Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
The company I work for has Loadrunner and I think about 400 vusers licence.
I also know that they have TruClient in the VUGen. But do they need to by additional TruClient licenses or does the current ammount of 400 also include TruClient VUsers to use from the controllers?
From the LoadRunner Help documentation.
"Note: In order to run the various protocols, you must have either a global license or licenses for the desired protocols. For more information, select Configuration > LoadRunner License in the LoadRunner Launcher (Start > Programs > LoadRunner > LoadRunner)."
I would take that to mean you need licenses specifically for the TruClient protocol as well, unless the 400 that you have are global. I'm no Performance Center admin mind you, I just hack out a script or two every once in awhile.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I have a practice room with a LAN. It is common for student to do exercises. A student create some files on a computer and I want:
- He/She can't see files of others.
- He/She can continue to work on his/her files.
I think this suits to a FTP server. But which fpt server can support over 3000 clients?
Or is there an alternative for this problem?
Thanks.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I want to release some javascript libraries under an open source license, but am having some difficulty picking one. I want a license that meets the following requirements:
Credit must be given to the original author
Modification to the source code must be released open source
Software can be sold, modified, or bundled with propriety software.
Are there any open source licenses that fit this bill well?
I have considered the MPL but I don't know if it requires that credit be given to authors.
CC BY-SA seems to follow your "rules": http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
MPL seems ok too
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
Which software license should one use to meet the following simple conditions:
Software is free to use
Software can be re-distributed
Software source is closed and remains my intellectual property
(copywright) and cannot be decompiled/edited.
(If possible) The software cannot be sold.
Thanks in advance.
The whole point of free software is that it can be modified to suit any user's potential requirements, so pretty much by definition, if you want point 3, your software isn't free.
Sounds like shareware. I can't point you to a license I would personally recommend, but Google has lots of results. See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shareware
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
To protect software, you can create a validation system which requires users to provide a valid license number (Often 25 letters or digits) which they have to enter with some personal information. This then gets validated (sometimes aby using a validation server, thus requiring online access) and when valid, the user can use the registered version of an application.
Now, simple question: What kinds of solutions are there which would allow developers to implement such a licensing scheme in an easy way into their applications? I could easily create my own solution but I don't want to re-invent the wheel again...
Ezirez Intellilock has a good solution and API to implement it.
Basicly you created a function of (HW ID, Registration Key) and check if it's right.
Intellilock is just a tool to help you lock the software if the license isn't there.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 13 years ago.
Improve this question
its not directly programming question
but i need to implement ffmpeg functionality in my application that is commercial.
what is my restrictions when using this lib/app ?
i was confused from reading there web page .
"FFmpeg is free software and is licensed under the LGPL or GPL depending on your choice of configuration options." from the homepage.
The mini-FAQ at http://ffmpeg.org/legal.html should probably answer your questions. Do you have a specific part of it you don't understand?
http://ffmpeg.org/legal.html
That sums up all relevant information quite nicely.
I would say that if you want to incorporate FFmpeg into your commercial application, you should consult a lawyer who is familiar with the laws and regulations in your area and the area in which you wish to distribute your application.