select() not responding? - c

The objective of my program is to use select to manage multiple sockets. However, I thought of trying it with one socket first. Now, the problem that I am facing is that initially client sends data to server, and server receives it and displays it, but then when client again sends some data, the server code remains still at select command.
here are some snippets that will give you an idea of how I am initializing the socket.
if((master_socket = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0)) < 0)
{
exit(1);
}
if((bind(master_socket, (struct sockaddr *)&req, sizeof(req))) < 0)
{
exit(1);
}
listen(master_socket, 5);
FD_SET(master_socket,&listening);
/* wait for connection, then receive and print text */
len = sizeof(struct sockaddr);
while(1)
{
FD_ZERO(&listening); //Flush out everything in socket
FD_SET(master_socket,&listening); // Add master
if(f_client>0) // Add client if any
{
FD_SET(f_client,&listening);
}
printf("Checking for new connection \n");
//Timeout is null, so waiting indefinitely
rc = select(FD_SETSIZE, &listening, NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (FD_ISSET(master_socket, &listening))
{
printf("Master side invoked\n");
if((f_client = accept(master_socket, (struct sockaddr *)&req, &len)) < 0)
{
exit(1);
}
}
else if (FD_ISSET(f_client,&listening))
{
if ((valread = read( f_client , buf, 1024)) == 0)
{
close(f_client);
f_client=0;
}
else
{
fputs(buf, stdout);
}
}
}
Basically in above program, it connects to the server, maintains a file descriptor for client f_client and add it. And in every round, it clears the socket, add master socket, and client socket if any, and then checks. Problem here is, first time it works, but second time when client sends some data. it gets hang to rc = select(FD_SETSIZE, &listening, NULL, NULL, NULL);
I am not to understand what is wrong here. Can anyone help?

if ((valread = read( f_client , buf, 1024)) == 0)
{
close(f_client);
f_client=0;
}
else
{
fputs(buf, stdout);
}
This code is broken. The fputs function can only be used with a C-style string. You just have arbitrary data with no particular structure. Since you ignore valread, you also have no idea how many bytes you read. (Think about it, how could fputs possibly know how many bytes to output? That information is only in valread, and you don't pass it that information.)
You've already received the data, this broken code just threw it away. If you log valread, you'll see that you actually already read it in your last call to read before the call to select that hung.
instead of fputs, you could use something like this:
for (int i = 0; i < valread; ++i)
putchar(buf[i]);

Related

How to use nanomsg survey architecture without while loop?

I was going through nanomsg usage for IPC and wanted to use SURVEY-archetype architecture described here.In this, processes run as client and server and exchange data. Now server has following code (also listed in the provided link):
int server (const char *url)
{
int sock = nn_socket (AF_SP, NN_SURVEYOR);
assert (sock >= 0);
assert (nn_bind (sock, url) >= 0);
sleep(1); // wait for connections
int sz_d = strlen(DATE) + 1; // '\0' too
printf ("SERVER: SENDING DATE SURVEY REQUEST\n");
int bytes = nn_send (sock, DATE, sz_d, 0);
assert (bytes == sz_d);
while (1)
{
char *buf = NULL;
int bytes = nn_recv (sock, &buf, NN_MSG, 0);
if (bytes == ETIMEDOUT) break;
if (bytes >= 0)
{
printf ("SERVER: RECEIVED \"%s\" SURVEY RESPONSE\n", buf);
nn_freemsg (buf);
}
}
return nn_shutdown (sock, 0);
}
Since socket type is NN_SURVEYOR, the while-loop doesn't wait at nn_recv. For client, socket type is NN_RESPONDENT and so, while loop in client waits at nn_recv.
Now since this while loop runs continuously and infinitely, the CPU usage shoots up to 99%. Can you please tell me that is there any other way to make survey architecture using nanomsg.
Try adding yield() call in the end of loop if nothing was received.

