I'm trying to attach gdb to a program started by socat like this:
socat TCP-LISTEN:5678,reuseaddr,fork EXEC:./test
In another terminal,
sudo gdb
attach `pidof socat`
br *0x080487D4
when execute continue command in gdb, it shows error like this:
Warning:
Cannot insert breakpoint 1.
Cannot access memory at address 0x80487d4
Command aborted.
0x080487D4 is in .text of test program. The follow-fork-mode of gdb is child, I have searched online but still can't solve it.
I debugged program successfully like this way a month ago, and don't know why it doesn't work now. But it's ok if debug the program directly using gdb like this:
gdb -q ./test
However, the way above doesn't meet my needs.
Through debugging, I think gdb expects that address is a valid address in the socat rather then test program. So how can I set breakpoints in test program? Without breakpoints in test program, it will run directly to the end when execute continue command. Setting breakpoints in socat program is useless.
Any advice? Thanks in advance.
I have figured out how to set breakpoints in test program.
When start test program using socat, it won't fork a test process until a socket connection comes. So trying to set breakpoints directly in test program fails.
I use a tool(for my purpose, choose pwntools) to connect to it and suspend it ,then use gdb to attach to the forked test process. Next, I can debug normally.
Any better ideas? Thanks in advance.
I'm trying to attach a program with gdb but it returns:
Attaching to process 29139
Could not attach to process. If your uid matches the uid of the target
process, check the setting of /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope, or try
again as the root user. For more details, see /etc/sysctl.d/10-ptrace.conf
ptrace: Operation not permitted.
gdb-debugger returns "Failed to attach to process, please check privileges and try again."
strace returns "attach: ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ...): Operation not permitted"
I changed "kernel.yama.ptrace_scope" 1 to 0 and /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope 1 to 0 and tried set environment LD_PRELOAD=./ptrace.so with this:
#include <stdio.h>
int ptrace(int i, int j, int k, int l) {
printf(" ptrace(%i, %i, %i, %i), returning -1\n", i, j, k, l);
return 0;
}
But it still returns the same error. How can I attach it to debuggers?
If you are using Docker, you will probably need these options:
docker run --cap-add=SYS_PTRACE --security-opt seccomp=unconfined
If you are using Podman, you will probably need its --cap-add option too:
podman run --cap-add=SYS_PTRACE
This is due to kernel hardening in Linux; you can disable this behavior by echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope or by modifying it in /etc/sysctl.d/10-ptrace.conf
See also this article about it in Fedora 22 (with links to the documentation) and this comment thread about Ubuntu and .
I would like to add that I needed --security-opt apparmor=unconfined along with the options that #wisbucky mentioned. This was on Ubuntu 18.04 (both Docker client and host). Therefore, the full invocation for enabling gdb debugging within a container is:
docker run --cap-add=SYS_PTRACE --security-opt seccomp=unconfined --security-opt apparmor=unconfined
Just want to emphasize a related answer. Let's say that you're root and you've done:
strace -p 700
and get:
strace: attach: ptrace(PTRACE_SEIZE, 700): Operation not permitted
Check:
grep TracerPid /proc/700/status
If you see something like TracerPid: 12, i.e. not 0, that's the PID of the program that is already using the ptrace system call. Both gdb and strace use it, and there can only be one active at a time.
Not really addressing the above use-case but I had this problem:
Problem: It happened that I started my program with sudo, so when launching gdb it was giving me ptrace: Operation not permitted.
Solution: sudo gdb ...
As most of us land here for Docker issues I'll add the Kubernetes answer as it might come in handy for someone...
You must add the SYS_PTRACE capability in your pod's security context
at spec.containers.securityContext:
securityContext:
capabilities:
add: [ "SYS_PTRACE" ]
There are 2 securityContext keys at 2 different places. If it tells you that the key is not recognized than you missplaced it. Try the other one.
You probably need to have a root user too as default. So in the other security context (spec.securityContext) add :
securityContext:
runAsUser: 0
runAsGroup: 0
fsGroup: 101
FYI : 0 is root. But the fsGroup value is unknown to me. For what I'm doing I don't care but you might.
Now you can do :
strace -s 100000 -e write=1 -e trace=write -p 16
You won't get the permission denied anymore !
BEWARE : This is the Pandora box. Having this in production it NOT recommended.
I was running my code with higher privileges to deal with Ethernet Raw Sockets by setting set capability command in Debian Distribution. I tried the above solution: echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope
or by modifying it in /etc/sysctl.d/10-ptrace.conf but that did not work for me.
Additionally, I also tried with set capabilities command for gdb in installed directory (usr/bin/gdb) and it works: /sbin/setcap CAP_SYS_PTRACE=+eip /usr/bin/gdb.
Be sure to run this command with root privileges.
