I deployed a simple ASP.net MVC application on IIS (7.5 under win 2k8 R2 64 bit), and it created its databases (ApplicationData and the second one with my own data) when I started using the app.
The databases (.mdf and .ldf files) were created inside App_Data folder.
Application uses entity framework code first approach. I had to change the app pool's identity to Network Service to get the webpage working. I also had to manually create this App_Data directory and assign permissions for Network Service user to modify it's contents.
Now the problem I got is that I can't see those databases in Management Studio (got SQL server 2012 express with advanced services installed). I can attach them manually if not using the webpage for a longer time, otherwise the .mdf files are locked by sqlservr.exe process of Network Service user.
All the time I got two simultaneously running sqlservr processes. One is run by MSSQLsomething user and the second one by Network Service. However, I got only one instance of SQL server installed (I'm 100% sure of it).
Could anyone explain me how is that possible that Management Studio cannot see those databases even at the moment they're being used (locked by sqlservr.exe process)?
This is because the database is hosted in User Instance Mode, and therefore not actually attached to the 'official' database server.
In that article you'll see that this is enabled using User Instance=true; in the connection string. To switch it off you specify User Instance=false;.
Related
experiencing an odd issue I've yet to see on any of my other machines. This is a fresh laptop, so I have installed VS 2017, SQL Server 2017 express, then created a quick sample project using one of the stock .net core projects (with authentication stored "in-app"). This, of course, creates some basic entity migrations and DB context.
When I run I'm getting access denied errors. So, of course, I checked SQL service default user which is an admin. I then run basic migration commands and receive this
So, of course, my next step was to double check the default data locations of SQL since it appears to be trying to store it in C:\Users root?! I have never had to bother touching this during install, but worth a look. And of course, they are as I expected in their default locations of C:\Program Files\ etc
Rapidly running out of things to try at this point - and considering this is a fresh windows 10 install, with bare-bones vs 2017 and SQL express 2017 it feels a lot like a bug here. Everything is a default if you were to File -> New Project -> .NET Core Web Application with INdividual accounts.
Anyone have any thoughts or things worth trying? Why is it trying to store my DB in C:\Users? Connection string -
"DefaultConnection": "Server=(localdb)\\mssqllocaldb;Database=aspnet-WebApplication3-53bc9b9d-9d6a-45d4-8429-2a2761773502;Trusted_Connection=True;MultipleActiveResultSets=true"
Thanks!
-Marc
You are not using SQL Server Express.
The local string says (localdb), which is the SQL Server engine running in user space. This is a big difference. Usually SQL Server or SQL Server express runs as service. (localdb) is not an alias for localhost (loopback address). It's a special name for a minified version of SQL Server which runs in user space.
When SQL Server runs as a service, it needs to have read/write permissions to the folder it writes. This is usually NOT THE CASE when the file is located within the User folder.
LocalDB on the other side, is always started when you start debugging your application and runs with the permissions of the user. So if your file was created by an admin user or outside of a directory you have write permissions.
Also, when you mount a database to SQL Server (Express), then the file is protected from write access to other applications, so LocalDB can't open it neither.
LocalDB is made for development to offer most of the SQL Server features but without all the hard setup and permanently running service in the background.
Essentially you have two options:
Use the SQL Server connection string as #TanvirArjel suggested
Detach the database from SQL Server express, copy it to your user folder (C:\Users\<myusername>\) and then correct the path to it
Then it should just work.
Notice that LocalDB is not meant to run in production, so you will likely experience issues when trying to run it in IIS (IIS Express and Console applications and WPF work fine).
Reasons for LocalDb not working with IIS is because ASP.NET (Core) applications within IIS run with a special user, but LocalDbs are always created in the users profile folder. Now, the accounts used by IIS don't have a profile and can't create the database and can't access any database outside (since localDbs are stored in user folder only the user who created it has access to it).
Here some source on it and the reasons behind it.
Using LocalDb with IIS
Write the connection string as follows.Hope it will work...
"DefaultConnection": "Server=YourPcName\\SQLExpressInstanceName;Database=aspnet-WebApplication3-53bc9b9d-9d6a-45d4-8429-2a2761773502;Trusted_Connection=True;MultipleActiveResultSets=true"
I am trying to find a solution to three issues I have encountered recently relating to SQL Server 2014. I am not an expert with this stuff by any means, but I've sort of fallen into needing to learn it in my current role. I went from never using SSMS a few months ago to (Trying) to teach myself how to use SSIS and SSRS. I've made a ton of progress, but now I'm stuck actually getting everything automated the way I want it.