UNIX Domain socket programming in C, printing issue

I am having a printing issue with my server. I want there to be simultaneous printing when I have 2 or more clients active on terminals. However, I am only printing from one client at a time. Once I close a client, the other clients are free to write to the server. What can I do to fix my problem?
I have tried to fork the printing section, which I think didn't really do anything. (Just realized if I do this, then the select system call is a waste, i'd rather use the select system call) *edit
while(TRUE) {
FD_ZERO(&readfds);
FD_SET(socket1, &readfds);
FD_SET(socket2, &readfds);
FD_SET(socket3, &readfds);
select(socket3+1, &readfds, NULL, NULL, NULL);
//add socket1
if(FD_ISSET(socket1, &readfds)) {
if((client_socket1 = accept(socket1, NULL, NULL)) < 0) {
perror("accept1");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
printf("New Connection\n");
puts("Welcome message1 sent successfully\n");
}
//add socket2
if(FD_ISSET(socket2, &readfds)) {
if((client_socket2 = accept(socket2, (struct sockaddr *)&addr2, (socklen_t*)&addr2)) < 0) {
perror("accept2");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
printf("New Connection\n");
puts("Welcome message2 sent successfully\n");
}
//add socket 3
if(FD_ISSET(socket3, &readfds)) {
if((client_socket3 = accept(socket3, (struct sockaddr *)&addr3, (socklen_t*)&addr3)) < 0) {
perror("accept3");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
printf("New Connection\n");
puts("Welcome message3 sent successfully\n");
}
//print from socket 3
while( (ready = read(client_socket3, buffer, sizeof(buffer))) > 0) {
printf("%s\n", buffer);
}
//print from socket 2
while( (ready = read(client_socket2, buffer, sizeof(buffer))) > 0) {
printf("%s\n", buffer);
}
//print from socket 1
while( (ready = read(client_socket1, buffer, sizeof(buffer))) > 0) {
printf("%s\n", buffer);
}
}
You need to add your client sockets to the fd_set and select statement before attempting to read from them. Also, you should make all your sockets non-blocking. Otherwise, the read call will block until you get data.
Here's a quick fix that uses recv instead of read to read the sockets, but with the async flag of MSG_DONTWAIT.
I didn't see anywhere where you were closing your client sockets or handling errors properly. So I inserted some code as a hint. Also, it's never a good idea to "printf" a buffer of data from a socket directly. Because you never know if the data you received is null terminated. Always null terminate your buffer after you read the data off the socket.
Change this block of code:
//print from socket 3
while( (ready = read(client_socket3, buffer, sizeof(buffer))) > 0) {
printf("%s\n", buffer);
}
To this:
while (1)
{
int result;
result = recv(client_socket3, buffer, sizeof(buffer)-1, MSG_DONTWAIT);
if ((result == -1) &&
((errno == EAGAIN) || (errno==EWOULDBLOCK)) )
{
// no more data available, but could be available later
// use the socket with "select" above to wait for more data
}
else if ((result == -1) || (result == 0))
{
// remote close or unrecoverable error
close(client_socket3);
client_socket3=-1;
}
else
{
// null terminate the buffer before printing
buffer[result] = '\0';
printf("%s\n", buffer);
}
}

How to use recv to recieve long text strings

I am trying to create a server and client program that sends a string from client to server where the server executes that string and sends the output back to the client. I am doing this in linux and I am very confused why my program isnt working the least bit. Here is the code.
**Client**
int main()
{
//Code to use unix socket here
if (connect(s, (struct sockaddr *)&remote, len) == -1) {
perror("connect");
exit(1);
}
printf("Connected.\n");
while(printf("> "), fgets(str, MAX, stdin), !feof(stdin)) {
if (send(s, str, strlen(str), 0) == -1) {
perror("send");
exit(1);
}
}
done=0;
do {
if(t=recv(s, str, MAX, 0)<0)
perror("recv failed at client side!\n");
str[t] = '\0';
if(strcmp(str, "ENDOFTRANS")==0)
{
printf("\nRead ENDOFTRANS. Breaking loop.\n");
done=1;
}
printf("Server > %s", str);
} while(!done);
}
And then the server code is:
**Server**
#define MAX 1000
int main(void)
{
//Unix socket code
//This process is now a daemon.
daemon();
//Listens for client connections, up to 5 clients can queue up at the same time.
if (listen(s, 5) == -1) {
perror("listen");
exit(1);
}
for(;;) {
int done, n, status;
printf("Waiting for a connection...\n");
t = sizeof(remote);
if ((newsock= accept(s, (struct sockaddr *)&remote, &t)) == -1) {
perror("accept");
exit(1);
}
printf("Connected.\n");
done = 0;
do {
switch(fork())
{
case -1: //ERROR
perror("Could not fork.\n");
break;
case 0: //CHILD
//Accept string from client.
//Edit: Why am I getting an error here? says: Invalid argument.
if(n = recv(newsock, str, MAX, 0)) {
perror("Recv error at server side.\n");
exit(1);
}
str[n]='\0';
if (n <= 0) {
if (n < 0)
perror("recv");
done = 1;
}
printf("String=>%s<",str);
//Redirect socket to STDOUT & STDERR.
test = close(WRITE); assert(test==0);
test = dup(newsock); assert(test==WRITE);
test = close(ERROR); assert(test==0);
test = dup(newsock); assert(test==ERROR);
if (!done)
{
if (str==something)
{
//execute command
}
else {
//Fork and execvp the command
}
//Sends End of Transaction character.
ENDTHETRANS();
exit(0);
}
break;
default: //PARENT
//Parent keeps accepting further clients.
wait(&status);
if ((newsock= accept(s, (struct sockaddr *)&remote, &t)) == -1) {
perror("accept");
exit(1);
}
printf("Connected.\n");
done=1;
break;
}
} while (!done);
}
close(s);
}
Im relatively new to programming in general and from my understanding the client code is good except that when it recieves the text back from the server it only recieves the text in small bits (2 rows at a time). I have to keep pressing enter on client promt to get the rest of the input. I have tried so many things that by this point I dont even know what I am doing wrong anymore.
Firstly, in the server code, after it recieves the string from the client I have a printf("String=>%s<",str); that outputs the string. However when the server prints the output as String=>ls -l the < key at the end gets eaten up somehow. It shouldnt be doing that right?
Any help much appreciated. Please bare in mind that I am a beginner and have only used pipes as inter process communcation before. Now I wanna make my first unix socket program.
Thanks in advance.
The usual problem in cases such as this is not realizing that SOCK_STREAM sockets don't preserve message boundaries. So data sent with a send call might be split up and received in multiple recvs, or it might be coalesced and multiple sends end up in a single recv. Most importantly, when a kernel send buffer fills up, a send call might write partial data (sending only some of the requested data) and return a short return value. You need to test for this and resend the rest of the data.
Another problem that often shows up is issues with line endings (particularly when talking between linux and windows). There may be extra carriage return characters (\r) in the either the client or server that confuse the other side. These tend to result in apparently missing or truncated output when printed.
edit
The line
if(t=recv(s, str, MAX, 0)<0)
is equivalent to
if(t = (recv(s, str, MAX, 0)<0))
that is, it sets t to 0 or 1 depending on whether there was an error or not. As with most errors of this type, turning on warnings will give you some indication about it.

