I would like to know if it's possible with Camel to do throttling based on the content of the exchange.
The situation is the following: I have to call a webservice via soap. Among, the parameters sent to that webservice there is a customerId. The problem is that the webservice send back an error if there are more than 1 request per minute for a given customerId.
I'm wondering if it would be possible to implement throttling per customerId with Camel. So the throttling should not be implemented for all messages but only for messages with the same customerId.
Let me know how I could implement this or if I need to clarify my question.
ActiveMQ Message Groups is designed to handle this case. So, if you can introduce a JMS queue hop in your route, then just set the JMSXGroupId header to the customerId. Then in another route, you can consume from this queue and send to your web service to get the behavior you described.
also see http://camel.apache.org/parallel-processing-and-ordering.html for more information...
While ActiveMQ Message Groups would definitely address the parallel processing of unique customer ID's, in my assessment Claus is correct that introducing a throttle for each unique group represents an unimplemented feature for Camel/ActiveMQ.
Message Groups alone will not meet the SLA described. While each group of messages (correlated by the customer ID) will be processed in order with one thread per group, as long as requests take less than a minute to receive a response, the requirement of one request per minute per customer would not be enforced.
That said, I would be very interested to know if it would be possible to combine Message Groups and a throttle strategy in a way that would simulate the feature request in JIRA. My attempts so far have failed. I was thinking something along these lines:
<route>
<from uri="activemq:pending?maxConcurrentConsumers=10"/>
<throttle timePeriodMillis="60000">
<constant>1</constant>
<to uri="mock:endpoint"/>
</throttle>
</route>
However, the throttle seems to be applied to the entire set of requests moving to the endpoint, and not to each individual consumer. I have to admit, I was a bit surprised to find that behavior. My expectation was that the throttle would apply to each consumer individually, which would satisfy the SLA in the original question, provided that the messages include the customer ID in the JMSXGroupId header.
I came across a similar problem and finally came up with the solution described here.
My assumptions are:
Order of messages is not important (though it can be solved by re-sequencer)
Total volume of messages per customer ID is not great so the runtime is not saturated.
The solution approach:
Run aggregator for 1 minute while using customerID to assemble messages with the same customer ID into a list
Use Splitter to split the list into individual messages
Send the first message from the splitter to the actual service
Re-route the rest of the list back into the aggregator.
Java DSL version is a bit easier to understand:
final AggregationStrategy aggregationStrategy = AggregationStrategies.flexible(Object.class)
.accumulateInCollection(ArrayList.class);
from("direct:start")
.log("Receiving ${body}")
.aggregate(header("customerID"), aggregationStrategy).completionTimeout(60000)
.log("Aggregate: releasing ${body}")
.split(body())
.choice()
.when(header(Exchange.SPLIT_INDEX).isEqualTo(0))
.log("*** Processing: ${body}")
.to("mock:result")
.otherwise()
.to("seda:delay")
.endChoice();
from("seda:delay")
.delay(0)
.to("direct:start");
Spring XML version looks like the following:
<!-- this is our aggregation strategy defined as a spring bean -->
<!-- see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27404726/how-does-one-set-the-pick-expression-for-apache-camels-flexibleaggregationstr -->
<bean id="_flexible0" class="org.apache.camel.util.toolbox.FlexibleAggregationStrategy"/>
<bean id="_flexible2" factory-bean="_flexible0" factory-method="accumulateInCollection">
<constructor-arg value="java.util.ArrayList" />
</bean>
<camelContext xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring">
<route>
<from uri="direct:start"/>
<log message="Receiving ${body}"/>
<aggregate strategyRef="_flexible2" completionTimeout="60000" >
<correlationExpression>
<xpath>/order/#customerID</xpath>
</correlationExpression>
<log message="Aggregate: releasing ${body}"/>
<split>
<simple>${body}</simple>
<choice>
<when>
<simple>${header.CamelSplitIndex} == 0</simple>
<log message="*** Processing: ${body}"/>
<to uri="mock:result"/>
</when>
<otherwise>
<log message="--- Delaying: ${body}"/>
<to uri="seda:delay" />
</otherwise>
</choice>
</split>
</aggregate>
</route>
<route>
<from uri="seda:delay"/>
<to uri="direct:start"/>
</route>
</camelContext>
Related
I am developing a sample route
FROM: SOURCE ENDPOINT URI
TO: TRANS ENDPOINT URI // Error or Exception occurred at this TRANS endpoint
TO: TARGET ENDPOINT URI
Now I want to catch the Error Occured endpoint and pass it to my processor.
