I'm trying to compile a program to run on a Linux powered board, which has an ARM926EJ-S processor. So I've installed Debian embedded cross-development toolchain, and tried compiling an Hello World with in gcc with -march=armv5te . When I tried running the binary on the board it crashed with file not found errors (due to library versions), after that I've tried compiling with -static flag and I got a seg fault (0x0000827c in __libc_start_main (), said mr gdb trough gdbserver).
Any idea on what to do here to get something running?
Apparently the solution is to try as many toolchains as you can find. Eventually you'll find the one that works, after spending a few too many hours compiling toolchains. uClibc buildroot in this case.
You can find toolchains which support ARM926EJ-S on Linaro Page. Use the most recent arm-linux-gnueabi from Linaro project. I am currently using a version with gcc 4.9.4 which you can find here
It is recommended to use -mcpu=arm926ej-s instead of -march and -mtune. See gcc documentation because it combines -march and -mtune for your specified processor. It was deprecated for x86, but not for arm.
Other possibility could be building your own toolchain via crosstools-ng. But the Linaro toolchains are working out of the box if you don't need some specific setting (for example only using static libraries).
Related
When using clang v8.0.0 on Windows (from llvm prebuilt binaries) with -g or -gline-tables-only source map tables are not being picked up by gdb or lldb debuggers.
Upon including -g flag file grows in size (which is to be expected) yet neither gdb nor lldb pickes the source up
When compiled with gcc though (with -g flag) source files are detected by debugger.
I have tried running the same command (clang -g <codefile>) on macOS High Sierra (clang -v says it is Apple LLVM version 10.0.0 (clang-1000/10.44.4)) where there source files are being picked up by lldb. So I guessed it is localized to my windows instance or llvm for windows build.
P.S. output of clang -v on windows:
clang version 8.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_800/final)
Target: x86_64-pc-windows-msvc
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: C:\Program Files\LLVM\bin
On Windows, Clang is not self-sufficient (at least not the official binaries). You need to have either GCC or MSVC installed for it to function.
As Target: x86_64-pc-windows-msvc indicates, by default your Clang is operating in some kind of MSVC-compatible mode. From what I gathered, it means using the standard library and other libraries provided by your MSVC installation, and presumably generating debug info in some MSVC-specific format.
Add --target=x86_64-w64-windows-gnu to build in GCC-compatible mode. (If you're building for 32 bits rather than 64, replace x86_64 with i686). This will make Clang use headers & libraries provided by your GCC installation, and debug info should be generated in a GCC-compatible way. I'm able to debug resulting binaries with MSYS2's GDB (and that's also where my GCC installation comes from).
If you only have GCC installed and not MSVC, you still must use this flag.
How do I know this is the right --target? This is what MSYS2's Clang uses, and I assume they know what they're doing. If you don't want to type this flag every time, you can replace the official Clang with MSYS2's one, but I'm not sure if it's the best idea.
(I think they used to provide some patches to increase compatibility with MinGW, but now the official binaries work equally well, except for the need to specify the target. Also, last time I checked their binary distribution was several GB larger, due to their inability to get dynamic linking to work. Also some of the versions they provided were prone to crashing. All those problems come from them building their Clang with MinGW, which Clang doesn't seem to support very well out of the box. In their defence, they're actively maintaining their distribution, and I think they even ship libc++ for Windows, which the official distribution doesn't do.)
I would like to experiment with intel's Cilk extension for C/C++ parallel programming but I am having a hard time figuring out how to install it on Windows. I tried consulting the official site but I couldn't find any Windows oriented guide. Switching to Linux is not convenient right now and I would prefer to leave it as a last resort.
I also tried to get a free trial version of Parallel Studio, but apparently it does not support CILK anymore.
If someone could guide me step-by-step, I would be very grateful.
I use Code Blocks, which includes the gnu gcc compiler.
(To start with, excuse me, I've never used Cilk personally).
First of all, it's deprecated:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cilk#Obsolescence
https://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-cilk-plus/topic/745556
If you want to try it with GCC, you need to get GCC (perhaps, versions from 4.9 to 8.0; support deprecated in 7.1 and removed in 8.1) compiled with Cilk support.
And then it should work in a very simple way, e.g.:
$ gcc -fcilkplus -lcilkrts <OTHER_FLAGS> mycode1.c
$ g++ -fcilkplus -lcilkrts <OTHER_FLAGS> mycode2.cpp
(I've tried to add these flags when compiling a non-Cilk C source on my Debian 9 GNU/Linux (amd64) system, and it seems to work; libcilkrts5 package seems to get installed there along with GCC 6.3.0, by default).
