I have a DataGrid nested in a DockPanel. The DockPanel serves as a data context:
DockPanel1.DataContext = GetData();
The GetData() method returns an ObservableCollection.
The ObservableCollection can be modified in the DataGrid as well as in a few textboxes nested in the DockPanel. I also navigate through the collection using a DataView.
I'd like to detect if the collection has been modified and warn a user when he/she tries to close the application without saving data.
Is there any built-in mechanism that I could use (a kind of "IsDirty" flag on the collection or on the view)? If not, I guess I will have to monitor all the controls and detect any changes manually.
Thanks,
Leszek
In order to detect changes in the collection itself, you would have to attach a CollectionChanged handler. If you also need to detect changes in the objects contained in the collection, you would have to attach PropertyChanged handlers to every object (provided that the objects implements INotifyPropertyChanged).
An implementation would basically look like this:
var collection = GetData();
collection.CollectionChanged += OnCollectionChanged;
...
private void OnCollectionChanged(object sender, NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
switch (e.Action)
{
case NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Add:
AddPropertyChanged(e.NewItems);
break;
case NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Remove:
RemovePropertyChanged(e.OldItems);
break;
case NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Replace:
case NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Reset:
RemovePropertyChanged(e.OldItems);
AddPropertyChanged(e.NewItems);
break;
}
...
}
private void OnPropertyChanged(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
...
}
private void AddPropertyChanged(IEnumerable items)
{
if (items != null)
{
foreach (var obj in items.OfType<INotifyPropertyChanged>())
{
obj.PropertyChanged += OnPropertyChanged;
}
}
}
private void RemovePropertyChanged(IEnumerable items)
{
if (items != null)
{
foreach (var obj in items.OfType<INotifyPropertyChanged>())
{
obj.PropertyChanged -= OnPropertyChanged;
}
}
}
To elaborate a bit on Clemens' answer above, here's the simple way to use these events (on the collection, and on the contained items) to implement an IsDirty flag such as you described:
public class DirtyCollection<T> : ObservableCollection<T> where T : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private bool isDirty = false;
public bool IsDirty
{
get { return this.isDirty; }
}
public void Clean()
{
this.isDirty = false;
}
protected override void OnCollectionChanged(NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
// We aren't concerned with how the collection changed, just that it did.
this.isDirty = true;
// But we do need to add the handlers to detect property changes on each item.
switch (e.Action)
{
case NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Add:
this.AddPropertyChanged(e.NewItems);
break;
case NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Remove:
this.RemovePropertyChanged(e.OldItems);
break;
case NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Replace:
case NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Reset:
this.RemovePropertyChanged(e.OldItems);
this.AddPropertyChanged(e.NewItems);
break;
}
base.OnCollectionChanged(e);
}
private void AddPropertyChanged(IEnumerable items)
{
if (items != null)
{
foreach (var obj in items.OfType<INotifyPropertyChanged>())
{
obj.PropertyChanged += OnItemPropertyChanged;
}
}
}
private void RemovePropertyChanged(IEnumerable items)
{
if (items != null)
{
foreach (var obj in items.OfType<INotifyPropertyChanged>())
{
obj.PropertyChanged -= OnItemPropertyChanged;
}
}
}
private void OnItemPropertyChanged(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
// A property of a contained item has changed.
this.isDirty = true;
}
}
The code should be fairly self-explanatory.
You can, of course, remove the "where T : INotifyPropertyChanged" to allow objects that don't implement that interface to be stored in the collection, but then you won't be notified of any property changes on them, as without that interface, they can't notify you of them.
And should you want to keep track of not only that the collection is dirty but also how, some additions in OnCollectionChanged and OnItemPropertyChanged to record the information passed in the event args would do that nicely.
