gcc static library linking vs dynamic linking - c

My build environment is CentOS 5. I have a third party library called libcunit. I installed it with autotools and it generates both libcunit.a and libcunit.so. I have my own application that links with a bunch of shared libraries. libcunit.a is in the current directory and libcunit.so and other shared libraries are in /usr/local/lib/. When I compile like:
gcc -o test test.c -L. libcunit.a -L/usr/local/lib -labc -lyz
I get a linkage error:
libcunit.a(Util.o): In function `CU_trim_left':
Util.c:(.text+0x346): undefined reference to `__ctype_b'
libcunit.a(Util.o): In function `CU_trim_right':
Util.c:(.text+0x3fd): undefined reference to `__ctype_b'
But when I compile with .so like:
gcc -o test test.c -L/usr/local/lib -lcunit -labc -lyz
it compiles fine and runs fine too.
Why is it giving error when linked statically with libcunit.a?

Why is it giving error when linked statically with libcunit.a
The problem is that your libcunit.a was built on an ancient Linux system, and depends on symbols which have been removed from libc (these symbols were used in glibc-2.2, and were removed from glibc-2.3 over 10 years ago). More exactly, these symbols have been hidden. They are made available for dynamic linking to old binaries (such as libcunit.so) but no new code can statically link to them (you can't create a new executable or shared library that references them).
You can observe this like so:
readelf -Ws /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 | egrep '\W__ctype_b\W'
769: 00000000003b9130 8 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT 31 __ctype_b#GLIBC_2.2.5
readelf -Ws /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.a | egrep '\W__ctype_b\W'
# no output

Didn't notice that the libcunit.a is actually found in your case and the problem with linakge is rather in the CUnit library itself. Employed Russian is absolutely right, and he's not talking about precompiled binary here. We understand that you've built it yourself. However, CUinit itself seems to be relying on the symbol from glibc which is not available for static linking anymore. As a result you have only 2 options:
File a report to the developers of CUnit about this and ask them to fix it;
Use dynamic linking.
Nevertheless, my recommendation about your style of static linkage still applies. -L. is in general bad practice. CUnit is a 3rd party library and should not be placed into the directory containing source files of your project. It should be rather installed in the same way as the dynamic version, i.e. like you have libcunit.so in /usr/local/lib. If you'd supply prefix to Autotools on the configure stage of CUnit, then Autotools would install everything properly. So if you want to link statically with CUnit, consider doing it in the following form:
gcc -o test test.c -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-Bstatic -lcunit -Wl,-Bdynamic -labc -lyz

Related

How to use LibFuzz on a C project that is not a library

I am trying to run libFuzz on a C project that usually compiles to an executable. The examples I found for libFuzz almost exclusively link with a library, i.e. a mylibary.a file. So I compiled the project with the normal Makefile, and combined the generated object files into a library with ar rcs a.o b.o etc.. Now I want to link this library file with the fuzzing target using clang++, but the linker is not able to find the implementation of the function I want to fuzz.
The command I use for linking inside the src directory of the project is
clang++ -Wall -fsanitize=fuzzer -Wno-cpp -Wpedantic -std=c++11 -O2 -g  -I/usr/include/libxml2 -g -O2 -rdynamic  -o fuzzing libmylib.a fuzztarget.cc -lcurl -lxml2 -I.
The error I get is "Undefined reference to function_xy()"
So the compiler finds the import of the function but not the implementation of it.
I am new to clang and generally building complex C projects so all help is greatly appreciated. Thank you!
I tried compiling the project with the included Makefile, then combining the generated object files into a .a library and finally linking the library with my fuzzing target.
The error you got is about linking, not the LibFuzzer. If you can compile and link your file without implementing function in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput, then the fuzz-target should work: Include header in your code, call the function, compile file and link with libraries. Please check the order of include path, file, linked libraries. Be careful with the option of optimization (-O2), sometimes the fuzzer does not give crash with this option.

