I am in the learning stages of Salesforce Apex. I have read the topic of Dynamic Apex and was not able to understand the concept. Can someone explain it how to deal with it and in which scenarios it is best to use?
Thanks in advance.
Use case 1:
You are developing a page that reads the salesforce object meta data to display the object records to the user. You want to use the describe global methods but you dont know how to combine standard SOQL with the generic SObject type.
Standard SOQL eg
Person__c [] persons = [SELECT Id, Name, Age__c, Height__c FROM Person__c];
But the describe global metadata methods returns a SObject types.
Solution:
Use the describe global methods to get a list of objects, then further get all the fields on that object. Build a SELECT statement in a local string variable with all the fields then execute the query with Database.query().
string objectfullname = 'scenario__c';
Schema.SObjectType targetType = Schema.getGlobalDescribe().get('scenario__c');
if (targetType == null) {
system.debug('Type not found: '+objectFullname);
throw new TypeNotFoundException(objectFullName);
}
Schema.DescribeSObjectResult typedescription = targetType.getDescribe();
Map<String, schema.Sobjectfield> resultMap = typedescription.Fields.getMap();
string query = 'SELECT ' + string.join(new List<string>(resultMap.keySet()), ',') + ' FROM '+ objectfullname + ' LIMIT 100';
sobject [] records = Database.query(query);
Use Case 2
You want to loosely couple your code with custom objects in a beta managed packaged so that the managed packaged can be uninstalled and upgraded.
Solution
When you use the Database.query() method, your code is not compiled against the custom object so it can be re-installed without any need for commenting out code to remove the dependency.
Use Case 3
You have a trigger that copies records to another custom object after insert according to an dynamic field mapping schema. You can't code it in the standard way [SELECT ...] because you only know what object you are inserting to at run time.
Solution
Again, use describe global methods & Database.query to get the records and type information then you can insert into the target object like normal DML.
sobject newRecord = ...
for (integer i = 0; i < fieldCount; i++) {
newRecord.put(fields[i],values[i]);
}
insert newRecord;
If you are doing bulk inserts, like always, make sure that you dont put DML (insert, update) statements in a loop.
Related
I have some images stored in the default cluster in my OrientDB database. I stored them by implementing the code given by the documentation in the case of the use of multiple ORecordByte (for large content): http://orientdb.com/docs/2.1/Binary-Data.html
So, I have two types of object in my default cluster. Binary datas and ODocument whose field 'data' lists to the different record of binary datas.
Some of the ODocument records' RID are used in some other classes. But, the other records are orphanized and I would like to be able to retrieve them.
My idea was to use
select from cluster:default where #rid not in (select myField from MyClass)
But the problem is that I retrieve the other binary datas and I just want the record with the field 'data'.
In addition, I prefer to have a prettier request because I don't think the "not in" clause is really something that should be encouraged. Is there something like a JOIN which return records that are not joined to anything?
Can you help me please?
To resolve my problem, I did like that. However, I don't know if it is the right way (the more optimized one) to do it:
I used the following SQL request:
SELECT rid FROM (FIND REFERENCES (SELECT FROM CLUSTER:default)) WHERE referredBy = []
In Java, I execute it with the use of the couple OCommandSQL/OCommandRequest and I retrieve an OrientDynaElementIterable. I just iterate on this last one to retrieve an OrientVertex, contained in another OrientVertex, from where I retrieve the RID of the orpan.
Now, here is some code if it can help someone, assuming that you have an OrientGraphNoTx or an OrientGraph for the 'graph' variable :)
String cmd = "SELECT rid FROM (FIND REFERENCES (SELECT FROM CLUSTER:default)) WHERE referredBy = []";
List<String> orphanedRid = new ArrayList<String>();
OCommandRequest request = graph.command(new OCommandSQL(cmd));
OrientDynaElementIterable objects = request.execute();
Iterator<Object> iterator = objects.iterator();
while (iterator.hasNext()) {
OrientVertex obj = (OrientVertex) iterator.next();
OrientVertex orphan = obj.getProperty("rid");
orphanedRid.add(orphan.getIdentity().toString());
}
To all salesforce experts i need some assistance. I have my contacts and a custom object named programs. I created a junction object using to master detail relationships with contacts and programs. I want to avoid relating the same contact to the same program. I tried triggers but I couldn't create the testing part to use it outside sandbox.
I went back to the basics and created a Unique text field. I tried to use default value but EVERYTHING i write in that crap is wrong -_-. I tried Contact__r.Email & "-" & Program__r.Name but to no avail.
I tried workflow rules with a field update but my field update NEVER runs.(Yes I did activate the workflow rule) and I didn't know what to write in my rule's code.
