What is (if there is) the analogue of SQL Server Management Studio for Oracle databases?
Question seems easy but Google didn't know a thing.
I've never worked with Oracle database, now I will have my first encounter soon so I'd like to be a little prepared.
It depends. There are a number of applications that could be used depending on what specifically you are trying to do.
If you are trying to administer the database, you would probably want to use Enterprise Manager. This is a web-based application that lets you monitor and administer the database. It can either be configured to run just on a particular database server (Enterprise Manager Database Control) or it can be configured to allow you to access all the databases and a variety of non-database products running in the organization (Enterprise Manager Grid Control). Grid Control is, obviously, a much more involved install. The Database Control should be installed when you install the database (though some DBAs will turn it off because they don't want to run a HTTP server on their database server).
If you are trying to write and debug PL/SQL code (packages, procedures, functions, triggers, etc.) or to just run some ad-hoc SQL statements, Oracle provides a free tool SQL Developer that can be used. There are a variety of other PL/SQL IDEs out there as well-- Toad from Quest and PL/SQL Developer from AllAroundAutomations are two of the more common ones.
Oracle also has a basic command-line SQL tool SQL*Plus that will exist pretty much wherever you are (in much the same way that vi will be available on just about any Unix machine you log in to). There are lots of DBAs (and a decent number of developers) that prefer to use SQL*Plus rather than using the various GUIs. At a minimum, in most large organizations, DBAs will use SQL*Plus to execute scripts built by the developers as part of the code promotion process so you'll want to have a basic familiarity with SQL*Plus.
You can use Oracle SQL Developer which is free from oracle.
Toad is also available.
Related
Does it matter which Database you decide to use in your VB.net program? If someone could give me a Pros and Cons of maybe performance/ simplicity/ potential that would be great. I know Access fairly well, but if SQL is better I would like to switch over.
Yes it matters. If you are talking about a real system you should use SQL Server without even considering access as an alternative.
MS access is a light database management system oriented to amateurs. It lacks many of the administration tools needed on a real system. Of course, it is a lot easier to setup and learn.
SQL Server is a relational database management system providing professional tools. SQL Server Management Studio is the default graphical tool on which you can administer your SQL Server instance.
Regarding performance SQL Server is definetely better. Regarding simplicity Access is a lot easier to learn. Regarding potential I suppose the SQL server certainly is better.
Perhaps this post could clarify things for you...
Hope I helped!
It depends upon your program bro.
let me start with MS ACCESS, MS Access is actually a combination of a rapid development UI tool and file system based relational database (JET). Access is intended for end users. it does not cater multiple users. however, it is easy to deploy and much cheaper especially for small installations.
on the other hand, MS SQL SERVER is a Client-server relational database system, with no UI development tools built in. It is also designed to support more users a lot easier to maintain because of its tools provided. Compared to MS ACCESS, it is more complex and has No built-in UI development tools - You will need another dev platform to build a front-end and (arguably) reporting. In my case, i usually implement Crystal reports as my reporting tool....
In conclusion. It is really your choice on what database you are going to use....if its just a simple application, better use MS ACCESS... but if you are creating an application that caters client server interaction, better use MS SQL SERVER...
I have a two-part application, where there is a central database that is edited, and then at certain times, the data is released and distributed as its own application. I would like to use a standalone database for the central database (MySQL, Postgres, Oracle, SQL Server, etc.) and then have a reliable export to an embedded database (probably SQLite) for distribution.
What tools/processes are available for such an export, or is it a practice to be avoided?
EDIT: A couple of additional pieces of information. The distributed application should be able to run without having to connect to another server (ex: your spellchecker still works even you don't have internet), and I don't want to install a full DB server for read-only access to the data.
If you really only want your clients to have read-access to the offline data it should not be that difficult to update your client-data manually.
A good practice would be to use the same product for the server database and the client database. You wouldn't have to write SQL-Statements twice since they use the same SOL-Dialect and same features.
Firebird for example offers a server
and an embedded version.
Also Microsoft offers their MS SQL Server
as a mobile version (compact edition) and there are
also Synchronization services
provided by Microsoft (good blog
describing sync services in visual
studio:
http://keithelder.net/blog/archive/2007/09/23/Sync-Services-for-SQL-Server-Compact-Edition-3.5-in-Visual.aspx)
MySQL has a product which is called "MySQLMobile" but I never actually used it.
I can also recommend SQLite as an embedded database since it is very easy to use.
Depending on your bandwidth and data amount you could even download the whole database and delete the old one. (in Firebird for example only copy the database files and it will also work with the mobile version) Very easy - BUT you have to know if it will work for your scenario. If you have more data you will need something more flexible and sophisticated, only updating the data that really changed.
I Want Implement a Software by C#.net.I want Use a DataBase Manager Software like Access or SqlLite or etc.My Program Saved Many Data in Local Machine.
I Do Not Want Publish or Move Data to Other Pcs
What DataBase Manager Software Must be Choose?
Not Different DataBase is Free or have a price.
what is the Best DataBase Manager Software to Save many Data in Local Machine?
For sure you are looking for a free database so for that you can use many databases like mysql ,postgresql , and sql server msde or access
but we still have other scenario, if you are going to distribute this application to other pcs so you have to think about deployment and in this case you can eliminate the mysql , postgresql because they depend on servers but msde (it's also server ) is much easier and you can found alot of tutorials how to deploy it with your project
It depends on how much you are expert in database and for what reason you are using it? are you going to need complex queries or it just a storage place for the data ?
if it's complex query i will go for msde for sql server if it's only for saving information may be i will go for access or even xml
Well if you are developing in C# consider using the MSSql Compact Edition. This allows you to create a local database and use it much like SqlLight. However, the support is much better, especially when you using Visual Studio. There you can find it as LocalDatabase under Data when you adding a new item. (Not 100% sure whether it is present on all versions of VS though).
