :
public static void ClearActivities()
{
_activities.Cleanup(); //Error here
_activities = null;
}
here is the code for DailyActivitiesViewModel in ViewModelLocator:
private static ActivitiesViewModel _activities;
public static ActivitiesViewModel ActivitiesStatic
{
get
{
if (_activities == null)
{
CreateActivities();
}
return _activities;
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Gets the ViewModelPropertyName property.
/// </summary>
[System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis.SuppressMessage("Microsoft.Performance",
"CA1822:MarkMembersAsStatic",
Justification = "This non-static member is needed for data binding purposes.")]
public ActivitiesViewModel Activities
{
get
{
return ActivitiesStatic;
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Provides a deterministic way to delete the ViewModelPropertyName property.
/// </summary>
public static void ClearActivities()
{
_activities.Cleanup(); --Error here
_activities = null;
}
/// <summary>
/// Provides a deterministic way to create the ViewModelPropertyName property.
/// </summary>
public static void CreateActivities()
{
if (_activities == null)
{
_activities = new ActivitiesViewModel();
}
}
Kindly Suggest?
Thanks
You need to determine if the field exists before you can use it: It seems like if the field _activities is already null then no clean-up is required.
why not do something like
public static void ClearActivites()
{
if (null == _activities) return;
_activities.Cleanup();
_activities = null;
}