MongoDB embedded vs array sub document performance - arrays

Question

Given the below competing schemas with up to 100,000 friends I’m interested in finding the most efficient for my needs.
Doc1 (Index on user_id)
{
"_id" : "…",
"user_id" : "1",
friends : {
"2" : {
"id" : "2",
"mutuals" : 3
}
"3" : {
"id" : "3",
"mutuals": "1"
}
"4" : {
"id" : "4",
"mutuals": "5"
}
}
}
Doc2 (Compound multi key index on user_id & friends.id)
{
"_id" : "…",
"user_id" : "1",
friends : [
{
"id" : "2",
"mutuals" : 3
},
{
"id" : "3",
"mutuals": "1"
},
{
"id" : "4",
"mutuals": "5"
}
]}
I can’t seem to find any information on the efficiency of the sub field retrieval. I know that mongo implements data internally as BSON, so I’m wondering whether that means a projection lookup is a binary O(log n)?
Specifically, given a user_id to find whether a friend with friend_id exists, how would the two different queries on each schema compare? (Assuming the above indexes) Note that it doesn’t really matter what’s returned, only that not null is returned if the friend exists.
Doc1col.find({user_id : "…"}, {"friends.friend_id"})
Doc2col.find({user_id : "…", "friends.id" : "friend_id"}, {"_id":1})
Also of interest is how the $set modifier works. For schema 1,given the query Doc1col.update({user_id : "…"}, {"$set" : {"friends.friend_id.mutuals" : 5}), how does the lookup on the friends.friend_id work? Is this a O(log n) operation (where n is the number of friends)?
For schema 2, how would the query Doc2col.update({user_id : "…", "friends.id" : "friend_id"}, {"$set": {"friends.$.mutuals" : 5}) compare to that of the above?

Answer 1

doc1 is preferable if one's primary requirements is to present data to the ui in a nice manageable package. its simple to filter only the desired data using a projection {}, {friends.2 : 1}
doc2 is your strongest match since your use case does not care about the result Note that it doesn’t really matter what’s returned and indexing will speed up the fetch.
on top of that doc2 permits the much cleaner syntax
db.doc2.findOne({user_id: 1, friends.id : 2} )
versus
db.doc1.findOne({ $and : [{ user_id: 1 }, { "friends.2" : {$exists: true} }] })
on a final note, however, one can create a sparse index on doc1 (and use $exists) but your possibility of 100,000 friends -- each friend needed a sparse index -- makes that absurd. opposed to a reasonable number of entries say demographics gender [male,female], agegroups [0-10,11-16,25-30,..] or more impt things [gin, whisky, vodka, ... ]