I am trying to use the Nancy addin Nancy.LightningCache
According to the docs I should be able to set up my caching easily, like this:
Bootstrapper
protected override void ApplicationStartup(TinyIoCContainer container, IPipelines pipelines)
{
base.ApplicationStartup(container, pipelines);
this.EnableLightningCache(
container.Resolve<IRouteResolver>(),
ApplicationPipelines,
new[] {"id", "claim", "query", "take", "skip"});
}
Route
Get["/profile"] = _ =>
View["UserProfileView", Model].AsCacheable(DateTime.Now.AddSeconds(30));
When this route is called I get the following exception.
Microsoft.CSharp.RuntimeBinder.RuntimeBinderException:
'Nancy.Responses.Negotiation.Negotiator' does not contain a definition for 'AsCacheable'
Any ideas?
I just hacked this https://gist.github.com/4191120 together and it worked. All using 0.13 nugets
OK, got it.
Working Route
return View["HomeView", (object)Model].AsCacheable(DateTime.Now.AddMinutes(1));
You can see that I have been forced to explicitly cast my Model to an object in order to satisfy the signature of the AsCachable extension method.
The problem only shows up at runtime because my Model is an ExpandoObject and so a dynamic type.
Related
In My CXF-based REST layer I am using Jackson for seializing/deserializing Groovy objects. The issue I am experiencing deals with deserializing a property that does not have a setter method. There is a domain object Dashboard with getGroups() method returning a list of Group objects. Upon serialization this object is properly converted to JSON with "group" attribute. When I send the object for update from JavaScript, JSON still has the "group" attribute. Since the property is read-only on the domain object I would like to simply ignore the "group" property when deserializing JSON.
Since I am using Jackson mix-ins, I tried various combination of #JsonIgnore, #JsonGetter and #JsonProperty annotations - all to no avail. If the property is available upon serialization, I get the error below in deserialization. I can clean the JSON object in JavaScript by removing the "group" attribute, bit I would like to find a server-side solution.
Caused by: com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.JsonMappingException: Problem deserializing 'setterless' property 'groups': get method returned null (through reference chain: org.ozoneplatform.commons.server.domain.model.DashboardTemplate["groups"])
at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.impl.SetterlessProperty.deserializeAndSet(SetterlessProperty.java:114)
at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BeanDeserializer.deserialize(BeanDeserializer.java:198)
at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BeanDeserializer._deserializeUsingPropertyBased(BeanDeserializer.java:577)
at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BeanDeserializer.deserializeFromObjectUsingNonDefault(BeanDeserializer.java:393)
at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BeanDeserializer.deserializeFromObject(BeanDeserializer.java:289)
at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.deser.BeanDeserializer.deserialize(BeanDeserializer.java:121)
at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectReader._bind(ObjectReader.java:1169)
at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectReader.readValue(ObjectReader.java:625)
at com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs.json.JacksonJsonProvider.readFrom(JacksonJsonProvider.java:448)
at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.utils.JAXRSUtils.readFromMessageBody(JAXRSUtils.java:1038)
at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.utils.JAXRSUtils.processParameter(JAXRSUtils.java:614)
at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.utils.JAXRSUtils.processParameters(JAXRSUtils.java:578)
at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.interceptor.JAXRSInInterceptor.processRequest(JAXRSInInterceptor.java:238)
How can I tell Jackson to ignore a read-only property on deserialization?
Thank you,
Michael
After many fruitless hours, I have finally found the magic combination of spells that addresses such a seemingly trivial issue. In the mixin I had to create this combination of annotations:
#JsonIgnore
abstract Set<Group> groups
#JsonProperty
abstract Set<Group> getGroups()
#JsonIgnore
abstract void setGroups(Set<Group> groups)
On top of that I had to add two configuration parameters to the ObjectMapper:
mapper.configure(MapperFeature.USE_GETTERS_AS_SETTERS, false)
mapper.configure(DeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES, false)
Isn't there a simpler way to achieve the same?
Michael
I had the same issue. Solution was to give the getter the correct name:
List list...
setList(...)
was correct, but my getter was
setProductList() which produced the "setterLess" error. changing it to:
setList(...) resolved the issue
I just ran into the same problem, and my solution was to create a private, no-op setter:
public class MyFoo {
public String getMyStr() {
return "hello, world";
}
private void setMyStr(String ignored) {}
}
Making setMyStr private prevents me from accidentally trying to call it from my code, but Jackson still finds it and invokes it. Little does jackson know -- or care -- that invoking it does nothing.
