I am fetching the data from the server each 10 sec, in this, i am getting 3 type of the data,
After the timeout call, i am removing the existing data, i can witness the console show that the array clears, but the elements still keep append upon.
how can i clear both elements in the DOM and unbind as well..
my close function is keep called, but the elements not remove from DOM.
my single view :
singleton.view = Backbone.View.extend({
tagName :'article',
template0 : function(value){
var label = value === 0 ? "projectName" : value === 1 ? "assignedTo" :"projectName";
return _.template("<a href='#'><%= "+label+" %></a>");
},
template1 : _.template($('#boardTemplate').html()),
initialize :function(prams){
this.template = this['template'+0](prams.subTempNo);
},
close:function(){
console.log('clean up') // i am getting consoled
this.unbind();// i am unbinding
this.remove();// i am removing
},
render:function(){
var temp = this.template;
this.$el.html(temp(this.model.toJSON()));
return this;
}
});
return singleton.view;
in the views :
listViewAppender:function(item,i){
var listElement = new singleton.view({model:item,tempNo:0,subTempNo:i,tagName:'li'});
listElement.close(); // whenever i call the new instance i am removing old stuff..
this.$el.find('.'+this.classItems[i]).append(listElement.render().el);
},
How can i fix this issue.. any correct approach pelase..
Ok just a quick rework.....you're going to have to test it out. Comment with what happens and I'll correct the code below.
Can you try
listViewSet:function(key,i){
var l = this.listCatch.length;
if(l > 0){
for (var i = 0; i < l; i++) {
console.log(this.listCatch[i]);
this.listCatch[i].remove();
}
}
this.listCatch = [];
_.each(this.listCollection.models, function(model){
that.listViewAppender(model,i); //setting agian.
});
},
listViewAppender:function(item,i){
var listElement = new singleton.view({model:item,tempNo:0,subTempNo:i,tagName:'li'});
console.log(listElement);
this.$el.find('.'+this.classItems[i]).append(listElement.render().el);
this.listCatch[i] = listElement;
},
I gone through across my functions, i find the issue in the line of this.listCatch[i] = listElement; wrongly declared.
Later i declared the array by manually, it's works fine. in my initialize i introduced 3 arrays, what i required now it works fine.
this.listCatch = [];
for(var i=0;i<this.listItems.length; i+=1){
this.listCatch[i] = [];
}
So before pushing the model to array, now the array introduced solved the issue.
Related
I want to stop self.lineDetails from being updated when I update self.modifiedLineDetails.
self.modifiedLineDetails = [];
angular.forEach(self.lineDetails, function (value1, index1) {
var lineDetail = self.lineDetails[index1];
self.modifiedLineDetails.push(lineDetail)
});
console.log(self.lineDetails)
angular.forEach(self.modifiedLineDetails, function (value10, index10) {
var modifiedLineDetail = self.modifiedLineDetails[index10];
if (modifiedLineDetail.SelectedCustomers.length > 0) {
modifiedLineDetail.SelectedCustomers = 1;
} else {
modifiedLineDetail.SelectedCustomers = 0
}
});
console.log(self.modifiedLineDetails)
Previously I just assigned it like this self.modifiedLineDetails = self.lineDetails then I updated self.modifiedLineDetails but it wasn't working so I tried pushing it per line but self.lineDetails keeps updating.
You should clone an array and then modify your new array, one way to do this is using
spread operation ...
Here is the example of it:
var initialarray = [1,2,3,4];
var modification = [...initialarray];
modification.push(5);
console.log(initialarray);
console.log(modification);
Since the problem seems to be occurring because I was using angular. I researched and found angular.copy which creates a deep copy. The code below worked for me.
self.modifiedLineDetails = angular.copy(self.lineDetails);
I have written this custom filter for AngularJS, but when it runs, I get the infinite digest loop error. Why does this occur and how can I correct this?
angular.module("app", []).
filter('department', function(filterFilter) {
return function(items, args) {
var productMatches;
var output = [];
var count = 0;
if (args.selectedDepartment.Id !== undefined && args.option) {
for (let i = 0; i < items.length; i++) {
productMatches = items[i].products.filter(function(el) {
return el.Order__r.Department__r.Id === args.selectedDepartment.Id;
});
if (productMatches.length !== 0) {
output[count] = {};
output[count].products = productMatches;
output[count].firstProduct = items[i].firstProduct;
count++;
}
}
}
return output;
};
}).
