What is the root property value if I get a Json like that:
{
"status": {
"status": 0,
"msg": "Ok",
"protocolversion": "extjs.json"
},
"value": {
"table": [
[
"admin",
"Administrator",
""
],
[
"test",
"Test",
""
]
],
"total": 2
}
}
The data will be displayed in a gridpanel, 1 row is admin, 1 row is test, etc.
Tried:
value, value.table
How to get this to work?
value.table is correct for the root property, but you are using a json format that I don't think Ext is set up to handle by default. It has a reader for json that is used for an array of objects, not for an nested arrays of field values with no object mapping information.
If you have to use that format, you will either need to create your own readers/writers or just use Ext.Ajax.request(), and in the callback, parse the nested array into objects. Something like:
Ext.Ajax.request({
url: 'path.com/to/content',
success: function (response, operation) {
var data = Ext.JSON.decode(response.responseText);
var fields = data.value.table;
var records = [];
Ext.Array.each(fields, function (fieldArray, fieldIndex) {
Ext.Array.each(fieldArray, function(fieldValue, valueIndex) {
//Create record object if it doesn't exist
var record = records[valueIndex] || {};
//Create a switch statement based on the array index to set fields
switch(fieldIndex) {
case 0:
record.User_id = fieldValue;
break;
case 1:
record.Username = fieldValue;
break;
}
});
});
//Add the objects to the empty store
store.add(records);
}
});
That's not a production solution by any means since it doesn't handle that empty string at the end of your list or the case that you get a jagged array of arrays per field which I can't imagine what to do with. If it's within your control or influence, I would suggest using a format more like what Ext suggests so you can use the built in json proxy/reader/writer or go crazy with it and implement ext's remote procedure call format:
{
"success": true,
"message": "Success",
"data": [
{
"User_id": "admin",
"Username": "Administrator"
}, {
"User_id": "admin",
"Username": "Administrator"
}
]
}
In above example "value" is root property. But for JSON reader it's a property name (or a dot-separated list of property names if the root is nested).
so you can assign into your field you need following.
fields:['table.admin','table.test']
Related
After some digging I decided my backend needed to consume duplicate keys and as a consequence my frontend can no longer send a dictionary as a JSON string.
See my previous question.
After applying the solution provided
let mediatagRequest = new MediaTagRequest(tags);
const headers = { 'content-type': 'application/json' }
let jsonObject = {};
for (let entry of mediatagRequest.tags.entries())
{
jsonObject[entry[0]] = entry[1];
}
const body = JSON.stringify({
tags: jsonObject
});
My current output (which is what I then wanted)
{
"tags": {
"city": "Karachi"
}
However my needs have changed and after a bit of of struggle I couldn't get my desired output to be like this
{
"tags": [
{
"key": "city",
"value": "Karachi"
},
{
"key": "city",
"value": "Mumbai"
}
]
}
Could someone help, thank you.
To get your desired output you could use the Object.entries() function to get the key, value pairs separately. This code segment will turn an object into a list of objects with key value pairs:
test_object = {
karachi: "dubai",
mumbao: "moscow",
};
output = Object.entries(test_object).map(([key, value]) => ({ key, value}));
console.log(output);
You can adapt this code to select the desired parts of your object and format them as you like. There are other Object functions you can see in the documentation.
Good healty everyone, I want to ask something about managing data from JSON. I've JSON format like below :
{
"msg": "Success"
"data": [
{
"id": "1",
"notelp": "0000000000",
"user": "no1"
},
{
"id": "2",
"notelp": "1111111111",
"user": "no2"
},
],}
and I want to get value from variable "notelp", I expect output like this {"0000000000", "1111111111",} how to get it ?
I tried this before, but still can't get what I want,
if (response.statusCode == 200) {
final result = json.decode(response.body);
debugPrint('dataTelp: ${result['data']['notelp']}');
}
thank you guys to help me to solve it and stay save.
You can use the forEach or another looping method to get data from a list.