I have a problem with resolving a type which is registered in UnityContainer. In my bootstraper I overrode ConfigureContainer method. Now this method looks like this
protected override void ConfigureContainer()
{
base.ConfigureContainer();
RegisterTypeIfMissing(typeof(IView<ShellViewModel>), typeof(Shell), false);
RegisterTypeIfMissing(typeof(CommandReaderWriter), typeof(CommandReaderWriter), true);
}
Then in function CreateShell (also in bootstraper) I want to get the instance of type CommandReaderWriter so I did this
var raeder = Container.TryResolve<CommandReaderWriter>();
unfortunatelly this returns null value. I also tried
var anotherReader = Container.TryResolve(typeof (CommandReaderWriter));
but it didn't do a trick. However, interesting is the fact that
var isRegistered = Container.IsTypeRegistered(typeof (CommandReaderWriter));
returns true.
so what is approperiate way to register singletone in UnityContainer ?
The two ways I use to register a singleton in Unity are:
_container.RegisterInstance<CommandReaderWriter>(new CommandReaderWriter);
and
_container.RegisterType<CommandReaderWriter,CommandReaderWriter>(new ContainerControlledLifetimeManager());
Both these methods set the Unity LifeTimeManager to be a ContainerControlledLifeTimeManager, which is Unity-speak for a singleton.
If you want to control exactly how the object is constructed use RegisterInstance. The second option is my preferred one because Unity then does all the dependency management for me.
I've got a repeating pattern in my routes - a certain Processor needs the same 3 Headers set every time I call it, so I've got the following code in my routes about 10+ times:
.whatever()
.setHeader("foo1", "bar1")
.setHeader("foo2", "bar2")
.setHeader("foo3", "bar3")
.processRef("processorBazThatNeedsHeaders")
.whatever()
The headers are populated differently every time, so abstracting this out into a subroute doesn't really buy me anything.
What I love to be able to do is subclass RouteDefinition to have another method in my DSL that would allow me to do this:
.whatever()
.bazProcessor("bar1", "bar2", "bar3")
.whatever()
and in 'bazProcessor', set the headers and call the processor.
I've tried to do this but it seems that it's only possible with some serious probably-not-future-proof surgery, and it seems that others have had similar luck.
I need them to be set as headers as opposed to passing them as parameters directly to the processor because the values are also used after the processor for routing.
Is there some hidden facility to achieve something like this?
By subclassing the RouteDefinition your extension will only be visible direct after from(...). This could be a limitation if you would like to use the DSL extension for example after the filter(...) DSL.
A simpler approach would be to encapsulate the logic somewhere, and use it in a class that implements the org.apache.camel.Processor interface, and then call an overload of .process(...), or bean(...) in the route to use the logic. You will be actually very closed to a DSL extension if you use a meaningful name for the Processor instance or a method, that returns that Processor instance. Here is an example of the suggested approach. At the end, your code could look like:
.whatever()
.process(setTheHeadersForBaz)
.whatever()
Just for reference: if you really need to do a DSL, there is a project that extends the Camel DSL based on Groovy. I guess a Scala way based on the Camel Scala DSL could be also an option.
Though slightly irrelevant, following is an example of extending Scala DSL.
We can create an implicit methods to DSL trait via an implicit class.
object DSLImplicits {
implicit class RichDSL(val dsl: DSL) {
def get = dsl.setHeader(Exchange.HTTP_METHOD, _ => HttpMethods.GET.name)
def post = dsl.setHeader(Exchange.HTTP_METHOD, _ => HttpMethods.POST.name)
}
}
And use it like this.
import DSLImplicits.RichDSL
//----------------------------
from("someWhere")
//Do some processing
.get.to("http://somewhere.com")
More details #
http://siliconsenthil.in/blog/2013/07/11/apache-camel-with-scala-extending-dsl/
So you only set the headers because you want the Processor to have access to those values?
