Working in Node-Red. I can use regular global variables across nodes and flows no problem. However, would like to use a global array variable.
Method A - desired functionality
I read in 16 data points at a time (type = double) and want to have them be index 0-15, then the following node would update indexes 16-31; then 32-45 and 46-64 in the last two nodes.
Node Red however, won't let update the array from the second node starting from index #16. I get "TypeError: Cannot read property 'indexOf' of undefined" error.
In lieu of Method A, I could have four different 16-index global arrays. However, accessing them gives erratic results. Trying to access index[n] returns the value from some other index - i.e. global.get("variable"[0]) returns variable[10] and global.get("variable"[1]) returns the value from variable[27].
This describes the problem -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cF1bz8bEozI
Here is my sample flow:
[{"id":"ee1694d.7df4768","type":"i2c in","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"Read Camera","address":"105","command":"128","count":"32","x":240,"y":1480,"wires":[["9e27949c.512c28"]]},{"id":"d9eaa7a4.7f0ed8","type":"inject","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"ON","topic":"1","payload":"1","payloadType":"str","repeat":"","crontab":"","once":false,"x":70,"y":1480,"wires":[["ee1694d.7df4768"]]},{"id":"6dc0727a.4cf53c","type":"i2c in","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"Read Camera","address":"105","command":"160","count":"32","x":240,"y":1520,"wires":[["a7ac4b94.44ce58"]]},{"id":"d6d80973.784148","type":"i2c in","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"Read Camera","address":"105","command":"192","count":"32","x":240,"y":1560,"wires":[["b90d910d.8e743","ebeeb439.54cf18"]]},{"id":"b90d910d.8e743","type":"i2c in","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"Read Camera","address":"105","command":"224","count":"32","x":240,"y":1600,"wires":[["2f7b8dde.7a9902"]]},{"id":"6b1509e2.8bd4d8","type":"debug","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"Row 3,4","active":true,"console":"false","complete":"payload","x":1020,"y":1520,"wires":[]},{"id":"a828b6d2.40da08","type":"delay","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"","pauseType":"delay","timeout":"50","timeoutUnits":"milliseconds","rate":"1","nbRateUnits":"1","rateUnits":"second","randomFirst":"1","randomLast":"5","randomUnits":"seconds","drop":false,"x":98,"y":1656,"wires":[["d6d80973.784148"]]},{"id":"ad0a1424.eaae08","type":"function","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"Save Global variables for Temperature","func":"global.set(\"RangeTemperaturesA\", 0);\n\nfor(i=0; i<16; i++){\n global.set(\"RangeTemperaturesA\"[i], msg.payload[i]); \n}\n\nreturn msg;","outputs":1,"noerr":0,"x":750,"y":1480,"wires":[["6b810d97.0beee4","6dc0727a.4cf53c"]]},{"id":"d386a34f.525d2","type":"function","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"Save Global variables for Temperature","func":"for(i=0; i<16; i++){\n global.set(\"RangeTemperatureB\"[i], msg.payload[i]); \n}\n\nreturn msg;","outputs":1,"noerr":0,"x":750,"y":1520,"wires":[["6b1509e2.8bd4d8"]]},{"id":"11c935c.be330ca","type":"function","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"Save Global variables for Temperature","func":"for(i=0; i<16; i++){\n global.set(\"RangeTemperatureC\"[i], msg.payload[i]); \n}\n\nreturn msg;","outputs":1,"noerr":0,"x":750,"y":1560,"wires":[[]]},{"id":"294185a.d5fe67a","type":"function","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"Save Global variables for Temperature","func":"for(i=0; i<16; i++){\n global.set(\"RangeTemperatureD\"[i], msg.payload[i]); \n}\n\nreturn msg;","outputs":1,"noerr":0,"x":750,"y":1600,"wires":[[]]},{"id":"3ffa9e84.cba002","type":"function","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"Find Max Temperature","func":"//n = Math.max(... global.get(\"RangeTemperature\"));\n\nreturn {payload: global.get(\"RangeTemperature\")};","outputs":1,"noerr":0,"x":900,"y":1660,"wires":[[]]},{"id":"9e27949c.512c28","type":"function","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"Get Temps full row","func":"var gridEye = [];\nvar loop=0;\n\nfor(n=0; n<32; n+=2){\n gridEye[loop] = ((msg.payload[n+1]<<8) | msg.payload[n]) * 0.25;\n //convert to F\n gridEye[loop] = ((5.0/3.0) * gridEye[loop] + 32.0).toFixed(2);\n //add right bitshit to reduce noise\n loop++;\n}\nmsg.payload=gridEye;\n\nreturn msg;","outputs":1,"noerr":0,"x":490,"y":1480,"wires":[["ad0a1424.eaae08"]]},{"id":"a7ac4b94.44ce58","type":"function","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"Get Temps full row","func":"var gridEye = []; //16-byte array with temperature readings\nvar loop=0;\n\nfor(n=0; n<32; n+=2){\n // Get raw values - bitshift left 8 bits then bitwise OR.