Related
I have a ViewModel with an Observable Collection Property
public ObservableCollection<GeographicArea> CurrentSensorAreasList
{
get
{
return currentSensorAreasList;
}
set
{
if (currentSensorAreasList != value)
{
currentSensorAreasList = value;
OnPropertyChanged(PROPERTY_NAME_CURRENT_SENSOR_AREAS_LIST);
}
}
}
Then in my xaml i have a binding
ItemsSource="{Binding CurrentSensorAreasList}">
This Observable Collection is updated trought a method that can be call in the viewModel constructor or when a collectionchanged handler from another list gets called.
I just clear the list and then add a fewer new items. While debugging i see all my new items updated on the list. But the UI does not get updated.
When i regenerate the viewModel and then this update method gets call in the constructor the list gets updated in the UI.
Any ideas?? I don't know if the problem comes when i call the method from a handler.....
UPDATE #1
As requested i'm going the code when I update the list
I have tested two ways to do this update
private void UpdateList1()
{
if (globalAreaManagerList != null && OperationEntity != null)
{
CurrentSensorAreasList.Clear();
CurrentSensorAreasList.AddRange(globalAreaManagerList.Where(x => x != (OperationEntity as AreaManager)).SelectMany(areaRenderer => areaRenderer.AreaList));
//AddRange is an extension method.
}
}
private void UpdateList2()
{
if (globalAreaManagerList != null && OperationEntity != null)
{
CurrentSensorAreasList = new ObservableCollection<GeographicArea>(globalAreaManagerList.Where(x => x != (OperationEntity as AreaManager)).SelectMany(areaRenderer => areaRenderer.AreaList))
}
}
Both cases works when i call it from the constructor. Then I have Other Lists where the Areas changes, and i get notified via CollectionChanged Handlers.
private void globalAreaManagerList_CollectionChanged(object sender, System.Collections.Specialized.NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (e.NewItems != null)
{
foreach (AreaManager newItem in e.NewItems)
{
newItem.AreaList.CollectionChanged += AreaList_CollectionChanged;
}
}
if (e.OldItems != null)
{
foreach (AreaManager oldItem in e.OldItems)
{
oldItem.AreaList.CollectionChanged -= AreaList_CollectionChanged;
}
}
UpdateList();
}
private void AreaList_CollectionChanged(object sender, System.Collections.Specialized.NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
UpdateList();
}
So when i use UpdateList1 seems to work more times but suddenly the Binding is broken and then this update does not show in the UI.
If you wish change exactly an instance of collection I recomend using DependecyProperty for that case.
Here is:
public ObservableCollection<GeographicArea> CurrentSensorAreasList
{
get { return (ObservableCollection<GeographicArea>)GetValue(CurrentSensorAreasListProperty); }
set { SetValue(CurrentSensorAreasListProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty CurrentSensorAreasListProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("CurrentSensorAreasList", typeof(ObservableCollection<GeographicArea>), typeof(ownerclass));
Where ownerclass - a name of class where you put this property.
But the better way is create only one instance of ObservaleCollection and then just change its items. I mean Add, Remove, and Clear methods.
I have the following implementation of RegionAdapter for a StackPanel but I need strict ordering of items I associate with a region can anyone help?
I want Views that Register themselves to the Region to be able to control there position maybe an index number of some sort
protected override void Adapt(IRegion region, StackPanel regionTarget)
{
region.Views.CollectionChanged += (sender, e) =>
{
switch (e.Action)
{
case NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Add:
foreach (FrameworkElement element in e.NewItems)
{
regionTarget.Children.Add(element);
}
break;
case NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Remove:
foreach (UIElement elementLoopVariable in e.OldItems)
{
var element = elementLoopVariable;
if (regionTarget.Children.Contains(element))
{
regionTarget.Children.Remove(element);
}
}
break;
}
};
}
How to tackle this greatly depends on whether the sorting refers to (a) the type of the view or (b) to the instance of the view. The former would be the case if you only wanted to specify that for example Views of type ViewA should be above Views of type ViewB. The latter is the case if you want to specify how several concrete instances of the same view type are sorted.
