Using pipe to pass integer values between parent and child - c

I'm a little confused on how to properly use pipe() to pass integer values between two processes.
In my program I first create a pipe, then I fork it. I assume I have "Two" pipes then?
From what I understand, this is my assignment.
My parent goes through a for loop checking an integer value "i" for a certain operation, increases a count variable, and saves value into an array. After each check my parent should pass an integer value, "i" to my child through a pipe. My child then uses that integer value, does some check on the value, and should increase a count variable, and save the result in a [shared?] array. Eventually; the child should return it's final count to the parent, who then prints out the two counts, and the "Shared" array.
-> I'm not sure I need to have a shared array or to save the results at all. I may only need the counts - the homework was ambiguous and I'm awaiting a response from the professor. Also; can I even do a shared array between processes? It sounds like a start of some problem to me.
-> Here are my questions:
One; how do I use pipes for integers? I've only seen them for character arrays and previous answers don't seem to think this is possible or legal..? I'm not sure. There was no resolution that I could find on it.
-> How do I use a unidirectional pipe to pass integers to a child? And have the child return something? I'm not sure how I'm able to... differentiate between the two pipes. I do "know" [or think I know] that I have to close one unused portion of each pipe to avoid "Some vague problem".
Sorry for the dumb questions; I haven't been taught processes (aside from fork) or pipes (at all) yet in this class - so I'm not really sure where to start!
Heres parts of my code - it's not pretty and it doesn't work and I don't expect it to. It's more of a shell placeholder. Once I figure out how to use a pipe - I'd Probably make the code make sense.
int main(void)
{
int fd[2];
pid_t childpid;
pid_t parentpid;
int i;
int threecount = 0;
int fivecount = 0;;
int results [MAXSIZE];
parentpid = getpid(); //Get current process ID number
pipe(fd);
childpid = fork();
if(childpid == 0){
close(fd[0]); //Closing this for some other reason
}
int j = 0;
if(childpid > 0)
close(fd[1]); //Closing this for some reason
if( childpid == -1 )
{
perror("Failed to fork\n");
return 1;
}
if (childpid > 0)
{
for(i = 1; i < MAXSIZE;i++)
{
if(i % 5 == 0)
{
fivecount++;
i = results[j];
j++;
wait(NULL);
}
}
}
else if (childpid == 0)
{
if(i % 3 == 0) //This i here should probably be the i value above, piped to the child
{
threecount++;
i = results[j]; //This should be part of th pipe
j++; //Trying to keep count of that shared array, not really the right way to do it though.
}
}
printf("%d %d \n", fivecount,threecount);
return 0;
}