\n // then take new value and multiply by 0.25 since it reads in 1/4 degree C\n gridEye[loop] = ((msg.payload[n+1]<<8) | msg.payload[n]) * 0.25;\n //convert to F\n gridEye[loop] = ((5.0/3.0) * gridEye[loop] + 32.0).toFixed(2);\n loop++;\n}\n\nmsg.payload=gridEye;\n\nreturn msg;","outputs":1,"noerr":0,"x":490,"y":1520,"wires":[["d386a34f.525d2"]]},{"id":"ebeeb439.54cf18","type":"function","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"Get Temps full row","func":"var gridEye = [];\nvar loop=0;\n/*\nvar pixel = 4;\nvar tmp = ((msg.payload[pixel*2 + 1]<<8) | msg.payload[pixel*2])*0.25; \n//gridEye reads in .25 degree C\ntmp = ((5/3 * tmp) + 32.0); //convert to F\n*/\n\nfor(n=0; n<32; n+=2){\n gridEye[loop] = ((msg.payload[n+1]<<8) | msg.payload[n]) * 0.25;\n //convert to F\n gridEye[loop] = ((5.0/3.0) * gridEye[loop] + 32.0).toFixed(2);\n //add right bitshit to reduce noise\n loop++;\n}\n/*\nfor(n=0; n<8; n++){\n gridEye[n]= ((n/35536 * 60 ) + 20);\n //convert to F\n //gridEye[n] = (((5.0/3.0) * gridEye[n]) + 32).toFixed(2);\n}\n*/\nmsg.payload=gridEye;\n\nreturn msg;","outputs":1,"noerr":0,"x":490,"y":1560,"wires":[["11c935c.be330ca"]]},{"id":"2f7b8dde.7a9902","type":"function","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"Get Temps full row","func":"var gridEye = [];\nvar loop=0;\n/*\nvar pixel = 4;\nvar tmp = ((msg.payload[pixel*2 + 1]<<8) | msg.payload[pixel*2])*0.25; \n//gridEye reads in .25 degree C\ntmp = ((5/3 * tmp) + 32.0); //convert to F\n*/\n\nfor(n=0; n<32; n+=2){\n gridEye[loop] = ((msg.payload[n+1]<<8) | msg.payload[n]) * 0.25;\n //convert to F\n gridEye[loop] = ((5.0/3.0) * gridEye[loop] + 32.0).toFixed(2);\n //add right bitshit to reduce noise\n loop++;\n}\n/*\nfor(n=0; n<8; n++){\n gridEye[n]= ((n/35536 * 60 ) + 20);\n //convert to F\n //gridEye[n] = (((5.0/3.0) * gridEye[n]) + 32).toFixed(2);\n}\n*/\nmsg.payload=gridEye;\n\nreturn msg;","outputs":1,"noerr":0,"x":490,"y":1600,"wires":[["294185a.d5fe67a"]]},{"id":"a0de3101.0c307","type":"function","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"Read from A","func":"var p = global.get(\"RangeTemperaturesA\"[1]);\nmsg.payload = p;\nreturn msg;","outputs":1,"noerr":0,"x":510,"y":1780,"wires":[["dbb0935d.742f7"]]},{"id":"dbb0935d.742f7","type":"debug","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"test A","active":true,"console":"false","complete":"payload","x":670,"y":1860,"wires":[]},{"id":"f6c50374.59f","type":"function","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"Read from B","func":"var n = global.get(\"RangeTemperatureB\"[0]);\nreturn {payload: n};","outputs":1,"noerr":0,"x":770,"y":1780,"wires":[["3e8947bc.be49b8"]]},{"id":"6b810d97.0beee4","type":"debug","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"Row 1,2","active":true,"console":"false","complete":"payload","x":1020,"y":1480,"wires":[]},{"id":"3e8947bc.be49b8","type":"debug","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"test b","active":true,"console":"false","complete":"payload","x":910,"y":1860,"wires":[]},{"id":"23da3f7f.1c4f8","type":"inject","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"","topic":"","payload":"","payloadType":"date","repeat":"","crontab":"","once":false,"x":340,"y":1780,"wires":[["a0de3101.0c307"]]},{"id":"2a146fa7.577fc","type":"inject","z":"d556390c.391838","name":"","topic":"","payload":"","payloadType":"date","repeat":"","crontab":"","once":false,"x":580,"y":1720,"wires":[["f6c50374.59f"]]}]
Edit -
I did a quick test -
For global.set -
global.set("RangeTemperaturesA", i)[i]; gives "TypeError: Cannot read property '0' of undefined"
global.set("RangeTemperaturesA[i]", i); gives "Error: Invalid property expression: unexpected i at position 19"
global.set("RangeTemperaturesA"[i], i); appears to probably work.
