nonblocking read from stdin - c

I expect ReadConsoleW() to return after reading a specific number of bytes.
But it doesn't return.
How can I make ReadConsoleW() return as soon as it finished reading the number of bytes specified?
The code I tried is here:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <Windows.h>
int main()
{
//something is being written to stdin.
Sleep(2000);
int b;
int r;
//read 3 wide character
ReadConsoleW(GetStdHandle(STD_INPUT_HANDLE), &b, 3*sizeof(TCHAR), (LPDWORD)&r, NULL);
//problem: no returns until enter pressed
putc(b,stdout);
while(1)
{};
}

Use SetConsoleMode to turn off ENABLE_LINE_INPUT flag. No line editing will be available, but it won't wait until the Enter is pressed.
Note that you can't read three WCHARs into an int.

Consider also asynchronous I/O in Windows using ReadFile/WriteFile.
See MSDN on asynchronous I/O
It is a little more complicated, but you do have what you want.

Related

Detecting Ctrl-D in C

I am trying to detect the Ctrl+D user input, which I know returns EOF. Right now, I know the code waits for input from the stdin stream, but is there a way to let the program continue until the Ctrl+D command is in stdin? The program should continue running past the if statement if Ctrl+D isn't inputted.
char buffer[];
if (fgets(buffer, 10, stdin) == NULL{
//write to file
}
You want to stop your program when the user presses Ctrl+D without actually reading stdin? In this case, you should consider using Ctrl+C instead. But first I will write something about non-blocking I/O, since this is what you are asking for.
There is no way to achieve nonblocking I/O in standard C. However, you could use POSIX-functions like select or fcntl in combination with read. There are other questions about it on StackOverflow which should provide all information you need. This question for example.
If you want to handle Ctrl+C instead, you can use thesignal function:
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
volatile bool shouldRun = true;
void sighandler(int) {
shouldRun = false;
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
if (signal(SIGINT, &sighandler) == SIG_ERR) {
fprintf(stderr, "Could not set signal handler\n");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
printf("Program started\n");
while (shouldRun) {
// Do something...
}
printf("Program is shutting down.\n");
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
Note that signal handlers (i.e. sighandler) might interrupt your thread at any moment. This means they are prone to race conditions. You must even avoid acquiring any locks within a signal handler. This means just calling printf within a signal handler can cause a deadlock. Just setting boolean flags as shown in the example is fine, though. There are solutions like signal masks and the self pipe trick to circumvent these limitations, but they should not be necessary here.
Since the machine generates EOF on Ctrl+D, you should be checking fgets() for NULL, as fgets() is obliged to return NULL on end of file.
line = fgets(l, BUFFSIZE, stdin)
if (line == NULL)
continue;
On most operating systems, stdin is buffered one line at a time, and any attempt to read it (without going into low-level nasties) will stop until either a line or EOF is available. If you don't mind this, and just want to check for EOF without reading-in any waiting input if EOF is not present, you could use ungetc:
#include <stdio.h>
int check_for_EOF() {
if (feof(stdin)) return 1;
int c = getc(stdin);
if (c == EOF) return 1;
ungetc(c, stdin);
}
int main() {
printf("Start typing:\n");
while (!check_for_EOF()) {
int bytes_typed = 0;
while (getchar() != '\n') bytes_typed++;
printf("You typed a line of %d bytes\n", bytes_typed);
}
printf("You typed EOF\n");
}
You are only guaranteed one character of push-back from ungetc, although most implementations give you much more. And it works only if you're not going to seek the stream later (which is the case with stdin). Notice also that I'm calling it "bytes typed", not "characters typed": Chinese, Japanese and Korean characters for example cannot fit into the char type of most C implementations, and it would depend how the console encodes them when you type (if you have a CJK input method set up or can copy/paste some, you can try it on the above program and see).
It is too much to post here and you are not specific what you have currently and what you want. So here gives you a general idea of how to do it:
Put that if statement inside a forked process or other thread
Send a posix signal to your (parent) process when the key is captured
Add signal handler in your program
If you just wanna terminate the program when C-d is entered, just send a SIGKILL in step 2 and ignore step 3.
If you do not know any term above, Google is your friend

