I am not sure if my question header represent exactly my problem, I will do the best to explain:
I have a grid cell DataTemplate: (the grid belong to third party company but it`s not important for my question)
<DataTemplate>
<TextBlock>
<Hyperlink Command="{Binding OpenLinkCommand}">
<Hyperlink.ToolTip>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Data.MapLink}"/>
</Hyperlink.ToolTip>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Data.MapLink}" TextDecorations="underline">
</Hyperlink>
</TextBlock>
</DataTemplate>
I want make this DataTemplate to show some hyperlink ("Data.MapLink" is the object which contain the link value) and each click on this link will fire the command "OpenLinkCommand".
The problem is that "Data.MapLink" and "OpenLinkCommand" are located in different dataContext and then I have to choose one of the next choices:
leave hyperlink dataContext as it - the command won`t work and the hyperlink will get the Data.MapLink value.
change hyperlink dataContext to the command datacontext - The command will work but the hyperlink name will be empty.
Regretfully I don`t have option put those items in same dataContext so I must find a way how to tell the command that it dataContext is "X" and tell the hyperLink that it dataContext is "Y".
I am hoping that my question is clear
How can I solve this problem?
There are some binding properties you can use to specify a different Source for your binding than the default DataContext
The most common ones are ElementName or RelativeSource, which will find another UI element in the VisualTree so you can bind to it's properties.
For example, the following uses ElementName to tell the binding that it should use MyGridView as the binding source, and to bind to MyGridView.DataContext.OpenLinkCommand
<Hyperlink Command="{Binding ElementName=MyGridView,
Path=DataContext.OpenLinkCommand}">
You can also use RelativeSource in a binding to find an object further up the VisualTree of the specified object type, and use it as the binding source. This example does the same thing as the above example, except it uses RelativeSource instead of ElementName, so your GridView doesn't need to have a Name specified.
<Hyperlink Command="{Binding
RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType={x:Type GridView}},
Path=DataContext.OpenLinkCommand}">
A third option is to set the binding's Source property to a static object, like this:
<Hyperlink Command="{Binding
Source={x:Static local:MyStaticClass.OpenLinkCommand}}">
Based on your comment here about binding to a singleton, this would probably be the best option for you.
You will have to have an instance of the desired data context (usually in the resources of a control or window). Once you have that, you should be able to explicitly set the data context of the textblock instead of inheriting the parent data context automatically.
For example:
<TextBlock DataContext="{StaticResource MyDataMapLinkDataContext}" Text="{Binding Data.MapLink}" TextDecorations="underline"/>
If you really do need to use another property for an extra data context then you can just use an attached property.
XAML
<Window.Resources>
<Style TargetType="Button">
<Setter Property="Template">
<Setter.Value>
<ControlTemplate TargetType="Button">
<ContentPresenter Content="{Binding (local:ExtraDataContextProvider.ExtraDataContext), RelativeSource={RelativeSource TemplatedParent}}"/>
</ControlTemplate>
</Setter.Value>
</Setter>
</Style>
</Window.Resources>
<Grid>
<Button Margin="172,122,131,79" Foreground="Green" local:ExtraDataContextProvider.ExtraDataContext="A test">
test
</Button>
</Grid>
</Window>
Code
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Controls;
using System.Windows.Data;
using System.Windows.Documents;
using System.Windows.Input;
using System.Windows.Media;
using System.Windows.Media.Imaging;
using System.Windows.Navigation;
using System.Windows.Shapes;
namespace WpfApplication1
{
public class ExtraDataContextProvider : DependencyObject
{
public static object GetExtraDataContext(DependencyObject obj)
{
return (object)obj.GetValue(ExtraDataContextProperty);
}
public static void SetExtraDataContext(DependencyObject obj, object value)
{
obj.SetValue(ExtraDataContextProperty, value);
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty ExtraDataContextProperty = DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("ExtraDataContext", typeof(object), typeof(ExtraDataContextProvider), new PropertyMetadata(null));
}
/// <summary>
/// Interaction logic for MainWindow.xaml
/// </summary>
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
}
}
Related
I want to offer a context menu with an item that has a color swatch in the space where "icons" are normally placed for such menu items, i.e. the space corresponding to MenuItem.Icon.