This is about as lame (and no error checking, btw) a sample as I can muster for using a pipe to send int from a parent to a child process, where the child was launched from fork(). It gets more complicated (obviously) for sending and receiving data, but i can't do everything for you. This just forks and waits for an int (actually, the number of bytes that are used by an int) from the child.
Update: Added send+response two-way communication example after this one. See the second code listing for more information.
Hope it helps.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int fd[2];
int val = 0;
// create pipe descriptors
pipe(fd);
// fork() returns 0 for child process, child-pid for parent process.
if (fork() != 0)
{
// parent: writing only, so close read-descriptor.
close(fd[0]);
// send the value on the write-descriptor.
val = 100;
write(fd[1], &val, sizeof(val));
printf("Parent(%d) send value: %d\n", getpid(), val);
// close the write descriptor
close(fd[1]);
}
else
{ // child: reading only, so close the write-descriptor
close(fd[1]);
// now read the data (will block)
read(fd[0], &val, sizeof(val));
printf("Child(%d) received value: %d\n", getpid(), val);
// close the read-descriptor
close(fd[0]);
}
return 0;
}
Output:
Parent(5943) send value: 100
Child(5945) received value: 100
Update: Expanded to include send+response using two pipe sets
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
// some macros to make the code more understandable
// regarding which pipe to use to a read/write operation
//
// Parent: reads from P1_READ, writes on P1_WRITE
// Child: reads from P2_READ, writes on P2_WRITE
#define P1_READ 0
#define P2_WRITE 1
#define P2_READ 2
#define P1_WRITE 3
// the total number of pipe *pairs* we need
#define NUM_PIPES 2
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int fd[2*NUM_PIPES];
int val = 0, len, i;
pid_t pid;
// create all the descriptor pairs we need
for (i=0; i<NUM_PIPES; ++i)
{
if (pipe(fd+(i*2)) < 0)
{
perror("Failed to allocate pipes");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}
// fork() returns 0 for child process, child-pid for parent process.
if ((pid = fork()) < 0)
{
perror("Failed to fork process");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
// if the pid is zero, this is the child process
if (pid == 0)
{
// Child. Start by closing descriptors we
// don't need in this process
close(fd[P1_READ]);
close(fd[P1_WRITE]);
// used for output
pid = getpid();
// wait for parent to send us a value
len = read(fd[P2_READ], &val, sizeof(val));
if (len < 0)
{
perror("Child: Failed to read data from pipe");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
else if (len == 0)
{
// not an error, but certainly unexpected
fprintf(stderr, "Child: Read EOF from pipe");
}
else
{
// report what we received
printf("Child(%d): Received %d\n", pid, val);
// now double it and send it back
val *= 2;
printf("Child(%d): Sending %d back\n", pid, val);
if (write(fd[P2_WRITE], &val, sizeof(val)) < 0)
{
perror("Child: Failed to write response value");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}
// finished. close remaining descriptors.
close(fd[P2_READ]);
close(fd[P2_WRITE]);
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
// Parent. close unneeded descriptors
close(fd[P2_READ]);
close(fd[P2_WRITE]);
// used for output
pid = getpid();
// send a value to the child
val = 42;
printf("Parent(%d): Sending %d to child\n", pid, val);
if (write(fd[P1_WRITE], &val, sizeof(val)) != sizeof(val))
{
perror("Parent: Failed to send value to child ");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
// now wait for a response
len = read(fd[P1_READ], &val, sizeof(val));
if (len < 0)
{
perror("Parent: failed to read value from pipe");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
else if (len == 0)
{
// not an error, but certainly unexpected
fprintf(stderr, "Parent(%d): Read EOF from pipe", pid);
}
else
{
// report what we received
printf("Parent(%d): Received %d\n", pid, val);
}
// close down remaining descriptors
close(fd[P1_READ]);
close(fd[P1_WRITE]);
// wait for child termination
wait(NULL);
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
(compile with, e.g., gcc thisfile.c -o test)
Output
Parent(2794): Sending 42 to child
Child(2797): Received 42
Child(2797): Sending 84 back
Parent(2794): Received 84

