I want to add an exclamation mark Image to the left of the built-in TextBox and make it visible whenever the TextBox Validation.HasError attached property is true, otherwise hide it.
How can I use ControlTemplate to add the Image without having re-bind all the TextBox properties?
<StackPanel>
<StackPanel.Resources>
<ControlTemplate x:Key="TextBoxWithIndicator" TargetType="{x:Type TextBox}">
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<!-- Re-bind {Binding Path=Property}, including some that I may miss -->
<TextBox Text="{TemplateBinding Text}" Width="{TemplateBinding Width}" Height="{TemplateBinding Height}"/>
<Image Source="resources/exclaim.png" Visibility="{TemplateBinding Validation.HasError}"/>
</StackPanel>
</ControlTemplate>
</StackPanel.Resources>
<TextBox Template="{StaticResource TextBoxWithIndicator}" Width="120">Happy Go Lucky</TextBox>
</StackPanel>
Note The preceding block of code represents my futile effort in WPF so far. It is probably also wrong on several counts, e.g. probably need a ValueConverter for Visibility <--> Validation.HasError; Setting Width="120" on TextBox seems to adjust the StackPanel width instead of TextBox width despite the TemplateBinding, etc.
I would suggest looking into Adorners. These are special FrameworkElements that are rendered in a special Adorner Layer on top of visual elements, and are intended to provide visual cues to the user.
The above link provides a summary of Adorners as well as an example of a Custom Adorner.
Related
I'm creating a custom TextBox with a Title and I'm trying do it with a template.
The problem is that I don't want to have a textbox inside of textbox.
For example:
<TextBox.Template>
<ControlTemplate TargetType="{x:Type TextBox}">
<StackPanel Height="30" VerticalAlignment="Top" Background="green">
<TextBlock Text="Title"/>
<TextBox Text="{Binding Text, ElementName=txtBox}"/> <!-- How I can do it without this? -->
</StackPanel>
</ControlTemplate>
</TextBox.Template>
This way works like I want but I don't want to recreate the TextBox with binding.
Or is this the right way?
You're not putting "a textbox inside a textbox", you're putting it inside a template. Very different thing. There's still only one textbox, you're just extending its appearance.
If you want fundamental TextBox behavior then you have to use a TextBox in your template, there's not really any way around that. I suspect though that the real problem here isn't so much the TextBox as it is the explicit binding. If that's what you're trying to avoid then you can use a TemplateBinding to bind to the templated control's Text property instead:
<TextBox Text="{TemplateBinding Text}"/>
EDIT: just as a follow-up to this, TemplateBinding is one-way only. If you need two-way binding then use Text="{Binding Text, RelativeSource={RelativeSource TemplatedParent}, Mode=TwoWay}" instead.
I have an ItemsControl in my user control with a scroll viewer around it for when it gets too big (Too big being content is larger than the viewable area of the UserControl). The problem is that the grid that it is all in just keeps expanding so that the scroll viewer never kicks in (unless I specify an exact height for the grid). See code below and thanks in advance.
<UserControl x:Class="BusinessObjectCreationWizard.View.TableSelectionPageView"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml">
<GroupBox FontWeight="Bold" Height="300px"
Header="Tables"
Padding="2">
<ScrollViewer>
<ItemsControl FontWeight="Normal"
ItemsSource="{Binding Path=AvailableTables}">
<ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<CheckBox Content="{Binding Path=DisplayName}"
IsChecked="{Binding Path=IsSelected}"
Margin="2,3.5" />
</DataTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
</ItemsControl>
</ScrollViewer>
</GroupBox>
</UserControl>
This user control is loaded here
<Border Background="White" Grid.Column="1" Grid.Row="0">
<HeaderedContentControl Content="{Binding Path=CurrentPage}"
Header="{Binding Path=CurrentPage.DisplayName}" />
</Border>
I would like to not specify the height.
If you remove the Height from your GroupBox (which, as far as I understand, is what you want to do), then it will fill its container, unless there's a panel upstream that imposes its own sizing rules.
I used this simplified version of your XAML. I removed the template and the binding, and hard-coded some items, to make this stand alone; those changes won't affect the way layout is done.
