I am working on a Windows Form that has multiple comboboxes. Depending on what is chosen in the first combobox determines what items are filled into the second combobox. The issue I am running into is if I choose ChoiceA in ComboBox1, ComboBox2 is clear()ed, then is filled with ChoiceX, ChoiceY, and ChoiceZ. I then choose ChoiceB in ComboBox1, ComboBox2 is clear()ed, but there are no choices to add to ComboBox2, so it should remain empty. The issue is, after choosing ChoiceB, there's a big white box with three empty slots in ComboBox2. So, basically, however many items are cleared N, that's how many empty slots show up after choosing ChoiceB.
This might be a tad confusing, I hope I explained it well enough.
-- EDIT Adding Code, hope it helps clear things up. BTW, mainItemInfo is another "viewmodel" type class. It interfaces back into the form to make updates.
private void cmbType_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
DropDownItem item = (DropDownItem)cmbType.SelectedItem;
if (!String.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(item.Text))
{
cmbBrand.Enabled = true;
btnAddBrand.Enabled = true;
mainItemInfo.FillBrands(new Dictionary<string, string> { { "Type", item.Text } });
mainItemInfo.SyncBrands(this);
}
}
public void FillBrands(Dictionary<string, string> columnsWhere)
{
// Clear list
Brands.Clear();
// Get data
StorageData storage = new StorageData(File.ReadAllLines(ItemsFilePath));
// Fill Brands
foreach (string type in storage.GetDistinctWhere(columnsWhere, "Brand"))
{
Brands.Add(type, new DropDownItem(type, type));
}
}
public void SyncBrands(IPopupItemInfo form)
{
form.ClearcmbBrand();
var brands = from brand in Brands.Keys
orderby Brands[brand].Text ascending
select brand;
foreach (var brand in brands)
{
form.AddTocmbBrand(Brands[brand]);
}
}
public void AddTocmbBrand(DropDownItem brand)
{
cmbBrand.Items.Add(brand);
}
public void ClearcmbBrand()
{
cmbBrand.Items.Clear();
}
Simply, you can add an item then clear the combobox again:
cmbBrand.Items.Clear();
cmbBrand.Items.Add(DBNull.Value);
cmbBrand.Items.Clear();
You should able to set the datasource of listbox2 to null to clear it, then set it again with the new data.
So, in pseudo-code, something like:
ItemSelectedInListBox1()
{
List futureListbox2Items = LoadOptionsBaseOnSelectedItem(item)
Listbox2.Datasource = null
Listbox2.Datasource = futureListBox2Items
}
That should refresh the list of items displayed in Listbox2 with no white spaces.
I was able to fix the extra space. I changed the Add and Clear methods to:
public void AddTocmbModel(DropDownItem model)
{
cmbModel.Items.Add(model);
cmbModel.DropDownHeight = cmbModel.ItemHeight * (cmbModel.Items.Count + 1);
}
public void ClearcmbModel()
{
cmbModel.Items.Clear();
cmbModel.DropDownHeight = cmbModel.ItemHeight;
}
Related
I have Datagrid and Text Box in my Form. Datagrid is showing me existing items in my stock. I use Text Box to search and set focus to that row which is matching with my Text Box. Now it is working fine when VirtualizingStackPanel.IsVirtualizing="false" but it is very slow and getting a lot RAM resource.
Here is my code for this.
public IEnumerable<Microsoft.Windows.Controls.DataGridRow> GetDataGridRows(Microsoft.Windows.Controls.DataGrid grid)
{
var itemsSource = grid.ItemsSource as IEnumerable;
if (null == itemsSource) yield return null;
foreach (var item in itemsSource)
{
var row = grid.ItemContainerGenerator.ContainerFromItem(item) as Microsoft.Windows.Controls.DataGridRow;
if (null != row) yield return row;
}
}
private void SearchBoxDataGrid_TextChanged(object sender, TextChangedEventArgs e)
{
var row = GetDataGridRows(AssortDataGrid);
/// go through each row in the datagrid
foreach (Microsoft.Windows.Controls.DataGridRow r in row)
{
DataRowView rv = (DataRowView)r.Item;
// Get the state of what's in column 1 of the current row (in my case a string)
string t = rv.Row["Ассортимент"].ToString().ToLower();
if (t.StartsWith(SearchBoxDataGrid.Text.ToLower()))
{
AssortDataGrid.SelectedIndex = r.GetIndex();
AssortDataGrid.ScrollIntoView(AssortDataGrid.SelectedItem);
break;
}
}
}
What I want is to make it VirtualizingStackPanel.IsVirtualizing="true" but in this case my method is not working. I know why it is not working, my code will work only for showing part of Datagrid.