pause in cmd \ Freeze and UnFreeze

I need a command in cmd that works like pause but I can code to continue.
e.g.
system("pause");
some lines of code;`
The problem with system("pause") is that "some lines of code" will not work until the user press sth.
I want to continue cmd with some command.
I want something that run the code but update cmd only when I give the
permission to it.
If I understand correctly, the code shall produce output which you don't want to be shown before you press a key. If you don't mind to have the output paged, you could use something like
FILE *stream = popen("PAUSE<CON&&MORE", "w");
and let the code output to stream (with fprintf(stream, ...) etc.).
Don't ever use system() if you can avoid it. It's crude, error-prone, and non-portable.
C11 introduces threading support, including thrd_sleep(). That should be your preferred solution (if supported by your compiler setup).
If your compiler vendor does not support C11, bugger him about it. That standard is almost four years old now.
WinAPI defines the Sleep() function:
VOID WINAPI Sleep(
_In_ DWORD dwMilliseconds
);
This function causes a thread to relinquish the remainder of its time
slice and become unrunnable for an interval based on the value of
dwMilliseconds.
#include <windows.h>
int main()
{
Sleep( 5000 ); // pause execution for at least 5 seconds
some_lines_of_code;
return 0;
}
I think what you're looking for is a method to check if stdin contains data ready to read; you want to use some non-blocking or asynchronous I/O so that you can read input when it becomes available, and perform other tasks until then.
You won't find a whole heap about non-blocking/asynchronous I/O in standard C, but in POSIX C you can set STDIN_FILENO as non-blocking using fcntl. As an example, here's a program which prompts you to press enter (like pause does) and busy-loops, allowing your code to conduct other (preferably non-blocking) actions inside the loop while it waits for the keystroke (ahemm, byte, since stdin is technically a file):
#include <stdio.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
int main(void) {
char c;
puts("Press any key to continue...");
fcntl(STDIN_FILENO, F_SETFL, fcntl(STDIN_FILENO, F_GETFL, 0) | O_NONBLOCK);
while (read(STDIN_FILENO, 1, &c) != 1 && errno == EAGAIN) {
/* code in here will execute repeatedly until a key is struck or a byte is sent */
errno = 0;
}
if (errno) {
/* code down here will execute when an input error occurs */
}
else {
/* code down here will execute when that precious byte is finally sent */
}
}
That's non-blocking I/O. Other alternatives include using asynchronous I/O or extra threads. You should probably use non-blocking I/O or asynchronous I/O (i.e. epoll or kqueue) for this task in particular; using extra threads just to determine when a character is sent to stdin is likely a little bit too hefty.

