I'm using Yeoman to create an angular project and have modules defined as:
angular.module('angularApp')<br />
.controller('LogOutCtrl', function ($scope) {//do stuff});
Test scripts via Yeoman are as follows:
describe('Controller: LogOutCtrl', function () {
// load the controller's module
beforeEach(module('angularApp', ['ui', 'appSettings']));
var LogOutCtrl,
scope;
// Initialize the controller and a mock scope
beforeEach(inject(function ($controller) {
scope = {};
LogOutCtrl = $controller('LogOutCtrl', {
$scope: scope
});
}));
it('should pass', function () {
expect(2+2).toBe(4); //aka some test
});
});
This is returning as an error via grunt/karma:
Error: Argument 'fn' is not a function, got string
I have looked at a few other ways of writing these as well:
How do I test an AngularJS service with Jasmine?
Any help would be appreciated, as I am new to Angular and Jasmine testing. I believe this is probably an issue with Yeoman's templates for test scripts.
Thanks!
This was an issue with the templates that Yeoman was using. They have been resolved after an update from 1.0 beta.
Related
I'm trying to write unit tests for an angular service with jasmine/karma. I have a similar service test, which works just fine. But this one has some additional dependencies, is in a different module and just doesn't find the service with the inject.
The service looks something like this. bService is in the same module, but commonFactory and commonService are in another module, say commonModule.
(function () {
'use strict';
angular
.module('myService')
.service('aService', aService);
aService.$inject = [
'commonFactory',
'commonService'
'bService'
];
function aService (
commonFactory,
commonService,
bService
) {
};
return {
codeIWantToTest: CodeIWantToTest;
}
function CodeIWantToTest () {
console.log('surprise!');
}
})();
My jasmine test looks like:
describe('myService.aService', function () {
'use strict';
var aService;
// I tried adding beforeEach(module('commonModule')); too, but that didn't do anything
beforeEach(module('myService'));
beforeEach(function() {
inject(function(_aService_) {
console.log('getting aService');
aService = _aService_;
});
});
it('tests my service is defined', function() {
expect(myService).toBeDefined();
});
});
This test fails. myService isn't defined and the console.log in the inject function doesn't ever fire. My karma.conf.js basically lists the dependencies in the order that they're injected into the service, then adds the service then the test.
What would cause the inject to not grab the service? What am I missing? I mentioned I have a similar test for commonService and it works just fine. So I'm baffled.
Another dev on my team found the solution and I wanted to post it as an answer for the future people. I had a feeling it was a dependency problem, and it was. While we were loading all of the JS stuff correctly, the template that the component uses was loading another js dependency. So to fix this for jasmine, we had two different solutions:
at the top of the component test file, we could add:
beforeEach(function () {
module(function ($provide) {
$provide.constant('myMissingDependency', {
// do things to load the dependency here
});
});
});
In our case it was a translation library
The other solution was to add a 'shim' file into the unit test directory and load it with karma.config.js ahead of the tests. That looked like:
(function() {
angular
.module('MyService')
.constant('myMissingDependency', Object.freeze({
// things to load the dependency
}));
})();
I wasn't able to switch to Chrome because we're using Docker and I couldn't get the tests to run locally to run Chrome. So adding a second set of eyes to this was what I needed.
I have the following code in my spec file
beforeEach(function () {
module('app');
inject(function ($injector) {
user = $injector.get('app.user');
});
});
user is undefined, and isn't being injected. So I want to make sure that the app module actually loaded.
If the module is not loaded, you get $injector:nomod error. If the module is loaded but the service cannot be found, you get $injector:unpr error. It is as easy as that. There is always a breadcrumb trail, no need to probe Angular to know if it fails silently or not.