What do you recommend? How to fix this issue? Any idea will be appreciated. If you give any working code it will be fantastic. I hope I could explain my problem.
Virtualization means that WPF will reuse the UI components, and simply replace the DataContext behind the components.
For example, if your Grid has 1000 items and only 10 are visible, it will only render around 14 UI items (extra items for scroll buffer), and scrolling simply replaces the DataContext behind these UI items instead of creating new UI elements for every item. If you didn't use Virtualization, it would create all 1000 UI items.
For your Search to work with Virutalization, you need to loop through the DataContext (DataGrid.Items) instead of through the UI components. This can either be done in the code-behind, or if you're using MVVM you can handle the SeachCommand in your ViewModel.
I did a little coding and make it work. If anyone needs it in future please, use it.
Firstly I am creating List of Products
List<string> ProductList;
Then on Load Method I list all my products to my Product List.
SqlCommand commProc2 = new SqlCommand("SELECT dbo.fGetProductNameFromId(ProductID) as ProductName from Assortment order by ProductName desc", MainWindow.conn);
string str2;
SqlDataReader dr2 = commProc2.ExecuteReader();
ProductList = new List<string>();
try
{
if (dr2.HasRows)
{
while (dr2.Read())
{
str2 = (string)dr2["ProductName"];
ProductList.Insert(0, str2.ToLower ());
}
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
MessageBox.Show("An error occured while trying to fetch data\n" + ex.Message);
}
dr2.Close();
dr2.Dispose();
After that I did some changes in SearchBoxDataGrid_TextChanged
private void SearchBoxDataGrid_TextChanged(object sender, TextChangedEventArgs e)
{
int pos = 0;
string typedString = SearchBoxDataGrid.Text.ToLower();
foreach (string item in ProductList)
{
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(SearchBoxDataGrid.Text))
{
if (item.StartsWith(typedString))
{
pos = ProductList.IndexOf(item);
AssortDataGrid.SelectedIndex = pos;
AssortDataGrid.ScrollIntoView(AssortDataGrid.SelectedItem);
break;
}
}
}
}
Now it works when VirtualizingStackPanel.IsVirtualizing="true".
That is all.
I am trying to implement a Search as you type functionality ( like the one in the search in the default email app ) - I have a listbox with say 50 items - each item bound to a class object which has string fields ... I wish to search and display items which have the text in the search box in one of their string fields - this as the user keys in to the textbox ... tried a couple of approaches -->
1 >> Using a CollectionViewSource
- Bound a CollectionViewSource to All the items from the DB
- Bound the List Box to a CollectionViewSource
- Setting the filter property of the CollectionViewSource - to whose function which searchs for the text in the Search box in the items and set the e.Accepted - on every keyup event
- Filtering works fine but its slow with 50 items :( - guess cos of filter taking each item and checking if to set e.Accepted property to true
.... One DB call on load but seems to be a lot of processing to decide which element to disply in the filer by the CollectionViewSource
2 >> Filter # DB level
- on keyup - sending the text in the search box to the ViewModel where a function returns an ObservableCollection of objects which has the search string
- ObservableCollection is bound to the listbox
.... Not much processing # the top layer but multiple DB calls on each Keypress - still slow but just a tad faster than Approach One
Is there any other approch you would recommend ? or any suggestions to further optimize the above mentioned approaches? - any tweak to give smooth functioning for the search?
First time into mobile dev :) ... Thanx in advance :)
You can optimize the search process further by delaying the search action by x milliseconds to allow the user to continue the writing of the search criteria. This way, each new typed char will delay the search action by xxx milliseconds till the last char where the action is triggered, you'll get a better performance using just one call instead of say 10 calls. Technically speaking, you can achieve this by using a Timer class.