But the color swatch is dynamic--a Brush property on the UserControl that (in this crafted example) changes to a random color in response to the ContextMenuOpening event--and my attempt at binding to it is failing.
When run, the menu item has no content in the Icon space, and Visual Studio's output contains an error that doesn't seem like it ought to be happening.
System.Windows.Data Error: 4 : Cannot find source for binding with reference 'RelativeSource FindAncestor, AncestorType='System.Windows.Controls.ContextMenu', AncestorLevel='1''. BindingExpression:Path=PlacementTarget.RandomBrush; DataItem=null; target element is 'Rectangle' (Name=''); target property is 'Fill' (type 'Brush')
Here's the XAML for the control:
<UserControl x:Class="ContextMenuItemIconTest.UserControl1"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
mc:Ignorable="d"
d:DesignHeight="300" d:DesignWidth="300">
<UserControl.ContextMenu>
<ContextMenu>
<MenuItem Header="Do something">
<MenuItem.Icon>
<Rectangle Width="16" Height="16" Fill="{Binding PlacementTarget.RandomBrush, RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType={x:Type ContextMenu}}}" />
</MenuItem.Icon>
</MenuItem>
</ContextMenu>
</UserControl.ContextMenu>
<Grid>
</Grid>
And the code behind:
using System;
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Controls;
using System.Windows.Media;
namespace ContextMenuItemIconTest
{
/// <summary>
/// Interaction logic for UserControl1.xaml
/// </summary>
public partial class UserControl1 : UserControl
{
public UserControl1()
{
InitializeComponent();
ContextMenuOpening += UserControl1_ContextMenuOpening;
}
void UserControl1_ContextMenuOpening(object sender, ContextMenuEventArgs e)
{
Random r = new Random();
RandomBrush = new SolidColorBrush(Color.FromRgb((byte)r.Next(256), (byte)r.Next(256), (byte)r.Next(256)));
}
#region RandomBrush (Dependency Property)
public Brush RandomBrush
{
get { return (Brush)GetValue(RandomBrushProperty); }
set { SetValue(RandomBrushProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty RandomBrushProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register(
"RandomBrush",
typeof(Brush),
typeof(UserControl1),
new PropertyMetadata(new SolidColorBrush(Colors.Blue)));
#endregion
}
}
Not sure if there is a better solution but I think the scenario here is very tricky. The Icon content seems to be detached completely from the visual tree. So you cannot use Binding with RelativeSource or ElementName and strangely even setting the Source to some {x:Reference} causes some cyclic reference error.
I just could think of this work-around, a little hacky but it's acceptable. There is an interesting knowledge about the Freezable object. Binding inside it (set for some property) can use RelativeSource as well as ElementName even when it's just declared as a resource (added to Resources). So in this case we can try using some object deriving from Freezable to act as the proxy. Because this proxy is declared as a resource, we can set the Binding inside Icon with Source being set to some StaticResource referencing the proxy. Then it would work. There are many objects deriving from Freezable for your choice, you can even create your own class. But I would like to use something existing here. The DiscreteObjectKeyFrame is the most suitable object to use. Technically its Value property can hold any kind of object. Now's the working code:
<ContextMenu>
<ContextMenu.Resources>
<!-- the proxy here -->
<DiscreteObjectKeyFrame x:Key="o" KeyTime="0"
Value="{Binding PlacementTarget.RandomBrush,
RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType=ContextMenu}}"/>
</ContextMenu.Resources>
<MenuItem Header="Do something">
<MenuItem.Icon>
<Rectangle Width="16" Height="16"
Fill="{Binding Value, Source={StaticResource o}}" />
</MenuItem.Icon>
</MenuItem>
</ContextMenu>
I am trying to get the content of a directory with many images displayed in a listbox wrapping the content horizontally, showing pics small and resizable. There's a sample on http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms771331%28v=vs.85%29.aspx which is doing just that, but it takes 10 seconds to build with 2500 pictures while I want it filled dynamically and also it uses thumbnails which do not always seem to be stored in images.