Here is a list of popular binary GCC builds:
https://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html
Unfortunately, most GCC binaries for MS Windows I can find come without Cilk enabled;
e.g., I didn't find it in the following packages:
http://codeblocks.org/downloads/binaries
https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Toolchains%20targetting%20Win32/Personal%20Builds/mingw-builds/
At least, it can be found in Cygwin (it has gcc-cilkplus & libcilkrts5 in its package list):
https://cygwin.com/packages/package_list.html
Alternatively, you can probably try Intel C++ Compiler (no experience with that, sorry).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cilk#Intel_Cilk_Plus
https://www.cilkplus.org/build-gcc-cilkplus
Cilk is alive and kicking at MIT as OpenCilk
You can either build it or even download a binary, but only linux, Mac or source is offered
I have been using gcc version 5.3.0. It says that it comes with openmp support. But every time when I compile a program using either gcc [by terminal] or via xCode 7, I get same error, "file omp.h not found". I have searched too much on this issue and tried almost everything I found.
First I tried to locate omp.h on my mac. I found some files; then in header file, I used that specific location of omp.h but no help [it gave me linker error].
I installed gcc version 6.0 (pre-release) but no help. I tried changing C_INCLUDE_PATH [which is now, and previously set to none] but that didn't helped me as well.
I reinstalled clang-omp but no help.
I am using llvm compiler version 7.0. Although i have installed clang-omp, there is no omp.h in my /usr/include/*
I changed the compiler and now I am able to run it. [It was issue of clang, which I couldn't solve].
I am a student and Intel is giving Intel Parallel Studio 1 year licence for free to students.
So I downloaded, and installed it.
In xCode, under build settings, I set my compiler to 'Intel C/C++ compiler' and in parallalization, I turned it to 'yes'. That was it. Then it compiled successfully. But, note that you won't be using header file 'omp.h' anymore.
By the way, I am still looking for answers, just to know what I was doing wrong.
You can install 'clang-omp' or 'gcc' (corresponds to GCC 5.3 right now) packages via Homebrew, both of which support OpenMP.
The built in GCC is based upon GCC 4.2.1 abs uses LLVM back end via Dragonegg, which is why it doesn't support OpenMP.
As noted already, Intel compilers support OpenMP on Mac.
I don't use Xcode editor so I don't know how to use any of these from there, but all will work from terminal just as they do on Linux.
the compiler on the mac is clang (based on llvm 3.5) which does not support openmp.
you can try install llvm/clang/openmp from source or using prebuild binaries, but I must admit it does not work as advertised for me…
edit unless you use the -fopenmp=libomp flag.
I have two binary files generated via 'objcopy -O binary' from respective ELF files. The ELF files are built with arm-none-linux-gnueabi toolchains; one is from linaro gcc 4.6.2 and other is from codesourcery gcc 4.6.3.
I load the binary files into memory via Uboot. While the one built with Linaro executes as expected the one built with codesourcery crashes (most probably as) there is no error on Uboot prompt but the program seems to hang.
Using 'arm-none-linux-gnueabi-readelf -S' from binutils of respective toolchains does not show much difference between files except for address offsets. Are there any tools/techniques that can help in this kind of situation before I attempt runtime debugging on target.
Thanks!
The difference turned out to be compiler option -munaligned-access. Code Sourcery toolchain enables this by default for ARMv6 and later architectures.
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/changes.html
Although this appeared in upstream gcc in 4.7 version, Code Sourcery had added this support earlier in their tool chain.
To figure this out I tracked the data abort exception and then compiled the culprit file with -save-temps options. Comparing intermediate .s file provided the hint.
What I can advice you is to compare default flags both compilers were built with:
/path/to/cross-compiler/bin/arm-*-*-gcc -Q -v
And preprocessor definitions:
/path/to/cross-compiler/bin/arm-*-*-gcc -dM -E - < /dev/null
The reason why your code compiled using Linaro GCC works is fact, that
it may have some options enabled by default, when CodeSourcery one
may have not.
Has someone infos how to build a llvm+clang toolchain using binutils and newlib and how to use it?
host: Linux, AMD64
target: cortex-m3, stm32
c-lib: newlib
assembler: gnu as
I created a firmware framework - PolyMCU https://github.com/labapart/polymcu - that is based on CMake that support GCC and LLVM. Because it is based on CMake you can build your firmware on Linux/Windows/MacOS.
It also uses Newlib - it looks all your requirements are there!
I also wrote a blog where I compared GCC and LLVM build size on ARM Cortex-M: http://labapart.com/blogs/3-the-importance-of-the-toolchain-version-in-embedded-space
Interesting results, Clang generated code is not much bigger than GCC on Cortex-M...
Unfortunately, right now clang does not support flexible cross-compilation settings. So, most probably you will need to invoke necessary tools with all necessary arguments.
Start with building llvm + clang using --target=thumbv7-eabi configure argument (note that you will need llvm + clang as of yesterday for this). You might want to specify --enable-targets=arm as well. This will instruct clang to generate code for thumb by default. After this you can invoke clang -mcpu=cortex-m3 to generate the code for you.
You will have to provide all necessary include / library paths by hands via -I / -L, etc.
If you're happy with some C++ hacking, you can write necessary "HostInfo", so it will invoke the right tools and provide right paths automagically.