List outPut = [];
List data = response['data'];
data.forEach((element) {
outPut.add(element['notelp']);
});
print(outPut);
I have a mongo document that contains an array called history:
{
"_id" : ObjectId("575fe85bfe98c1fba0a6e535"),
"email" : "email#address",
"__v" : 0,
"history" : [
{
"name" : "Test123",
"organisation" : "Rat",
"field" : 4,
"another": 3
}
]
}
I want to add fields to each history object or update fields IF the name AND organisation match, however if they don't, I want to add a new object to the array with the queried name and organisation and add/update the other fields to the object when necessary.
So:
This query, finds one that matches:
db.users.find({
email:"email#address",
$and: [
{ "history.name": "Test123", "history.organisation": "Rat"}
]
})
However, I'm struggling to get the update/upsert to work IF that combination of history.name and history.organisation dont exist in the array.
What I think I need to do is a :
"If this history name does not equal 'Test123' AND the history organisation does not equal 'Rat' then add an object to the array with those fields and any other field provided in the update query."
I tried this:
db.users.update({
email:"email#address",
$and: [
{ "history.name": "Test123", "history.organisation": "Rat"}
]
}, {
history: { name: "Test123"},
history: { organisation: "Rat"}
}, {upsert:true})
But that gave me E11000 duplicate key error index: db.users.$email_1 dup key: { : null }
Any help greatly appreciated.
Thanks community!
Not possible with a single atomic update I'm afraid, you would have to do a couple of update operations that satisfy both conditions.
Break down the update logic into two distinct update operations, the first one would require using the positional $ operator to identify the element in the history array you want and the $set to update the existing fields. This operation follows the logic update fields IF the name AND organisation match
Now, you'd want to use the findAndModify() method for this operation since it can return the updated document. By default, the returned document does not include the modifications made on the update.
So, armed with this arsenal, you can then probe your second logic in the next operation i.e. update IF that combination of "history.name" and "history.organisation" don't exist in the array. With this second
update operation, you'd need to then use the $push operator to add the elements.
The following example demonstrates the above concept. It initially assumes you have the query part and the document to be updated as separate objects.
Take for instance when we have documents that match the existing history array, it will just do a single update operation, but if the documents do not match, then the findAndModify() method will return null, use this logic in your second update operation to push the document to the array:
var doc = {
"name": "Test123",
"organisation": "Rat"
}, // document to update. Note: the doc here matches the existing array
query = { "email": "email#address" }; // query document
query["history.name"] = doc.name; // create the update query
query["history.organisation"] = doc.organisation;
var update = db.users.findAndModify({
"query": query,
"update": {
"$set": {
"history.$.name": doc.name,
"history.$.organisation": doc.organisation
}
}
}); // return the document modified, if there's no matched document update = null
if (!update) {
db.users.update(
{ "email": query.email },
{ "$push": { "history": doc } }
);
}
After this operation for documents that match, querying the collection will yield the same
db.users.find({ "email": "email#address" });
Output:
{
"_id" : ObjectId("575fe85bfe98c1fba0a6e535"),
"email" : "email#address",
"__v" : 0,
"history" : [
{
"name" : "Test123",
"organisation" : "Rat",
"field" : 4,
"another" : 3
}
]
}
Now consider documents that won't match:
var doc = {
"name": "foo",
"organisation": "bar"
}, // document to update. Note: the doc here does not matches the current array
query = { "email": "email#address" }; // query document
query["history.name"] = doc.name; // create the update query
query["history.organisation"] = doc.organisation;
var update = db.users.findAndModify({
"query": query,
"update": {
"$set": {
"history.$.name": doc.name,
"history.$.organisation": doc.organisation
}
}
}); // return the document modified, if there's no matched document update = null
if (!update) {
db.users.update(
{ "email": query.email },
{ "$push": { "history": doc } }
);
}
Querying this collection for this document
db.users.find({ "email": "email#address" });
would yield
Output:
{
"_id" : ObjectId("575fe85bfe98c1fba0a6e535"),
"email" : "email#address",
"__v" : 0,
"history" : [
{
"name" : "Test123",
"organisation" : "Rat",
"field" : 4,
"another" : 3
},
{
"name" : "foo",
"organisation" : "bar"
}
]
}
We have created an array of complextype(Carrier field) objects. See below metadata
{ shortName : 'Person',
namespace : 'Demo',
autoGeneratedKeyType : breeze.AutoGeneratedKeyType.Identity,
"dataProperties": [
{
"name": "carriers",
"complexTypeName":"Carrier:#Test",
"isScalar":false
}]
}
The Carrier entity is defined as below:
{
"shortName": "Carrier",
"namespace": "Test",
"isComplexType": true,
"dataProperties": [
{
"name": "Testing",
"isScalar":true,
"dataType": "String"
}
]
}
We have the following matching data for the above entities:
{
carriers: [
{
Testing : 'InputBox1'
},
{
Testing : 'InputBox2'
}
]
}
We are trying to dynamically add the complextype object(Carrier) to the above carriers array by using the following approach:
var test = {
"Testing" : "Test"
};
var result = manager.createEntity('Carrier', test);
The above code throws an exception(undefined is not a function) inside breeze.debug.js at line number 12457(see below code)
entity = entityType.createEntity(initialValues);
The exception is thrown since the complextype entity does not have 'createEntity' function in it.
