I have this form : http://jsfiddle.net/dfJeN/
As you can see the name value for the input is statically set :
name="username"
, the form validation works fine (add something and remove all text from the input, a text must appears).
Then I try to dynamically set the name value : http://jsfiddle.net/jNWB8/
name="{input.name}"
Then I apply this to my validation
login.{{input.name}}.$error.required
(this pattern will be used in an ng-repeat) but my form validation is broken. It is correctly interpreted in my browser (if I inspect the element I saw login.username.$error.required).
Any Idea ?
EDIT: After logging the scope in the console it appears that the
{{input.name}}
expression is not interpolate. My form as an {{input.name}} attribute but no username.
UPDATE: Since 1.3.0-rc.3 name="{{input.name}}" works as expected. Please see #1404
You can't do what you're trying to do that way.
Assuming what you're trying to do is you need to dynamically add elements to a form, with something like an ng-repeat, you need to use nested ng-form to allow validation of those individual items:
<form name="outerForm">
<div ng-repeat="item in items">
<ng-form name="innerForm">
<input type="text" name="foo" ng-model="item.foo" />
<span ng-show="innerForm.foo.$error.required">required</span>
</ng-form>
</div>
<input type="submit" ng-disabled="outerForm.$invalid" />
</form>
Sadly, it's just not a well-documented feature of Angular.
Using nested ngForm allows you to access the specific InputController from within the HTML template. However, if you wish to access it from another controller it does not help.
e.g.
<script>
function OuterController($scope) {
$scope.inputName = 'dynamicName';
$scope.doStuff = function() {
console.log($scope.formName.dynamicName); // undefined
console.log($scope.formName.staticName); // InputController
}
}
</script>
<div controller='OuterController'>
<form name='myForm'>
<input name='{{ inputName }}' />
<input name='staticName' />
</form>
<a ng-click='doStuff()'>Click</a>
</div>
I use this directive to help solve the problem:
angular.module('test').directive('dynamicName', function($compile, $parse) {
return {
restrict: 'A',
terminal: true,
priority: 100000,
link: function(scope, elem) {
var name = $parse(elem.attr('dynamic-name'))(scope);
// $interpolate() will support things like 'skill'+skill.id where parse will not
elem.removeAttr('dynamic-name');
elem.attr('name', name);
$compile(elem)(scope);
}
};
});
Now you use dynamic names wherever is needed just the 'dynamic-name' attribute instead of the 'name' attribute.
e.g.
<script>
function OuterController($scope) {
$scope.inputName = 'dynamicName';
$scope.doStuff = function() {
console.log($scope.formName.dynamicName); // InputController
console.log($scope.formName.staticName); // InputController
}
}
</script>
<div controller='OuterController'>
<form name='myForm'>
<input dynamic-name='inputName' />
<input name='staticName' />
</form>
<a ng-click='doStuff()'>Click</a>
</div>
The problem should be fixed in AngularJS 1.3, according to this discussion on Github.
Meanwhile, here's a temporary solution created by #caitp and #Thinkscape:
// Workaround for bug #1404
// https://github.com/angular/angular.js/issues/1404
// Source: http://plnkr.co/edit/hSMzWC?p=preview
app.config(['$provide', function($provide) {
$provide.decorator('ngModelDirective', function($delegate) {
var ngModel = $delegate[0], controller = ngModel.controller;
ngModel.controller = ['$scope', '$element', '$attrs', '$injector', function(scope, element, attrs, $injector) {
var $interpolate = $injector.get('$interpolate');
attrs.$set('name', $interpolate(attrs.name || '')(scope));
$injector.invoke(controller, this, {
'$scope': scope,
'$element': element,
'$attrs': attrs
});
}];
return $delegate;
});
$provide.decorator('formDirective', function($delegate) {
var form = $delegate[0], controller = form.controller;
form.controller = ['$scope', '$element', '$attrs', '$injector', function(scope, element, attrs, $injector) {
var $interpolate = $injector.get('$interpolate');
attrs.$set('name', $interpolate(attrs.name || attrs.ngForm || '')(scope));
$injector.invoke(controller, this, {
'$scope': scope,
'$element': element,
'$attrs': attrs
});
}];
return $delegate;
});
}]);
Demo on JSFiddle.