A. Sort type wise
On option is to implement a custom attribute, something like OrderIndexAttribute, which exposes an integer property:
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class, AllowMultiple = false)]
public OrderIndexAttribute : Attribute
{
public int Index { get; }
public OrderIndexAttribute(int index)
{
Index = index;
}
}
Mark your view class with that attribute:
[OrderIndex(2)]
public ViewA : UserControl
{...}
Get the attribute of the type when adding the view to the region:
case NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Add:
foreach (FrameworkElement element in e.NewItems)
{
// Get index for view
var viewType = element.GetType();
var viewIndex= viewType.GetCustomAttribute<OrderIndexAttribute>().Index;
// This method needs to iterate through the views in the region and determine
// where a view with the specified index needs to be inserted
var insertionIndex = GetInsertionIndex(viewIndex);
regionTarget.Children.Insert(insertionIndex, element);
}
break;
B. Sort instance wise
Make your views implement an interface:
public interface ISortedView
{
int Index { get; }
}
On adding the view to the region, try casting the inserted view to the interface, read the index and then do the same as above:
case NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Add:
foreach (FrameworkElement element in e.NewItems)
{
// Get index for view
var sortedView = element as ISortedView;
if (sortedView != null)
{
var viewIndex = sortedView.Index;
// This method needs to iterate through the views in the region and determine
// where a view with the specified index needs to be inserted
var insertionIndex = GetInsertionIndex(viewIndex);
regionTarget.Children.Insert(insertionIndex, sortedView);
}
else
{ // Add at the end of the StackPanel or reject adding the view to the region }
}
I found Marc's "A. Sort type wise" case to be very helpful for my situation. I needed to sort the views into the region by using the OrderIndexAttribute and still be able to add a view if it did not actually have the OrderIndexAttribute.
As you will see below, I did this by keeping track of the view indexes in a List. The insertion index of a view without the attribute is defaulted to zero so that it sorts to the front(or top) of the StackPanel.
This original post is rather old, but maybe someone will stumble upon it as I did and will find my contribution to be helpful. Refactoring suggestions are welcome. :-)
public class StackPanelRegionAdapter : RegionAdapterBase<StackPanel>
{
private readonly List<int> _indexList;
public StackPanelRegionAdapter(IRegionBehaviorFactory behaviorFactory)
: base(behaviorFactory)
{
_indexList = new List<int>();
}
protected override void Adapt(IRegion region, StackPanel regionTarget)
{
region.Views.CollectionChanged += (sender, e) =>
{
switch (e.Action)
{
case NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Add:
foreach (FrameworkElement element in e.NewItems)
{
var viewType = element.GetType();
// Get the custom attributes for this view, if any
var customAttributes = viewType.GetCustomAttributes(false);
var viewIndex = 0; // Default the viewIndex to zero
// Determine if the view has the OrderIndexAttribute.
// If it does have the OrderIndexAttribute, get its sort index.