<Window xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation">
<GroupBox FontWeight="Bold" Header="Tables" Padding="2">
<ScrollViewer>
<ItemsControl FontWeight="Normal">
<TextBlock>Foo</TextBlock>
<TextBlock>Bar</TextBlock>
<TextBlock>Baz</TextBlock>
</ItemsControl>
</ScrollViewer>
</GroupBox>
</Window>
Run it, and you'll see that the content does indeed size to fit the window, and the scrollbar only enables when the window gets too small to see all three items. I believe this is what you want.
So the problem is most likely one of the parent panels, one you're not showing in your sample XAML. The problem you describe could occur if your GroupBox appears inside a StackPanel:
<Window xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation">
<StackPanel>
<GroupBox FontWeight="Bold" Header="Tables" Padding="2">
<ScrollViewer>
<ItemsControl FontWeight="Normal">
<TextBlock>Foo</TextBlock>
<TextBlock>Bar</TextBlock>
<TextBlock>Baz</TextBlock>
</ItemsControl>
</ScrollViewer>
</GroupBox>
</StackPanel>
</Window>
Now the GroupBox appears at the top of the Window, sized to exactly fit its contents. If you shrink the Window enough, the GroupBox will be cut off -- because it's sized to fit its content, not its container. This sounds like the problem you're describing.
The reason is that StackPanel asks its children what their ideal height is (based on their content), and uses that height. Without StackPanel (or something similar), the default is to respect the control's VerticalAlignment, and if that's set to the default value of Stretch, then the control is stretched to fill its parent. This means it won't be taller than its parent, which sounds like what you want.
Solution: remove the StackPanel (or whatever else is causing you problems) and use something else. Depending on what you're trying to accomplish, you might have better luck with a DockPanel or a Grid. Hard to tell without knowing more about your layout.
Edit: Okay, it looks like the problem is indeed the HeaderedContentControl parent -- but not directly. HeaderedContentControl isn't a panel, so it doesn't do any layout of its own (and its descendant, GroupBox, doesn't have this same problem). The problem is its default template -- which includes a StackPanel. The good news is, you're free to use a different template, let's say one with a DockPanel instead:
<Window xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml">
<HeaderedContentControl>
<HeaderedContentControl.Style>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type HeaderedContentControl}">
<Setter Property="Template">
<Setter.Value>
<ControlTemplate TargetType="{x:Type HeaderedContentControl}">
<DockPanel>
<ContentPresenter ContentSource="Header" DockPanel.Dock="Top"/>
<ContentPresenter/>
</DockPanel>
</ControlTemplate>
</Setter.Value>
</Setter>
</Style>
</HeaderedContentControl.Style>
<GroupBox FontWeight="Bold" Header="Tables" Padding="2">
<ScrollViewer>
<ItemsControl FontWeight="Normal">
<TextBlock>Foo</TextBlock>
<TextBlock>Bar</TextBlock>
<TextBlock>Baz</TextBlock>
</ItemsControl>
</ScrollViewer>
</GroupBox>
</HeaderedContentControl>
</Window>
If you leave off the <HeaderedContentControl.Style> part, this reproduces your problem; but with the style in place, it allows the GroupBox to fill its container, so the ScrollViewer will get a scrollbar when you want it to.
If the previous answer doesn't fix the problem, you could also try binding the Width, Height of your grid to the ActualWidth, ActualHeight of your parent UserControl. Something like:
<UserControl
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
x:Class="WpfApplication.UserControl1"
x:Name="UserControl">
<Grid Height="{Binding ElementName=UserControl, Path=ActualHeight}"
Width="{Binding ElementName=UserControl, Path=ActualWidth}" />
In this case you aren't setting an explicit width and height but you are limiting the Grids width/height to the constraints of the UserControl it sits in.
I had the same issue, after reading this response I replaced all StackPanels with Grids in UserControl. It resolved the Scrollbar issue.
Try removing the grid entirely and setting the HorizontalAlignment and VerticalAlignment directly on the GroupBox. If a layoutpanel has only one child, it's often redundant... this migth be true in your case.
If that doesn't work... what's the parent of your grid control?