Sample code:
for(i=0; i<16; i++){
global.set("RangeTemperaturesA"[i], i);
node.warn("Value: " + i);
}
return msg;
Global.get -
global.get("RangeTemperaturesA"[n]) gives erratic results.
global.get("RangeTemperaturesA[n]") gives "Error: Invalid property expression: unexpected n at position 19"
global.get("RangeTemperaturesA")[n] gives "Value: undefined; Count: 0" gives "Value: undefined; Count: 0" which is perhaps the most promising if the array was never populated correctly.
Sample code:
for(n=0; n<16; n++){
node.warn("Value: " + global.get("RangeTemperaturesA")[n] + "; Count: " + n);
}
return msg;
The problem is due to the way you're trying to address the individual array entries.
With the code: global.get("variable"[0]), you are asking it to use the 0th element of the string "variable" as the argument passed to the get function. In otherwords, it is equivalent to: global.get("v")
Similarly, global.get("variable"[2]) will be equivalent to global.get("r").
You should either move array index inside the quotes:
global.get("variable[0]");
or access the 0th element of the result of the get function:
global.get("variable")[0];
The same holds true for how you are trying to use the set function.
Updates to reflect edits to the quesiton
None of your attempts to use global.set() are correct:
global.set("RangeTemperaturesA", i)[i] - here you are setting the global property RangeTemperaturesA to the value of i. The function set doesn't return anything, so attempting to treat it as an array is just wrong.
global.set("RangeTemperaturesA[i]", i); - this is the closest of the three, however, you are setting the string literal RangeTemperaturesA[i] - JavaScript doesn't know you want the i in the middle of that string to be the value of your local variable i.
global.set("RangeTemperaturesA"[i], i); - no. This is the same error as you had in the original question. "RangeTemperaturesA"[i] will evalute to the ith character of the string RangeTemperaturesA.
To do it properly, you want to use "RangeTemperaturesA["+i+"]" as the key:
global.set("RangeTemperaturesA["+i+"]", i);
When i is 0, that will generate the key RangeTemperaturesA[0].
The same applies for global.get:
var myValue = global.get("RangeTemperaturesA["+i+"]");
All of these examples assume you have already set RangeTemperaturesA to be an array:
global.set("RangeTemperaturesA",[]);
I am trying new things with arrays and having some difficulty. I am trying to create multiple instances of 1 class and putting them into an array.
I am creating the instances like so:
public function creatingitem(e:TimerEvent)
{
amtcreated = Math.ceil(Math.random() * 4);
while (amtcreated >= 1)
{
amtcreated--;
var i:Number = Math.ceil(Math.random() * 3);
switch (i)
{
case 1 :
//Object1
objectnum = 1;
objectwei = 3;
r = new Board(objectnum,objectwei,stagw,stagh);
addChild(r);
fallingitem.push(r);
break;
case 2 :
//Object2
objectnum = 2;
objectwei = 4;
c = new Board(objectnum,objectwei,stagw,stagh);
addChild(c);
fallingitem.push(c);
break;
case 3 :
//Object3
objectnum = 3;
objectwei = 4;
l = new Board(objectnum,objectwei,stagw,stagh);
addChild(l);
fallingitem.push(l);
break;
default :
break;
}
}
}
Once these are created they check if they collide with the main ball:
public function hitcheck(e:Event)
{
for (var v:int = fallingitem.length - 1; v >= 0; v--)
{
if (ball.hitTestObject(fallingitem[v]))
{
trace(fallingitem[v]);
if (fallingitem[v] == r)
{
bonusscore += 100;
fallingitem[v].removeitem();
}
else if (fallingitem[v] == c)
{
bonusscore += 75;
fallingitem[v].removeitem();
}
else if (fallingitem[v] == l)
{
bonusscore += 75;
fallingitem[v].removeitem();
}
trace(bonusscore);
}
}
}
The issue is I am seeing every item getting hit due to the trace function. Not all instances are meeting the if conditions. As an example I could have 2 "r" instances and when I hit both 1 will go through and add to the score and the other will just continue past. The trace directly following the hitTestObject shows me that both are being hit and registered but I am not sure why it does not add score.
