We are facing an issue with long running threads in our web logic server 11g.
What actually happening is when we made a request in our application, if the thread associated with the request is taking more than 5 mins. Our weblogic server 11g is creating a new thread for the same request. that means we have 2 long running threads for the same request after 5 mins ( after 10 mins we will have 3 and so on ). this thing goes on repeat for every 5 mins and all the threads in the weblogic server get struck ed and finally server goes into "warning" status and application hangs out.
I suspected it as session replication issues but we are not using any clustered environment so I believe Session-replication will not be the reason for this strange behaviour of server.
Any suggestion on how to resolve this issue is highly appreciated.
Could be due to Idempotent setting of weblogic server plug-in is set to on and WLIOTimeoutSecs is left at its default value of 300 seconds.
Related
I am a bit new to postgresql db. I have done a setup over Azure Cloud for my PostgreSQL DB.
It's Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (4vCPU, 8GB RAM) machine with PostgreSQL 9.6 version.
The problem that occurs is when the connection to the PostgreSQL DB stays idle for some time let's say 2 to 10 minutes then the connection to the db does not respond such that it doesn't fulfill the request and keep processing the query.
Same goes with my JAVA Spring-boot Application. The connection doesn't respond and the query keep processing.
This happens randomly such that the timing is not traceable sometimes it happens in 2 minutes, sometimes in 10 minutes & sometimes don't.
I have tried with PostgreSQL Configuration file parameters. I have tried:
tcp_keepalive_idle, tcp_keepalive_interval, tcp_keepalive_count.
Also statement_timeout & session_timeout parameters but it doesn't change anyway.
Any suggestion or help would be appreciable.
Thank You
If you are setting up PostgreSQL DB connection on Azure VM you have to be aware that there are Unbound and Outbound connections timeouts . According to
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/load-balancer/load-balancer-outbound-connections#idletimeout ,Outbound connections have a 4-minute idle timeout. This timeout is not adjustable. For inbound timeou there is an option to change in on Azure Portal.
We run into similar issue and were able to resolve it on client side. We changed Spring-boot default Hikari configuration as follow:
hikari:
connection-timeout: 20000
validation-timeout: 20000
idle-timeout: 30000
max-lifetime: 40000
minimum-idle: 1
maximum-pool-size: 3
connection-test-query: SELECT 1
connection-init-sql: SELECT 1
We have a spring java application that connects to a MS SQL server cluster of 2 nodes (2016 SP2 standard version).
We are testing failover: if a node fails, the application needs 90 seconds before reconnecting to the other node, that will be too much for production.
After reading and reading again the HickaryCP documentation for java, I tried to test this scenario with datagrip: I run a long query (insert a line in a table every 500 ms during 10 minutes) and I get the same issue: the database was unavailable for 90 seconds after 1 node failure.
Maybe the issue is cluster side and not application side...
Is there any SQL server cluster configuration that prevent us to reconnect before 90 seconds?
How can the connection be back before these 90 seconds? is there any caching or default configuration that we should update?
Thanks a lot for your help
EDIT
The test was wrong, I updated in comments the issue I am getting:
it reconnects as soon as the 1st node is back. The issue is after a second failover: no connection can be established then (I wait for the 2 nodes synchronization before the 2nd failover)
I have a SQL Server 2008 database, and I need a mergereplication because i want to sync with mobile devices afterwards.
So I created a replication but when it comes to start the snapshotagent, the agent tries to start for about 20 minutes and then it shows the message
The replication agent has not logged a progress message in 10 minutes.
This might indicate an unresponsive agent or high system activity.
Verify that records are being replicated to the destination and that
connections to the Subscriber, Publisher, and Distributor are still
active.
There aren't any other errormessages, neither in the snapshot-agent-status-window nor in the agent-log-window.
I don't have the administrator of the domain, but the local administrator and a domainuser with admin-privilegs. Both have all rights to database, are in the access-list of the replication.
The server agent runs on the local administrator-account and there are 3 MergeReplications on the server, working
The job runs also under the local administrator.
Thank you for your help, Karl
So it works again...
Maybe someone else has got the same issue one day, so i post the solution here:
I researched on the server and found out, the sql server service is running under a local user. The reason for this is, that there were problems with the backupsystem, used by our customers and so they changed it years ago.
Because of the local user account a 15404-Error occures.
Knowing, that i mustn't use domain-accounts, I also solved the initial problem with my snapshot-agent. I searched for hours (nearly days ;) ) and it was just this little change:
When the Replication is created, the job is created too. The job has three steps. The Job-owner is the local-admin, also for the server-agent-service. But the second step of my job (replictionsnapshot) has one setting: run as. And by default this isn't the job-owner but the user running the creation, in my case my domain-account.
Now, that I set it to the local-administrator as well everything works fine again.
Thanks, Karl
I had the same issue, And the below fixed the issue. The replication agent was timing out after 10 minutes and changing the heartbeat from 10 to 30 minutes solved the issue,
Run the below command
exec sp_changedistributor_property #property = 'heartbeat_interval', #value = 30;
and then restart the sql agent on the subscriber to continue syncing.
I have an MVC3 application hosted by third party hosting provider. The site has been running well for the past 3 months without any problems. Today suddenly the Application started throwing following Exception as recorded in my logs part of which is shown below.
System.Data.ProviderIncompatibleException: The provider did not return
a ProviderManifestToken string. --->
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Timeout expired. The timeout
period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is
not responding.
The message is self explanatory and I first thought I should increase the connect timeout, but then the exception was still thrown suggesting the other part (Server Not Responding). I contacted my hosting provider and he said there was nothing wrong on his part. So I am stuck with a down website and don't know what to do.
Any ideas why the provider is throwing the exception listed above. Also, is it possible for me to remotely connect to the database on the hosting server with limited authority. Any tools for that ? I don't have an exposure in database subject, except for application programming.
This occurs due to the Timeout, the default timeout is 30 seconds, for time out there are 2 common reasons.
Long running tasks or uncommitted transactions. Refer to the Timeout expired to know about this.
I've recently switched to running my development environment over our company's VPN using NetExtender. It would now seem that my database driven applications are now timing out the first time they try to hit the database. After the timeout (30 sec or so) and an additional 5-10 seconds, all DB calls succeed. During the 5-10 seconds the timeout error response is sent immediately. It seems to be related to when SQL Server needs to create a new database session for me. Each time I need to be assigned a new client process ID, I timeout. This is a huge problem when using Resharper + NUnit as a test harness as each time the tests are run, a new instance of resharper's unit test runner is created thusly causing me to timeout. Server timeout seems to be in the area of 30 seconds, which is certainly generous enough for a connection to be established.
It sounds to me like it could be a DNS issue. If the primary DNS is not properly configured and is inaccessible from the VPN client, it will timeout and pass on to the secondary.
Additionally, some VPNs allow you to access some local resources - this could put the DNS on your own, local network in play.
I think I'd try changing the DNS-order and see if that did the trick.