Firefox has an SQLite Manager add-on.
I think the best choice depends on your needs, for example if you must synchronize data with sql server for me the best choise was sql express.
I would vote for SQL Express. You get essentially a scaled down SQL Server that is capable of working with quite a bit of data. SQL Express plays well with Visual Studio and you will be able to take advantage of the System.Data.SqlClient and related namespaces which come with the .NET framework out of the box. They are also better than the Odbc namespaces. Finally, there is a LOT of online support for SQL Express and, as far as I know, SQL Express's flavor of SQL (T-SQL) is the same as that of SQL Server. So should you one day need the flexibility of running with either or (local database, or server database) you will have it. Also, SQL Express is fairly commonly used in the microsoft world so you should be able to find lots of examples, if need by.
TurboDB for .NET from dataweb is a good solution, if you want a powerful engine with stored procedures and professional support from the manufacturer:
http://www.dataweb.de/en/products/dotnet_database.html
Hello,
I'm new here, so sorry, if my question is too basic. However, maybe you have some advice, example, links, which could help me... I'm trying to find something helpfull for few days, but no results as for now.
I'm working in a distributed environment. I have a Oracle server hundreds of miles away and a MS SQL server close to me. I'm writing a application using Visual Web Developer 2008 Express. I need some data from Oracle. It's not worth to query the Oracle server every time i need some data from it. I'd prefer to run some Oracle queries once each night and store results in some local (SQL Server) tables. I assume, I should run queries through standard windows scheduler (Windows Server 2008). I have the basic connectivity - I can open Oracle Database from local Visual Studio.
The questions are:
How to write a query/procedure/function that would get data from Oracle and put them into a SQL Server table (possibly recreated before each query run)?
How can I run such a query from command line (or in other way run from scheduler)
What naming conventions are applicable? In VS I use something like //IP.IP.IP.IP/Name and a user with password.
Thanks for any help or advice.
Regards,
Matteo
I suggest you speak to the DBA's of the Oracle and SQL Server databases, as there may be other considerations you need to bear in mind. (Data Integrity, Security, ownership etc.)
One route you could follow would be to implement DTS (For older databases) or SSIS (for new versions of SQL Server) processes to copy the data across on the schedule you want. (This is pretty much what they were built for.)
How much data are we talking about?
If there is a small quantity that you need to transfer every day, you can write a stupid fetch and insert script in language of your choice.
You only need to search for better solutions if "sync" would take too much resources.
Thanks...
I'm the DBA for the SQL Server, which will serve only for my application. For Oracle I just want to read data and I have enough privileges and agreement with DBA's. Security, ownership and integrity are not an issue for now. I just need some technical advise how to get data from Oracle to MSSQL tables on a schedule.
I use MS SQL Server 2008 Express SP1. I'm very close to solve my problem - I have established connections and everything installed and working. I just don't know, how to run a query, which would get data from Oracle and put into MSSQL, on regular basis, without manual interaction.
I've some experience in programming, but not much in databases (except creating complex SQl queries). Therefore some example or links to detailed description would be helpful. I'm not sure about naming conventions, differences between procedures, functions and queries, command line options to run db automation procedures and so on. I'm also not sure, about which mechanisms or technologies are available in MS SQL Server 2008 Express edition.
I frequently develop small internet applications using ASP.NET and SQL Server 2005. My databases are always only accessed by one application through an ASP.NET web service or something similar.
When I'm developing an application and moving a database back and forth between my development computer (SQLExpress 2008) and hosted server (SQL Server 2005) invariably I end up getting a hodgepodge of owners/roles/schemas/logins etc that seem to crop up and take control of various pieces of the database.
I only know enough about SQL Server to be dangerous, and I just want to get databases designed, but I invariably have to change the db and end up getting various permissions errors (for example when trying to open a diagram after transferring a db).
Is there a way to simply tell SQL Server Management Studio "Hey, I'm the only guy who's going to use this stupid db, so just let me do it?"
Like some command that sets all of these pieces to 'dbo' or something like that?
I am assuming you are using Windows. Make sure you are connecting to SQL with Windows authentication and give your account Sysadmin permissions. Now everything you create (Create Table tablename, Create View viewname) will automatically have dbo as the owner.
Unfortunatly there is a couple of easy answers to your question, but you are probably not going to like them because they will require you to invest in SQL Server skills.
The first tool you should look at is Visual Studio 2008 Database Developer Edition. This version has management tools you are looking for to manage schemas, users, ... I thinks this is now included with Visual Studio 2008 Development Edition
The second approach is to embrace SQL Server administration and get comfertable with writting DDL scripts. The goal is to get to the point where you can deploy changes to SQL Server in a predicatble manner from your development enviornment to test and ultimatly to production.
The crux of the problem is that you move back and forth the database itself. Databases are surprisingly tightly coupled to their host SQL instance, by the login to user mapping and by other settings as well, like encryption keys, usage of msdb procedures and maintenance plans among other. You could minimize some of the impact by carefully using exlclusively SQL Authentication, but that won't eliminate the problem completely. The real solution is that you should have a deployment script and apply changes to your production database(s) via executing T-SQL script(s) that you have previously tested on your development db, not by moving a db 'back and forth'.
I create all objects specifically specifying I want them created as dbo.
so to create a proc I do
Create Procedure dbo.myprocname