Related

Get pid from brother process

I want to have a parent process and three child processes. I want these child processes to know the pids of the other child processes.
The problem is that when I do fork and then I do it again, the second fork is also executed in the child process creating an extra process (or so I think).
How could I solve it?
Thanks.
The parent should fork three times, the children should not fork. This way, the parent will know the pids of all three children.
After the fork, you'll need some kind of separate communication channel by which the parent can communicate these pids to all children. A simple way would be to open a pipe (see pipe(2)) before forking each child, so the child inherits the pipe's file descriptor (at least the read end) and the parent keeps the write end. Then have the parent send the three pids down each pipe and close it.
Example code (long, but that's the nature of C):
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#define NUM_CHILDREN 3
/* Entry point for the child processes */
int child_main(int pipe_read_end) {
pid_t my_pid = getpid();
/* Read child pids from pipe */
int child_pids[NUM_CHILDREN];
unsigned int bytes_read = 0;
while (bytes_read < sizeof(child_pids)) {
ssize_t result = read(pipe_read_end, ((unsigned char *) child_pids) + bytes_read, sizeof(child_pids) - bytes_read);
if (result < 0) {
perror("error reading from pipe");
return 1;
} else if (result == 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "unexpected end of file\n");
return 1;
} else {
bytes_read += result;
}
}
close(pipe_read_end);
/* Do something useful with these child pids */
for (int i = 0; i < NUM_CHILDREN; i++) {
printf("Child %d received sibling pid %d\n", my_pid, child_pids[i]);
}
return 0;
}
/* Entry point for the parent process. */
int main() {
int child_pids[NUM_CHILDREN];
int pipe_write_ends[NUM_CHILDREN];
for (int i = 0; i < NUM_CHILDREN; i++) {
/* Create the pipe for child i */
int pipefd[2];
if (pipe(pipefd)) {
perror("error creating pipe");
return 1;
}
int pipe_read_end = pipefd[0];
int pipe_write_end = pipefd[1];
/* Fork child i */
pid_t child_pid = fork();
if (child_pid < 0) {
perror("error forking");
return 1;
} else if (child_pid == 0) {
printf("Child %d was forked\n", getpid());
close(pipe_write_end);
return child_main(pipe_read_end);
} else {
printf("Parent forked child %d\n", child_pid);
close(pipe_read_end);
pipe_write_ends[i] = pipe_write_end;
child_pids[i] = child_pid;
}
}
/* Send pids down the pipes for each child */
for (int i = 0; i < NUM_CHILDREN; i++) {
unsigned int bytes_written = 0;
while (bytes_written < sizeof(child_pids)) {
ssize_t result = write(pipe_write_ends[i], ((unsigned char *) child_pids) + bytes_written, sizeof(child_pids) - bytes_written);
if (result < 0) {
perror("error writing to pipe");
return 1;
} else {
bytes_written += result;
}
}
close(pipe_write_ends[i]);
}
/* Wait for children to exit */
for (int i = 0; i < NUM_CHILDREN; i++) {
if (waitpid(child_pids[i], 0, 0) < 0) {
perror("error waiting for child");
return 1;
}
}
}
As #PSkocik points out in their answer, you should probably not be doing this. Pids can be reused by the OS, so there's no way for the children to know that their sibling pids still actually refer to their siblings; only the parent can be sure, because it has to wait for each pid before it can be reused.
However, this same mechanism can be used for other forms of IPC (inter-process communication); you could, for example, use it to create pipes between the children directly.
You can use shared memory or some other kind of IPC to communicate the PIDs, but you probably shouldn't even try.
PIDs are subject to recycling and you can only ever know for sure if a PID refers to the process you think it refers to if that PID belongs to a child process of yours (because then you can know if you've waited on it or not).
Otherwise, PIDs (of non-children) are racy references which are basically only usable for hacky debugging.