Nice one by #EnISeeK.... but i got it to be more elegant and less obtrusive to other directives:
.directive("dynamicName",[function(){
return {
restrict:"A",
require: ['ngModel', '^form'],
link:function(scope,element,attrs,ctrls){
ctrls[0].$name = scope.$eval(attrs.dynamicName) || attrs.dynamicName;
ctrls[1].$addControl(ctrls[0]);
}
};
}])
Just a little improvement over EnlSeek solution
angular.module('test').directive('dynamicName', ["$parse", function($parse) {
return {
restrict: 'A',
priority: 10000,
controller : ["$scope", "$element", "$attrs",
function($scope, $element, $attrs){
var name = $parse($attrs.dynamicName)($scope);
delete($attrs['dynamicName']);
$element.removeAttr('data-dynamic-name');
$element.removeAttr('dynamic-name');
$attrs.$set("name", name);
}]
};
}]);
Here is a plunker trial. Here is detailed explantion
I expand the #caitp and #Thinkscape solution a bit, to allow dynamically created nested ng-forms, like this:
<div ng-controller="ctrl">
<ng-form name="form">
<input type="text" ng-model="static" name="static"/>
<div ng-repeat="df in dynamicForms">
<ng-form name="form{{df.id}}">
<input type="text" ng-model="df.sub" name="sub"/>
<div>Dirty: <span ng-bind="form{{df.id}}.$dirty"></span></div>
</ng-form>
</div>
<div><button ng-click="consoleLog()">Console Log</button></div>
<div>Dirty: <span ng-bind="form.$dirty"></span></div>
</ng-form>
</div>
Here is my demo on JSFiddle.
I used Ben Lesh's solution and it works well for me. But one problem I faced was that when I added an inner form using ng-form, all of the form states e.g. form.$valid, form.$error etc became undefined if I was using the ng-submit directive.
So if I had this for example:
<form novalidate ng-submit="saveRecord()" name="outerForm">
<!--parts of the outer form-->
<ng-form name="inner-form">
<input name="someInput">
</ng-form>
<button type="submit">Submit</button>
</form>
And in the my controller:
$scope.saveRecord = function() {
outerForm.$valid // this is undefined
}
So I had to go back to using a regular click event for submitting the form in which case it's necessary to pass the form object:
<form novalidate name="outerForm"> <!--remove the ng-submit directive-->
<!--parts of the outer form-->
<ng-form name="inner-form">
<input name="someInput">
</ng-form>
<button type="submit" ng-click="saveRecord(outerForm)">Submit</button>
</form>
And the revised controller method:
$scope.saveRecord = function(outerForm) {
outerForm.$valid // this works
}
I'm not quite sure why this is but hopefully it helps someone.
This issue has been fixed in Angular 1.3+
This is the correct syntax for what you are trying to do:
login[input.name].$invalid
if we set dynamic name for a input like the below
<input name="{{dynamicInputName}}" />
then we have use set validation for dynamic name like the below code.
<div ng-messages="login.dynamicInputName.$error">
<div ng-message="required">
</div>
</div>
Related
Im new in Angularjs
and I would like to do something like the following in directive
<!--get numb1&numb2 from user input-->
<div>
<input ng-model="numb1" type=number/>
</div>
<div>
<input ng-model="numb2" type=number/>
</div>
<!--result display on the following input box, not allow to edit-->
<div>
<input ng-model="result" formula="some formula here, can be anything" readonly/>
</div>
numb1 & numb2 can be change anytime, use $watch instead on ngChange.
Can anyone guide me on this?
You can achieve your requirement with the following code snippet.