The biggest challenge, and root of all my problems, stems from the fact that I am not a local admin on my machine. It was great to finally get IT to install the programs, but they do not want to give me, or anyone not in IT in my company, local admin access. Apart from asking my director to try to convince them to do so, I'm hoping for some solutions that would mean I don't have to call them every day to run these programs.
My integration server is running, I've got my SSIS packages built, but I can't connect to the Integration Server through SSMS, as I am not a local admin on my machine. I've read about going through dcomcnfg settings for REMOTE access issues, but I'm worried that won't help here since I'm trying to do this from the local machine and it still doesn't work. Any ideas as to how I can change the settings so that it runs for non-admin accounts or just make it work?
SSRS: I've built a report, and want to deploy it, but I don't have access to the reporting services configuration manager either. For whatever reason my reporting server is stopped in the server configuration manager. When I click on it, it says to use reporting services config mgr to tweak settings, so a bit stuck. Appears to be the same issue - not a local admin. Again, are there any settings I can change (getting IT to log in as an admin and walking them through what to change is my only choice, essentially).
SQL Server agent appears to be the same issue...
I could probably run my reports now, but it would be so much nicer to use these programs to the full extent. Any help would be appreciated here. I tried to research as much as possible, but most solutions seem to relate to logging on myself as an admin, running things as admin, etc, and I just can't do that.
Thanks!
You do not need to be local admin on your machine, SSIS and SSAS require Windows Authentication to log on remotely to the server via SSMS and publishing anything to the server from BIDS / SSDT Visual Studio Shell also requires WinAuth, though you can work locally and then swap the package to the server via Ctrl-C, and also instead of deploying SSRS you can login directly to the report manager and upload an RDL file (report). To start and stop SQL Agent services you need Windows Authentication via SSMS (in your setup), but to view the SQL Agent you must be in the SQL Server SysAdmin role (or at a grain level SQL Agent Reader via the MSDB rights.
I recommend you attempt to not get local administrator rights and instead ask 'merely' for rights to read and write to the server drives, and to manage only the aspects of SQL Server and it's services with a domain login on the server. You will require this anyway to check ingress and egress file locations and debug production issues (unless you have FTP to the box).
You do not have access to stop or start SQL Agent from your client SSMS also because I believe you are accessing it via SQL Authentication, which is not ideal or secure. But if you do not see the agent on the bottom left of SSMS it is because you do not have rights. If you see the Agent and it is red then the service is disabled and must be started.
You will need to get direct access to the SQL box (and you do not need local admin to manage SQL Server, just a domain account with some service rights and drive rights). If your system administrators are running SQL Server under Local Admin, then they should not be managing SQL Server in the first place (see my write up hyperlinked below).
The SSRS Team at Microsoft has merged into the SharePoint team, and SharePoint 2013 wraps up all of the BI tools right into it, so that is something you should also consider if you plan on building out a BI shop at your firm, i.e. you may not have to if you already have SharePoint installed.
Good luck, don't get discouraged.
What user account would you recommend running the SQL Server Express 2008 services in a development environment?
Here's the scenario:
MVC web project
Three MS SQL Server database projects
One of the databases must be populated with lookup tables
Other tables are user data and don't need data uploading
GoDaddy hosting
Visual Studio 2013
I'd like to deploy everything (web project, sql schemas, reference data) to GoDaddy in one fell swoop, but they appear to only offer FTP uploading. When using FTP in the Web Publishing Wizard, it says "Database preview not supported for this method" which I'm taking "method" to mean FTP. I can publish the web project fine in FTP, but of course without the databases the web application generates errors.
So here are my questions
There is a "Web Deploy" publish method listed in the wizard, but GoDaddy has no information on how to set this up. Can this be used with GoDaddy and will it publish DBs also?
How does one configure the project to use the local SQL Server when running on localhost, but when deployed it uses the GoDaddy SQL Servers?
Can the data in the local DB be uploaded as part of the publishing wizard process, or is SQL Server Management Studio the tool of choice?
Thanks!
I don't believe GoDaddy supports WebDeploy. They didn't when I left their service a few years ago. You can talk to them to confirm whether this has changed.
