I have application with ArcGIS Runtime for WPF. I use Clusterer to my objects in GraphicsLayer, I'm trying FlareClusterer and CustomClusterer. Every clusterer rebuild increases used RAM.
I've tried calling:
GC.Collect();
GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();
but this doesn't help.
Does anyone know of a solution for this problem?
P.S. Sorry for my bad English.
GC.Collect(); won't help if objects can't be collected. I would suggest profiling your app. Use ANTS, it's free for 2 weeks. It will show you zombie leftover objects.
A quick check is to go through you code and look for all event subscriptions. Every += should have -= (unless it's anonymous lambda that does work right in the same spot) Make sure to unsubscribe before you release the object. That's a common mistake especially when clearing collections (collection is clear, but the object that it used to have will remain.
There lots of other things, but ANTS I think is the first quick and easy test.
Related
I am trying to find a way to detect whether or not an SCNGeometry is intersecting with any other SCNGeometries. I can't seem to find anything in apple docs to support this notion, nor anything online either.
As of right now, the only method I can think of doing is enabling the Physics Engine and doing contact tests, but I want to try and avoid it if possible.
Basically, all I want to do is throw an SCNGeometry onto the a scene, and detect what SCNGeometry it is touching (Basically getting an array of geometries) so that I may process further steps.
There is no code as of yet, I am trying to research how if possible it can be done.
I can also accept code in any programming language, so feel free to provide an answer in what you feel most comfortable with.
I'm developing a Magazine app and trying to find the best strategy to optimize performance and stability. The app should be able to handle +100 pages and expect users to swipe between them fast and smoothly.
With all this in mind, this is what I've tried so far.
The basic structure would be using tabs, with tabs bar hidden, to allow user swipe. Since loading + 100 tabs with huge images would be a mistake, I always mantain three tabs: the current page, the previous and the following. With a selection listener I change the positions accordingly.
The way I load and dispose images as selection changes is the big deal here. The app downloads the images from Internet and cache them in FileSystemStorage. Those images are 768 x 1024. This is what I've tried with different luck:
Simply retrieve the images from FileSystem everytime a new page is requested:
if (FileSystemStorage.getInstance().exists(rutaImagen)) {
try {
int size = (int) FileSystemStorage.getInstance().getLength(rutaImagen);
EncodedImage imagenPubli = EncodedImage.create(FileSystemStorage.getInstance().openInputStream(rutaImagen), size);
} catch(IOException io) {
}
}
This has proven to be inefficient and risky in terms of memory usage. My iPad mini launch frequent low memory warnings, and end up killed by jetsam after a little while.
Store the images in a WeakHashMap, so Images don't need to be constantly loaded form FileSystemStorage, which seems to be the cause of problems and too expensive. Only if they are garbage collected, the first method comes in action.
This solution perfoms better, and the memory warnings are dramatically reduced, but are still there. After stressing hard the app, 15 or 20 minutes later jetsam jumps in and kill the app.
Similar approach: instead of WeakHashMap, I have tried CacheMap. This has been the best solution for me so far. I have to push hard to see some memory warnings once in a while, and no crash so far. Still not enterily happy though, because I believe I should not see any memory warnings at all.
I talk about iOS only here because the app performs well on Android whatever method I use, and I have never got any Out of Memory there.
What do you think? Am I in the right path? Would you guys use a different approach?
Thanks
I believe that you should use the "let-it-be-done" approach. So far you have tried to code everything yourself, while codenameOne has many optimized way of doing it. The easiest way would be to use a MultiList, which will display your images (by using an UrlImage). The UrlImage will allow codenameone to handle the caching and else. Basically, the image will be loaded when viewed and placed in cache afterwards.
It's unclear from the question where the magazine page is just an image. If so I would suggest using the ImageViewer class as it was designed exactly with the use case of an infinite list of large images to swipe and zoom thru.
The general strategy with the Tabs seems like a good start if you need something more elaborate than images. If it doesn't perform well you can always substitute Tabs for something else.
I am working on a WPF application which doesnot seem to release all the memory when logged out of a screen. On start of app, there is a login screen where I enter userID/Pwd. It takes to a different screen(lets say WPF2). At this point, I am totally unloading the login screen(memory now is 70MB). WHen the WPF2 screen is loaded with dynamically memory goes upto 200MB. When the user logs out from WPF2, login screen loads again. AT this point, I am clearing all objects used in WPF2 in dispose method. But the memory is still 200MB not 70MB, and also when I login again it increases from there.
WHen the application is closed, all memory used is released.
I understand this is very application specific question, but any general ideas are highly appreciated.
Thanks
Items are not released from memory when an event handler is still attached to them, or when the application closes.
This sounds like you have some event handlers to clean up.