I've tried to add a VirtualizingStackPanel without any visible change and lots more and finally built a new program from a very basic sample, see below. This shows content immediatly, also when I apply a size converter, but I can in no way get it in multiple columns! It seems that the Microsoft example gets this done by adding a WrapPanel to the a style which targets the listbox, and the line IsItemsHost="True" apparently is crucial to getting the images in multiple columns. When I try the same in my sample (in PhotoListBoxStyle), the program doesn't even start anymore. When I rebuild the program as the Microsoft example but keep the code behind to arrange the binding, it is still fast, but the resizer stops working properly and it still uses 1 column.
What can I do to get the below code wrapped in multiple columns?
Dick
XAML:
<Window x:Class="PhotoData.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:local="clr-namespace:PhotoData"
Title="MainWindow" Height="350" Width="525">
<Window.Resources>
<local:UriToBitmapConverter x:Key="UriToBitmapConverter" />
<!-- Main photo catalog view -->
<Style TargetType="{x:Type ListBox}" x:Key="PhotoListBoxStyle">
<Setter Property="Foreground" Value="White" />
<Setter Property="Template">
<Setter.Value>
<ControlTemplate TargetType="{x:Type ListBox}" >
</ControlTemplate>
</Setter.Value>
</Setter>
</Style>
</Window.Resources>
<GroupBox Grid.Column="0" Grid.Row="1">
<ListBox Margin="10" Name="designerListBox" >
<ListBox.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal"
VerticalAlignment="Center"
HorizontalAlignment="Center"
IsItemsHost="True">
<Image Source="{Binding imageLocation, Converter={StaticResource UriToBitmapConverter}}" />
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
</ListBox.ItemTemplate>
</ListBox>
</GroupBox>
</Window>
Code behind:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.IO;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Controls;
using System.Windows.Data;
using System.Windows.Documents;
using System.Windows.Input;
using System.Windows.Media;
using System.Windows.Media.Imaging;
using System.Windows.Navigation;
using System.Windows.Shapes;
namespace PhotoData
{
/// <summary>
/// Interaction logic for MainWindow.xaml
/// </summary>
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
List<binderClass> myList = new List<binderClass>();
foreach (string file in Directory.GetFiles(#"c:\temp", "*.jpg", SearchOption.AllDirectories))
{
myList.Add(new binderClass() { imageLocation = file, displayName = "TEST" });
Debug.WriteLine(file);
}
designerListBox.ItemsSource = myList;
}
}
public class UriToBitmapConverter : IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
BitmapImage bi = new BitmapImage();
bi.BeginInit();
bi.DecodePixelWidth = 100;
bi.CacheOption = BitmapCacheOption.OnLoad;
bi.UriSource = new Uri(value.ToString());
bi.EndInit();
return bi;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
throw new Exception("The method or operation is not implemented.");
}
}
class binderClass
{
public string imageLocation
{
get;
set;
}
public string displayName
{
get;
set;
}
}
}
If you want to wrap content of ListBox then you need to change ListBox.ItemsPanel, which hosts all items, to be WrapPanel and then your ItemTemplate will be just Image:
<ListBox Name="designerListBox" ScrollViewer.HorizontalScrollBarVisibility="Disabled">
<ListBox.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<WrapPanel Orientation="Horizontal"/>
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ListBox.ItemsPanel>
<ListBox.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<Image Width="100" Source="{Binding imageLocation, Converter={StaticResource UriToBitmapConverter}}" />
</DataTemplate>
</ListBox.ItemTemplate>
</ListBox>
StackPanel or VirtualizingStackPanel will never wrap content. It will stack child item horizontally or vertically.
EDIT
You may hit some performance issues, especially when working with images, when using panel different then VirtualizingStackPanel. Other panels don't provide virtualization so all items are treated as if they are visible and will be loaded immediately.