Why not just use a listbox instead of an itemscontrol, that has a built in scrollviewer.
They are different. If you do not want to have the items selectable, then don't use a ListBox. It is going to be heavier, and will also have the deselect a selection everytime the user clicks on an entry. Just put the ItemsControl in a ScrollViewer
I had the same problema with ListBox, it wasn't expanding and the scroll viewer didn't appear. I solved it as follows:
<UserControl x:Class="TesteView"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml">
<Grid MaxHeight="710">
....
....
<StackPanel>
<ListBox MaxHeight="515"
ScrollViewer.HorizontalScrollBarVisibility="Hidden"
ScrollViewer.VerticalScrollBarVisibility="Auto"
ItemsSource="{Binding Path=Teste,Mode=TwoWay}">
....
....
</ListBox>
</StackPanel>
</Grid>
</UserControl>
I have a DataTemplate that contains an Expander with a border in the header. I want the header border to have round corners when collapsed and straight bottom corners when expanded. What would best practice be for achieving this (bonus points for code samples as I am new to XAML)?
This is the template that holds the expander:
<DataTemplate x:Key="A">
<StackPanel>
<Expander Name="ProjectExpander" Header="{Binding .}" HeaderTemplate="{StaticResource B}" >
<StackPanel>
<Border CornerRadius="0,0,2,2">
This is the expander datatemplate:
<DataTemplate x:Key="B">
<Border x:Name="ProjectExpanderHeader"
CornerRadius="{Binding local:ItemUserControl.ProjectHeaderBorderRadius, RelativeSource={RelativeSource FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type ContentPresenter}}}"
Background="{StaticResource ItemGradient}"
HorizontalAlignment="{Binding HorizontalAlignment,
RelativeSource={RelativeSource FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type ContentPresenter}},
Mode=OneWayToSource}">
<local:ItemContentsUserControl Height="30"/>
</Border>
</DataTemplate>
Bind the CornerRadius property to the Expander.IsExpanded property and attach an IValueConverter that returns rounded corners when false and straight bottom corners when true. It's not the most elegant, but it will get the job done.
The other way to do this, if using MVVM, would be to expose a boolean property and bind it to the Expander.IsExpanded property. Then expose another property for the CornerRadius, which checks the boolean property and returns the appropriate values. This is definitely the "best practice" way to go about this.
Another way to do this is by editing the control template. The argument can be made that this is the best practice, though I'm not sure I'm ready to commit to that.
It's straightforward to do this if you have Expression Blend. An advantage of editing the control template is that it separates the behavior of the Expander from your data template, so that you can reuse it across different types of data. A disadvantage is that you end up embedding the properties of the header's Border in the control template, so you can't really change them for any individual instance of the control. (Other disadvantages: you have to have Expression Blend, and it produces a big bolus of XAML that you have to put in your resource dictionary.)
In Expression Blend, create an empty page and put an Expander on it. Right-click on the Expander and pick "Edit Template/Edit a Copy...". Give it a name like "ExpanderRoundedCorners".
This will add about 200 lines of XAML to Page.Resources, but most of this is used to create the graphics on the expand button. Switch to XAML view and search for the ToggleButton named "HeaderSite". This is the expand button. Note that its Content property is set to {TemplateBinding Header}. We'll want to fix that.
Delete the Content property, and add a child element to the ToggleButton like this:
<ToggleButton.Content>
<Border x:Name="HeaderBorder" BorderBrush="Red" BorderThickness="2">
<ContentPresenter Content="{TemplateBinding Header}"/>
</Border>
</ToggleButton.Content>
Now find the trigger that makes ExpandSite visible when the ToggleButton is pressed. Add this setter to it:
<Setter TargetName="HeaderBorder" Property="CornerRadius" Value="4"/>
That's it. Now every time you create an Expander with the ExpanderRoundedCorners style, the header content will be enclosed in a Border whose corners are rounded when the Expander is expanded.
You'll probably want to jigger around with this a little more when you've got it working. At the least, you'll want to remove the Border from the header template in your style, since it's now part of the control template.
I'm curious if anyone knows of a way to easily get a double border effect in WPF similar to what you see in the selected items in Windows Explorer in Windows 7.
