I have a load test solution with one load test and one web test. I have created a Agent where the load test solution lies and a Controller which has a SQL server set up. So i am using the Controller to store the Load test results in database. While running the test case i am facing the below issue -
The load test results database could not be opened. Check that the load test results database specified by the connect string for your test controller (or local machine) specifies a database that contains the load test schema and that is currently available. For more information, see the Visual Studio help topic 'About the Load Test Results Store'. The connection error was: An error occurred while attempting to create the load test results repository schema: To create the database 'LoadTest2010' your user account must have the either the SQL Server 'sysadmin' role or both the 'serveradmin' and 'dbcreator' roles
Note - The same solution runs fine for two of my colleagues. So i think it is something to do with permissions. I have matched the permissions which i and my colleague share on controller, agent, database, they are exactly the same.
I am blocked from two days, it would be great if anyone can spend some time and help me.
Thanks in advance.
Load Test Repository is configured at Controller Level. So, if someone else can do Load Tests, configuration is ok.
Maybe, you are not using a remote Test Controller in your Test (Local Testing only).
You should create a remote test settings in VS and specify the remote test controller.
Related
I am working on an ios project that has a Sybase (ultralite) database that is synchronized with a Sybase Sql Anywhere 12 database using mobilink.
Everything was properly, until i decided today to add some fields to the main database so that they synchronize to the main database.
I have updated the schema of the consolidated database from the main engine, then i have updated the schema of the remote database from the consolidated engine, and then i mapped the added fields together, and I deployed a new ultralite database.
Please note that it's not the first time I do a similar task, i always add fields, and sync databases..
after the update, when i synchronize using the blank ultralite database, mobilink will fail giving only this error: Synchronization Failed: -1305 (MOBILINK_COMMUNICATIONS_ERROR) %1:201 %2: %3:0
I have researched Error Number 201 in sybase and it points to: SQLE_NOT_PUBLIC_ID
and in the sybase documentation the error's probably cause is:
"The option specified in the SET OPTION statement is PUBLIC only. You cannot define this option for any other user."
I have tried to redeploy, I have tried to move the engine to a windows pc, all give the same error.. and i have no clue where this SET OPTION statement came from and how can i solve it..
Any hints are appreciated!
The problem was just caused by small network timeout value while setting up mobilink parameters.
info.stream_parms = (char*) #"host=192.168.0.100;port=3309;timeout=1"
i just changed the value from timeout=1 to timeout=300 and it worked!
I'm developing an asp.net mvc application at my office. I wanted to work at home as well, so, I pushed my project on github, when I came my home back, I pulled it from github to my projects folder, now I tried to access its SQL Server database in server explorer using windows authentication, on pressing ok, it showed me the following error :
Cannot open database "HrAndPayrollSystem.Models.HrAndPayroll" requested by the login. The login failed.
Login failed for user 'user'.
and here is my connection string :
<connectionStrings><add name="HrAndPayroll" connectionString="Data Source=(LocalDb)\MSSQLLocalDB;Initial Catalog=HrAndPayrollSystem.Models.HrAndPayroll;Integrated Security=False" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />
What could be the reason, how should I resolve it? Thanks in Advance :)
So, I somehow managed to get through this.
In other words, this error says that you need to access your database at least for a single time, means you need to perform some transactions with the database, inserting something or retrieving something, at this point you accessed the database for the first time on the different machine. Since, I had to access database at the point when my application starts, so, crashing start crashes my whole application, so I created another controller that does not contain any authorize attribute, just to leave it open in order to access the database, created a single field, accessed the database, now go and check your database in server explorer, you are about to access it for the first time in the database, and now also, it will never crash anywhere.
So, the point is that you need to access your database at least for a first time..
We have a .NET3.5 Windows Forms application that calls an ASP.NET SOAP web service on the same server. This web service then saves the data into a SQL Server Express 2005 database, again on the same server.
The application has been deployed internally, as well as to a number of our customers and has worked as expected for over 18 months. However this week, at our main customer's site, the application has started generating an error message on four out of the 10 servers it is deployed on. All of the web service methods use the same connection string, but only one web method is affected.
The connection string has this format:
Data Source=MYSERVER\SQLEXPRESS;Initial Catalog=MyDatabase;
Persist Security Info=True;User ID=MyUser;Password=MyPassword
When the application calls one particular web service method, it is producing an error:
Cannot find the user 'MyDatabase', because it does not exist or you
do not have permission.
There have been no changes to the application to cause this, however the customers' IT people may have made changes to these servers. MyUser has been granted permissions on the stored procedures and is able to connect to all of the other web service interfaces.
The main thing that is confusing me is that the error messages says that the user that does not exist is MyDatabase which is the Initial Catalog name in the connection string.
I have been onsite with the customer and verified that the application is still set up correctly and that all of the other web service interfaces are correctly connecting to the database.
Any suggestions of either possible causes or other things I can check would be gratefully received.
I would strongly advise against removing the dbo. That is the schema name. Simply removing it will imply to the DB to use the default schema, which is probably dbo anyways. So it would accomplish nothing. But by not using the schema name when calling the procedure you can run into naming conflicts. For example, if you have a procedure with the same name in two different schemas in the DB, and you try to call it without a schema name, the DB will not know which one to call, resulting in an exception.
We have a couple of loadtests running on a build server and I've been having problems with persisting the results from the test in a resultstore database. It works fine when running locally and up and until a week ago, the test result got persisted when running on the build server (TFS2010). Note I have no test controller or test agents. Only a build controller and build agents. I've setup the connection string for the controller 'Local - No controller' and it is seemed to be saved correctly (can see the connection string on the build server too). But when running via the build server, the result is not saved in the database. Locally works fine. So what am I doing wrong here and where is the connection string saved? My guess is that it follows the test controller and hence I do not explicit have one, my guess is that it uses a default local test controller. Any thoughts on where the chain breaks?
A fixed the problem, by opening visual studio on each of the build servers and configuring the connection string - *sigh
I am having to modify an old web project that us using classic asp. There are actually 2 different projects that are clones of each other, they just point to different databases.
I modified the code from the first project (asp, db, stored procs etc.) and it all works great.
I then copied all that code to the other project since they are clones. All works just fine there too. I can execute the stored procs in query analyzer and all the data comes back as expected and it shows up on the display asp pages.
When i hit the edit button on the page I get the "Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server error '80040e09'" and it shows the select part of the query in the error window.
I dont get anything about permissions etc.. If I view the page source the data is actually in there. I am really confused as to what is going on.
Anyone have any suggestions or things to look for.
Thanks
This appears to be a permissions error based on the usual meanings of this error code.
I would manually log in to the database using the same credentials you have configured in your application's connection string. Then run the same query and see what happens.