Pipe between children

I want to do a program that first creates 3 processes (A) and later, creates one process more (B) and these first processes must write in a pipe that the last process read each time that process write.
I tried something but I don't know the way to do that because the process (B) is created after the processes (A)
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#define MAX_CHILDREN 3
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
pid_t pid;
int fd[2];
char buffer[100];
char str[] = "Hello";
char str2[] = "Hello2";
char str3[] = "Hello3";
for(int num_process = 0; num_process < MAX_CHILDREN; num_process++)
{
if(pipe(fd) == -1)
{
perror( "pipe Failed" );
continue;
}
pid = fork();
if(pid < 0)
{
perror("fork failed");
exit(1);
}
if(pid == 0)
{ //child code
if(num_process == 0){
printf("Child %i (pid= %i) send string %s\n", num_process, getpid(),str);
write(fd[1],str,strlen(str));
}
if(num_process == 1){
printf("Child %i (pid= %i) send string %s\n", num_process, getpid(),str2);
write(fd[1],str2,strlen(str2));
}
if(num_process == 2){
printf("Child %i (pid= %i) send string %s\n", num_process, getpid(),str3);
write(fd[1],str3,strlen(str3));
}
exit(0);
}
else{//parent
printf("Im parent %i\n",getpid());
wait(NULL);
}
}
//Creating another child process from parent, this process recieves string sent from
//childs
pid = fork();
if(pid < 0)
{
perror("fork failed");
exit(1);
}
if(pid == 0){//child
printf("The new process %i read fd pipe\n",getpid());
if( read(fd[0],buffer,sizeof(buffer)) <= 0) //read pipe
{
perror("error read");
exit( EXIT_FAILURE );
}
printf("String readed : %s\n",buffer);
}
else{//parent
wait(NULL);
}
return 0;
}
You need to make a number of changes to the code. The parent shouldn't really wait on its children until after they're all launched. Since you create a new pipe for each of the first three children, you need to keep track of which file descriptors are in use. You should use arrays for that, and for the strings to be sent. Neither the read() nor the write() system calls null-terminates strings, and you don't tell it to write a null byte at the end, so you need to tell printf() to print the correct information.
Those changes and sundry others lead to:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#define MAX_CHILDREN 3
int main(void)
{
pid_t pid;
int fd[MAX_CHILDREN][2];
char buffer[100];
const char *str[MAX_CHILDREN] = { "Hello 1", "Hello 2", "Hello 3" };
for (int i = 0; i < MAX_CHILDREN; i++)
{
if (pipe(fd[i]) == -1)
{
perror("pipe Failed");
exit(1);
}
pid = fork();
if (pid < 0)
{
perror("fork failed");
exit(1);
}
if (pid == 0)
{
printf("Child %i (pid= %i) send string %s\n", i + 1, getpid(), str[i]);
write(fd[i][1], str[i], strlen(str[i]));
exit(i + 1);
}
}
pid = fork();
if (pid < 0)
{
perror("fork failed");
exit(1);
}
if (pid == 0)
{
printf("The new process %i read fd pipe\n", getpid());
for (int i = MAX_CHILDREN; i-- > 0; )
{
int nbytes;
if ((nbytes = read(fd[i][0], buffer, sizeof(buffer))) <= 0)
{
perror("error read");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
printf("String read: %.*s\n", nbytes, buffer);
}
exit(4);
}
int corpse;
int status;
while ((corpse = wait(&status)) >= 0)
printf("child %d exited with status 0x%.4X\n", corpse, status);
return 0;
}
When run, the output might be:
Child 1 (pid= 91027) send string Hello 1
Child 2 (pid= 91028) send string Hello 2
Child 3 (pid= 91029) send string Hello 3
The new process 91030 read fd pipe
String read: Hello 3
String read: Hello 2
String read: Hello 1
child 91027 exited with status 0x0100
child 91028 exited with status 0x0200
child 91029 exited with status 0x0300
child 91030 exited with status 0x0400
I reversed the order of the elements in the reading loop, mainly just for fun. You can use a conventional for (int i = 0; i < MAX_CHILDREN; i++) loop instead if you prefer.
Although it isn't crucial in this program, you aren't closing enough file descriptors in the children or the parent. The parent should close the write ends of the pipes; it isn't going to be using them. The children should close the read ends of the pipes; they aren't going to be using them. Further, the second and third children should close the pipes opened for the first, and the third should close the pipe for the second, as they aren't going to use those, either. If you don't do this and the fourth child looped waiting for EOF (0 bytes returned), it would hang.
Rule of thumb: If you
dup2()
one end of a pipe to standard input or standard output, close both of the
original file descriptors returned by
pipe()
as soon as possible.
In particular, you should close them before using any of the
exec*()
family of functions.
The rule also applies if you duplicate the descriptors with either
dup()
or
fcntl()
with F_DUPFD
Note that an alternative design for the program would create a single pipe outside the loop and the children would all write to the same pipe. You'd probably want to add a newline to the message strings so that the results are separate. You'd definitely want to think about looping the read in the fourth child, and you'd need to worry about the pipe being closed properly, and so on. It'd be a worthwhile sub-exercise to code that.