If you look closely, you'll notice that the selected item has a dark border, a lighter, inner-border, and then a gradient background.
Currently, I'm using two borders around an object any time I want to achieve this effect. Doing it that way is ugly syntactically and really muddies my view xaml. Being a web developer at heart I'd like to separate the xaml structure from the style as much as possible. So, I've started putting this into Styles and Content Templates in order to pull it out of my view xaml.
However, I'm curious if there may be a better way to go about this.
I played around for a while using a VisualBrush as a background to try to get the effect. However, I want to be able to apply the background to elements that can be any size and the way the VisualBrush stretched the visual to fit the element background didn't work the way I wanted it to. Essentially, I'd really just like it to stretch the visual the way the WPF layout system would do it.
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
--
Dusty
A VisualBrush is probably not what you want to do in this scenario, as it's pretty heavy.
You can solve the problem with some Xaml without nesting borders.
For example,
<Border BorderBrush="#FF00B5C5" BorderThickness="1" CornerRadius="2" Background="White">
<Grid Background="#FF00B5C5" Margin="1">
<Rectangle Fill="#FFA2F2FE" />
<TextBlock Text="This is some text" VerticalAlignment="Center"/>
</Grid>
</Border>
You can, of course, tweak the properties to get the look you need.
EDIT: If you want to create a style, so you can reskin the look-and-feel, you can do something like this:
<Window.Resources>
<Style x:Key="BorderedTextBlock" TargetType="ContentControl">
<Setter Property="ContentTemplate">
<Setter.Value>
<DataTemplate>
<Border BorderBrush="#FF00B5C5" BorderThickness="1" CornerRadius="2" Background="White">
<Grid Background="#FF00B5C5" Margin="1">
<Rectangle Fill="#FFA2F2FE" />
<TextBlock Text="{Binding}" VerticalAlignment="Center"/>
</Grid>
</Border>
</DataTemplate>
</Setter.Value>
</Setter>
</Style>
</Window.Resources>
<Grid x:Name="LayoutRoot">
<ContentControl Style="{StaticResource BorderedTextBlock}" Content="This is some text" Width="200" Height="24"/>
</Grid>
Additionally, turn this into a custom control with all the styling and theming parameters that you need.
Hope that helps,
Sergio
What is difference between a ControlTemplate and a DataTemplate in WPF?
Typically a control is rendered for its own sake, and doesn't reflect underlying data. For example, a Button wouldn't be bound to a business object - it's there purely so it can be clicked on. A ContentControl or ListBox, however, generally appear so that they can present data for the user.
A DataTemplate, therefore, is used to provide visual structure for underlying data, while a ControlTemplate has nothing to do with underlying data and simply provides visual layout for the control itself.
A ControlTemplate will generally only contain TemplateBinding expressions, binding back to the properties on the control itself, while a DataTemplate will contain standard Binding expressions, binding to the properties of its DataContext (the business/domain object or view model).
Very basically a ControlTemplate describes how to display a Control while a DataTemplate describes how to display Data.
For example:
A Label is a control and will include a ControlTemplate which says the Label should be displayed using a Border around some Content (a DataTemplate or another Control).
A Customer class is Data and will be displayed using a DataTemplate which could say to display the Customer type as a StackPanel containing two TextBlocks one showing the Name and the other displaying the phone number. It might be helpful to note that all classes are displayed using DataTemplates, you will just usually use the default template which is a TextBlock with the Text property set to the result of the Object's ToString method.