The workflow firing condition could be simply a formula that says true. Alternatively use "every time record is inserted". It also depends whether your master-details are set once and that's it or they will be "reparentable" (option introduced in Summer '12 I think). Maybe post a screenshot / text description of your firing condition? Also - is your unique field set to "case sensitive"?
As for the formula to populate the unique field - something like Contact__c + ' ' + Program__c (or whatever the API names of your fields are) should be OK. Don't use Contact__r.Email etc as these don't have to be unique...
You'll have to somehow fill in the uniqueness criteria for all existing records (maybe that's why you claimed it doesn't work?). If you can use Apex for data fixes - something like this should get you started.
List<Junction__c> junctions = [SELECT Contact__c, Program__c
FROM Junction__c
WHERE Unique_Text_Field__c = null
LIMIT 10000];
for(Junction__c j : junctions){
String key = String.valueOf(j.Contact__c).left(15) + ' ' + String.valueOf(j.Program__c).left(15);
j.Unique_Text_Field__c = key;
}
update junctions;
Keep rerunning it until it starts to show 0 rows processed. The Ids are cut down to 15 chars because in Apex you'd usually see full 18-char Id but workflows use 15-char versions.
We have an app that is made up of almost entirely custom objects. Creating a smooth workflow for our users is vital for this app. I'm new to apex, but familiar with basic code writing.
Here are the relationships between the objects: (--< = 1 to many, M/D = Master/Detail)
Object_a --< Object_b --M/D--< Object_c;
Object_a --M/D--< Object_d
When a user populates a date field on Object_c and saves, we'd like a date field on all related records on Object_d (i.e. all Object_d's records for that specific Object_a record) to be updated with the same value.
Any help is appreciated.
You'll need to write a trigger on insert / update of Object_c as workflow rules can't fire on update of multiple objects and rollup summary fields won't help (master-details aren't set everywhere).
Before you deep dive into coding please consider what should happen if you have more than 1 Object__c modified at the same time (with Data Loader for example, through integration with some external system or other piece of code). If you have 2 records that both are related to same Object_A and one has "today" while other has "today + 7", which value should "win"?
One way of solving it would be to start with a map of Object_A Ids and date values to set. The way I'll be building the map means I'll keep overwriting the values on case of duplicate id which is not what you might need (select later of the dates maybe?).
Map<Id, Date> datesToSet = new Map<Id, Date>(); // you could make it Map<Id, Object_C__c> too, principle would be similar
for(Object_C__c c : [SELECT Id, Date_Field__c, Object_B__r.Object_A__c FROM Object_C__c WHERE Id IN :trigger.new AND Object_B__r.Object_A__c != null]){
datesToSet.put(c.dObject_B__r.Object_A__c, c.Date_Field__c);
}
System.debug(datesToSet);
Now we have map of unique A ids and values we should apply to all their child D records.
List<Object_D__c> childsToUpdate = [SELECT Id, Some_Other_Date_Field__c, Object_A__c FROM Object_D__c WHERE Object_A__c IN :datesToSet.keyset()];
System.debug('BEFORE: ' + childsToUpdate);
for(Object_D__c d : childsToUpdate){
d.Some_Other_Date_Field__c = datesToSet.get(d.Object_A__c);
}
System.debug('AFTER: ' + childsToUpdate);
update childsToUpdate;
This is an APEX code related question and is specific to a VisualForce controller class.
Question
I am trying to update a record with a known AccountId. However, when I set the ID in the sObject declaration SalesForce is appending the string "IAR" to the end of the ID!
Can someone please let me know what I am doing that is wrong and if I am going about this in the wrong way than what is the correct way to update a record from a custom method, outside of quicksave() or update().
Description
So basically, the user will come to this page with the id encoded and it will either have an id or a level. This is handled by the function decode() which takes a string; "id" / "level". I then create an Account variable "acc" which will be used to store all of the Account information before we insert or update it with the statement "insert acc;". Since, I cannot set the ID for "acc" with "acc.id = salesForceID" I have decided to set it when "acc" is created. The following APEX code occurs in the constructor when it is declaring the "acc" variable.
URL Variable Passed
/application?id=001Q000000OognA
APEX Controller Class (Abridged)
salesForceID = decode('id');
debug1 = 'salesForceID: ' + salesForceID;
acc = new Account(id = salesForceID);
debug2 = 'Account ID: ' + acc.id;
Debug Output
salesForceID: 001Q000000OognA
Account ID: 001Q000000OognAIAR
Comments
I apologise for the brevity of the code given, this is for security reasons. I am basically trying to set the ID of the acc before I insert/upsert/update it. I appreciate any explanations for why it could be appending "IAR" and or any alternate ways to update a record given an input AccountId. I do understand that if you pass the id in as a URL variable that SalesForce will automatically do this for you. However, I am passing more than one variable to the page as there are three separate use cases.