Using sockets to read from client side

I basically have a server set up and I'm accepting new clients(UNIX) and i'm using select() command to wait for activity on file descriptor but I'm not sure how to write from the clients side and then read it on the servers side
FD_ZERO(&readfds);
FD_SET(server_sockfd, &readfds);
FD_SET(STDIN_FILENO, &readfds);
while (1) {
testfds = readfds;
select(4 + MAXCLIENTS, &testfds, NULL, NULL, NULL);
for (fd = 0; fd < 4 + MAX_CLIENTS; fd++) {
if (FD_ISSET(fd, &testfds)) {
if (fd == server_sockfd) { /* new connection request */
client_sockfd = accept(server_sockfd, NULL, NULL);
if (num_clients < MAXCLIENTS) {
FD_SET(client_sockfd, &readfds);
num_clients++;
} else {
sprintf(message, "XSorry, too many clients. Try again later.\n");
write(client_sockfd, message, strlen(message));
close(client_sockfd);
}
} else if (fd == STDIN_FILENO) {
fgets(kb_message, BUFSIZ + 1, stdin);
if (strcmp(kb_message, "quit\n") == 0) {
sprintf(message, "XServer is shutting down.\n");
for (fd2 = 4; fd2 < 4 + MAX_CLIENTS; fd2++) {
if (FD_ISSET(fd2, &readfds)) {
write(fd2, message, strlen(message));
close(fd2);
}
}
close(server_sockfd);
exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
} else {
sprintf(message, "M%s", kb_message);
for (fd2 = 4; fd2 < 4 + MAX_CLIENTS; fd2++)
if (FD_ISSET(fd2, &readfds))
write(fd2, message, strlen(message));
}
} else { /* client leaving */
close(fd);
FD_CLR(fd, &readfds);
num_clients--;
}
}
}
}
How would I handle write request from clients and then write back to them, would it be under "else" and how can I check if client is exiting or writing.
Thanks
The most common mistake with select(2) is not re-initializing the descriptor sets, since second, third, and forth arguments are input-output parameters.
Setup an fd_set, for reading before the outer loop, add listening socket descriptor to it, enter the loop, make a copy of the this fd_set and give the copy to select(2). When new connection arrives, add its descriptor to the original fd_set. Same for closed socket (error or EOF on read(2)) - remove the descriptor from the original fd_set.
Hope this helps.
You are correct in thinking you need the read code in your 'else' block. If a file descriptor triggers and it isn't stdin or the 'connect' descriptor, then it is one of your clients attempting to send you data. When one of those file descriptors is triggered in the select, you need to call 'read' on that descriptor to read the data into the buffer. The read command will return you the number of bytes read. If this is a positive number, then it indicates the client has sent you data. If it is zero, then that indicates that the client has ended the TCP connection to your server.
The else block will look something like:
else
{
//Existing connection has data for us to read
if((nBytes = read(fd, buffer, MAXBUFFER)) <= 0)
{
if(nBytes == 0)
{
//Actually, its sending us zero bytes, connection closed
printf("Socket %d hung up\n", fd;
}
else
printf ("Read Error"\n)
}
Also, Follow Nikolai N Fetissov's advice above and make sure that when client's connect you store their fd in a permanent fd_set structure, as the one you are using is being modified by the select call.
Your problem might be that you have a variable called read. It's going to mask one of hte functions you need to use - the read() system call to get data out of the socket. The client puts it in with write(). You might also want to check the return value from select(), which will tell you how many of the file descriptors are ready for reading. Then you can check which ones using FD_ISSET(). It looks like you're doing that part already (except you seem to be checking the wrong variable?)... just call read() on that file descriptor to get out the data the client wrote.
else
{
bzero(buf,100);
n=read(i,buf,100); // Read the client message
buf[n]='\0';
if(n==0) // Check the client is closed or not
{
printf("%d is closed\n",i);
close(i);
FD_CLR(i, &master);
if(i==fdmax)
fdmax--;
}
else
{
n=strlen(buf);
write(1,buf,n);
fflush(stdout);
write(1,"Enter the message\n",18);
bzero(buf,100);
read(0,buf,100);
buf[n]='\0';
write(i,buf,n);
fflush(stdout);
}
}
Notes:
After accept the client, Add the client in the fd set.
Then read the message from the client
If the message is equal to 0, then the client is closed.
If you want to send the message to the client, using the client fd, you can send to the client