Could anyone please help me with this?
<route>
<from uri="file:C:/MINTS/Source/"/>
<to uri="file:C:/MINTS/TRANS/"/> <!-- EXCPECTION OCCURED -->
<to uri="file:C:/MINTS/TARGET/"/>
<onException>
<exception>java.lang.Exception</exception>
<handled>
<constant>true</constant>
</handled>
<!-- NEED TO CATCH FAILURE ENDPOINT URI AND PASS TO MY PROCESSOR BELOW-->
<process ref="MyExceptionProcessor" />
</onException>
</route>
You can use exchange properties:
CamelFailureEndpoint
example xml-dsl: <exchangeProperty>CamelFailureEndpoint</exchangeProperty>
example java: exchange.getProperty(Exchange.FAILURE_ENDPOINT, String.class);
CamelToEndpoint
example xml-dsl: <exchangeProperty>CamelToEndpoint</exchangeProperty>
example java: exchange.getProperty(Exchange.TO_ENDPOINT, String.class)
The first one should print uri for the consumer endpoint (from) that failed and the second one should show the previously called producer (to) endpoint.
One handy way to debug contexts of an failed exchange is to use:
<to uri="log:loggerName?showAll=true" />
This will log all exchange properties, headers, body and exception which can help to understand what information is available within exchange. Be careful where you use it as it might also log secrets and passwords if they're within the exchange so better use it only locally during development.
For more information you'd probably need to access CamelMessageHistory exchange property through processor, bean or something.
I am trying to use selectors on an amqp with Azure Service Bus consumer. However, for some reason the route is also consuming messages that do not match the selector.
Here's an example:
This route generates messages and append a header:
<route id="MessageGenerator">
<from uri="timer:generator?delay=5000&period=5000"/>
<setHeader headerName="INSTANCE_ID">
<simple>{{env:INSTANCE_ID}}</simple>
</setHeader>
<to uri="amqp:queue:external_queue" />
</route>
While this route should consume only those that contain INSTANCE_ID matching 2 possible values: env:INSTANCE_ID or Any.
<route id="ExternalConsumer">
<from uri="amqp:queue:external_queue?selector=INSTANCE_ID IN ('{{env:INSTANCE_ID}}', 'Any')"/>
<log message="{{env:INSTANCE_ID}} consumed message with Instance ID: ${header.INSTANCE_ID}" logName="AMQP_TEST" loggingLevel="INFO"/>
</route>
But the the log shows that it is consuming any message, regardless of the selector specifying which ones.
Am I missing something?
Thanks!
Issue here was that Azure Service Bus does NOT support selectors on queues. I switched to topics, which already have filters per subscription.
I am using Apache Camel in OSGI scenario using Karaf in version 2.15.1. I am using the exchange.getExchangeId() to print the exchange id in a request/reply. The exchange pattern is set to InOnly. The route looks like this:
<route id="ip_client_rpc">
<from uri="restlet:http://localhost:7070/lsp/patron/id?restletMethod=POST&synchronous=true"/>
<to uri="log:${headers}"/>
<setExchangePattern pattern="InOnly"/>
<process ref="rabbit_client"/>
<to uri="log:${headers}"/>
</route>
However when I print the exchange id sent to the rabbitmq queue it always ends with an even number.