How to load C library functions into assembly, and use assembly library functions in another C or assembly project

Currently I am building a foo.h and foo.c with:
$ clang -I . -dynamiclib \
-undefined dynamic_lookup \
-o foo.dylib foo.c
I am able to use this in other C libraries like this:
clang -I . -dynamiclib \
-undefined dynamic_lookup \
-o bar.dylib bar.c foo.dylib
I would like to use this library in an assembly project.
$ nasm -f macho64 test.asm \
&& ld -e start -macosx_version_min 10.13.0 -static -o test test.o foo.dylib
$ ./test
ld: warning: foo.dylib, ignoring unexpected dylib file
Wondering how I link together the C -> asm system to get the C functions working in asm. Then I would like to go further and use that compiled asm to use in either a C or asm project, so wondering how to do that.
When using the assembly in C, I would like for you to basically get functions and import #include "myassembly.h" or something like that, so it feels like a real library. Then you have a function like myfunc which is defined in assembly, but you can use it in c as myfunc(1, 2, 3); sort of thing.
If I change it from static to dynamic linking with the -lSystem flag (and removing -static), I get this:
dyld: Library not loaded: foo.dylib
Referenced from: ./test
Reason: image not found
make: *** [...] Abort trap: 6
You're specifying -static which means:
-static Produces a mach-o file that does not use the dyld. Only used
building the kernel.
dyld is the dynamic loader. If you're not using the dynamic loader, you can't use dynamic libraries.
Update for edited question:
When a dylib is created, it gets an "install name". When an executable is linked to that dylib, the executable stores the install name of the dylib in its reference to it. (Note, it does not store the link-time path of the dylib file it linked against.) When the executable is loaded, the dynamic loader looks for the dylib using the install name it recorded, by default.
You can specify the install name using the -install_name <name> option to the linker. It could be the absolute path to where you expect the library to be installed (e.g. /usr/local/lib/foo.dylib), if you expect it to be installed in a fixed location. Often, though, that's not useful. You want a more flexible means for the dynamic loader to find the dylib.
The dynamic loader understands certain special path prefixes on install names to support such flexibility. See the dyld(1) man page. For example, if you specify an install name of #executable_path/foo.dylib then, at load time, the loader will look next to the executable for the library.
You can see the install name of a dylib by using otool -D foo.dylib. Your dylib may not have an install name, in which case its effective install name is just its file name with no path.
If the loader doesn't find the library by using its install name, it has a search strategy. By default, it looks in ~/lib:/usr/local/lib:/lib:/usr/lib. You can use some environment variables to alter the search strategy. For example, you can set DYLD_FALLBACK_LIBRARY_PATH to a colon-delimited list of directories to search, instead. These environment variables are also listed in the dyld(1) man page.