If so then a simple example using a Factory could look like this:
whatever()
.process(BazProcessorFactory.instance("bar1", "bar2", "bar3"))
.whatever()
Where the BazProcessorFactory is just a wrapper around your Processor:
public class BazProcessorFactory {
public Processor instance(final String...vals) {
return new Processor() {
#Override
public void process(Exchange exchange) throws Exception {
//access your array of values here
System.out.println("Foo1 = "+vals[0]);
}
}
}
}
I am new to WPF and Prism, but I already learned that you have to register a View in Unity as an object:
Container.RegisterType<Object,MyView>("My.Assembly.MyView");
Still, when I use
var RelativeUriToMyView = new Uri("My.Assembly.MyView",UriKind.Relative);
RegionManager.RequestNavigate(RelativeUriToMyView, RegionName, CallbackResult);
the MyView displays as System.Object, and the CallbackResult contains no Error.
What am I missing? I'm happy to provide more information if needed.
You would want to look at the RegionNavigationContentLoader.cs in the PRISM source code; Here is the code that is loading the view for you.
protected virtual object CreateNewRegionItem(string candidateTargetContract)
{
object newRegionItem;
try
{
newRegionItem = this.serviceLocator.GetInstance<object>(candidateTargetContract);
}
catch (ActivationException e)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException(
string.Format(CultureInfo.CurrentCulture, Resources.CannotCreateNavigationTarget, candidateTargetContract),
e);
}
return newRegionItem;
}
There are several helper methods that take the URI, extract the query string, and create the 'name' used to lookup your view and cast it as an object.
Essentially, the name you are using to associate your concrete class as an object with Unity is the same one you'll need to use when you try to resolve the object with Unity. Here is some pesudocode to explain,
Container.RegisterType<object, ConcreteClass>(typeof(ConcreteClass).FullName);
Locator.GetInstance<object>(UriWithFullName)
If none of this helps, post the RelativeUriToMyView so I can see the contents.
Good luck.
The issue seemed to be caused by registering the view with its FullName (My.Assembly.MyView) instead of its Name (MyView).
Edit:
Changed the question to more accurately reflect the issue.
I have a Silverlight application which has two different XAPs - an InitialXAP which is loaded statically by the HTML page and a DynamicXAP which is loaded from code within the initial XAP. The DynamicXAP is loaded with code similar to this:
var asm = LoadAssemblyFromXap(stream, "DLLName");
// LoadAssemblyFromXAP will load the DynamicXAP as a file stream,
// unpack it and load DLLName as a dll.
var controllerType = asm.GetType("ClassNameToInstantiate_InsideAsm");
var constructor = controllerType.GetConstructor(Type.EmptyTypes);
return constructor.Invoke(null);
I have a class which uses reflection (specifically FieldInfo.GetValue) to do data binding. This class is defined in the InitialXAP. If I try to use this class in the DynamicXAP, I get an error:
Message: Unhandled Error in Silverlight Application System.FieldAccessException: Class.In.DynamicXAP.Which.Uses.The.Reflection.Class.In.InitialXAP
at System.Reflection.RtFieldInfo.PerformVisibilityCheckOnField(IntPtr field, Object target, IntPtr declaringType, FieldAttributes attr, UInt32 invocationFlags)
at System.Reflection.RtFieldInfo.InternalGetValue(Object obj, Boolean doVisibilityCheck, Boolean doCheckConsistency)
at System.Reflection.RtFieldInfo.InternalGetValue(Object obj, Boolean doVisibilityCheck)
at System.Reflection.RtFieldInfo.GetValue(Object obj)
I can get around this error by creating a subclass of the class using reflection and overriding the method using reflection like so:
public class InitialXAP.ClassUsingReflection {
public virtual object GetValue()
{
return fieldInfo.GetValue(parent);
}
}
public class ClassUsingReflection : InitialXAP.ClassUsingReflection {
public override object GetValue()
{
return fieldInfo.GetValue(parent);
}
}
But I would prefer to avoid this duplication by allowing reflection from the InitialXAP in the DynamicXAP. Any ideas on what I can do?
Although there is a learning curve, I would look at Silverlight MEF or Prism (both are together at last in the latest Prism 4 Beta). They both support dynamic loading of modules and enforce good patterns for reuse and separate/team development.
InitialXAP.ClassUsingReflection...
Note the duplicate isn't part of the inital xap namespace (ClassUsingReflection), and may be imported.
Notice GetVisible - as in not visible to Dynamic xap...
Just leave the duplicate (take away base class obviously) and try.