Request from client:ID-VirtualDev-49301-1443430754519-5-6
Request from client:ID-VirtualDev-49301-1443430754519-5-8
Request from client:ID-VirtualDev-49301-1443430754519-5-10
Request from client:ID-VirtualDev-49301-1443430754519-5-12
Request from client:ID-VirtualDev-49301-1443430754519-5-14
Is there a reason why the final digit is always even? Is there another exchange being created that I am missing?
Thanks
Camel uses the same id generator for generating unique ids for different things, its just by chance that its even in this case. Could be that a breadcrumb or message id was also generated that takes the odd number.
I'm using activeMQ 5.9.
I'm trying to implement an interception type route in my activemq.xml, where I check if a particular header equals some value then send it to a different queue, otherwise allow it to continue.
I'm following the info here: http://activemq.apache.org/broker-camel-component.html
My camel.xml file looks like this:
<camelContext id="camel" trace="false" xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring">
<route id="routeAboveQueueLimitTest">
<from uri="activemq:queue:do.something"/>
<choice>
<when>
<simple>${header.scope} == 'test'</simple>
<to uri="activemq:queue:test.do.something"/>
</when>
<otherwise>
<to uri="activemq:queue:do.something"/>
</otherwise>
</choice>
</route>
</camelContext>
Then when I put a message on "activemq:queue:do.something" with header called scope = "test" it correctly routes to the "activemq:queue:test.do.something" queue. However, when it doesn't have that header, it puts it back on the "activemq:queue:do.something" queue and processes it again and again and again!
That kind of seems logical, but the above page clearly says that you have to explicitly send it back to the broker component, and the 2nd example on the page shows exactly that.
I realise this could be worked around by sending it to a different queue if it doesn't have the header but that is undesirable at this stage.
I think the intercept pattern would be much better suited for what you are looking.
<intercept>
<when><simple>${header.scope} == 'test'</simple></when>
<to uri="activemq:queue:test.do.something"/>
</intercept>
More info here: http://camel.apache.org/intercept.html
This will allow messages without the scope header set to 'test' to continue, but will redirect messages that do have the test header.
InterceptSendToEndpoint is a better option here...
<interceptSendToEndpoint uri="activemq:queue:do.something">
<when><simple>${header.scope} == 'test'</simple></when>
<to uri="activemq:queue:test.do.something"/>
<stop/>
</interceptSendToEndpoint>
I want to set the endpoint specific header value in Multicast component.
XML DSL as below:
<route>
<from uri="direct:testRoute"/>
<multicast strategyRef="MyAggregator" parallelProcessing="true">
<to uri="direct:call1"/> <!-- set the header MY_HEADER = "call_1" -->
<to uri="direct:call2/> <!-- set the header MY_HEADER = "call_2" -->
</multicast>
</route>
Basically in the response aggregation I want to know, to which service request this response belongs to.
I tried by doing this, but its not the correct way (parse exception):
<to uri="direct:call1">
<setHeader headerName="MY_HEADER"><simple>call1</simple></setHeader>
</to>
What I see from reading the documentation is that, multicast will copy the source Exchange and multicast each copy. So its a shallow copy of the Exchange and kind of reference shared between all the multicast recipient.
But here I am looking for specific header value for individual recipient.
How to do this? Any pointers?
You can't do that in the multicast route. But it should be simple in the direct route afterwards.
<route>
<from uri="direct:call1"/>
<setHeader headerName="MY_HEADER"><simple>call1</simple></setHeader>
.. do whatever
</from>
</route>
otherwise, if call1 is used for other things and you cannot know when to put the header once in that route, make a simple prep-route:
<route>
<from uri="direct:prepCall1"/>
<setHeader headerName="MY_HEADER"><simple>call1</simple></setHeader>
<to uri="direct:call1"/>
</from>
</route>
As a third option, even though you cannot place DSL (xml or java) in the multicast list, you can supply an "onPrepareRef" processor bean that adds the headers to your exchange. But one processor will handle all multicast endpoints.
There is a header with the key Exchange.TO_ENDPOINT that you can see which of the 2 endpoints the response is from.