version node not found for symbol

I've build a shared library on my desktop that uses statically linked gstreamer and gstreamer plugins (base, good, rtsp-server).
Now I'm trying to compile the library using yocto but its giving me a linker error:
version node not found for symbol _IO_do_write##GLIBC_2.17
failed to set dynamic section sizes: Bad value
The solutions I found on stack overflow did not seem to help me.
use compiler with --disable-symvers
link libc libs in different orders (-ldl -lm -lc -lpthread -ltinfo -lrt)
link libc libs statically/shared
What I find particularly odd is that the linker is looking for GLIBC_2.17 while yocto uses 2.27 and my system is using 2.24. I don't know if this matters or if it is normal (the function did not change since 2.17?).
NM -C shows the symbol in libc.a:
nm -C recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libc.a | grep IO_do_write
U _IO_do_write
U _IO_do_write
0000000000001ba8 W _IO_do_write
So I would thinks that lib is linked incorrectly?
The linker command is a long one because of all the shared libs so I shortend it a bit (removed boost and custom libs):
aarch64-poky-linux-g++ -fPIC --sysroot=recipe-sysroot -O2 -pipe -g -feliminate-unused-debug-types -fdebug-prefix-map=recipe-root/git-r0 -fdebug-prefix-map=recipe-sysroot= -fdebug-prefix-map=recipe-sysroot-native= -fvisibility-inlines-hidden --sysroot=recipe-sysroot -Wl,-allow-multiple-definition -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic -Wsuggest-override -Wswitch-default -Wduplicated-cond -Wshadow -Werror -ftemplate-depth=1024 -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--as-needed -lc -Wl,--no-as-needed -Wl,--no-undefined -pthread -ldl -shared -Wl,-soname,rtsp_streamer.so -o rtsp_streamer.so ... custom static libs .and boost static libs ... -lpthread recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/gstreamer-1.0/libgstrtsp.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/gstreamer-1.0/libgstrtp.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/gstreamer-1.0/libgstrtpmanager.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/gstreamer-1.0/libgstcoreelements.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/gstreamer-1.0/libgstadder.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/gstreamer-1.0/libgstapp.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/gstreamer-1.0/libgstaudioconvert.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/gstreamer-1.0/libgstaudiorate.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/gstreamer-1.0/libgstaudioresample.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/gstreamer-1.0/libgstaudiotestsrc.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/gstreamer-1.0/libgstgio.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/gstreamer-1.0/libgstpango.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/gstreamer-1.0/libgsttypefindfunctions.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/gstreamer-1.0/libgstvideoconvert.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/gstreamer-1.0/libgstvideorate.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/gstreamer-1.0/libgstvideoscale.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/gstreamer-1.0/libgstvideotestsrc.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/gstreamer-1.0/libgstvolume.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/gstreamer-1.0/libgstautodetect.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/gstreamer-1.0/libgstvideofilter.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libBrokenLocale.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libBrokenLocale_pic.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libanl.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libanl_pic.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libatomic.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libatomic_ops.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libatomic_ops_gpl.a ... more boost static libs ... recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libc.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libc_pic.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libcidn_pic.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libcrypt.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libcrypt_pic.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libcrypto.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libdl.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libdl_pic.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libg.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libgomp.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libgstallocators-1.0.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libgstaudio-1.0.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libgstbase-1.0.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libgstcheck-1.0.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libgstcontroller-1.0.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libgstfft-1.0.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libgstpbutils-1.0.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libgstreamer-1.0.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libgstriff-1.0.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libgstrtp-1.0.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libgstrtsp-1.0.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libgstrtspserver-1.0.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libgstapp-1.0.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libgstnet-1.0.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libgstsdp-1.0.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libgsttag-1.0.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libgstvideo-1.0.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libhistory.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libitm.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/liblicensing.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libm.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libm_pic.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libmcheck.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libncurses++.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libncurses++w.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libnsl.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libnsl_pic.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libnss_compat_pic.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libnss_db_pic.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libnss_dns_pic.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libnss_files_pic.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libnss_hesiod_pic.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libnss_nis_pic.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libnss_nisplus_pic.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libprotobuf-lite.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libprotobuf.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libprotoc.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libpthread.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libpthread_nonshared.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libreadline.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libresolv.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libresolv_pic.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/librpcsvc.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/librt.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/librt_pic.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libsqlite3.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libssl.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libssp.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libssp_nonshared.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libstdc++.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libstdc++fs.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libsupc++.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libthread_db_pic.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libutil.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libutil_pic.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libz.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/librt.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libpthread.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libm.a recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/libc.a
Does anybody know what is wrong? If more info is needed please ask. Thanks in advance!
Does anybody know what is wrong?
I suspect that you are not linking against GLIBC-2.27 from Yocto, but against some other GLIBC, though it is hard to see how that could happen.
Your first step should be to find out which libc.so.6 is actually being used. You can do so by adding -Wl,-t flag to your link line. Also add -Wl,-y,_IO_do_write while you are at it.
After you know which libc.so.6 is being used, run readelf -Ws /path/to/libc.so.6 | grep _IO_do_write to see what (if any) versioned symbols are defined in it.
I don't know if this matters or if it is normal (the function did not change since 2.17)?
Yes: that is normal -- the function didn't change its ABI since GLIBC-2.17, so that's the version that is attached to it.
I figured out what went wrong. The shared library is build using a CMAKE project and our own written FindGSTREAMER.cmake. To find gstreamer, among other things, a glob is used to find all the static libs. Because on my desktop I have gstreamer installed in its seperate location this works. With Yocto however this causes every static lib in the recipe-sysroot/usr/lib directory to be linked. Including every libc library (.a, _pic.a and .so). Apparently this causes the linker unable to resolve the symbols.
Correctly filtering the libraries needed by gstreamer fixed the problem.