if (HasThisAttribute(customAttributes))
{
viewIndex= viewType.GetCustomAttribute<OrderIndexAttribute>().Index;
}
// Get the insertion index
var insertionIndex = GetInsertionIndex(viewIndex);
regionTarget.Children.Insert(insertionIndex, element);
}
break;
case NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Remove:
foreach (UIElement elementLoopVariable in e.OldItems)
{
var element = elementLoopVariable;
if (regionTarget.Children.Contains(element))
{
regionTarget.Children.Remove(element);
}
}
break;
}
};
}
private static bool HasThisAttribute(IReadOnlyList<object> customAttributes)
{
// Determine if the view has the OrderIndexAttribute
if (customAttributes.Count == 0) return false;
for (var i = 0; i < customAttributes.Count; i++)
{
var name = customAttributes[i].GetType().Name;
if (name == "OrderIndexAttribute") return true;
}
return false;
}
private int GetInsertionIndex(in int viewIndex)
{
// Add the viewIndex to the index list if not already there
if (_indexList.Contains(viewIndex) == false)
{
_indexList.Add(viewIndex);
_indexList.Sort();
}
// Return the list index of the viewIndex
for (var i = 0; i < _indexList.Count; i++)
{
if (_indexList[i].Equals(viewIndex))
{
return i;
}
}
return 0;
}
protected override IRegion CreateRegion()
{
return new AllActiveRegion();
}
}
The answer from Marc and R.Evans helped me to create my own a little more generic RegionAdapter with the following improvements:
uses ViewSortHint to be compatible with Prism 6
Prism 7 / .Net 5 compatible
Helper Class for use in multiple Adapters
less code
Adapt method:
protected override void Adapt(IRegion region, StackPanel regionTarget)
{
region.Views.CollectionChanged += (s, e) =>
{
if (e.Action == NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Add)
foreach (FrameworkElement item in e.NewItems)
{
regionTarget.Children.Insert(regionTarget.Children.GetInsertionIndex(item), item);
}
else if (e.Action == NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Remove)
foreach (UIElement item in e.OldItems)
{
if (regionTarget.Children.Contains(item))
{
regionTarget.Children.Remove(item);
}
}
};
}
Helper/Extension:
internal static int GetInsertionIndex(this IList items, in object newItem)
{
// Return the list index of the viewIndex
foreach (object item in items)
{
var currentIndex = item.GetType().GetCustomAttribute<ViewSortHintAttribute>()?.Hint ?? "0";
var intendedIndex = newItem.GetType().GetCustomAttribute<ViewSortHintAttribute>()?.Hint ?? "0";
if (currentIndex.CompareTo(intendedIndex) >= 0)
return items.IndexOf(item);
}
// if no greater index is found, insert the item at the end
return items.Count;
}
I want a list of items that can display either an item's 'greek' or 'english' name, depending on a user toggling between the two. All of the items in the list implement INPC.
Since each item has a GreekName property and an RomanName property, the strategy I am using is to simply change the items DisplayName property. Unit tests and log output indicate that the DisplayName for each item does change and does fire INPC, but the list does not update.
The list is an ObservableCollection. I am wondering if this fails to update because the hash code doesn't change? Does that mean that the only way to replace the item in the list with a new one?
Some code below...
Cheers,
Berryl
public class MasterViewModel : ViewModelBase
{
public ObservableCollection<DetailVm> AllDetailVms
{
get { return _allDetailVms; }
}
private readonly ObservableCollection<DetailVm> _allDetailVms;
void OnCollectionChanged(object sender, NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs e) {
if (e.NewItems != null && e.NewItems.Count != 0)
foreach (DetailVm vm in e.NewItems) vm.PropertyChanged += OnGreekGodChanged;
if (e.OldItems != null && e.OldItems.Count != 0)
foreach (DetailVm vm in e.OldItems) vm.PropertyChanged -= OnGreekGodChanged;
}
private void OnGreekGodChanged(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
var detailVm = (DetailVm)sender;
// if DisplayName has changed we want to refresh the view & its filter
var displayName = ExprHelper.GetPropertyName<DetailVm>(x => x.DisplayName);
if (e.PropertyName == displayName)
Log.Info("'{0} reports it's display name has changed", detailVm.DisplayName);
}
private void _flipGreekOrRomanDisplay(string newName, Func<DetailVm, string> property)
{
foreach (var detailVm in _allDetailVms)
{
Log.Info("To '{0}', before change: '{1}'", newName, detailVm.DisplayName);
detailVm.DisplayName = property(detailVm);
Log.Info("To '{0}', after change: '{1}'", newName, detailVm.DisplayName);
}
NameFilterLabelText = newName;
NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => NameFilterLabelText);
NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => UseGreekName);
NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => UseRomanName);
}
}
My idiocy - my databinding was off. The code was fine and the view updates by virtue of it's items firing INPC, as expected.
I am currently working with data grid where I only want to allow the user to enter UP TO 20 rows of data before making CanUserAddRows to false.