The HTML
<div ng-app="demo">
<div ng-controller="DefaultController as vm">
<inputs formula="vm.formula"></inputs>
</div>
</div>
<script type="text/template" id="inputsTemplate">
<div>
<input type="number" ng-model="vm.a"/>
</div>
<div>
<input type="number" ng-model="vm.b"/>
</div>
<div>
<input type="number" ng-model="vm.result" readonly/>
</div>
</script>
The AngularJS code
angular
.module('demo', [])
.controller('DefaultController', DefaultController)
.controller('InputsController', InputsController)
.directive('inputs', inputs);
function DefaultController() {
var vm = this;
vm.formula = 'a + b';
}
function inputs() {
var directive = {
restrict: 'E',
scope: {
formula: '='
},
template: function () {
return angular.element(document.querySelector('#inputsTemplate')).html();
},
controller: InputsController,
controllerAs: 'vm',
bindToController: true
};
return directive;
}
InputsController.$inject = ['$scope', '$parse'];
function InputsController($scope, $parse) {
var vm = this;
var expressionFunc = $parse(vm.formula);
$scope.$watchGroup(['vm.a', 'vm.b'], function (newValue, oldValue, scope) {
if (angular.isDefined(vm.a) && angular.isDefined(vm.b)) {
var result = expressionFunc(vm);
vm.result = result;
}
});
}
The jsfiddle link here
The coding style is followed from angular-styleguide by John Papa and from Pro AngularJS by Adam Freeman
Explanation:
There is a main controller which is having a formula set on its scope such as a + b and which is passed to a directive called inputs through an attribute called formula, this an element directive meaning that it is restricted to be applied only as an individual html element.
The inputs directive gets its template from a script tag having html content
by using the template property of the directive definition. The inputs directive has its own controller bound using the controller aliasing syntax.
The inputs directive has three objects on its controller scope they're a, b and result and the magic happens in the InputsController using the $parse service which returns a function when an expression is parsed which can indeed be evaluated on an object to execute that expression and get the result i.e.
var expressionFunc = $parse(vm.formula);
var result = expressionFunc(vm);
vm.result = result;
Also as we need to watch both a and b objects on the scope, we can use the $watchGroup function on the $scope object to handle the change events and update the view accordingly.
Note: we are only parsing once var expressionFunc = $parse(vm.formula); and executing the expression many times var result = expressionFunc(vm); this is an important factor and should be considered for quality of the code and for performance.
You are in the same scope, so, you can use ng-value in order to set a new value given numb1 and numb2. For example, you formula is numb1 + numb2, just try something like this:
<input ng-model="result" ng-value="{{numb1 + numb2}}" readonly/>
I'm trying to build an Angular JS form. I'd like user to be able to set the focus on a text field when they click a button. Not sure why this doesn't work? Thanks
html:
<div ng-app="" ng-controller="personController">
<p>Name: <input type="text" ng-model="name" id="question1" focus="{{focusThis}}"></p>
<p ng-bind="name"></p>
<input type="button" value="focus" ng-click="focus()">
</div>
Angular JS function:
function personController($scope)
{$scope.focus=function(){
$scope.focusThis="true";
};
};
How about some general solution ($ is jQuery):
mod.directive('nsFocusId', ['$timeout', function($timeout) {
return {
restrict: 'A',
link: function(scope, element, attrs, ctrl) {
element.click(function() {
$timeout(function () { $('#' + attrs.nsFocusId).focus(); }, 0);
});
}
};
}]);
Usage:
<label data-ns-focus-id="id-of-target-element">a</label>
This directive could be used on any element and it will focus element by id that you provide.
I've used $timeout just to make it more flexible for future upgrades (but feel free to wrap it with just scope.$apply function);
https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/directive/ngFocus
ng-focus executes an expression when the element is focused, so it doesn't actually set the element as focused but rather respond to it being focused.
How to set focus on input field?
Check this resource or google up 'how to set an element focused' and it should direct you in the right way.