How to distinguish one child process from other child processes

I have an assignment for class and I am confused on this part of the requirements. So we need to make a multi process word counter with n number of processes and n will be an input argument for the program. Each process needs to do their own mini word count of a select portion of the inputted file. So essentially the inputted file will be divided into 1/n parts and split between n processes.
I understand how to fork the processes through a for loop and how to use pipes to send the mini word count from the children processes to the parent process, but I unsure of how to tell a certain process to do a select part of the input file.
Would you use their PID values to check which process they are then assign them their task?
This is my code so far.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#define MSGLEN 64
#define MESSES 3
int main(){
int fd[2];
pid_t pid;
int result;
//Creating a pipe
result = pipe (fd);
if (result < 0) {
//failure in creating a pipe
perror("pipe error\n");
exit (1);
}
//Creating a child process
for(int i = 0; i < MESSES; i++){
if ((pid = fork()) < 0) {
//failure in creating a child
perror ("fork error\n");
exit(2);
}
if(pid == 0)
break;
}
if (pid == 0) {
// ACTUALLY CHILD PROCESS
char message[MSGLEN];
//Clearing the message
memset (message, 0, sizeof(message));
printf ("Enter a message: ");
//scanf ("%s",message);
fgets (message, 1024, stdin);
close(fd[0]);
//Writing message to the pipe
write(fd[1], message, strlen(message));
close(fd[1]);
close(fd[0]);
exit (0);
}
else {
//Parent Process
char message[MSGLEN];
char *ptr;
long wc;
close(fd[1]);
while (1) {
//Clearing the message buffer
memset (message, 0, sizeof(message));
//Reading message from the pipe
if(read(fd[0], message, sizeof(message)) == 0)
exit(0);
printf("Message entered %s\n",message);
/*
Message entered needs to be in the format of number first space then string for it to work
*/
wc = 0;
wc = strtol(message, &ptr, 10);
printf("The number(unsigned long integer) is %ld\n", wc);
printf("String part is %s", ptr);
}
close(fd[0]);
wait(NULL);
// exit(0);
}
return 0;
}
The key thing to remember when using fork is that the parent and child share the same memory and a copy of everything the parent has is passed to the child. At which point the child has now forked the parents data.
In the code below we're counting how many processes we've created. You could if you wanted use this as an argument in the child ie the nth child gets value n.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define PROCESS_COUNT 50
int main(void) {
pid_t pid;
size_t pid_count = 0;
//pid_t pid_array[PROCESS_COUNT];
for(int i = 0; i < PROCESS_COUNT; i++) {
if ((pid = fork()) < 0) {
perror ("fork error\n");
exit(2);
}
if (pid == 0) {//child
size_t n = 0;
size_t p = getpid();
while(n++ < 2) {
//Next line is illustration purposes only ie I'm taking liberties by
//printing a pid_t value
printf("child %zu has pid_count == %zu\n", p, pid_count);
sleep(1);
}
exit (0);
}
else {
//Count how many process we've created.
pid_count++;
int status;
waitpid( -1, &status, WNOHANG);
}
}
wait(NULL);
return 0;
}
If you want to get really fancy you can use IPC using pipes or shared memory. There are lots of ways to get data from one process to another, sometimes something as simple as temporary files is more than sufficient. For your problem I'd use mmap but it does not need to be that complicated