Jesup's answer is correct; it is due to Linux kernel hardening. In my case, I am using Docker Community for Mac, and in order to do change the flag I must enter the LinuxKit shell using justin cormack's nsenter (ref: https://www.bretfisher.com/docker-for-mac-commands-for-getting-into-local-docker-vm/ ).
docker run -it --rm --privileged --pid=host justincormack/nsenter1
/ # cat /etc/issue
Welcome to LinuxKit
## .
## ## ## ==
## ## ## ## ## ===
/"""""""""""""""""\___/ ===
{ / ===-
\______ O __/
\ \ __/
\____\_______/
/ # cat /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope
1
/ # echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope
/ # exit
Maybe someone has attached this process with gdb.
ps -ef | grep gdb
can't gdb attach the same process twice.
I was going to answer this old question as it is unaccepted and any other answers are not got the point. The real answer may be already written in /etc/sysctl.d/10-ptrace.conf as it is my case under Ubuntu. This file says:
For applications launching crash handlers that need PTRACE, exceptions can
be registered by the debugee by declaring in the segfault handler
specifically which process will be using PTRACE on the debugee:
prctl(PR_SET_PTRACER, debugger_pid, 0, 0, 0);
So just do the same thing as above: keep /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope as 1 and add prctl(PR_SET_PTRACER, debugger_pid, 0, 0, 0); in the debugee. Then the debugee will allow debugger to debug it. This works without sudo and without reboot.
Usually, debugee also need to call waitpid to avoid exit after crash so debugger can find the pid of debugee.
If permissions are a problem, you probably will want to use gdbserver. (I almost always use gdbserver when I gdb, docker or no, for numerous reasons.) You will need gdbserver (Deb) or gdb-gdbserver (RH) installed in the docker image. Run the program in docker with
$ sudo gdbserver :34567 myprogram arguments
(pick a port number, 1025-65535). Then, in gdb on the host, say
(gdb) target remote 172.17.0.4:34567
where 172.17.0.4 is the IP address of the docker image as reported by /sbin/ip addr list run in the docker image. This will attach at a point before main runs. You can tb main and c to stop at main, or wherever you like. Run gdb under cgdb, emacs, vim, or even in some IDE, or plain. You can run gdb in your source or build tree, so it knows where everything is. (If it can't find your sources, use the dir command.) This is usually much better than running it in the docker image.
gdbserver relies on ptrace, so you will also need to do the other things suggested above. --privileged --pid=host sufficed for me.
If you deploy to other OSes or embedded targets, you can run gdbserver or a gdb stub there, and run gdb the same way, connecting across a real network or even via a serial port (/dev/ttyS0).
I don't know what you are doing with LD_PRELOAD or your ptrace function.
Why don't you try attaching gdb to a very simple program? Make a program that simply repeatedly prints Hello or something and use gdb --pid [hello program PID] to attach to it.
If that does not work then you really do have a problem.
Another issue is the user ID. Is the program that you are tracing setting itself to another UID? If it is then you cannot ptrace it unless you are using the same user ID or are root.
I have faced the same problem and try a lot of solution but finally, I have found the solution, but really I don't know what the problem was. First I modified the ptrace_conf value and login into Ubuntu as a root but the problem still appears. But the most strange thing that happened is the gdb showed me a message that says:
Could not attach to process. If your uid matches the uid of the target process, check the setting of /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope, or try again as the root user.
For more details, see /etc/sysctl.d/10-ptrace.conf
warning: process 3767 is already traced by process 3755 ptrace: Operation not permitted.
With ps command terminal, the process 3755 was not listed.
I found the process 3755 in /proc/$pid but I don't understand what was it!!
Finally, I deleted the target file (foo.c) that I try to attach it vid gdb and tracer c program using PTRACE_ATTACH syscall, and in the other folder, I created another c program and compiled it.
the problem is solved and I was enabled to attach to another process either by gdb or ptrace_attach syscall.
(gdb) attach 4416
Attaching to process 4416
and I send a lot of signals to process 4416. I tested it with both gdb and ptrace, both of them run correctly.
really I don't know the problem what was, but I think it is not a bug in Ubuntu as a lot of sites have referred to it, such https://askubuntu.com/questions/143561/why-wont-strace-gdb-attach-to-a-process-even-though-im-root
Extra information
If you wanna make changes in the interfaces such as add the ovs bridge, you must use --privileged instead of --cap-add NET_ADMIN.
sudo docker run -itd --name=testliz --privileged --cap-add=SYS_PTRACE --security-opt seccomp=unconfined ubuntu
If you are using FreeBSD, edit /etc/sysctl.conf, change the line
security.bsd.unprivileged_proc_debug=0
to
security.bsd.unprivileged_proc_debug=1
Then reboot.
Is it possible that I can view the line number and file name (for my program running with ltrace/strace) along with the library call/system call information.
Eg:
code section :: ptr = malloc(sizeof(int)*5); (file:code.c, line:21)
ltrace or any other tool: malloc(20) :: code.c::21
I have tried all the options of ltrace/strace but cannot figure out a way to get this info.
If not possible through ltrace/strace, do we have any parallel tool option for GNU/Linux?