This is the relevant HTML:
<tr class='destination' ng-repeat-start='pickupAccount in pickupAccounts | department : {"selectedDepartment": selectedDepartment, "option": displayExclusive }'>
<!-- td here -->
</tr>
displayExclusive is boolean.
I have written this custom filter for AngularJS, but when it runs, I get the infinite digest loop error.
Keep in mind that filter should return array of the same object structure. When we activate filter, it fires digest cycle that will run over our filter again. If something changed in output list - fires new digest cycle and so on. after 10 attempts it will throw us Infinite Digest Loop Exception
Testing
This empty filter will works (100%). Actually we do nothing here but return the same object that filter receives.
filter('department', function(filterFilter) {
return function(items, args) {
var output = items;
return output;
};
})
Now the main idea is: write some condition to push to output objects from input list a.e. items based on some if statement, a.e.
var output = [];
if (args.selectedDepartment.Id !== undefined && args.option) {
angular.forEach(items, function(item) {
if(<SOME CONDITION>) {
output.push(item);
}
});
}
By this way it will work too.
our case:
we have this logic:
productMatches = items[i].products.filter(function(el) {
return el.Order__r.Department__r.Id === args.selectedDepartment.Id;
});
if (productMatches.length !== 0) {
output[count] = {};
output[count].products = productMatches;
output[count].firstProduct = items[i].firstProduct;
count++;
}
Here we completely modified object that has been stored in output.
So next digest cycle our items will change again and again.
Conclusion
The main purpose of filter is to filter list and not modify list object content.
Above mentioned logic you wrote is related to data manipulation and not filter. The department filter returns the same length of items.
To achieve your goal, you can use lodash map or underscorejs map for example.
This happens when you manipulate the returned array in a way that it does not match the original array. See for example:
.filter("department", function() {
return function(items, args) {
var output = [];
for (var i = 0; i < items.length; i++) {
output[i] = {};
output[i] = items[i]; // if you don't do this, the next filter will fail
output[i].product = items[i];
}
return output;
}
}
You can see it happening in the following simplified jsfiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/u873kevp/1/
If the returned array does have the same 'structure' as the input array, it will cause these errors.
It should work in your case by just assigning the original item to the returned item:
if (productMatches.length !== 0) {
output[count] = items[i]; // do this
output[count].products = productMatches;
output[count].firstProduct = items[i].firstProduct;
count++;
}
output[count] = {};
Above line is the main problem. You create a new instance, and ng-repeat will detect that the model is constantly changed indefinitely. (while you think that nothing is changed from the UI perspective)
To avoid the issue, basically you need to ensure that each element in the model remains the 'same', i.e.
firstCallOutput[0] == secondCallOutput[0]
&& firstCallOutput[1] == secondCallOutput[1]
&& firstCallOutput[2] == secondCallOutput[2]
...
This equality should be maintained as long as you don't change the model, thus ng-repeat will not 'wrongly' think that the model has been changed.
Please note that two new instances is not equal, i.e. {} != {}
I'm having trouble decorate the objects in my list returned by $asArray in angularfire with a new method (not decorating the array itself).