I made a dependency property on my own datagrid (that derives from the original one). I tried using the event "ItemContainerGenerator.ItemsChanged" and check for row count in there and if row count = max rows, then make can user add row = false (I get an exception for that saying i'm not allow to change it during "Add Row".
I was wondering if there is a good way on implementing this ....
Thanks and Regards,
Kevin
Here's a subclassed DataGrid with a MaxRows Dependency Property. The things to note about the implementation is if the DataGrid is in edit mode and CanUserAddRows is changed an InvalidOperationException will occur (like you mentioned in the question).
InvalidOperationException
'NewItemPlaceholderPosition' is not
allowed during a transaction begun by
'AddNew'.
To workaround this, a method called IsInEditMode is called in OnItemsChanged and if it returns true we subscribe to the event LayoutUpdated to check IsInEditMode again.
Also, if MaxRows is set to 20, it must allow 20 rows when CanUserAddRows is True, and 19 rows when False (to make place for the NewItemPlaceHolder which isn't present on False).
It can be used like this
<local:MaxRowsDataGrid MaxRows="20"
CanUserAddRows="True"
...>
MaxRowsDataGrid
public class MaxRowsDataGrid : DataGrid
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty MaxRowsProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("MaxRows",
typeof(int),
typeof(MaxRowsDataGrid),
new UIPropertyMetadata(0, MaxRowsPropertyChanged));
private static void MaxRowsPropertyChanged(DependencyObject source, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
MaxRowsDataGrid maxRowsDataGrid = source as MaxRowsDataGrid;
maxRowsDataGrid.SetCanUserAddRowsState();
}
public int MaxRows
{
get { return (int)GetValue(MaxRowsProperty); }
set { SetValue(MaxRowsProperty, value); }
}
private bool m_changingState;
public MaxRowsDataGrid()
{
m_changingState = false;
}
protected override void OnItemsChanged(System.Collections.Specialized.NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
base.OnItemsChanged(e);
if (IsInEditMode() == true)
{
EventHandler eventHandler = null;
eventHandler += new EventHandler(delegate
{
if (IsInEditMode() == false)
{
SetCanUserAddRowsState();
LayoutUpdated -= eventHandler;
}
});
LayoutUpdated += eventHandler;
}
else
{
SetCanUserAddRowsState();
}
}
private bool IsInEditMode()
{
IEditableCollectionView itemsView = Items;
if (itemsView.IsAddingNew == false && itemsView.IsEditingItem == false)
{
return false;
}
return true;
}
// This method will raise OnItemsChanged again
// because a NewItemPlaceHolder will be added or removed
// so to avoid infinite recursion a bool flag is added
private void SetCanUserAddRowsState()
{
if (m_changingState == false)
{
m_changingState = true;
int maxRows = (CanUserAddRows == true) ? MaxRows : MaxRows-1;
if (Items.Count > maxRows)
{
CanUserAddRows = false;
}
else
{
CanUserAddRows = true;
}
m_changingState = false;
}
}
}
I am an adept of K.I.S.S. To reduce the amount of lines required to do the job and keep it simple, use the following:
private void MyDataGrid_LoadingRow( object sender, DataGridRowEventArgs e )
{
// The user cannot add more rows than allowed
IEditableCollectionView itemsView = this.myDataGrid.Items;
if( this.myDataGrid.Items.Count == max_RowCount + 1 && itemsView.IsAddingNew == true )
{
// Commit the current one added by the user
itemsView.CommitNew();
// Once the adding transaction is commit the user cannot add an other one
this.myDataGrid.CanUserAddRows = false;
}
}
Simple and compact ;0)
I have a attached property of type ObservableCollection on a control. If I add or remove items from the collection, the ui does not update. However if I replace the collection within with a new one the ViewModel the ui does update.
Can someone give me an example of what I need to do within the Dependency object so that it can handle changes within the collection?