You may be able to use the -i option (to output the instruction pointer at the time of the call) in strace and ltrace, combined with addr2line to resolve the calls to lines of code.
No It's not possible. Why don't you use gdb for this purpose?
When you are compiling application with gcc use -ggdb flags to get debugger info into your program and then run your program with gdb or equivalent frontend (ddd or similar)
Here is quick gdb manual to help you out a bit.
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~gilpin/tutorial/
You can use strace-plus that can collects stack traces associated with each system call.
http://code.google.com/p/strace-plus/
Pretty old question, but I found a way to accomplish what OP wanted:
First use strace with -k option, which will generate a stack trace like this:
openat(AT_FDCWD, NULL, O_RDONLY) = -1 EFAULT (Bad address)
> /usr/lib/libc-2.33.so(__open64+0x5b) [0xefeab]
> /usr/lib/libc-2.33.so(_IO_file_open+0x26) [0x816f6]
> /usr/lib/libc-2.33.so(_IO_file_fopen+0x10a) [0x818ca]
> /usr/lib/libc-2.33.so(__fopen_internal+0x7d) [0x7527d]
> /mnt/r/build/tests/main(main+0x90) [0x1330]
> /usr/lib/libc-2.33.so(__libc_start_main+0xd5) [0x27b25]
> /mnt/r/build/tests/main(_start+0x2e) [0x114e]
The address of each function call are displayed at the end of each line, and you can paste it to addr2line to retrieve the file and line. For example, we want to locate the call in main() (fifth line of the stack trace).
addr2line -e tests/main 0x1330
It will show something like this:
/mnt/r/main.c:55
I use a debugging script that runs several related processes in succession with the debugger. I'm currently using -x to execute several commands automatically (such as run). How can I make gdb quit automatically when the debugged process successfully terminates? Adding a quit command to the command file will cause that command to be handled not just on successful termination, but when errors occur also (when I'd rather take over at that point).
Here's an extract of what's going on:
+ gdb -return-child-result -x gdbbatch --args ./mkfs.cpfs /dev/loop0
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.1-ubuntu
Reading symbols from /home/matt/cpfs/mkfs.cpfs...done.
Program exited normally.
Breakpoint 2 at 0x805224f: file log.c, line 32.
(gdb)
Contents of gdbbatch:
start
b cpfs_log if level >= WARNING
I think I have found a complete solution to your question in connection to looking for something similar in How to make gdb send an external notification on receiving a signal?. None of the other guys here seem to have mentioned or discovered gdb hooks.
Based on Matthew's tip about $_exitcode, this is now my app/.gdbinit that achieves exactly the behavior wanted; normal quit on successful termination and drop to gdb prompt, send email, whatnot on everything else:
set $_exitcode = -999
set height 0
handle SIGTERM nostop print pass
handle SIGPIPE nostop
define hook-stop
if $_exitcode != -999
quit
else
shell echo | mail -s "NOTICE: app has stopped on unhandled signal" root
end
end
echo .gdbinit: running app\n
run
gdb sets $_exitcode when the program successfully terminates. You can make use of that - set it to an unlikely value at the start of your script, and only quit at the end if it has changed:
set $_exitcode = -999
# ...
run
# ...
if $_exitcode != -999
quit
end
(Setting $_exitcode to an unlikely value is a bit ugly, but it will otherwise not be defined at all if the program doesn't terminate, and there doesn't seem to be any obvious way of asking "is this variable defined?" in a conditional.)
GDB has a different "language" for interacting with automated programs called GDB/MI (detailed here), but unfortunately, it doesn't look like it supports conditionals, and is expected to run from other programs with parsing and branching. So, it looks like Expect is the easiest (or at least a working) solution:
$ cat gdbrunner
#!/usr/bin/expect -f
#spawn gdb -return-child-result --args ./mkfs.cpfs /dev/loop0
spawn gdb -return-child-result --args [lindex $argv 0]
#send "start\n"
#send "b cpfs_log if level >= WARNING"
send "run\n"
expect {
normally\. { send "quit\n" }
"exited with code" { interact -nobuffer }
}
I tested this with the simple programs:
$ cat prog1.c
int main(void) { return 0; }
$ cat prog2.c
int main(void) { return 1; }
With the following results:
$ ./gdbrunner ./prog1
spawn gdb -return-child-result --args ./prog1
run
(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/foo/prog1
Program exited normally.
(gdb) quit
$ ./gdbrunner ./prog2
spawn gdb -return-child-result --args ./prog2
run
(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/foo/prog2
Program exited with code 01.
(gdb)
Essentially, you have to parse the output and branch using something else. This would of course work with any other program capable of handling input/output of another process, but the above expect script should get you started, if you don't mind Tcl. It should be a little better, and expect the first (gdb) prompt, but works due to stdin buffering.
You can also modify it to use that GDB/MI interface with the -i command-line argument to GDB; its commands and output are a bit more readily parsable, if you will expand to need more advanced features, as you can see in the previously linked documentation.