The standard layout system creates item containers and computes layout for each item associated with a list control. The word "virtualize" refers to a technique by which a subset of user interface (UI) elements are generated from a larger number of data items based on which items are visible on-screen. Generating many UI elements when only a few elements might be on the screen can adversely affect the performance of your application. The VirtualizingStackPanel calculates the number of visible items and works with the ItemContainerGenerator from an ItemsControl (such as ListBox or ListView) to create UI elements only for visible items.
I need to access the container's DataContext from a UserControl (a grid containing textboxes and a listbox: I need to insert items in this list box) that I created in WPF: which is the best way to do it?
I was thinking to pass the DataContext as parameter to user control but think there is a cleaner way to do it.
Normally the DataContext will be inherited, just do not explicitly set it on the UserControl and it will get it from its parent. If you have to set it you could still use the Parent property to get the parent, which you then can safe-cast to a FrameworkElement and if it is not null you can grab its DataContext.
I sometimes have nested User controls and a grandchild usercontrol sometimes needs the grandparent's view's data context. The easiest way I have found so far (and I'm somewhat of a newbie) is to use the following:
<Shared:GranchildControl DataContext="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource
FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type GrandparentView}},
Path=DataContext.GrandparentViewModel}" />
I wrote up a more detailed example on my blog if you want more specifics.
Add this BindingProxy class to your project:
using System.Windows;
namespace YourNameSpace
{
/// <summary>
/// Add Proxy <ut:BindingProxy x:Key="Proxy" Data="{Binding}" /> to Resources
/// Bind like <Element Property="{Binding Data.MyValue, Source={StaticResource Proxy}}" />
/// </summary>
public class BindingProxy : Freezable
{
protected override Freezable CreateInstanceCore()
{
return new BindingProxy();
}
public object Data
{
get { return (object)GetValue(DataProperty); }
set { SetValue(DataProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty DataProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("Data", typeof(object), typeof(BindingProxy));
}
}
Add the BindingProxy to your UserControl's resources.
Set the 'Data' property of the BindingProxy to whatever you need, e.g. search for a parent Window. Data="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type Window}},Path=DataContext}" If you needed something more complex you could use a custom converter.
Now you have access to that parent's DataContext: {Binding Data.MyCommand, Source={StaticResource BindingProxy}}
<UserControl
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:common="clr-namespace:YourNameSpace;assembly=YourAssembly"
mc:Ignorable="d" d:DesignHeight="300" d:DesignWidth="300">
<UserControl.Resources>
<common:BindingProxy x:Key="BindingProxy" Data="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type Window}},Path=DataContext}" />
</UserControl.Resources>
<Border>
<Button Command="{Binding Data.MyCommand, Source={StaticResource BindingProxy}}">Execute My Command</Button>
<!-- some visual stuff -->
</Border>
</UserControl>
H.B. answers the question in your title.
However the text poses a different design question. I'd ask you to reconsider your design.
A control inherits the DataContext property of its ancestor as long as no one in between explicitly overrides.
If the user control needs data, it should get it from its data source (a viewmodel for the user control). So in this case, the user control can obtain the data it needs from the ListItemsForDisplay property exposed on the SomeViewModel instance. No need to get parent and cast.. much cleaner.
<ContainerType DataSource={Binding SomeViewModel}>
<YourUserControl>
<ListBox ItemsSource={Binding ListItemsForDisplay}"/>
...
In this case, UserControl will get DataContext windows
<Window>
<local:MyUserControl DataContext="{Binding}"/>
</Window>
I am creating a WPF custom control, a Button with an Image and Text. I have added two dependency properties to the control, ImagePath and Text, and the control template (in Themes\Generic.xaml) is a simple stack panel that arranges the image and text horizontally.
The Text property works fine. But for some reason, the sample image in my test project doesn't appear when I use TemplateBinding to the ImagePath dependency property to get its path. I have tested the image by temporarily replacing the TemplateBinding in the custom control with a path to the image, in which case it appears.
I am hoping that someone with more experience in this area can take a look and tell me why the control isn't working as expected. Thanks for your help.