I have modified your code, check it.
<div ng-app="TestApp" ng-controller="personController">
<p>Name: <input type="text" ng-model="name" id="question1" ></p>
<p ng-bind="name"></p>
<input type="button" value="focus" ng-click="focus()">
</div>
var app = angular.module('TestApp', []);
app.controller('personController', function ($scope, $http, $log) {
$scope.focus = function () {
$("#question1").focus();
console.log($("#question1"));
}
});
edit: I worked it out, I need to use [tray.id] instead of {{tray.id}}
I have an array of "trays" and I want to build a form to edit them, but I'm not sure how to set the ng-model for each tray so I can differentiate between them.
This does not work, angular doesn't like me putting {{tray.id}} into ng-model
<div ng-repeat="tray in formData.trayData">
<div class="form-group">
<label class="control-label" for="formData.trays.{{tray.id}}.name">Name:</label>
<div class="controls">
<input type="text" class="form-control" name="tray.{{tray.id}}.name" ng-model="formData.trays.{{tray.id}}.name" placeholder="Name">
</div>
</div>
<div class="form-group">
<label class="control-label" for="formData.trays.{{tray.id}}.seal">Seal:</label>
<div class="controls">
<input type="text" class="form-control" name="tray.{{tray.id}}.seal" ng-model="formData.trays.{{tray.id}}.sealed" placeholder="Seal">
</div>
</div>
</div>
In my controller I setup formData using a json object from an API
$scope.formData.trayData = $scope.surgeryDetails.trays;
$scope.formData.trays = [];
And here is what I get from {{formdata.trayData}}
[{"id":8,"name":"Tray 1","seal":"Foo","status_id":9},{"id":9,"name":"Tray 2","seal":"Bar","status_id":9}]
I'm glad you figured the ngModel part out on your own.
However, I also just wanted to mention that you may not be getting what you are expecting when/if you go to handle validation using the name attribute.
There is currently a bug in Angular that prevents dynamic element validation. The workaround is provided in the comments by Thinkscape, or here is a plunker with the correct code. Here is the main part:
angular.module('myModule', [])
.config(function($provide) {
$provide.decorator('ngModelDirective', function($delegate) {
var ngModel = $delegate[0],
controller = ngModel.controller;
ngModel.controller = ['$scope', '$element', '$attrs', '$injector',
function(scope, element, attrs, $injector) {
var $interpolate = $injector.get('$interpolate');
attrs.$set('name', $interpolate(attrs.name || '')(scope));
$injector.invoke(controller, this, {
'$scope': scope,
'$element': element,
'$attrs': attrs
});
}
];
return $delegate;
});
$provide.decorator('formDirective', function($delegate) {
var form = $delegate[0],
controller = form.controller;
form.controller = ['$scope', '$element', '$attrs', '$injector',
function(scope, element, attrs, $injector) {
var $interpolate = $injector.get('$interpolate');
attrs.$set('name', $interpolate(attrs.name || attrs.ngForm || '')(scope));
$injector.invoke(controller, this, {
'$scope': scope,
'$element': element,
'$attrs': attrs
});
}
];
return $delegate;
});
})
how to create a directive for disable all elements into div element ?
something like this :
<div div-disabled div-disabled-condition="state=='Stack'||state=='Over'||state=='Flow'">
<input type="text"/>
<input type="url"/>
<div>
<input type="text"/>
<input type="url"/>
</div>
<div>
Is it possible? I have no idea .