Statically linking against LAPACK

I'm attempting to do a release of some software and am currently working through a script for the build process. I'm stuck on something I never thought I would be, statically linking LAPACK on x86_64 linux. During configuration AC_SEARCH_LIB([main],[lapack]) works, but compilation of the lapack units do not work, for example undefiend reference to 'dsyev_' --no lapack/blas routine goes unnoticed.
I've confirmed I have the libraries installed and even compiled them myself with the appropriate options to make them static with the same results.
Here is an example I had used in my first experience with LAPACK a few years ago that works dynamically, but not statically: http://pastebin.com/cMm3wcwF
The two methods I'm using to compile are the following,
gcc -llapack -o eigen eigen.c
gcc -static -llapack -o eigen eigen.c
Your linking order is wrong. Link libraries after the code that requires them, not before. Like this:
gcc -o eigen eigen.c -llapack
gcc -static -o eigen eigen.c -llapack
That should resolve the linkage problems.
To answer the subsequent question why this works, the GNU ld documentation say this:
It makes a difference where in the command you write this option; the
linker searches and processes libraries and object files in the order
they are specified. Thus, foo.o -lz bar.o' searches libraryz' after
file foo.o but before bar.o. If bar.o refers to functions in `z',
those functions may not be loaded.
........
Normally the files found this way are library files—archive files
whose members are object files. The linker handles an archive file by
scanning through it for members which define symbols that have so far
been referenced but not defined. But if the file that is found is an
ordinary object file, it is linked in the usual fashion.
ie. the linker is going to make one pass through a file looking for unresolved symbols, and it follows files in the order you provide them (ie. "left to right"). If you have not yet specified a dependency when a file is read, the linker will not be able to satisfy the dependency. Every object in the link list is parsed only once.
Note also that GNU ld can do reordering in cases where circular dependencies are detected when linking shared libraries or object files. But static libraries are only parsed for unknown symbols once.

Static library symbols not being found even with -l

I have a static library, liborc-0.4.a with no shared library. I have another library, libschroedinger-1.0.a (no shared) that depends on symbols in liborc-0.4.a. If I run nm on liborc-0.4.a, symbols such as orc_init show up as T (meaning they are defined). I built libschroedinger-1.0.a with the command line flag -lorc-0.4 so it saw the symbols and was ok.
However, now I have a small executable that depends on libschroedinger-1.0.a. It compiles fine, but when I run the linker
gcc -lschroedinger-1.0 -lorc-0.4 -o output input.o
It gives errors such as:
/usr/local/lib/libschroedinger-1.0.a(libschroedinger_1.0_la-schro.o):schro.c:(.text+0x21):
undefined reference to `orc_init'
gcc is sensitive to the order of libraries. When it's compiling liborc-0.4.a in, there is no need for orc_init, so it's not included. The solution is to put the LDFLAGS at the end of the command:
gcc -o output input.o -lschroedinger-1.0 -lorc-0.4
You most probably compiled libschroedinger with shared liborc. Static library is the same as bunch of object files in an archive, so they don't need to see more than headers. Write like the following to be sure (the same apples to liborc).
gcc /path/to/libschroedinger-1.0.a /path/to/liborc-0.4.a -o output input.o

Resources