This is the role of Web.Config Transforms. For an intro to the topic, see here; the article is a little out of date and doesn't mention one of the most useful points - you can add transforms for each publish profile, so they're applied according to your publish settings.
You probably can't upload the local DB file. In almost every hosting situation, the SQL server and the web server are two separate machines, and don't share any files (corollary: the web server doesn't have the SQL service installed). One workaround you can try is to publish the DB directly from your own machine. That is, if you can connect to the DB from your machine, you can do a Web Deploy publish to your own machine but it will send the SQL changes to your GoDaddy DB server.
A more advanced workaround for #3:
Set up your FTP publishing settings for your files
Figure out how to publish your DB through WebDeploy only/from the command line (you can refer to here for a sample using WebDeploy from the command line; note this is going from GoDaddy -> Local, but it's trivial to turn it around)
Customize the web publish pipeline to insert an MSBuild target to execute your WebDeploy command line (see here for an example of modifying the pipeline; you can add the target directly in your .pubxml file if you're not intending to use it for multiple projects).
This will give you a single publish profile which will separately publish your files (via FTP) and your DB (via WebDeploy).
I am a newbie with DotNetNuke and have been stumbling on how to deploy from the development server to the deployment server. For starters my development and deployment servers are one and the same machine. Here are the steps that I did:
DNN Setup
Downloaded DNN using WebMatrix.
Launched DNN and proceeded with the installation wizard, which is basically just testing the environment and then creating the DNN database.
After the wizard's installation launching DNN will now proceed to the Getting Started page
Added "localhost/dnn" in the site alias list
Moving to ISS
In IIS I added application (folder) DNN in the web root
I copied all the files from the original webmatrix path to the dnn folder in c:\inetpub\webroot making sure that the file/folder hierarchies are the same
Result:
When launching DNN using my browser I am directed to the installation wizard page instead of the Getting Started page. What am I missing?
Thanks!
Confirm that the permissions on the folder containing DNN are the same on your test server as they are on your development server. (I give Network Service read/write and IUsr Read/Execute)
Confirm that the application pool running your application has the proper identity (Network Service is suggested) and is running the proper .NET Framework version; based upon your question, I think you are set on this.
Gain access to your web.config file. You will see a ConnectionStrings section. You probably need to update the connection strings.
If your test server runs off of a different database than your dev server, figure out the connection string of your test server and update your connection string accordingly
You may be able to restore a .BAK file of your DB to your test server
If you do this, you will probably need to (in SSMS) edit your Portal Alias table to include the host name that you are using in your test server environment. Examples: Maybe you access the site via localhost/ on your dev environment, but you access to test site via test.Ronald.com? test.Ronald.com would be your PortalAlias
If your test server runs off the same database server as your dev server, it sounds like you need to open up access in firewalls so that your test server has connectivity to your dev database
A word of advice
Once you get it running, you will be making changes to each database separately (assuming your test site and dev site use different DB Servers). This sync issue can be a royal pain with DNN, as your page structures, module assignments, html module contents, installed modules/extensions will get out of sync. While restoring backups is nice, it is not a very good long-term solution. I recommend database-syncing tools
The problem is most likely a problem with DNN not being able to find the Database. If it can't find the database, it will run the wizard in order to create one.
I am running desktop app that uses mdf file on local path.What if I want to do is that this mdf file should be placed over a network shared folder but network is using Domains and we need password to connect to that folder.Server is running windows Server and dont know if it has installed SQL Express or not.
Q
1-> do server needs to have SQL server Express.
2-> If I publish that project then use on multiple clients that may not have Visual Studio and sql server express but will have Dot Net framework. Will that Database Using application will work
1 - You don't have to use SQL Server Express, but its better than sharing a folder and use a mdf file over network using file sharing, and more trustable.
If your application will be used by one user at time only, you can share a folder on remote server, put the mdf file in there and give read/write access permission on share to the user running your desktop app.
If several users will run the app at the same time and access the database, it won't work because windows will probably lock the mdf file (and if not, your database will get corrupt). Then, you will have to use SQL Server Express and no folder sharing at all.
2 - It will work as long as your clients have SQL Compact Edition, that is installed with the .net framework by default, so you won't have any problems. By the way, if you are planning to all your customers using the same database, all the concerns I answered in question 1 applies here. If multiple users have to connect to the same db file at the same file, you'll have to: 1 - setup a SQL Server Express on client or 2 - publish your sql server express so it can be accessible from outside your network and configure your custumers desktop app to access this server.