Just make sure you're using the right module name. You can use beforeEach to load your module. Also, with $injector you can get an instance of your service or controller you're trying to test:
'use strict';
describe('MyControllerName', function () {
var MyControllerName;
beforeEach(module('myAppMomduleName'));
beforeEach(inject(function ($injector) {
MyControllerName = $injector.get('MyControllerName');
}));
it('should create an instance of the controller', function () {
expect(MyControllerName).toBeDefined();
});
});
I am trying to mock a factory within one of my angularjs modules. The full angularjs application is
angular.module('administration', ['administrationServices'])
The dependency:
var module = angular.module('administrationServices')
contains a factory service:
module.factory('Example', [function(){
return{
list:function(){
return ['This is real']
}
}
}])
This is the service I am attempting to override in my protractor e2e test. The actual test looks something like this:
describe('Example page', function(){
beforeEach(function() {
var mock = function(){
// get the module and provide the mock
var module = angular.module('administrationServices').config(['$provide', function($provide){
$provide.factory('Example',[function(){
return {
list: function(){
return ['This is a Mock Test']
}
}
}])
}])
}
// override the mock service
browser.addMockModule('administrationServices', mock)
})
it('should go to the page and see mock text', function() {
// code that goes to page and checks if the service works
// ...
})
})
The issue I'm having occurs when I $ protractor conf.js, I get the error:
Error while running module script administrationServices: [$injector:nomod] http://errors.angularjs.org/1.3.4/$injector/nomod?p0=administrationServices
This is where I'm confused. Every blog post about protractor's addMockModule uses similar syntax it seems. There are other factory services in administrationServices and those seem to get overwritten because the app can't open to the page due to those services (user and group services) not working.
Anyways, if somebody has seen this and can help direct me in the right direction, that would help; I am fairly new to mock services, protractor and e2e testing.
I think the problem is that your mock function does not return anything. It doesn't share the new module outside the function scope.
var mock = function(){
// get the module and provide the mock
return angular.module('administrationServices').config(['$provide', function($provide){
$provide.factory('Example',[function(){
return {
list: function(){
return ['This is a Mock Test'];
}
}
}])
}])
};
// override the mock service
browser.addMockModule('administrationServices', mock)
Just make it return the new module and it should be fine.
I try to set up angular controller unit test following this guide, the code is as follows:
describe('ProfileController', function() {
// load haloApp module
beforeEach(module('haloApp'));
it("should have notify_changed in scope", inject(function($controller) {
var scope= {},
ctrl = $controller('ProfileController', {$scope:scope});// inject controller
// expect(ProfileController).not.toBeDefined();
expect(scope.notify_changed).toBe(false);
}));
});
When I run this test case with jasmine, it report the following error:
ReferenceError: module is not defined
I have required angular file before this code snippet. Is there anything I am missing?
The module function is a part of the ngMock module defined in angular-mocks.js. Make sure that file is included when running your tests. See https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ngMock and https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ngMock/function/angular.mock.module
I'm trying to create some unit tests in Angular using Jasmine being run through Teaspoon. The tests are running, however I have a simple test just to test the existence of a controller that is failing. I have the following test setup.
//= require spec_helper
require("angular");
require("angular-mocks");
var app = require("./app");
describe("My App", function() {
describe("App Controllers", function() {
beforeEach(module("app"))
it("Should have created an application controller", inject(function($rootScope, $controller){
var scope = $rootScope.$new();
ctrl = $controller("ApplicationCtrl", { $scope: scope });
}));
})
})
The require statements are processed by Browserify which is handling my dependencies, but I can also hook into sprockets which I'm using for the spec helper.
Inside the app that is being required, I have
require("angular");
var controllers = require("./controllers");
var app = angular.module("app", [
"app.controllers"
]);
exports.app = app;
When I run this test, I get the following error produced
Failure/Error: TypeError: '[object Object]' is not a function (evaluating 'module("aialerts")')
I've spent quite a while trying to figure this out but I have no idea what's going on. Any help appreciated.
I had the same problem. Change this line:
beforeEach(module("app"))
to:
beforeEach(angular.mock.module("app"))
Browserify uses Node-style require, where module is an object that you can use to export functionality:
console.log(module); // {exports: {}}
angular-mocks.js tries to attach a function to window.module, but that's not possible in Browserify/Node.
Taking a look through the angular-mocks source, it appears that angular-mocks also attaches the module function to angular.mock. So instead of using the global module object, you must use angular.mock.module.