The angularfire documentation seems to suggest that the right way to do this is to override the $$added method in the factory for $FirebaseArray, returning a new object that either encapsulates or extends the snapshot that gets passed in to that method. From the documentation:
// an object to return in our JokeFactory
app.factory("Joke", function($firebaseUtils) {
function Joke(snapshot) {
this.$id = snapshot.name();
this.update(snapshot);
}
Joke.prototype = {
update: function(snapshot) {
// apply changes to this.data instead of directly on `this`
this.data = snapshot.val();
},
makeJoke: function() {
alert("Why did the " + this.animal + " cross the " + this.obstacle + "?");
},
toJSON: function() {
// since we didn't store our data directly on `this`, we need to return
// it in parsed format. We can use the util function to remove $ variables
// and get it ready to ship
return $firebaseUtils.toJSON(this.data);
}
};
return Joke;
});
app.factory("JokeFactory", function($FirebaseArray, Joke) {
return $FirebaseArray.$extendFactory({
// change the added behavior to return Joke objects
$$added: function(snap) {
return new Joke(snap);
},
// override the update behavior to call Joke.update()
$$updated: function(snap) {
this.$getRecord(snap.name()).update(snap);
}
});
});
However, when I do this in my code, nothing ever gets added to the array, although I can see from outputting to the console that it is getting called.
var printMessageObjConstructor = function(snap) {
this.$id = snap.name();
this.snapshot = snap;
this.$update = function(snap) {
this.snapshot = snap;
};
this.printMessage = function() {
return this.author + "'s question is: " + this.body;
};
};
var ref = new Firebase("https://danculley-test.firebaseio.com/questions");
//What Am I Doing Wrong Here?
var arrayFactory = $FirebaseArray.$extendFactory({
$$added: function(snap, prevChild) {
var x = new printMessageObjConstructor(snap);
console.log("I am being called from FirebaseDecoratedCtlOverloadAddedinNewObj.");
return x;
},
$createObject: function(snap) {
return new printMessageObjConstructor(snap);
},
$$updated: function(snap) {
var i = this.$indexFor(snap.name());
var q = this.$list[i];
q.$update(snap);
}
});
var sync = $firebase(ref, {arrayFactory:arrayFactory});
var list = sync.$asArray();
list.$loaded(function(list) {
$scope.questions = list;
});
I've set up a new plunk stripped down to show the issue with a couple other use cases that I've tried. (The actual method I'm adding is more complex and isn't related to the view, but I wanted to do something simple to reproduce the issue.)
I think the issue is that I don't quite understand what exactly $$added is supposed to return, or what additional behavior beside returning the value to be stored $$added is supposed to have. There also doesn't really seem to be an $$added on the prototype or on $FirebaseArray to call as a super to get the default behavior. Can someone point me in the right direction?
UPDATE
For the benefit of others, after reviewing the like that Kato posted, I was able to solve the issue by adding the following, almost all copied directly from the source except for the commented line below.
$$added: function(snap, prevChild) {
var i = this.$indexFor(snap.name());
if( i === -1 ) {
var rec = snap.val();
if( !angular.isObject(rec) ) {
rec = { $value: rec };
}
rec.$id = snap.name();
rec.$priority = snap.getPriority();
$firebaseUtils.applyDefaults(rec, this.$$defaults);
//This is the line that I added to what I copied from the source
angular.extend(rec, printMessageObj);
this._process('child_added', rec, prevChild);
}
}
For the benefit of others, after reviewing the link that Kato posted, I was able to solve the issue by adding the following, almost all copied directly from the source except for the commented line below.
$$added: function(snap, prevChild) {
var i = this.$indexFor(snap.name());
if( i === -1 ) {
var rec = snap.val();
if( !angular.isObject(rec) ) {
rec = { $value: rec };
}
rec.$id = snap.name();
rec.$priority = snap.getPriority();
$firebaseUtils.applyDefaults(rec, this.$$defaults);
//This is the line that I added to what I copied from the source
angular.extend(rec, printMessageObj);
this._process('child_added', rec, prevChild);
}
}
I am having an issue with losing data within an array when i try to assign it to a new array.
My object im using is as follows:
$scope.shops = [
{
name: "Kroger",
items: [ { itemName: "Chips"} ]
}
];
This is the code for the functions im using, it may be a callback issue? or something? Im losing the items info for the shop.
