I am using iOS 6 Social framework for accessing user's Facebook data. I am trying to get likes of the current user within my app using ACAccount and SLRequest. I have a valid Facebook account reference of type ACAccount named facebook, and I'm trying to get user's likes this way:
SLRequest *req = [SLRequest requestForServiceType:SLServiceTypeFacebook requestMethod:SLRequestMethodGET URL:url parameters:nil];
req.account = facebook;
[req performRequestWithHandler:^(NSData *responseData, NSHTTPURLResponse *urlResponse, NSError *error) {
//my handler code.
}
where url is #"https://graph.facebook.com/me/likes?fields=name"; In my handler, I'm getting this response:
{
error = {
code = 2500;
message = "An active access token must be used to query information about the current user.";
type = OAuthException;
};
}
Shouldn't access tokens be handled by the framework? I've found a similar post Querying Facebook user data through new iOS6 social framework but it doesn't make sense to hard-code an access token parameter into the URL, as logically the access token/login checking should be handled automatically by the framework. In all examples that I've seen around no one plays with an access token manually:
http://damir.me/posts/facebook-authentication-in-ios-6
iOS 6 Facebook posting procedure ends up with "remote_app_id does not match stored id" error
etc.
I am using the iOS6-only approach with the built in Social framework, and I'm not using the Facebook SDK. Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Can.
You need to keep a strong reference to the ACAccountStore that the account comes from. If the store gets deallocated, it looks like it causes this problem.
Try running on an actual device instead of a simulator. This worked for me.
Ensure that your bundle id is input into your Facebook app's configuration. You might have a different bundle id for your dev/debug build.
Related
I am facing a peculiar issue with using Jupyterhub config c.AzureAdOAuthenticator.username_claim = 'unique_name' . Due to the way our AzureAD is configured this returns an email like fname.lname#xyz.com . However we want to convert this to local username fname.lname without the #xyz.com while Spawning jupyterhub-singleuser. Since the enhancement to Refactor oauthenticators #526 is not yet released we cannot use a function like c.AzureAdOAuthenticator.username_claim = 'get_username_from_userinfo' to convert email to username. If we use a mapping like c.AzureAdOAuthenticator.username_map = { 'fname.lname#xyz.com': 'fname.lname'} then it spawns correctly as fname.lname . But we dont want to keep adding these hardcoded maps for any new users added to jupyterhub. How can we handle this issue by changing some code in the jupyterhub version 3.1.0. Which module can we do a small change to remove the domain #xyz.com?
There is a similar issue logged here: https://github.com/jupyterhub/jupyterhub/issues/2579
UPDATE: Below posting is a solution that worked for this issue:
https://discourse.jupyter.org/t/wildcard-mapping-in-azureadoauthenticator-username-map/17686
I'm actually using this React library (https://www.npmjs.com/package/react-google-login) to authenticate with Google.
As for the basic profile and email scopes, this works fine. On my client app on Google Cloud Platform, I've correctly enabled the People API (https://developers.google.com/people) and added the correct scope to the scope list, in React (https://www.googleapis.com/auth/user.phonenumbers.read). I've also ensured that my phone number on my Google Profile was made public even if I don't know if that could matter. After doing all this, the consent screen is working fine asking me to allow the app to access my phone number.
However after login, I can only see the data linked to profile and email scopes. In the library I can see that they made some object properties as shown in the code below inside the library itself :
function handleSigninSuccess(res) {
/*
offer renamed response keys to names that match use
*/
const basicProfile = res.getBasicProfile()
const authResponse = res.getAuthResponse(true)
res.googleId = basicProfile.getId()
res.tokenObj = authResponse
res.tokenId = authResponse.id_token
res.accessToken = authResponse.access_token
res.profileObj = {
googleId: basicProfile.getId(),
imageUrl: basicProfile.getImageUrl(),
email: basicProfile.getEmail(),
name: basicProfile.getName(),
givenName: basicProfile.getGivenName(),
familyName: basicProfile.getFamilyName()
}
onSuccess(res)
}
\
So the problem is that I don't know if I even receive the phone data or if I just can't read it because I don't know how to call the phone data inside the response, in terms of variables name in React. Anyone has an idea ?