C: Using Fork() and Pipe() to add numbers in child processes

I'm trying to send numbers from a file to child processes with fork() and pipe(), which the child processes should add and send back to the parent process which will then add the child sums to get a total sum.
For a simplified version of that problem, I've got an Array of 4 numbers, and am only using 1 Child process (2 pipes).
I'm having difficulties seeing where control in my program goes, which makes it hard for me to troubleshoot what else is going wrong.
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int numChildProcesses = 1;
int testArray[4] = {2,7,9,4};
printf("Will use 1 child process; %d pipes.\n", numChildProcesses*2);
int fd[numChildProcesses*2][2]; //parent and child
int val = 0, len, i;
// create all the descriptor pairs we need
for (i=0; i<numChildProcesses*2; ++i) // 2 pipes // parent + child
{
if (pipe(fd[i]) < 0)
{
perror("Failed to allocate pipes.");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}
for (i=0;i<numChildProcesses;i++)
{
//CHILD/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
if (fork() == 0)
{
int total = 0, xCount = 0;
while (xCount < 4)
{
// wait for parent to send us a value
len = read(fd[i][0], &val, sizeof(val));
if (len < 0)
{
perror("Child: Failed to read data from pipe.\n");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
else if (len == 0)
{
// not an error, but certainly unexpected
fprintf(stderr, "Child: Read EOF from pipe\n");
}
else // Successfully read from Parent
{
total += val;
xCount += 1;
printf("Child: Recieved %d\tTotal: %d\tCount: %d\n", val, total, xCount);
}
}
// send the value back to the parent
printf("Child: Sending %d back\n", total);
if (write(fd[i][1], &total, sizeof(total)) < 0)
{
perror("Child: Failed to write response value");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
//PARENT/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
if (fork() > 0)
{
int total = 0;
// send array to child as well as starting point
printf("\nParent: Sending numbers to child\n");
//if (write(fd[i][1], 0, (fileNumbers/numChildProcesses)*5) != sizeof((fileNumbers/numChildProcesses)*5));
if (write(fd[i][1], &testArray, sizeof(testArray)) != sizeof(testArray))
{
perror("Parent: Failed to send value to child ");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
// now wait for a response
len = read(fd[i][0], &val, sizeof(val));
if (len < 0)
{
perror("Parent: failed to read value from pipe");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
else if (len == 0)
{
// not an error, but certainly unexpected
fprintf(stderr, "Parent: Read EOF from pipe\n");
}
else
{
// report what we received
total += val;
printf("Parent: Received %d\tTotal: %d\n", val, total);
}
// wait for child termination
wait(NULL);
}
}
}
My output is as follows:
Will use 1 child process; 2 pipes.
Parent: Sending numbers to child
Parent: Received 2 Total: 2
Child: Recieved 7 Total: 7 Count: 1
Child: Recieved 9 Total: 16 Count: 2
Child: Recieved 4 Total: 20 Count: 3
Furthermore, if I try something like printf("%d", fork()); as soon as I enter my for() loop to see what it taking control, it gets a little crazy. It acts like using fork() affects the way the program runs, as if it is a pop() or something of the sort.
Anyways, thank you for any insight you can offer.
-Tom
You're forking too much. You're calling fork() twice in your loop: once in your "child" if, and one in your "parent" if. And then even more when you add your printf("%d", fork());.
You should only call fork() once per loop. Save the return value in a variable, then print/check it.

Child reading from std input and writes to std output

I have a program where the child runs a program but the parent process passes the child a number and the child writes back to the parent a response. However whenever I run the code, it does not give me anything back, so I must be passing or receiving to the child wrong, but I'm not sure how. Any help is appreciated. Here is my code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int main() {
int pid;
int n;
char buf[101];
int pfdA[2];
int pfdB[2];
// CREATES FIRST PIPE
if (pipe(pfdA) == -1) {
perror("pipe failed");
exit(-1);
}
// CREATES SECOND PIPE
if (pipe(pfdB) == -1) {
perror("pipe failed");
exit(-1);
}
// FORK()
if ((pid == fork()) < 0) {
perror("fork failed");
exit(-2);
}
if (pid == 0 ) {
// duplicate file descriptor 0 to point to FIRST pipe
dup(pfdA[0]);
// CLOSES ends of FIRST pipe you don't need anymore
close(pfdA[0]);
close(pfdA[1]);
// duplicates file descriptor 1 to point to SECOND pipe
dup(pfdA[1]);
// CLOSES ends of SECOND pipe you don't need anymore
close(pfdB[0]);
close(pfdB[1]);
execlp("./A5_CHILD", "./A5_CHILD", (char *) 0);
perror("execlp");
exit(-3);
}
else {
while( 1 ) {
char NUM[100];
close(pfdA[0]);
close(pfdB[1]);
int r=0;
printf("Enter a Number: ");
fflush(stdout);
scanf("%s", NUM);
// SENDS NUM to Child process
write(pfdA[1], NUM, strlen(NUM));
// READS FROM CHILD THE RESPONSE into the variable buf and
// store the return value from read() into the variable r
r= read(pfdB[0], buf, 100);
if( r > 0 ) {
buf[r] = '\0';
printf("%s\n", buf);
fflush(stdout);
}
else {
printf("[PARENT] Reading from child: read() returned %d\n", r);
break;
}
}
}
return(0);
}
Unless you explicitly close(0), dup(pfdA[0]) almost certainly does not return 0. Try dup2 to specify which descriptor you want as the new one. That is (error checking omitted for brevity):
dup2( pfdA[0], STDIN_FILENO );
close( pfdA[0])
Similarly for stdout.

Resources