How to completely hide the ExtJS Source Code in browsers inspect element? - extjs

I have an EXTJS app and when I look at the source by using browser's inspect element I can see my entire app's source code (except for the server-side code ofcourse.).
I have seen some extjs apps that when inspecting theie source code, all I can see is the app.html page and non of their .js files is discover able by the browser.
I was wondering how I should configure my EXTJS app to make them not viewable inside the browsers "Sources" tab (ie. Chrome's Inspect Element > Sources).
Any help is much appreciated,

The best you can do is to obfuscate your code, as there is no way to stop someone looking at it once its got to the browser.
Even if the browser could hide it somehow, there is nothing stopping a user sniffing the packets on the network etc.

Related

How Can I Hide the PDF Viewer Toolbar in CefSharp?

When loading a PDF document into browser, is there a way to hide the toolbar (zoom, save, print, etc.)? I've spent some time searching and even some time experimenting, but with no success.
It seems if I load a PDF into Chrome and use the developer tools, I can inspect the element and then set display: none. That does the trick there, but when I try to execute some javascript via CefSharp, it doesn't seem to have any effect.
From poking at some view source information, it looks like Chrome (the official Google version) is somehow intercepting the PDF view request and displaying the PDF in a container or frame or something of that sort that I can't directly access from operating on the main CEF frame.
Any ideas? Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance!

How do I make selenium see the network requests made by a web browser?

I have a dotnet Selenium web driver app.
When I'm testing the page one of the things I need to confirm is that a flash object on the page has pulled correct content from a content store on my site. (i.e. the flash object should be loading content from /stuff/info.txt and including that content within the animation.)
As a human looking at this I can use the chrome network tab and see that /stuff/info.txt has been accessed.
How can I make Selenium execute a similar watch and see the network requests made by a web browser?
I did not wrote this, neither tested it however someone did it here: http://www.softwareishard.com/blog/firebug/automate-page-load-performance-testing-with-firebug-and-selenium/
Basically all the requests are exported via netexport and firebug plugins inside a HAR (Http ARchive file)
Please give us your feedback if you give it a try!
Cheers !
I assume you want to automate the process which the developer tools of browsers does. Something like firebug but for verification using Code.
I don't believe Selenium has such features. For now, you will not be able to achieve this.

How do I stop Angular from loading the .angular.min.js.map file when pulling Angular from a CDN?

I am working on a website which loads AngularJS from a CDN, and along with Angular it loads a 284KB map file (angular.min.js.map), which I understand is for debugging.
I don't want to debug, this is going into production, and 284KB is a lot! How do I stop this file from loading?
I can't edit the file (CDN), and it doesn't matter what my Google Chrome options are, I can't advise others to change their settings to use the website I am working on.
Thanks
According to http://blog.teamtreehouse.com/introduction-source-maps
The developer tools will only load this file if support for source maps is enabled and the developer tools are open.
So any impact will only be felt if someone opens their developers tools, which I suspect is acceptable, as in that case ability to debug it more important than download speed/size.
Within Google Chrome's inspector, have you unticked 'Enable JavaScript source maps' in Settings > General?
I think your dev setup is trying to pull the source map file in regardless, for others without this option ticked in Chrome's inspector it won't be a problem.
Don't worry about the source map files for production.
Only if a user has chrome dev tools or other source map compatible browser tools running will they request and download the source map file/s.

Checkboxes disappearing when uploading to Google App Engine

I have written a controller to take input from the form containing a list of options. The options have to be selected using checkboxes. I have successfully tested the code on my local machine. But when uploaded to the app engine, the webpage is not displaying the checkbox fields. It is not displaying the options either. I tested with 3 browsers - IE, Mozilla and Chrome and this happens everywhere. But, everything is working on fine on the browsers when running on local machine. I am quite confused as to what is going wrong.
Please help me fix this issue.
Thanks in advance...
You likely need to setup static file/directory mappings in app.yaml.
You need to provide us with more details to help you debug issues. For example, if the browser doesn't display what you expect tell us what it does display. What happens if you view source? Is your HTML there?

Is there a "Browser Control" to host a website inside Flash/Silverlight?

I'm looking for something similar to the VB6 / .Net Winforms "Browser Control", that let's you show a browser inside your application.
I don't want to just render a page, I want it to be a fully-functional browser, in which people can click links, will run Javascript, etc.
In essence, what I want is an IFrame, only that it runs inside a Flash app, or a Silverlight app.
The ultimate reason for this is that I want to defeat IFrame busters. I'm making a web app that lets you see other sites inside of it, and I'm running into a bunch of sites that have this code:
var t=top.location,w=window.location;if(t!=w) t.replace(w);
(that's from eBay BTW)
which essentially pops the user out of my site and into theirs.
My hope is that by using a "browser control" of some sort, inside a plugin sandbox, "top", will be top for that browser control, and not for my site.
Of course, if you have any other ideas to achieve the same, they'll be more than welcome.
Edit: I've tried the Component One control suggested by Bill, but it didn't work for these purposes, because it's creating an IFrame outside of the SilverLight control, so it executes in the same context as the page hosting Silverlight, which is what I'm trying to avoid.
Northcode SWF Studio allows you to add browser window on the stage in Flash. I personally use SWF Studio as a third party SWF2EXE tool to extend the power of Flash projectors. It's quite stable and powerful. As far as browser control is concerned here is the example you can download and test if it serves your purpose. Check the Browser APT here.
We've not built a component to enable folks to do this but we're open to suggestions here. That being said, easiest solution is an iFrame, but word of caution in that when you overlay an iFrame over the the top of Silverlight we've seen customers experience perf issues as a result (mostly due to alpha transparency of the iframe etc).
This isn't isolated to Silverlight, Flash suffers the same issue as it has to do with browsers and rendering within the given operating system.
HTH.
Scott Barnes / Rich Platforms Product Manager / Microsoft.
I use the HTML control created by Component One. It has the limitation that the Silverlight object in the page should be set to windowless, but otherwise it works very well.
It's an old post but I'll add my tupence answer. I used the DivElements free control for Silverlight link text and it works quite nicely. It just positions the div accurately so that it looks like it's on top.
As for the other such controls, you've got to set the windowless property of the Silverlight container to true.
It works really well for me and I'm able to seemlessly have Google maps and the Acrobat plugin displayed side by side with my Silverlight application.
PS: because the component just adds a <div> to the page, you can't do stuff like having it load dynamically Javascript file like in the <header> tag.
PPS: when setting the HTML code "by hand", be sure to hook up on the DocumentReady or Loaded event before playing with the HTML DOM.
Hope that helps someone.

Resources