angular
.module('uiRouterApp.ctrl.add', ['uiRouterApp.ctrl.customDirective'])
.controller('addCtrl', [
'$scope',
'$location',
'$stateParams',
'$state',
function ($scope, $location, $stateParams, $state) {
$scope.state = {};
}
]).directive('divDisabled', function () {
return {
scope: {
divDisabledCondition: '#'
},
link: function (scope, element, attrs) {
}
};
});
Update :
please see this :
<div class="col-sm-12 ng-isolate-scope" selected-object="SelectedAutoComplete" local-data="requirements.Item1" search-fields="NameFa,NameEn" title-field="NameFa" minlength="2" field-required="true" image-field="ImageUrl" disable-auto-compelete="response.State=='Success'||response.State=='Error'||response.State=='Warning'">
<div class="angucomplete-holder">
<input id="_value" ng-model="searchStr" type="text" placeholder="select" class="form-control ng-dirty" ng-focus="resetHideResults()" ng-blur="hideResults()" autocapitalize="off" autocorrect="off" autocomplete="off" ng-change="inputChangeHandler(searchStr)" ng-disabled="response.State=='Success'||response.State=='Error'||response.State=='Warning'" style="">
<!-- ngIf: showDropdown -->
</div>
</div>
directive :
.directive('contentsDisabled', function() {
return {
compile: function(tElem, tAttrs) {
var inputs = tElem.find('input');
for (var i = 0; i < inputs.length; i++) {
inputs.attr('ng-disabled', tAttrs['disableAutoCompelete']);
}
}
}
})
why When the state is 'Success' or 'Error' or 'Warning' Input not disabled ?
You can create a directive that alters its content during compile time by adding the condition. Something along these lines (untested):
module.directive('contentsDisabled', function() {
return {
compile: function(tElem, tAttrs) {
var inputs = tElem.find('input');
inputs.attr('ng-disabled', tAttrs['contentsDisabled']);
}
};
});
See a JSFiddle here: http://jsfiddle.net/HB7LU/6380/
This has the drawback that you just copy the expression from contents-disabled into ng-disabled attributes of any inputs - if somebody uses a directive that in turn creates <input> elements, you won't pick them up.
It'd be less fragile to get hold of the FormController instance and iterate through all its controls, but sadly AngularJS doesn't expose the controls in a form. Maybe file a feature request?
You also can use a tag fieldset :
<form>
<fieldset ng-disable="foo">
<input name="the_one"/>
<input name="the_second"/>
</fieldset>
<input name="the_thrid"/>
</form>
With this way, when the variable foo is TRUE, inputs "the_one" and "the_second" will be disabled.
Why don't you use ng-disabled on your required expression on each input?
https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/directive/ngDisabled
If you truly do want a grouping directive, use the compile function of the directive to insert the ng-disabled attribute on each child. Or use a paren't child directive to signify which children to apply the ng-disabled to.
There is a new option to control enable/disable input field for angucomplete-alt.
http://ghiden.github.io/angucomplete-alt/#example13
LIVE DEMO
I use Angular 1.2.18 (have to support IE8), and I'm trying to create something similar to ngMessages that exists in Angular 1.3:
HTML:
<form name="form" novalidate>
<div>
<label for="phone">Phone:</label>
<input id="phone" name="phone" ng-model="phone" type="text"
required ng-minlength="5">
<div form-errors-for="form.phone">
<div form-error="required">Required</div>
<div form-error="minlength">Too short</div>
</div>
</div>
</form>
JS:
angular.module("Validation", [])
.directive("formErrorsFor", function() {
return {
scope: {
model: '=formErrorsFor'
},
controller: function($scope) {
this.model = $scope.model;
}
};
})
.directive("formError", function() {
return {
require: '^formErrorsFor',
link: function(scope, element, attrs, ctrl) {
console.log(ctrl.model.$error); // Always {}. Why??
}
};
});
Unfortunately, accessing form.phone.$error from the formError directive, always results in an empty object. Why it doesn't have the required and the minlength properties?
PLAYGROUND HERE
I tried you jsbin. The issue here is you are trying to access errors too early.
Also the scope on the two directives are different.
I changed you jsbin and it seems to work. I added a watch
scope.$watch(function(){
return ctrl.model.$error;
},function(n,o){
console.log(n);
});
for error changes as it s not defined on scope. See this http://jsbin.com/duxewigi/3/edit