My VS 2008 solution contains one project, CustomControlDemo. The project contains a custom control, TaskButton.cs, and a main window, Window1.xaml, that I use to test the control. My test image, calendar.png, is located in a Resources folder at the root level of the project, and Generic.xaml is located in a Themes folder, also at the root level of the project.
Here is the code for my custom control (from TaskButton.cs):
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Controls;
namespace CustomControlDemo
{
public class TaskButton : RadioButton
{
#region Fields
// Dependency property backing variables
public static readonly DependencyProperty ImagePathProperty;
public static readonly DependencyProperty TextProperty;
#endregion
#region Constructors
/// <summary>
/// Default constructor.
/// </summary>
static TaskButton()
{
DefaultStyleKeyProperty.OverrideMetadata(typeof(TaskButton), new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(typeof(TaskButton)));
// Initialize ImagePath dependency properties
ImagePathProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("ImagePath", typeof(string), typeof(TaskButton), new UIPropertyMetadata(null));
TextProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("Text", typeof(string), typeof(TaskButton), new UIPropertyMetadata(null));
}
#endregion
#region Dependency Property Wrappers
/// <summary>
/// The ImagePath dependency property.
/// </summary>
public string ImagePath
{
get { return (string)GetValue(ImagePathProperty); }
set { SetValue(ImagePathProperty, value); }
}
/// <summary>
/// The Text dependency property.
/// </summary>
public string Text
{
get { return (string)GetValue(TextProperty); }
set { SetValue(TextProperty, value); }
}
#endregion
}
}
And here is the control template (from Generic.xaml):
<ResourceDictionary
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:local="clr-namespace:CustomControlDemo">
<Style TargetType="{x:Type local:TaskButton}">
<Setter Property="Template">
<Setter.Value>
<ControlTemplate TargetType="{x:Type local:TaskButton}">
<StackPanel Height="Auto" Orientation="Horizontal">
<Image Source="{TemplateBinding ImagePath}" Width="24" Height="24" Stretch="Fill"/>
<TextBlock Text="{TemplateBinding Text}" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Foreground="{DynamicResource TaskButtonTextBrush}" FontWeight="Bold" Margin="5,0,0,0" VerticalAlignment="Center" FontSize="12" />
</StackPanel>
</ControlTemplate>
</Setter.Value>
</Setter>
</Style>
</ResourceDictionary>
And finally, here is the Window1 markup that I am using to test the control:
<Window x:Class="CustomControlDemo.Window1"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:customControl="clr-namespace:CustomControlDemo"
Title="Window1" Height="300" Width="300">
<Grid>
<customControl:TaskButton ImagePath="Resources\calendar.png" Text="Calendar" />
</Grid>
</Window>
Any ideas why the image path isn't working? Thanks again.
I am going to leave cwap's answer as the accepted answer, because it is technically correct. However, it turns out that there is an easier way to solve this problem.
TemplateBindings aren't first-class Binding objects. They are designed to be lightweight, so they are one-way, and they lack some features of other Binding objects. Most notably, they don't support known type converters associated with a target. See MacDonald, Pro WPF in C# 2008, p. 872. That's why cwap responds correctly that I would probably need to create a type converter and reference it specifically in the control template for my custom button.
But I don't have to use a TemplateBinding to bind the control template to the ImagePath property of my custom control. I can use a plain old Binding object. Here is the revised markup for my custom control's template:
<!-- Task Button Default Control Template-->
<Style TargetType="{x:Type local:TaskButton}">
<Setter Property="Template">
<Setter.Value>
<ControlTemplate TargetType="{x:Type local:TaskButton}">
<StackPanel Height="Auto" Orientation="Horizontal">
<Image Source="{Binding Path=ImagePath, RelativeSource={RelativeSource TemplatedParent}}" Width="24" Height="24" Stretch="Fill" Margin="10,0,0,0" />
<TextBlock Text="{TemplateBinding Text}" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Foreground="{TemplateBinding Foreground}" FontWeight="Bold" Margin="5,0,10,0" VerticalAlignment="Center" FontSize="12" />
</StackPanel>
</ControlTemplate>
</Setter.Value>
</Setter>
</Style>
If you look at the ImageControl in the template, you can see the change. Note the RelativeSource property in the same object. Setting this property to ={RelativeSource TemplatedParent} is what lets me enter a relative path in my Window1 instance of the TaskButton and have it resolved correctly in the custom control.