Nonblocking Get Character

Platform: Linux 3.2.0 x86 (Debian 7)
Compiler: GCC 4.7.2 (Debian 4.7.2-5)
I am writing a function that reads a single character from stdin if a character is already present in stdin. If stdin is empty the function is suppose to do nothing and return -1. I googled nonblocking input and was pointed to poll() or select(). First I tried to use select() but I could not get it to work so I tried poll() and reached the same conclusion. I am not sure what these functions do exactly but from what I understand of poll()'s documentation if I call it like so:
struct pollfd pollfds;
pollfds = STDIN_FILENO;
pollfds.events = POLLIN;
poll(pollfds, 1, 0);
if(pollfds.revents & POLLIN) will be true if "Data other than high-priority data may be read without blocking.". But poll() always times out in my test situation. How I test the function could be the problem but the functionality I want is exactly what I am testing for. Here is the function currently and the test situation as well.
#include <poll.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int ngetc(char *c)
{
struct pollfd pollfds;
pollfds.fd = STDIN_FILENO;
pollfds.events = POLLIN;
poll(&pollfds, 1, 0);
if(pollfds.revents & POLLIN)
{
//Bonus points to the persons that can tell me if
//read() will change the value of '*c' if an error
//occurs during the read
read(STDIN_FILENO, c, 1);
return 0;
}
else return -1;
}
//Test Situation:
//Try to read a character left in stdin by an fgets() call
int main()
{
int ret = 0;
char c = 0;
char str[256];
//Make sure to enter more than 2 characters so that the excess
//is left in stdin by fgets()
fgets(str, 2, stdin);
ret = ngetc(&c);
printf("ret = %i\nc = %c\n", ret, c);
return 0;
}
You're doing IO incorrectly, the POSIX manual and all other related documentation explicitly says never to mix IO done on FILE *s and file descriptors. You have very blatantly broken this rule. This rule is in place because FILE *s use buffering an this means that after a call to fgets there will be nothing left for read to get because fgets already read all pending data into a buffer that is kept in the FILE * structure.
So since there's no way to check if an ISO C IO method will block, we have to use file descriptors only.
Since we know that STDIN_FILENO is just the number 0, we can use
fcntl (0, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
this will turn all reads on file descriptor 0 to non-blocking mode, if you want to use a different file descriptor so that you can leave 0 alone then just use dup to duplicate it.
This way, you can stay away from poll completely and implement ngetc as
ssize_t
ngetc (char *c)
{
return read (0, c, 1);
}
or better yet, a macro
#define ngetc(c) (read (0, (c), 1))
Thus you get a simple implementation for what you're looking for.
Edit: If you are still worried about the terminal buffering the input, you can always change the terminal's settings, see How to disable line buffering of input in xterm from program? for more information on how to do this.
Edit: The reason that one could not use fgetc instead of read is for the same reason that using fgets won't work. When one of the FILE * IO functions is run, it reads all the data from the associated file descriptor. But once that happens, poll will never return because it's waiting on a file descriptor that's always empty, and the same thing will happen with read. Thus, I suggest that you follow the advice of the documentation and never mix streams (IO using fgets, fgetc, etc.) and file descriptors (IO using read, write, etc.)
There are two problems in your code.
According to manual of poll, assigning 0 to timeout will return immediately
If the value of timeout is 0, poll() shall return immediately. If the value of timeout is -1, poll() shall block until a requested event occurs or until the call is interrupted.
fgets does not do what you expect, it is from stdio library and will buffer reads. Suppose you entered 3 letters and press enter, after fgets, the third letter won't be available to poll.
So comment out the fgets line and assign -1 to timeout in poll, and run it again to see if that's what you want.
I did not get the expected behavior with the answer above, and I actually had to take into account this answer as well
which set the TTY in non canonical mode.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <termios.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
struct termios t;
tcgetattr(0, &t);
t.c_lflag &= ~ICANON;
tcsetattr(0, TCSANOW, &t);
fcntl(0, F_SETFL, fcntl(0, F_GETFL) | O_NONBLOCK);
printf("Starting loop (press i or q)...\n");
for (int i = 0; ; i++) {
char c = 0;
read (0, &c, 1);
switch (c) {
case 'i':
printf("\niteration: %d\n", i);
break;
case 'q':
printf("\n");
exit(0);
}
}
return 0;
}