$scope.addItem = function(newItem, newShop){
var x = findShop(newShop);
x.items.push(newItem);
$scope.shops.push(x);
};
findShop = function(shopTag){
var old = angular.copy($scope.shops);
var tar = {
name: shopTag,
items: []
};
$scope.shops = [];
angular.forEach(old, function(shop, key){
if(shop.name === shopTag) {
tar.items = angular.copy(shop.items);
}
else {
$scope.shops.push(shop);
}
});
return tar;
};
the goal is to have the findShop function return a shop with the correct name, with empty items if there wasnt a shop previously, or with items full of the items if the shop was already created. then the addItem will push the item into the shop.items array and push the shop into the $scope
Any help is greatly appreciated!!!
You are right , it is this line which is causing the problem ,
tar.items = shop.items;
Try using it like this ,
tar.items = angular.copy(shop.items);
var old = $scope.shops; // old and $scope.shops point to the same place
..........
$scope.shops = []; // you assigned a new array that overrides the data
............
angular.forEach(old, function(shop, key){ // for each on an empty array????
If you dont want to point to the same reference use:
var copiedObject = angular.copy(objToCopy);
I guess the array is getting empty even before for loop.
Var old is reference to shops array, which you are making empty before foreach.. effectively making old empty...
So, I'm having issues testing an angular filter that takes an array that has previously been sorted by a group property. It uses a flag property to indicate that the item is the first observation of that group, and then false for subsequent observations.
I'm doing this to have a category header in the UI with an ng-repeat directive.
When I test the filter, the output does not return the array with the flags unless I create new objects for the return array. This is a problem, because it causes an infinite loop when running in a webpage. The code works in the webpage when it just adds a flag property to the input object.
Is there some additional step I should be taking to simulate how angular handles filters so that it outputs the proper array?
This is what my test looks like right now.
describe('IsDifferentGroup', function() {
var list, itemOne, itemTwo, itemThree;
beforeEach(module("App.Filters"));
beforeEach(function () {
list = [];
itemOne = new ListItem();
itemTwo = new ListItem();
itemThree = new ListItem();
itemOne.group = "A";
itemTwo.group = "B";
itemThree.group = "C";
list.push(itemOne);
list.push(itemOne);
list.push(itemOne);
list.push(itemOne);
list.push(itemTwo);
list.push(itemThree);
list.push(itemThree);
list.push(itemThree);
list.push(itemThree);
list.push(itemThree);
});
it('should flag the items true that appear first on the list.', (inject(function (isDifferentGroupFilter) {
expect(list.length).toBe(10);
var result = isDifferentGroupFilter(list);
expect(result[0].isDifferentGroup).toBeTruthy();
expect(result[1].isDifferentGroup).toBeFalsy();
expect(result[4].isDifferentGroup).toBeTruthy();
expect(result[5].isDifferentGroup).toBeTruthy();
expect(result[6].isDifferentGroup).toBeFalsy();
expect(result[9].isDifferentGroup).toBeFalsy();
})));
});
And here is something like the code with the filter:
var IsDifferentGroup = (function () {
function IsDifferentGroup() {
return (function (list) {
var arrayToReturn = [];
var lastGroup = null;
for (var i = 0; i < list.length; i++) {
if (list[i].group != lastGroup) {
list[i].isDifferentGroup = true;
lastAisle = list[i].group;
} else {
list[i].isDifferentGroup = false;
}
arrayToReturn.push(list[i]);
}
return arrayToReturn;
});
}
return IsDifferentGroup;
})();
Thanks!
I figured out my issue.
When I was passing the items into the list, I just pushed a pointer to an item multiple times. I was not passing in unique objects so the flag was being overridden by the following flag in the array(I think). So, I just newed up 10 unique objects using a loop, pushed them into the array and ran it through the filter. And it worked.
I'm not entirely sure my analysis is correct about the override, because itemTwo was not being flagged as unique when it was the only itemTwo in the array. But the test is working as I would expect now so I'm going to stop investigating the issue.