I'm writing C code and was initially using the gcc checker. Errors were reported in the C file. Lots of errors that didn't matter were being reported due to, for instance, no include directory switches on the gcc command line in the checker. Because we're using icc and it feels unwieldy to setup all of the parameters that are already setup in our makefile, I decided to switch over to using the make checker.
Upon switching to the make checker, I did not get any results. Looking at the makeprg command in make.vim, it is make -sk. I realized that our makefile was not setup to do syntax checking, so I created a new target called syntax_check that added the -fsyntax-only and -c flags. I then changed the make.vim makeprg command to make -sk clean syntax-check so that the appropriate target is run.
When I save the file I watched top in another window and saw that the build is occuring. However, I'm still getting no errors. By this, I mean I don't see the green sidebar indicating lines that did not have errors. Running :Errors does not bring up the location list.
Any ideas? And is my understanding of how to look at the generated errors in syntastic wrong (which it may very well be)?
As a side note for the question here, I've also got this question in on the Syntastic github page here.
It turns out that the errorformat was wrong for handling icc. This, of course, makes total sense.
The errorformat for icc that I've got so far is:
let errorformat = '%W%f(%l): %tarning #%n: %m,%E%f(%l): %trror: %m'
I will add more to this as I find errors that aren't covered by this format or find that I need different formatting.
Related
I'm starting a new job. I'm a windows guy that has been working in the Microsoft stack for decades. The new job calls for work to be done on a Mac, and I'll be working in straight C code. It's interesting, and I vaguely remember using it a tiny amount in the mid-90s. But I'm running into a problem. When I try to compile the code ("make" command on the command line tool) it throws an error...
The codebase I'm learning is trying to use the *strdup(const char *__s1) function/method as defined in the string.h include file. When I look at that header, I see where it would be defined, but there's a preprocessor if-block around it that looks like...
#if __DARWIN_C_LEVEL >= 200112L
Looking around for that __DARWIN_C_LEVEL variable online... I see people asking what it is, but I haven't seen anything about what to do if your value is too low. I tried looking for a way to alter a config file or something on my machine so that value would just be high enough, but I can't find that. Is there something I need to update so that the code does what I want?
As an additional note, the only other guy at work that does anything in this code base works on a straight linux machine and edits the code with Vi. He's obviously an expert in the code base and his environment, but doesn't know how to help with trying to get this running on MacOS.
Any help would be appreciated.
Edit 9 November 2020
I'm beginning to believe I don't actually have the latest version of XCode if that would explain the issue. I haven't gotten a response, but I'm asking about help with that piece here at work.
I'm also trying suggestions. When I try the option for std=gnu11...
make -std=gnu11
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/make: invalid option -- =
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/make: invalid option -- g
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/make: invalid option -- u
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/make: invalid option -- 1
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/make: invalid option -- 1
If I remove the equal sign, it seems to like it better but still has errors...
make -std gnu11
[...]
No implicit rule found for 'gnu11'.
Finished prerequisites of target file 'gnu11'.
Must remake target 'gnu11'.
make: *** No rule to make target `gnu11'. Stop.
I can't understand why 'layout next' has stopped showing code. It worked for some time and i was happy with 'layout next' option but now i constantly see the error. Awkwardly enough i could find only one question relating that topic which doesn't seem to solve the problem. Any ideas how to bring this function back?
Maybe i should find some compilation flag to enable this?
EDIT:
Make sure you add -g flag on compilation and type run after 'layout next' window have appeared.
No Source Available
The error means literally that: GDB doesn't know where the source for the current program location is.
There are several possible reasons:
you have not started the program yet
you built your program without debugging info (without -g flag)
you are stopped inside a system library
you moved the source to a different location after the program was built
In an attempt to add the include paths to Syntastic (3.6.0-106; Vim 7.3), to stop it from giving a fatal error at the first include it can't find, I tried creating a .syntastic_c_config file. There's not a lot of information on how this is supposed to work, but there are references out there and I followed their example:
-I/path/to/include
-I/you/get/the/idea
-L/some/library
-lfoo
-lbar
-DHAVE_SOME_FLAG
-pedantic
-Wall
-std=c99
That is, one compiler argument per line.
This has had the effect of removing virtually all error checking, unless I force it with :SynasticCheck -- at which point, it seems to work a little bit better, but not exactly how I'd expect. However, either way, if I :echo g:syntastic_c_config_file (or any other option that I'm expecting to be set), Vim just gives me an undefined variable warning.
I'm clearly doing something fundamentally wrong, but I'm not really sure what!
This is an old post, but I stumbled upon here searching for an answer to the same problem. Looks like Syntastic has changed quite a bit. Documentation listed above by OP is not valid anymore. Current (as of 18 July 2020) documentation is at: https://github.com/vim-syntastic/syntastic/blob/master/doc/syntastic-checkers.txt
To add include paths to 'gcc' checker, you would need to create a file with your include dirs, one per line, preceded by '-I'. For example, in /home/user/.syntastic_c_config_file add:
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0/include
-I/usr/include/boost
Then in your {vimrc} file (usually, ~/.vimrc), add one line:
let g:syntastic_c_config_file='/home/user/.syntastic_c_config_file'
Syntastic has become more powerful now and contains many options in the above linked documentation.