So my recommendation for others researching this thread would be to skip the value converter and simply switch from TemplateBinding to Binding for the Image property.
Thanks also to Marco Zhou, who provided this answer to a similar question in the MSDN WPF forum.
Image doesn't take a string as a source :) You can see this in intellisense. You need to bind on an ImageSource (Or use an IValueConverter to convert the string to an ImageSource)
See this question for some tips on how to do this conversion.
Actually neither of these answers are correct.
{TemplateBinding ImagePath} is nothing more than a shortcut for {Binding Path=ImagePath, RelativeSource={RelativeSource TemplatedParent}} and as such is almost completely identical.
Also if you provide a string for ImagePath it will correctly resolve to an ImageSource although you take a hit in application performance. The real issue has to do with relative and absolute image path on the supplied ImagePath="Resources\calendar.png" in the xaml for the test. This clues the compiler to think that the supplied path is absolute because of the use of \ instead of / in defining the path.
The reason that the long form of the binding works and the shortcut doesn't is that it provides clues to the compiler that the source of the image supplied (Resources\calendar.png) is a relative path not an absolute path, therefore the image is found and the binding works. If you debug the binding you will see that the shortcut tries resolve the supplied string into an image source but can not find the file "Resources\calendar.png" If you provide a full URI to the image i.e "C:\...\Resources\calendar.png" or the corresponding blend notation of "/application;component/Resources/calendar.png" then the image will be found and the binding resolved.
This point becomes really important when you are trying to reference images from an external source instead of those compiled as resources into the final compilation.
simple way(tested)
1-make your valueConverter like this
public class objectToImageSourceConverter:IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
string packUri =value.ToString();
ImageSource Source = new ImageSourceConverter().ConvertFromString(packUri) as ImageSource;
return Source;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}
2-bind your Image Source to parent's string properety (i used "tag" property)
like this xaml:
<Image HorizontalAlignment="Right" Height="Auto" Margin="0,11.75,5.5,10.75" VerticalAlignment="Stretch" Width="40.997" Source="{Binding Path=Tag, RelativeSource={RelativeSource TemplatedParent}}"/>
When developing WPF UserControls, what is the best way to expose a DependencyProperty of a child control as a DependencyProperty of the UserControl? The following example shows how I would currently expose the Text property of a TextBox inside a UserControl. Surely there is a better / simpler way to accomplish this?
<UserControl x:Class="WpfApplication3.UserControl1"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml">
<StackPanel Background="LightCyan">
<TextBox Margin="8" Text="{Binding Text, RelativeSource={RelativeSource FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type UserControl}}}" />
</StackPanel>
</UserControl>
using System;
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Controls;
namespace WpfApplication3
{
public partial class UserControl1 : UserControl
{
public static DependencyProperty TextProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("Text", typeof(string), typeof(UserControl1), new PropertyMetadata(null));
public string Text
{
get { return GetValue(TextProperty) as string; }
set { SetValue(TextProperty, value); }
}
public UserControl1() { InitializeComponent(); }
}
}
That is how we're doing it in our team, without the RelativeSource search, rather by naming the UserControl and referencing properties by the UserControl's name.
<UserControl x:Class="WpfApplication3.UserControl1" x:Name="UserControl1"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml">
<StackPanel Background="LightCyan">
<TextBox Margin="8" Text="{Binding Path=Text, ElementName=UserControl1}" />
</StackPanel>
</UserControl>
Sometimes we've found ourselves making too many things UserControl's though, and have often times scaled back our usage. I'd also follow the tradition of naming things like that textbox along the lines of PART_TextDisplay or something, so that in the future you could template it out yet keep the code-behind the same.
You can set DataContext to this in UserControl's constructor, then just bind by only path.
CS:
DataContext = this;
XAML:
<TextBox Margin="8" Text="{Binding Text} />