How do I convince LibTools to generate a library identical to what gcc does automatically?
This works if I do things explicitly:
gcc -o libclique.dylib -shared disc.c phylip.c Slist.c clique.c
cp libclique.dylib [JavaTestDir]/libclique.dylib
But if I do:
Makefile libclique.la (which is what automake generates)
cp .libs/libclique.1.dylib [JavaTestDir]/libclique.dylib
Java finds the library but can't find the entry point.
I read the "How to create a shared library (.so) in an automake script?" thread and it helped a lot. I got the dylib created with a -shared flag (according to the generated Makefile). But when I try to use it from Java Native Access I get a "symbol not found" error.
Looking at the libclique.la that is generated by Makefile it doesn't seem to have any critical information in it, just looks to be link overloads and moving things around for the convenience of subsequent C/C++ compiler steps (which I don't have), so I would expect libclique.1.dylib to be a functioning dynamic library.
I'm guessing that is where I'm going wrong, but, given that JNA links directly to a dylib and is not compiled with it (per the example in the discussion cited above), it seems all the subsequent compilation steps described in the LibTools manual are moot.
Note: I'm testing on a Mac, but I'm going to have to do this on Windows and Linux machines also, which is why I'm trying to put this into Automake.
Note2: I'm using Eclipse for my Java development and, yes, I did import the dylib.
Thanks
You should be building a plugin and in particular pass
libclique_la_LDFLAGS = -avoid-version -module -shared -export-dynamic
This way you tell libtool you want a dynamically loadable module rather than a shared library (which for ELF are the same thing, but for Mach-O are not.)
Related
I inherited a code which has a makefile, but so far I was unable to run it on a linux server. The main complain of the compiler is that it is unable to load libgmp.so.3 : error while loading shared libraries: libgmp.so.3. I know that libgmp.so.10 exists on this server, but I was wondering which part of the makefile needs to be changed so the compiler looks for libgmp.so.10 rather than libgmp.so.3.
OPTFLAG = -O2 -Wall -fPIC -fexceptions -DNDEBUG
LDFLAGS = -O2 -Wl,-no_compact_unwind -DNDEBUG -lm -pthread
COMPILER = gcc ${OPTFLAG}
LINKER = gcc ${LDFLAGS}
# CPLEX directory
CPLEX_HOME = /opt/ibm/ILOG/CPLEX_Studio1263/cplex
CPLEX_INC = ${CPLEX_HOME}/include/
CPLEX_LIB = ${CPLEX_HOME}/lib/x86-64_linux/static_pic/ -lcplex
# Compile the main file
code: code.c
${COMPILER} -c code.c -o code.o -I${CPLEX_INC}
${LINKER} -o code code.o -L${CPLEX_LIB}
clean::
rm -f *.o
rm -f ${LIB}/*.o
rm -f *~
rm -f ${SRC}/*~ ${INCLUDE}/*~
You need to rebuild whatever program or library uses libgmp.so.3 from source code. Could you provide the exact command run by make and the error message it produces?
EDIT The problem here is that the system has installed a version of the IBM CPLEX software which comes with its own GCC binary, and that GCC binary uses libgmp.so.3. The easiest way to fix this would be to upgrade the CPLEX software to a version which supports the operating system being used, or use the software on the operating system for which it was written (i.e., something really old that actually ships libgmp.so.3).
The most easy way it to install libgmp-dev package, from your linux distribution. GMP is a package library to do multiple precision calculations on large integers, which is probably needed by your program. As you put in some comments, adding -L/usr/lib64/libgmp.so.10 is an error, as -L option allows to add a directory to search for libraries, and not a specific library.
If only the library is needed and no header file is missing in your compilation (this is something strange, but sometimes happen) then you can still link with only the libgmp.so.10 object, but you have to do in a something nasty way. Just add /usr/lib64/libgmp.so.10 as an object file (not a library, with -l option) to your link command.
EDIT
From looking more closely your Makefile I see no reference to the libgmp.so.3 library, so I only can assume this is a indirect reference from some other already compiled library that comes from outside with your package. Just use
ldd lib<nameOfLibrary>.so.x.x
with all the libraries needed by your final executable, so see which shared objetc is the one that requests libgmp.so.3 soname, and then recompile it, reinstall it, or use your system's libraries ONLY, and not mesh anymore with libraries coming from another system. For example you can try (this is an expensive command, but it will get the answer)
find / -name "lib*.so.*" -print | xargs ldd > all_libs.lddout
and then find all_libs.lddout to see which library uses libgmp.so.3 (this will be the outdated library) You'll need to deinstall it or upgrade it, to be able to continue.
Linux systems have a library version system that allows an executable to be able to load different versions of the same library and allow them to live together in the same system. One of two: or you are able to locate the sources of version 3 of the shared libgmp.so.3 library and install it on your system, or you'll need to update the libraries your program uses to be able to link with the libgmp.so.10 already installed on your system.
2ND EDIT
As I see in the comments, you have changed the default compiler on your system by another coming possibly from other linux distribution (as your installed library is libgmp.so.10 while the one cc1 requests is libgmp.so.3, which is not installed on your system.
Installing a different compiler from the one you have installed, and doing that without previously deinstalling the other compiler, can lead you to this kind of problems.