Here you'll find a sample source code example that shows u how to implement this.
private void txtSearchCriteria_TextChanged(object sender, TextChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (txtSearchCriteria.Text == "Search ...")
return;
if (this.deferredAction == null)
{
this.deferredAction = DeferredAction.Create(() => ApplySearchCriteria());
}
// Defer applying search criteria until time has elapsed.
this.deferredAction.Defer(TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(250));
}
private DeferredAction deferredAction;
private class DeferredAction
{
public static DeferredAction Create(Action action)
{
if (action == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("action");
}
return new DeferredAction(action);
}
private Timer timer;
private DeferredAction(Action action)
{
this.timer = new Timer(new TimerCallback(delegate
{
Deployment.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(action);
}));
}
public void Defer(TimeSpan delay)
{
// Fire action when time elapses (with no subsequent calls).
this.timer.Change(delay, TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(-1));
}
}
public void ApplySearchCriteria()
{
ICollectionView dataView = this.ViewSource.View;
string criteria = this.txtSearchCriteria.Text;
string lowerCriteria = criteria.ToLower();
using (dataView.DeferRefresh())
{
Func<object, bool> filter = word =>
{
bool result = word.ToString().ToLower().StartsWith(lowerCriteria);
return result;
};
dataView.Filter = l => { return filter.Invoke(l); };
}
this.lstWords.ItemsSource = dataView;
if (this.lstWords.Items.Count != 0)
{
this.lblError.Visibility = Visibility.Collapsed;
}
else
{
this.lblError.Visibility = Visibility.Visible;
}
}
Im busy with my app and i walked in some problems when i click on a photo in my listbox PhotoFeed.
I got 1 List<> with in it the strings UrlTumb and UrlFull.
I got 1 ListBox with in it a WrapPanel filled with images wich i set the Image.Source from my UrlTumb.
What my problem is when i click on a photo in my listbox i want to navigate to a new page and display there the original image (UrlFull) now i can only get my UrlTumb from my Image.Source but i want my UrlFull which is stored in the List. Now is my question how do i obtain the UrlFull. So how can i back trace which item i clicked and get the UrlFull from that item so i can send it with my NavigationService.Navigate
I can do it on an dirty way and create an invisible textblock besides the image in my ListBox and put the UrlFull in there but i would like to do it in a proper way
So what do i place in the ????? spot in this line
NavigationService.Navigate(new Uri("/PhotoInfo.xaml?urlfull={0}", ????? , UriKind.Relative));
Greetings Cn
There are multiple options:
Use selected item's index listBox.SelectedIndex to get the index
of the selected property which will correspond to the index in your
source (it might not if you filter the collection using collection
source, but I think that is not the case)
Use selected item listBox.SelectedItem this will return the
SelectedItem which will contain your object. (Note, that if your
selection mode set to multiple, this will return only the firstly
selected item)
Use SelectemItems. It will allow you to get an array of selected
items (Note: this should be normally used only when your list's
selection mode is set to multiple)
Use SelectedValue, which will contain the value of the SelectedItem
(this will save you and extra step.
Use arguments of the Selection changed event AddedItems.
Bellow is the code snippet of 3 options above. x, y, z will all be your selected names (e.g. "Mike")
XAML:
<ListBox x:Name="lb"
ItemsSource="{Binding Names}"
SelectionChanged="NameChanged" />
Code behind:
public class Person
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public override string ToString()
{
return Name;
}
}
private List<Person> people = new List<Person>
{
new Person{Name = "Lewis"},
new Person{Name = "Peter"},
new Person{Name = "Brian"}
};
public List<Person> People
{
get
{
return this.people;
}
set
{
this.people = value;
}
}
private void NameChanged(object sender, SelectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
var x = this.people[lb.SelectedIndex];
var y = lb.SelectedItem;
var z = lb.SelectedItems[0];
var h = lb.SelectedValue;
var u = e.AddedItems[0];
var person = e.AddedItems[0] as Person;
if (person != null)
{
var result = person.Name;
}
}
For the differences between SelectedValue and SelectedItem refer here SelectedItem vs SelectedValue
I have a XtraGrid with one GridView, with a column with checkbox repository item. Now I am handling the CellValueChanging event because I want to only allow the user to check or uncheck based on calculations on other column values on the same row hence I need the e.RowHandle and e.Column of this event and this cannot be done on the EditValueChanging of the repository control.
Now somewhere my calculations say that user cannot check a particular cell to and I throw a message box and try Me.BandedGridView1.SetRowCellValue(e.RowHandle, e.Column, False) but unfortunately this does not set the value to false of that cell.