Thank you,
You can't really have 2 r instances. When you're creating the instances, if you happen to create 2 rs, the second r = new Board... statement overwrites the reference, and the variable r is referring to the second one. Both objects still exist, but the variable can only refer to one of them, so when you perform the check, you're ignoring the object that was previously set to r but isn't any more.
To fix this, you could turn r, c and l into Arrays and whenever you create an instance, add it to the appropriate array. Then, you would perform the check using (r.indexOf(fallingitem[v]) != -1), which returns true if the object is in the array.
The other way, based on the provided code, would be to check whatever value objectnum is setting in the constructor, since you're setting that value based on whether it's in the r, c or l category. Though, that won't work if the property is private or might be changed.
When I remove the tests to compute minimum and maximum from the loop, the execution time is actually longer than with the test. How is that possible ?
Edit :
After running more test, it seems the runtime is not constant, ie the same code
can run in 9 sec or 13 sec.... So it was just a repetable coincidence. Repetable until you do enough tests that is...
Some details :
execution time with the min max test : 9 sec
execution time without the min max test : 13 sec
CFLAGS=-Wall -O2 -fPIC -g
gcc 4.4.3 32 bit
Section to remove is now indicated in code
Some guess :
bad cache interaction ?
void FillFullValues(void)
{
int i,j,k;
double X,Y,Z;
double p,q,r,p1,q1,r1;
double Ls,as,bs;
unsigned long t1, t2;
t1 = GET_TICK_COUNT();
MinLs = Minas = Minbs = 1000000.0;
MaxLs = Maxas = Maxbs = 0.0;
for (i=0;i<256;i++)
{
for (j=0;j<256;j++)
{
for (k=0;k<256;k++)
{
X = 0.4124*CielabValues[i] + 0.3576*CielabValues[j] + 0.1805*CielabValues[k];
Y = 0.2126*CielabValues[i] + 0.7152*CielabValues[j] + 0.0722*CielabValues[k];
Z = 0.0193*CielabValues[i] + 0.1192*CielabValues[j] + 0.9505*CielabValues[k];
p = X * InvXn;
q = Y;
r = Z * InvZn;
if (q>0.008856)
{
Ls = 116*pow(q,third)-16;
}
else
{
Ls = 903.3*q;
}
if (q<=0.008856)
{
q1 = 7.787*q+seiz;
}
else
{
q1 = pow(q,third);
}
if (p<=0.008856)
{
p1 = 7.787*p+seiz;
}
else
{
p1 = pow(p,third);
}
if (r<=0.008856)
{
r1 = 7.787*r+seiz;
}
else
{
r1 = pow(r,third);
}
as = 500*(p1-q1);
bs = 200*(q1-r1);
//
// cast on short int for reducing array size
//
FullValuesLs[i][j][k] = (char) (Ls);
FullValuesas[i][j][k] = (char) (as);
FullValuesbs[i][j][k] = (char) (bs);
//// Remove this and get slower code
if (MaxLs<Ls)
MaxLs = Ls;
if ((abs(Ls)<MinLs) && (abs(Ls)>0))
MinLs = Ls;
if (Maxas<as)
Maxas = as;
if ((abs(as)<Minas) && (abs(as)>0))
Minas = as;
if (Maxbs<bs)
Maxbs = bs;
if ((abs(bs)<Minbs) && (abs(bs)>0))
Minbs = bs;
//// End of Remove
}
}
}
TRACE(_T("LMax = %f LMin = %f\n"),(MaxLs),(MinLs));
TRACE(_T("aMax = %f aMin = %f\n"),(Maxas),(Minas));
TRACE(_T("bMax = %f bMin = %f\n"),(Maxbs),(Minbs));
t2 = GET_TICK_COUNT();
TRACE(_T("WhiteBalance init : %lu ms\n"), t2 - t1);
}
I think compiler is trying to unroll the inner loop because you are removing dependency between iterations. But somehow this doesn't help in your case. Maybe because the loop is too big and using too many registers to be unrolled.
Try to turn off unrolling and post results again.
If this is the case, I would suggest you to submit a performance issue to gcc.
PS. I think you can merge if (q>0.008856) and if (q<=0.008856).
Maybe its the cache, maybe unrolling problems, there is only one way to answer this: look at the generated code (e.g. by using the -S option). Maybe you can post it/or spot the difference when comparing them.
EDIT: As you now clarified that it was just the measurement I can only recommend (or better command ;-) you, that when you want to get runtime numbers: ALWAYS put it into some loop and average it. Best to do it outside your programm (in a shell script), so your cache is not already filled with the right data.