The library you're using seems to be using Google Identity which does not include a method to obtain the user's phone number, just their basic profile.
You can get the user's phone number with the people api but this is not in the scope of this library. You'd have to make your own method to get the the authenticated user profile with the phoneNumbers field. Enabling the people api and requesting authorization are just the first steps.
https://developers.google.com/people/api/rest/v1/people/get
I've been going through the rules guide but haven't found an answer to this.
App users are able to submit "scores" of different types, which are then processed in JS and written to a "ranking" node. I have it set up so that every time a new score is submitted, the rankings are automatically recalculated and a new child is written if the user doesn't exist or updated if the user exists.
My question is how to secure this "ranking" node. Everyone should be able to read it, nobody except the system should be able to write it. This would prevent people from submitting their own rankings and aggregate scores.
EDIT
This is the operation:
Ref.child('rankings').child(uid).once('value', function (snapshot) {
if (snapshot.exists()) {
snapshot.ref().update(user); //user object created upstream
} else {
var payload = {};
payload[uid] = user;
snapshot.ref().parent().update(payload);
}
});
How would I add custom authentication to this call? Also, since I'm using AngularJS, is there any way to hide this custom token or would I have to route it through a backend server?
The key part of your problem definition is:
only the system should be able to write it.
This requires that you are able to recognize "the system" in your security rules. Since Firebase security is user-based, you'll have to make your "system" into a user. You can do this by either recording the uid from a regular user account or by minting a custom token for your "system".
Once you have that, the security for your ranking node becomes:
".read": true,
".write": "auth.uid == 'thesystem'"
In the above I assume you mint a custom token and specify thesystem as the uid.
I have combined Admin SDK Directory API with the Google+ Domains API to fetch all the Google plus profile information.
But , There are people who do not have Google Plus profile in our organization which generates a null pointer Exception,I also tried the below code to validate
Person profile = plus.people().get(directorylist.getId()).execute();
if(!profile.isEmpty())
{
System.out.println(profile.getDisplayName());
profile.getImage().getUrl();
profile.getSkills();
System.out.println("SKILL="+profile.getSkills());
System.out.println("ORG="+profile.getOrganizations());
}
But the validation is not working and it is throwing null pointer Exception . Let me know if anyone has a better solution to this problem
You want:
public abstract boolean isPlusUser()
source
I am working on a web app project that has been in development for long time. The app has two sides, the majority of the site is publicly accessible. However, there are sections that require the user to be logged in before they can access certain content.
When the user logs in they get a sessionid (GUID) which is stored in a table in the database which tracks all sort for data about the user and their activity.
Every page of the app was written to look if this session id variable exists or not in the querystring. If a user tries to access one of these protected areas, the app checks to see if this sessiond variable is in the querystring. If i is not, they are redirected to the login screen.
The flow of the site moves has the user moving seamlessly from secured areas to non-secured areas, back and forth, etc.
So we did a test run with the Google Custom Search and it does an awesome job picking up all our dynamic content in these public areas. However, we have not been able to figure out how to pass the sessionid along with the search results IF the user is logged in already.
Is it possible to pas querystring variables that already exist in the url along with the search results?
As far as I know, this is not possible. Google doesn't give you the possibilty to modify the URL's of the Search Results in their Custom Search.
A possible solution would be to store your Session-Key to a Cookie, rather than passing it with every URL.
Use the parseQueryFromUrl function
function parseQueryFromUrl () {
var queryParamName = "q";
var search = window.location.search.substr(1);
var parts = search.split('&');
for (var i = 0; i < parts.length; i++) {
var keyvaluepair = parts[i].split('=');
if (decodeURIComponent(keyvaluepair[0]) == queryParamName) {
return decodeURIComponent(keyvaluepair[1].replace(/\+/g, ' '));
}
}
return '';
}
Select RESULTS ONLY option in the Look & Feel and it will provide you with the code.
www.google.com/cse/