C: Question about Beej's networking guide... Is there an assumption here?

I was just going through the Networking Guide by Beej and am curious about this part of the code (specifically marked with "From here" and "To here"):
// main loop
for(;;) {
read_fds = master; // copy it
if (select(fdmax+1, &read_fds, NULL, NULL, NULL) == -1) {
perror("select");
exit(4);
}
// run through the existing connections looking for data to read
for(i = 0; i <= fdmax; i++) {
if (FD_ISSET(i, &read_fds)) { // we got one!!
if (i == listener) {
// handle new connections
addrlen = sizeof remoteaddr;
newfd = accept(listener,
(struct sockaddr *)&remoteaddr,
&addrlen);
if (newfd == -1) {
perror("accept");
} else {
FD_SET(newfd, &master); // add to master set
if (newfd > fdmax) { // keep track of the max
fdmax = newfd;
}
printf("selectserver: new connection from %s on "
"socket %d\n",
inet_ntop(remoteaddr.ss_family,
get_in_addr((struct sockaddr*)&remoteaddr),
remoteIP, INET6_ADDRSTRLEN),
newfd);
}
} else {
// handle data from a client
//----------------- FROM HERE --------------------------
if ((nbytes = recv(i, buf, sizeof buf, 0)) <= 0) {
// got error or connection closed by client
if (nbytes == 0) {
// connection closed
printf("selectserver: socket %d hung up\n", i);
} else {
perror("recv");
}
close(i); // bye!
FD_CLR(i, &master); // remove from master set
//----------------- TO HERE ----------------------------
} else {
// we got some data from a client
for(j = 0; j <= fdmax; j++) {
// send to everyone!
if (FD_ISSET(j, &master)) {
// except the listener and ourselves
if (j != listener && j != i) {
if (send(j, buf, nbytes, 0) == -1) {
perror("send");
}
}
}
}
}
} // END handle data from client
} // END got new incoming connection
} // END looping through file descriptors
} // END for(;;)--and you thought it would never end!
return 0;
Now I know that read doesn't always read "everything" that is to be read on a socket and that it sometimes can return only part of it. In that case, wouldn't this code be incorrect? I mean, after one read, the connection is being closed... Instead, aren't we supposed to have some other mechanism in place? If so, what is the right approach here?
The socket is only going to get closed there if there was an error from recv(), otherwise it'll deal with the data that was read even if it isnt all read. It will then read more out when it loops through again. Pretty sure this is what you're asking?
Yes you would keep reading until you got all the data you expected, obviosuly you need someway of knowing how much to expect - which is why http puts the document size first
Your only calling close when recv() has returned a negative value which means that recv had some sort of error. Notice that the block where you do the close has a comment stating // got error or connection closed by client).
When you actually get some data (the else branch starting with // we got some data from a client), the connection is not being closed.
You are right that you can't assume the data arrives all at one time. Your mistake is in following how the code is working.

Resources