Part of the dependency object is listed below:
public class RadCalendarBehavior : DependencyObject
{
private static void OnSpecialDaysChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
var calendar = d as RadCalendar;
if (e.NewValue != null)
{
calendar.DayTemplateSelector = new SpecialDaySelector((ObservableCollection<DateTime>)e.NewValue, GetSpecialDayTemplate(d));
}
}
public static ObservableCollection<DateTime> GetSpecialDays(DependencyObject obj)
{
return (ObservableCollection<DateTime>)obj.GetValue(SpecialDaysProperty);
}
public static void SetSpecialDays(DependencyObject obj, ObservableCollection<DateTime> value)
{
obj.SetValue(SpecialDaysProperty, value);
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty SpecialDaysProperty =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("SpecialDays", typeof(ObservableCollection<DateTime>), typeof(RadCalendarBehavior), new UIPropertyMetadata(null, OnSpecialDaysChanged));
}
}
I understand that I need to register that the collection has changed, but I am unsure how to do this within the dependency property
A change within the collection won't trigger the OnSpecialDaysChanged callback, because the value of the dependency property hasn't changed. If you need to react to detect changes with the collection, you need to handle the event CollectionChanged event manually:
private static void OnSpecialDaysChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
var calendar = d as RadCalendar;
if (e.OldValue != null)
{
var coll = (INotifyCollectionChanged)e.OldValue;
// Unsubscribe from CollectionChanged on the old collection
coll.CollectionChanged -= SpecialDays_CollectionChanged;
}
if (e.NewValue != null)
{
var coll = (ObservableCollection<DateTime>)e.NewValue;
calendar.DayTemplateSelector = new SpecialDaySelector(coll, GetSpecialDayTemplate(d));
// Subscribe to CollectionChanged on the new collection
coll.CollectionChanged += SpecialDays_CollectionChanged;
}
}
private static void SpecialDays_CollectionChanged(object sender, NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
// handle CollectionChanged
}
This is just to add to the answer by Thomas. In my code I do interact with the DependencyObject's properties by creating a handler object localy like below:
private static void OnSpecialDaysChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
var action = new NotifyCollectionChangedEventHandler(
(o, args) =>
{
var calendar = d as RadCalendar;
if (calendar!= null)
{
// play with calendar's properties/methods
}
});
if (e.OldValue != null)
{
var coll = (INotifyCollectionChanged)e.OldValue;
// Unsubscribe from CollectionChanged on the old collection
coll.CollectionChanged -= action;
}
if (e.NewValue != null)
{
var coll = (ObservableCollection<DateTime>)e.NewValue;
// Subscribe to CollectionChanged on the new collection
coll.CollectionChanged += action;
}
}
Hope this is helpful to someone.
If you have a collection-type dependency property keep the following in mind:
If your property is a reference type, the default value specified in dependency property metadata is not a default value per instance; instead it is a default value that applies to all instances of the type. [...]
To correct this problem, you must reset the collection dependency property value to a unique instance, as part of the class constructor call.
(see MSDN Collection-Type Dependency Properties)
To answer Sam's question (I just ran into the same problem):
Make your CollectionChanged-handler non-static and unsubscribe/re-subscribe on instance-level.
private static void OnSpecialDaysChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
var calendar = (RadCalendar)d;
if (e.OldValue != null)
{
var coll = (INotifyCollectionChanged)e.OldValue;
// Unsubscribe from CollectionChanged on the old collection of the DP-instance (!)
coll.CollectionChanged -= calendar.SpecialDays_CollectionChanged;
}
if (e.NewValue != null)
{
var coll = (ObservableCollection<DateTime>)e.NewValue;
calendar.DayTemplateSelector = new SpecialDaySelector(coll, GetSpecialDayTemplate(d));
// Subscribe to CollectionChanged on the new collection of the DP-instance (!)
coll.CollectionChanged += calendar.SpecialDays_CollectionChanged;
}
}
private void SpecialDays_CollectionChanged(object sender, NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
// handle CollectionChanged on instance-level
}