It turns out that Syntastic will source the configuration file without explicitly setting the respective variable. Moreover, the contents of the configuration file are not passed into any syntastic_c_* variables, but nonetheless passed into the call to gcc. Syntastic is also clever enough to backtrace to look for the configuration file (e.g., it will go up levels until it finds it, so you can keep the .syntastic_c_config in your project root).
As to why it was failing, the debug log was showing that my compiler was ignoring the library flags (-L/some/path and -lfoo) and that was blocking Syntastic from any further syntax checking. Removing those lines from my config file solved the problem.
i'm trying to do some code in a keyboard driver, a 3rd party software that looks like this can run the command i'm trying to do in a plugin file that compiles alongside the daemon that the command needs to be sent to. the command looks like this.
g15_send_cmd (g15screen_fd,G15DAEMON_MKEYLEDS,mled_state);
here's the code i'm working with and trying to run the command in (it compiles as a plugin with the daemon. in the uncompiled source it's
"g15daemon/plugin/g15_plugin_uinput.c"
the file that defines the command is in
(link)
"g15daemon/libg15daemon_client/g15daemon_clinet.h"
whereas with the g15macro (3rd software) is run from outside the daemon for various reasons i don't want to (and pretty much can't) use it, one being speed of execution of commands when keys are pressed.
so the program compiles like this without error it seems. but if the code i specified above activates, the driver(daemon) crashes giving
g15daemon: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib/g15daemon/1.9.5.3/plugins/g15plugin_uinput.so: undefined
symbol: g15_send_cmd
what did i do wrong or what am i missing here? (and i'm sorry if the code in the plugin file is ugly down by that switch command, but i didn't know how to do any better since i don't know C much at all, all i have behind me are Py and C#)
Edit: the solution was given
but i don't know how to add a linker flag, also since it links to a part of the program being compiled will it even work?
You forgot to link your plugin with g15daemon_client library. The simple way to fix it is to add -lg15daemon_client to the linker flags.
I'm attempting to build Firefox on my Windows Vista Ultimate machine. I keep getting the following error:
nsinstall: Bad file number
I've read that this error is caused because of UAC in Vista. Here are the two articles that lead me to this conclusion. https://wiki.mozilla.org/Penelope_Developer_Page#Windows_Vista and http://www.kevinbrosnan.net/mozilla-build-error-nsinstall-bad-file-number
Using the standard "Run as Administrator", I've attempted to redo my build but I get the exact same error. I also started a normal command prompt as admin and then went to the batch file in mozilla-build (start-msvc8.bat) and ran it. Still, same error at the same point.
Any other insights on how I might either get around this error or perhaps something else is causing the error?
Note: I also posted something here in the hopes to get topic-specific help but I've not heard a peep... After I posted that I found the info on nsinstall. Anyway, I prefer SO so I thought I'd try here...
Update: I've attempted to completly disable UAC to correct the problem as is suggested by cnemelkasr. I've received the exact same error. This new knowledge is making me think that a file or folder is missing... Does anyone who has experience with NSInstall know what the given error -- Bad file number -- might mean? I figure it might be referring to a file handle...
If it really is a UAC error, you can try turning off UAC altogether. I've had to do this for several packages. There are numerous places on the web to get the instructions for doing that.
http://www.petri.co.il/disable_uac_in_windows_vista.htm is one of them.
I found the answer to my question. I'm posting the answer here to share the answer with others and to close this question.
After disabling the UAC, it was suggested that the directory depth was interfering with NSInstall. I moved the folder from c:/Users/Frank/Documents/hg-repos/firefox-src-hgRepo/mozilla-fv-expirement/ to C:/mozilla-fv-expirement/. Cleaned all previous build attempts and finally redid my build (with UAC off) and I received a working debug binary.
The suggestion was posted at: mozilla.dev.builds
The "Bad file number" message in the cases I have seen, is caused by too many arguments passed to execvp (command, argv) (or similar) function. But only from some programs. An old bash, sh or a Borland/Watcom program in your PATH is an likely candidate.
So when you shorten the name of the build directory, the total size of the command line (that eventually gets passed to CreateProcess()) gets shorter. I don't think UAC has anything to do with this since I've seen this on Win-XP too. But it's a bit strange Mozilla would not use relative paths while building. I guess it uses some directory prefix value in it's makefiles (I've never tried building it).
If you look at the documentation for _execvp():
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/3xw6zy53.aspx
E2BIG is one of the possible errno values:
The space required for the arguments and environment settings exceeds 32 KB.
Now, here is the strange part.
Fact 1:
On Visual-C/MingW (any version), strerror(EBADF) doesn't return "Bad file number" .
(it return "Bad file descriptor").
Fact 2:
On Borland's CBuilder 5.6 and Watcom 1.9 (these do not use the MSVC runtime), strerror(EBADF) does indeed return "Bad file number".
Theory:
Is possible that Borland, Watcom (and other CRTs too?) mixes up the meaning of E2BIG and EBADF. Did that make any sense? Someone please correct me if you have a better theory.
I'm a bit confused myself...
Conclusion: Either shorten the size of your environment (easiest) or shorten the command-line (not always easy).
--gv