The most reliable thing you can do is to reinstall the compiler from your distribution, or better, reinstall the whole linux system, as you have probably broken many things that will be emerging as you use your system. There's very poor info on what you have done to go further in your problem. Anyway, my recommendation is to not use the comment parts to add new information about your problem, just edit your question and add all those new information to it.
I want to my make own library and have it use the same syntax as the standard C libraries as in
#include<mylib.h>
So that it looks like #include and some of the libraries that are included with C.
Can I make the library static as opposed to linking so that I can compile it in GCC without additional arguments, as if I were using another library like stdio.h or string.h?
This seems simple enough.
Develop the library (create as many source files as you need).
Build the source files into a shared library (.so) using a tool like CMAKE (which i strongly recommend).
Copy that library to your library path (i.e. /usr/lib)
Later on, all you have to do is import your lib: (i) in the source using #include<mylib.h>; (ii) when building (also using CMAKE) or using the flag (-lmylib) in the GCC compiler: gcc -lmylib myfiles.c -o myoutput.
In addition to #include "mylib.h", you need to add -lmylib command line to the compiler (more specifically linker) when using the library. I assume that the your library archive created through ar command is named as libmylib.a.
Usually, we do not write 'manually' build instructions, but we rely on tool that generates build chains. There are quite a lot of them, the most know are probably autotools and cmake (under Linux).
I would suggest you to have a look to cmake examples and/or documentation to get your code built.
There are quite a lot of differences between static and dynamic libs, and you will also need to package somehow your lib if you really want to use it like 'standard' lib (like libxml2, openssl, etc.)
A lot to say about it, but you should first have a look to 'how to build' your lib, and then see how to make it easy to use, IMHO.
TL;DR - I need to compile archive.a with test.o to make an executable.
Background - I am trying to call a function in a separate library from a software package I am modifying but the function (a string parser) is creating a segmentation violation. The failure is definitely happening in the library and the developer has asked for a test case where the error occurs. Rather than having him try to compile the rather large software package that I'm working on I'd rather just send him a simple program that calls the appropriate function (hopefully dying at the same place). His library makes use of several system libraries as well (lapack, cblas, etc.) so the linking needs to hit everything I think.
I can link to the .o files that are created when I make his library but of course they don't link to the appropriate system libraries.
This seems like it should be straight forward, but it's got me all flummoxed.
The .a extension indicates that it is a static library. So in order to link against it you can use the switches for the linking stage:
gcc -o myprog -L<path to your library> main.o ... -larchive
Generally you use -L to add the path where libraries are stored (unless it is in the current directory) and you use -l<libname> to sepecify a library. The libraryname is without extension. If the library is named libarchive.a you would still give -larchive.
If you want to specify the full name of the library, then you would use i.e. -l:libname.a
update
If the libraypath is /usr/lib/libmylibrary.a you would use
-L/usr/lib -lmylibrary
I am attempting to follow the besic guide given here on embedding lua into C. I copied the code verbatim into my own embed.c file and executed the exact compiler command listed:
cc -o embed embed.c \
-I/usr/local/include \
-L/usr/local/lib \
-llua -llualib
I get the error:
embed.c:19:14: error: invalid storage class for function ‘openlualibs’
After which I moved the functions outside of main, compiled again, and got:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -llualib
I am at a loss for why I cannot compile this. lua is installed properly. has anyone else encountered these problems? If this is a bad tutorial, please feel free to simply direct me to a batter one.
On some Linux distributions you may need to install the lua-devel (or similar named) package, in order to get the proper header files and library symlinks required for compiling and linking projects against the package. If you do have a liblualib-<version>.so.<version>, for example liblualib-5.so.5.0, you may need to install the devel package.
Starting with lua 5.1, liblualib does not exist. Here is the release announcement: http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2005-05/msg00186.html
I've had somewhat similar problems when embedding Lua. What I found that works for me is linking the dynamic link library (dl) and the math library (m). The math library may not be necessary if you're not using the lmath standard library.
cc -o embed embed.c -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib -llua -lm -ldl
This, of course, assumes that /usr/local/ is where the Lua files are installed, which is probably true.
As for the tutorial you linked to, I think it may be very out of date. Besides liblualib no longer existing, there are individual functions to open each standard library. These are the luaopen_* functions. Here's the relevant 5.1 reference manual entry. (I assume you're using 5.1, since that seems to be the version available in the packages) As for a better tutorial, I suggest the Programming in Lua book. Unfortunately, it was written for Lua 5.0. It is still mostly relevant, but I suggest you look over the relevant sections of the 5.1 reference manual, too.
I've known that I should use -l option for liking objects using GCC.
that is gcc -o test test.c -L./ -lmy
But I found that "gcc -o test2 test.c libmy.so" is working, too.
When I use readelf for those two executable I can't find any difference.
Then why people use -l option for linking objects? Does it have any advantage?
Because you may have either a static or a shared version of the library in your library directory, e. g. libmy.a and libmy.so, or both of them. This is more relevant to system libraries: if you link to libraries in your local build tree, you know which version you build, static or shared, but you may not know other systems' configuration and libraries mix.
In addition to that, some platforms may have different suffixes. So it's better to specify it in a canonical way.
The main reason is, -lname will search for libname.a (or libname.so, etc.) on the library search list. You can add directories to the library search list with the -L option. It's a convenience built into the compiler driver program, making it easier to find libraries that have been installed in standard places on the system.