Thanks for your help.
001Q000000OognA is the "standard" 15-character Salesforce ID. 15-character ID's are case-sensitive.
001Q000000OognAIAR is the case-insensitive 18-character version of that ID.
Either one is fine. You do not need to worry about the difference. If for some reason you really need to use the 15-character version in parameters etc, you can safely truncate the last 3 digits.
More information here: http://www.salesforce.com/us/developer/docs/api/Content/field_types.htm
from f in CUSTOMERS
where depts.Contains(f.DEPT_ID)
select f.NAME
depts is a list (IEnumerable<int>) of department ids
This query works fine until you pass a large list (say around 3000 dept ids) .. then I get this error:
The incoming tabular data stream (TDS) remote procedure call (RPC) protocol stream is incorrect. Too many parameters were provided in this RPC request. The maximum is 2100.
I changed my query to:
var dept_ids = string.Join(" ", depts.ToStringArray());
from f in CUSTOMERS
where dept_ids.IndexOf(Convert.ToString(f.DEPT_id)) != -1
select f.NAME
using IndexOf() fixed the error but made the query slow. Is there any other way to solve this? thanks so much.
My solution (Guids is a list of ids you would like to filter by):
List<MyTestEntity> result = new List<MyTestEntity>();
for(int i = 0; i < Math.Ceiling((double)Guids.Count / 2000); i++)
{
var nextGuids = Guids.Skip(i * 2000).Take(2000);
result.AddRange(db.Tests.Where(x => nextGuids.Contains(x.Id)));
}
this.DataContext = result;
Why not write the query in sql and attach your entity?
It's been awhile since I worked in Linq, but here goes:
IQuery q = Session.CreateQuery(#"
select *
from customerTable f
where f.DEPT_id in (" + string.Join(",", depts.ToStringArray()) + ")");
q.AttachEntity(CUSTOMER);
Of course, you will need to protect against injection, but that shouldn't be too hard.
You will want to check out the LINQKit project since within there somewhere is a technique for batching up such statements to solve this issue. I believe the idea is to use the PredicateBuilder to break the local collection into smaller chuncks but I haven't reviewed the solution in detail because I've instead been looking for a more natural way to handle this.
Unfortunately it appears from Microsoft's response to my suggestion to fix this behavior that there are no plans set to have this addressed for .NET Framework 4.0 or even subsequent service packs.
https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=475984
UPDATE:
I've opened up some discussion regarding whether this was going to be fixed for LINQ to SQL or the ADO.NET Entity Framework on the MSDN forums. Please see these posts for more information regarding these topics and to see the temporary workaround that I've come up with using XML and a SQL UDF.
I had similar problem, and I got two ways to fix it.
Intersect method
join on IDs
To get values that are NOT in list, I used Except method OR left join.
Update
EntityFramework 6.2 runs the following query successfully:
var employeeIDs = Enumerable.Range(3, 5000);
var orders =
from order in Orders
where employeeIDs.Contains((int)order.EmployeeID)
select order;
Your post was from a while ago, but perhaps someone will benefit from this. Entity Framework does a lot of query caching, every time you send in a different parameter count, that gets added to the cache. Using a "Contains" call will cause SQL to generate a clause like "WHERE x IN (#p1, #p2.... #pn)", and bloat the EF cache.
Recently I looked for a new way to handle this, and I found that you can create an entire table of data as a parameter. Here's how to do it:
First, you'll need to create a custom table type, so run this in SQL Server (in my case I called the custom type "TableId"):
CREATE TYPE [dbo].[TableId] AS TABLE(
Id[int] PRIMARY KEY
)
Then, in C#, you can create a DataTable and load it into a structured parameter that matches the type. You can add as many data rows as you want:
DataTable dt = new DataTable();
dt.Columns.Add("id", typeof(int));
This is an arbitrary list of IDs to search on. You can make the list as large as you want:
dt.Rows.Add(24262);
dt.Rows.Add(24267);
dt.Rows.Add(24264);
Create an SqlParameter using the custom table type and your data table:
SqlParameter tableParameter = new SqlParameter("#id", SqlDbType.Structured);
tableParameter.TypeName = "dbo.TableId";
tableParameter.Value = dt;
Then you can call a bit of SQL from your context that joins your existing table to the values from your table parameter. This will give you all records that match your ID list:
var items = context.Dailies.FromSqlRaw<Dailies>("SELECT * FROM dbo.Dailies d INNER JOIN #id id ON d.Daily_ID = id.id", tableParameter).AsNoTracking().ToList();
You could always partition your list of depts into smaller sets before you pass them as parameters to the IN statement generated by Linq. See here:
Divide a large IEnumerable into smaller IEnumerable of a fix amount of item