fflush() is not working in Linux

I used the fflush() in Linux GCC but it did not work. Are there any alternatives for that function? Here is my code:
#include<stdio.h>
void main()
{
char ch='y';
while(ch=='y')
{
int a;
printf("Enter some value:");
scanf("%d",&a);
fflush(stdin);
printf("Do you want to continue?");
scanf("%c",&ch)
}
The output that I got is:
Enter some value: 10
Then the program ends. That's all. What can I do in Linux? Is there an alternative function?
Don't use fflush, use this function instead:
#include <stdio.h>
void clean_stdin(void)
{
int c;
do {
c = getchar();
} while (c != '\n' && c != EOF);
}
fflush(stdin) depends of the implementation, but this function always works. In C, it is considered bad practice to use fflush(stdin).
One that always works on Linux:
#include <termios.h>
#include <unistd.h>
void clean_stdin()
{
int stdin_copy = dup(STDIN_FILENO);
/* remove garbage from stdin */
tcdrain(stdin_copy);
tcflush(stdin_copy, TCIFLUSH);
close(stdin_copy);
}
You can use tcdrain and tcflush not only for in/out/err fd.
The behavior of fflush is not defined for input streams (online 2011 standard):
7.21.5.2 The fflush function
Synopsis
1
#include <stdio.h>
int fflush(FILE *stream);
Description
2 If stream points to an output stream or an update stream in which the most recent
operation was not input, the fflush function causes any unwritten data for that stream
to be delivered to the host environment to be written to the file; otherwise, the behavior is
undefined.
3 If stream is a null pointer, the fflush function performs this flushing action on all
streams for which the behavior is defined above.
Returns
4
The fflush function sets the error indicator for the stream and returns EOF if a write
error occurs, otherwise it returns zero.
I faced the same problem while working on LINUX and an alternative solution of this problem can be that you define a dummy character lets say char dummy;
and put a scanf() to scan it just before your actual input takes place. This worked for me. I hope it would work for you too.
fflush() doesn't do much for input streams but since scanf() never returns this doesn't matter. scanf() blocks because the terminal window doesn't send anything to the C program until you press Enter
You have two options:
Type 10 Enter
Put the terminal into raw mode.
The second option has many drawbacls like you will lose editing capabilities, so I suggest to read the input line by line.
You must include and use __fpurge(whatever you want) instead.
Salute from argentina
Use getchar() instead, after scanf
#include<stdio.h>
int main()
{
char ans='y';
int a;
while(ans=='y'||ans=='Y')
{
printf("Type a number:-");
scanf("%d",&a);
printf("square of number = %d\nwant to enter
number again(y/n)?\nANS=",a*a);
scanf("%s",&ans);//use %s in place of %c
}
return 0;
}
By using bzero(); system call in Linux we can flush the previous stored value.
Please read the manual page of bzero(); by typing in terminal man bzero.
try this example
#include<stdio.h>
#include<string.h>
int main()
{
char buf[]={'y'};
int num;
while(buf[0]=='y')
{
printf("enter number");
scanf("%d",&num);
printf("square of %d is %d\n",num,num*num);
bzero(buf, 1);
printf("want to enter y/n");
scanf("%s",&buf[0]);
}
return 0;
}

Is there a way to get text as soon as possible without waiting for a newline?

I'm using C. I wrote a very simpe program which prints back the input, using getchar() and putchar() or printf(). Is there any way to make it so as soon as the user types one key, the program registers it, without waiting for an Enter? Let me show:
Currently, if the user types "abc" and then presses Enter, the program prints "abc" and a newline and keeps waiting for more input. I want to make it so as soon as the user types "a", the program prints "a" and waits for more input. I'm not sure whether this has to be done inside the source code or if something has to be changed in the Windows command line.
Just in case, here's the source code:
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
int c;
while ((c = getchar()) != EOF) {
putchar(c);
}
return 0;
}
if you are using Visual Studio, there is a library called conio (#include <conio.h>) which defines a kbhit() function and getch().
otherwise, on Windows, there is still the possibility of using functions from the Windows SDK (ReadConsoleInput() and the like), but that would require a little bit more code (although, once done and if done properly, it can be reused any time you want)
If you're using Visual Studio, you can use getch().
In this simple case, the other answers should suit you fine.
The general solution is to disable line buffering. This depends on the particular console; the following example is Windows-only (untested):
#include <windows.h>
int main() {
HANDLE hConsole = GetStdHandle(STD_INPUT_HANDLE);
DWORD mode;
GetConsoleMode(hConsole, &mode);
SetConsoleMode(hConsole, mode & ~ENABLE_LINE_INPUT);
// ...
}
I assume that the standard C library functions are implemented in terms of ReadConsole and friends; if not, this might not even work. (I'm currently on Linux, so I cannot test this.)
On Linux you can take over the terminal:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include <termios.h>
system("stty raw"); /* raw output to terminal, direct feedback */
system("clear"); /* clear screen */
printf("Press a key");
answer = getchar();
system("stty cooked"); /* revert back*/

Resources