Hope this Helps,
You gave not enough information about how you get the memory values. I assume you looked in task manager? If you look only at task manager, you will probably not get the values you expect. Furthermore, memory releasing is not done in the moment a object is no more used. It is an asynchronous task done by the Garbage Collection. If you want to measure memory at a specific point of time, you probably should force GC to free memory before (but only for measurement, not for production code). Look at this thread to get a starting point about the different memory types.
Here you find a very good video, that gives a start to debug memory problems in WPF.
When you call Dispose()on a IDisposableyou can clear umanaged resources.
The GarbageCollector may not have collected WPF2 yet.
I have a standalone WPF application running on .NET 3.5. Every so often, the display simply freezes up for several seconds. This is most noticeable on screens where something is being updated often. Here is a video showing the problem.
While the display is frozen, the interface remains responsive (video).
I've come across some other posts with similar problems who attributed it to a SW/HW rendering issue. To be safe, I disabled HW rendering altogether, but still have the problem.
I ran a file monitor during the freezes to see if there is some extraordinary file access or activity going on, but nothing is out of the ordinary.
Final note: The target platform is a small touch-screen panel PC without much memory or horsepower (512 MB). I only see this issue on the target, never on my development PC, which has much more in the way of resources.
UPDATE
I thought I had fixed the issue by removing some animation code, but it did not work. I am still encountering the problem and I'm at the end of my rope.
Here's some more things I've tried:
Upgraded to .NET 4.0. Same behavior.
Added debug code to all methods that may be invoked via DispatcherTimer (which are called on the UI thread) to make sure none of them are holding up the UI.
I'm really stumped here and have added a bounty. As I mentioned, the problem only occurs on the target PC (link).
I tend to suspect either .NET GC or the OS swapfile when this kind of behavior shows up.
For the former, you could try the .NET performance counters to monitor for suspect activity.
If the device has a swap file, you can disable it and see if the behavior changes.
As others have said, a profiler (or some what of isolating what condition is inducing the delay - even just attaching and breaking the debugger when it occurs) would be a good way to get more information.
Did you tried to profile the application on the tested system? Using a memory and/or performance profiler?
You could get some good informations out of this type of test : some .Net profilers
And here's one for WPF : WPF profiler from microsoft
The culprit was the following method call:
new HwndSource(new HwndSourceParameters());
This was added to my application because it patched a memory leak problem in .NET 3.5. This work-around can be found here. If I remove this call, the rendering issues go away.
I took out the call and fixed the memory leak in another way (removing storyboard animation and using code behind instead)
I did nice winforms 2.0 application and it's working great and customers are still happy but unfortunatelly I cannot solve one issue. The problem is that after using app for a couple of hours, gdi user handles number is rising and rising and finally process cannot allocate more objects and app crashes...
I'm not doing anything fancy, it's regular app, a few forms, a few more modal forms, a few datagridviews and a lot tablelayoutpanels where I'm adding a lot labels and textboxes.
My questions are:
are there any "recommended-practises"
concerning adding/removing regular system
controls on forms at runtime (dgv/tlp)
how to detect system handles'
leaks - preferably using visual
studio and a kind of free plugin
(profiler?)
Detecting graphics and window handle leaks is very difficult. As to a particular strategy for finding them at runtime, I can't suggest anything (though I'd love to hear someone else's!).
As for preventing them, here are a couple of reminders:
While the Control class's finalizer will call Dispose(), this is non-deterministic. You are not guaranteed that ANY object will EVER get finalized by the garbage collector. It's likely that it will, but it's not a guarantee.
In keeping with the above, Forms are an exception. When a Form is shown in a NON-MODAL way (meaning through Show(), NOT ShowDialog()), then when the Form closes it will deterministically call Dispose(). Forms that are shown through ShowDialog() must have Dispose() called manually in order to deterministically clean up the control handle.
Keeping those two things in mind, the most important thing that you can do is to ensure that you always call Dispose() on any object that you explicitly create that implements IDisposable. This INCLUDES Forms, Controls, Graphics objects, even the graphics helper classes like Pen and Brush. All of those classes implement IDisposable, and all of them need to be disposed of as soon as you no longer need them.
Try to cache your graphics utility classes, assuming you're using some. While a Pen and a Brush are fairly lightweight to create, they do take up handles and need to be disposed of when you're finished. Rather than creating them all the time, create a cache manager that allows you to pass in the parameters that you would use in the constructor for those objects and keep that object around. Repeated calls with the same parameters should still only use one single instance. You can then flush your cache on a periodic basis or at specific places in your application if you know where those would be.
Following those guidelines will greatly reduce--if not eliminate--your handle leaks.
I find that using the Task Manager with the GDI Objects column visible essential to finding such leaks. You can target specific areas by breaking before the call, make a note of the GDI objects, then break after the suspect call to determine if the objects are being released properly.
The source code for two useful GDI leak tracking tools can be found here: link text
I have used it successfully on many Visual Studio C++ projects. I am not sure whether I work with .NET as well.