What are we missing here?
Excellent question - Sorry I didn't have a chance to address this earlier.
When adding a complexType object you need to use the createInstance() method instead of the createEntity.
var thisEntityType = manager.metadataStore.getEntityType('Carrier');
var thisEntity = thisEntityType.createInstance(initialValues);
Basically you get the complexType and then create an instance of it using the values you want assigned. Keep in mind the initial values should be a hash object of course. Often I will include a helper function to do this for me like this -
function createComplexType(entityType, constructorProperties) {
var thisEntityType = manager.metadataStore.getEntityType(entityType);
var thisEntity = thisEntityType.createInstance(constructorProperties);
return thisEntity;
}
Im trying to compare two specific bits of information. One is in the form of a as3 string the other is in the form of a Json array.
The Json array shows customer data from a shop website. What i want to do is have as3 compare the string(i.e a customer name) with the data , and when it has found the matching name, only trace that customers specific information.
Im amusing id have to use a loop for the comparison , but im having trouble getting my head around how to convert the Json into specific junks that can then be compared individually with a string. Any help would be perfect.
Thanks
Be aware that JSON is just a standard AS3 object. There's no magic going on here; loop through it as you would any other structure and run your comparisons as usual.
Solution
var jsonObj:Object = {
"customers": [
{
"id": "04aa1ab3-521b-11e3-a29a-bc305bf5da20",
"name": "fake name",
"customer_code": "00000002",
"customer_group_id": "6012cd22-5166-11e3-a29a-bc305bf5da20",
"customer_group_name": "All Customers",
"first_name": "test",
"last_name": "test",
"company_name": "",
"email": "testest#yahoo.com"
}
]
}
var myString:String = "fake name";
for (var k:String in jsonObj.customers[0]) {
var v:String = jsonObj.customers[0][k];
if (v == myString) {
trace(myString + "'s email is " + jsonObj.customers[0].email)
}
}
Use a Dictionary Object to store customer objects using their unique names (or ids ) as reference;
You certainly do not want to write unnecessary loop search for a customer in question.
Solution.
var jsonObj:Object = {
"customers": [
{
"id": "04aa1ab3-521b-11e3-a29a-bc305bf5da20",
"name": "fake name",
"customer_code": "00000002",
"customer_group_id": "6012cd22-5166-11e3-a29a-bc305bf5da20",
"customer_group_name": "All Customers",
"first_name": "test",
"last_name": "test",
"company_name": "",
"email": "testest#yahoo.com"
}
]
}
//Dictionary Object to store customers
var customers:Dictionary=new Dictionary();
//customer object in the json
var customer:Object;
//loop json object to retrieve customers and
//store them in Dictionary using either unique name or id
for each(customer in jsonObj)
customers[customer.name]=customer;
//retrieve customer in question
function getCustomer(id:String):Object
{
return customers[id] as Object;
}