Troels Larsen has a good explanation on MSDN forum
<Window x:Class="WpfApplication7.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
Title="MainWindow" Height="350" Width="525">
<Window.Resources>
<DataTemplate x:Key="ButtonContentTemplate">
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<Grid Height="8" Width="8">
<Path HorizontalAlignment="Stretch"
Margin="0,0,1.8,1.8"
VerticalAlignment="Stretch" Stretch="Fill" Stroke="#FF000000"
Data="M0.5,5.7 L0.5,0.5 L5.7,0.5"/>
<Path HorizontalAlignment="Stretch"
Margin="2,3,0,0"
VerticalAlignment="Stretch" Stretch="Fill" Stroke="#FFFFFFFF"
Data="M3.2,7.5 L7.5,7.5 L7.5,3.5"/>
<Path HorizontalAlignment="Stretch"
Margin="1.2,1.4,0.7,0.7"
VerticalAlignment="Stretch" Fill="#FFFFFFFF" Stretch="Fill" Stroke="#FF000000"
Data="M2.5,2.5 L7.5,7.5"/>
<Path HorizontalAlignment="Stretch"
Margin="1.7,2.0,1,1"
VerticalAlignment="Stretch" Stretch="Fill" Stroke="#FF000000"
Data="M3,7.5 L7.5,7.5 L7.5,3.5"/>
<Path HorizontalAlignment="Stretch"
Margin="1,1,1,1"
VerticalAlignment="Stretch" Stretch="Fill" Stroke="#FFFFFFFF"
Data="M1.5,6.5 L1.5,1 L6.5,1.5"/>
</Grid>
<ContentPresenter Content="{Binding}"/>
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
<ControlTemplate TargetType="Button" x:Key="ButtonControlTemplate">
<Grid>
<Ellipse Fill="{TemplateBinding Background}"/>
<ContentPresenter HorizontalAlignment="Center"
VerticalAlignment="Center"/>
</Grid>
</ControlTemplate>
</Window.Resources>
<StackPanel>
<Button Template="{StaticResource ButtonControlTemplate}" ContentTemplate="{StaticResource ButtonContentTemplate}" Content="1"/>
<Button Template="{StaticResource ButtonControlTemplate}" ContentTemplate="{StaticResource ButtonContentTemplate}" Content="2"/>
<Button Template="{StaticResource ButtonControlTemplate}" ContentTemplate="{StaticResource ButtonContentTemplate}" Content="3"/>
</StackPanel>
</Window>
(Templates blatently stolen from
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.controls.controltemplate.aspx
and
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.controls.contentcontrol.contenttemplate%28VS.95%29.aspx
respectively)
Anyway, the ControlTemplate decides how the Button itself looks, while
the ContentTemplate decides how the Content of the button looks. So
you could bind the content to one of you data classes and have it
present itself however you wanted it.
ControlTemplate: Represents control style.
DataTemplate: Represents data style(How would you like to show your data).
All controls are using default control template that you can override through template property.
For example
Button template is a control template.
Button content template is a data template
<Button VerticalAlignment="Top" >
<Button.Template>
<ControlTemplate >
<Grid>
<Rectangle Fill="Blue" RadiusX="20" RadiusY="20"/>
<Ellipse Fill="Red" />
<ContentPresenter Content="{Binding}">
<ContentPresenter.ContentTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" Height="50">
<TextBlock Text="Name" Margin="5"/>
<TextBox Text="{Binding UserName, Mode=TwoWay}" Margin="5" Width="100"/>
<Button Content="Show Name" Click="OnClickShowName" />
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
</ContentPresenter.ContentTemplate>
</ContentPresenter>
</Grid>
</ControlTemplate>
</Button.Template>
</Button>
public String UserName
{
get { return userName; }
set
{
userName = value;
this.NotifyPropertyChanged("UserName");
}
}
ControlTemplate - Changing the appearance of element. For example Button can contain image and text
DataTemplate - Representing the underlying data using the elements.
ControlTemplate DEFINES the visual appearance, DataTemplate REPLACES the visual appearance of a data item.
Example: I want to show a button from rectangular to circle form => Control Template.
And if you have complex objects to the control, it just calls and shows ToString(), with DataTemplate you can get various members and display and change their values of the data object.
All of the above answers are great but there is a key difference that was missed. That helps make better decisions about when to use what. It is ItemTemplate property:
DataTemplate is used for elements that provide ItemTemplate property for you to replace its items' content using DataTemplates you define previously according to bound data through a selector that you provide.
But if your control does not provide this luxury for you then you still can use a ContentView that can display its content from predefined ControlTemplate. Interestingly, you can change the ControlTemplate property of your ContentView at runtime. One more thing to note that unlike controls with ItemTemplate property, you cannot have a TemplateSelector for this (ContentView) control. However, you still can create triggers to change the ControlTemplate at runtime.