I need to do it here and here only because of the huge number of calculations based on other column values and I need to set value of the current cell whose event I'm handling right.
Please help.
I'm using DevExpress 9.2 (no chance of upgrading to higher version)
Try this code it's working perfectly !
private void GridView1_CellValueChanged(object sender, CellValueChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (e.Column.Caption != "yourColumnCaption") return;
GridView1.SetFocusedRowCellValue("yourColumnFieldName", 1);
}
You might want to prevent updates by handling ShowingEditor event.
class TestData
{
public TestData(string caption, bool check)
{
Caption = caption;
Check = check;
}
public string Caption { get; set; }
public bool Check { get; set; }
}
Initialize some test data:
BindingList<TestData> gridDataList = new BindingList<TestData>();
gridDataList.Add(new TestData("First row", true));
gridDataList.Add(new TestData("Second row", true));
gridControl.DataSource = gridDataList;
Handle ShowingEditor. Check if user is allowed to change chechbox. If not, cancel the event.
private void gridView1_ShowingEditor(object sender, CancelEventArgs e)
{
GridView view = sender as GridView;
// Decision to allow edit using view.FocusedRowHandle and view.FocusedColumn
if (view.FocusedColumn.FieldName == "Check")
{
// Allow edit of odd rows only
bool allowEdit = view.FocusedRowHandle % 2 == 1;
e.Cancel = !allowEdit;
}
}
I've been using WinForms databinding to display data from a database mapped with Fluent NHibernate, and that's been working great.
For example, I can just set a DataGridView's DataSource property from an entity's IList property, and voila - there's all the data!
But now I need to start adding and saving new data rows, and that's not going so well. I thought I'd be able to just enable the grid's AllowUserToAddRows property, and new rows would get added to the underlying IList in the entity, but that didn't work.
Then, after a little searching, I tried setting the DataSource property to a BindingList that was populated from the IList, but that's not being updated with new rows either.
During the course of my searches, I also came upon a few people reporting difficulty with WinForms and DataBinding in general, which makes me wonder if I should pursue that approach any further.
Is the DataBinding approach worth continuing? If so, can anyone suggest where I'm going wrong?
Or is it better to just handle all the DataGridView events associated with adding a new row, and writing my own code to add new objects to the IList property in my entity?
Other suggestions? (though I don't think switching to WPF is going to be an option, no matter how much better the databinding may be)
Can you load (or copy) your nHibernate entities into a generic List? If so, I have had good success in with two-way binding using a DataGridView bound to a generic List.
The key points are:
The generic list contains list objects where each is an instance of your custom class.
Your custom class must implement public properties for each of the fields to bind. Public fields didn't work for me.
Use a BindingSource to wrap the actual generic list.
The BindingSOurce allows you to set the AllowNew property to true. Binding directly to the List almost works, but the DataGridVieww does not display the "New row" line, even if AllowUsersToAddRows = true.
For example, add this code to a Form with a dataGridView1:
private List<MyObject> m_data = new List<MyObject>();
private BindingSource m_bs =new BindingSource();
private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
m_data.Add(new MyObject(0,"One",DateTime.Now));
m_data.Add(new MyObject(1, "Two", DateTime.Now));
m_data.Add(new MyObject(2, "Three", DateTime.Now));
m_bs.DataSource = m_data;
m_bs.AllowNew = true;
dataGridView1.DataSource = m_bs;
dataGridView1.AutoGenerateColumns = true;
dataGridView1.AllowUserToAddRows = true;
}
private void Form1_FormClosing(object sender, FormClosingEventArgs e)
{
for (int i = 0; i < m_data.Count ; i++)
{
Console.WriteLine(string.Format("{0} {1} {2}", m_data[i].ID, m_data[i].Name, m_data[i].DOB));
}
}
}
public class MyObject
{
// Default ctor, required for adding new rows in DataGridView
public MyObject()
{
}
public MyObject(int id, string name, DateTime dob)
{
ID = id;
Name = name;
DOB = dob;
}
private int m_id;
public int ID
{
get
{
return m_id;
}
set
{
m_id = value;
}
}
private string m_name;
public string Name
{
get
{
return m_name;
}
set
{
m_name = value;
}
}
private DateTime m_dob;
public DateTime DOB
{
get
{
return m_dob;
}
set
{
m_dob = value;
}
}
}
When the form closes, the contents of the bound List are printed to the Output window.